11-22-2018, 11:48 AM | #14351 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
|
Quote:
I used to think he was a con man, but I've come to believe that he actually thinks what he says is true and makes sense, which is far more dangerous in my opinion. |
|
11-22-2018, 01:09 PM | #14352 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The scorched Desert
|
Quote:
There is absolutely no doubt in my mind. When you consistently speak fiction as fact and vice versa the line between them becomes so blurred that one begins to lose sight of where it really is. |
|
11-22-2018, 02:05 PM | #14353 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Seven miles up
|
Quote:
There was an ad for Parkinson's Medication on tv today, and I really felt like it really seemed like they were just talking about trump. No offense to anyone with Parkinson's that they would be lumped into that basket though.
__________________
He's just like if Snow White was competitive, horny, and capable of beating the shit out of anyone that called her Pops. Like Steam? Join the FOFC Steam group here: http://steamcommunity.com/groups/FOFConSteam |
|
11-22-2018, 07:40 PM | #14354 | ||||
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
|
Quote:
Truth. Quote:
I don't know enough about AOC - I agree with those who say it's ridiculous all the hand-wringing being done about her when she hasn't taken office yet. Particularly considering Sanders, who I think is the best example. Yes, he's a socialist. Don't have to take my word for it, he's been calling himself one for 30 years. More specifically, he's defined it in terms of economic democracy - i.e. equality of outcome - going so far to say that political democracy is basically worthless without it. Again his words not mine. As far as Steve King is concerned, I think he probably is a white supremacist based on the documented statements I've read about, though I don't know enough about him to be sure. I know it's not the way most people do things these days, but I don't pay a great deal of attention to people like him one way or the other. I.e, I worry a lot more about who represents me - and I don't live in Iowa - and try to let other people worry about who represents them. So for me, it's about the president, or in the last election Sen. Stabenow, Gov. Whitmer, etc. in Michigan. Quote:
See: Sen. Bernie Sanders(VT), a competitive runner-up for Democratic nominee for president, 2016. See also: the global trend of political power going to the extremes and away from the middle - Brazil and Germany being the most recent examples. Quote:
The literal definition of it, under which the United States for example is a primarily capitalist system with some socialist elements, and many European countries by comparison are the reverse; some capitalism is still involved, but primarily socialist. A nationalized healthcare system such as you described would probably be socialist in nature - I don't know of an example of another way to fund it without that being the case. . |
||||
11-22-2018, 08:09 PM | #14355 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
|
Quote:
I think Bernie is a good case for why a socialist isn't winning a Presidential election any time soon. And the definition of democratic socialism that we see in AOC and Bernie really gets twisted by the right. It's not the literal definition of socialism. That's not happening here and no one that I've seen with any serious national political aspirations is pushing for that. |
|
11-22-2018, 09:10 PM | #14356 | |
College Prospect
Join Date: Dec 2002
|
Quote:
This was my point all along. The Democrats surveyed favoring Socialism are viewing themselves as supporters of the Sanders-led left wing. Very, very few are advocating for a South American style Socialist government take over of private enterprise. By the way, he refers to himself as a Democratic Socialist. The equality of outcome statement sounds like some awful Ben Shaprio speech. I seriously doubt you can find a statement from Sanders saying he's in favor of equality of outcome. He just wants to reduce income inequality - the string pullers on the right are going to get twitchy when they hear that. He's in favor of a $15 minimum wage, right? How can you be in favor of a minimum wage yet advocate for equality of outcome. That makes no sense. |
|
11-22-2018, 09:19 PM | #14357 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2013
|
Quote:
I think the number of people advocating for full blown socialism are greater than you think. Many think countries like Venezuela would be a paradise except that the CIA keeps them down. And a Democratic Socialist is still a Socialist.
__________________
"I am God's prophet, and I need an attorney" |
|
11-22-2018, 09:34 PM | #14358 | ||||||
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
|
Quote:
Literally the dictionary definition of socialism is collective ownership of the means of production. Quote:
Without actually using the words equality of outcome, he could hardly make it more clear. This is literally what the phrase economic democracy means; that all people are made equal economically, not just politically. That's what he says in this quote as well. Quote:
Aside from the fact that there's no other logical way to read quotes like the above, he's a pragmatic politician You take what you can get if you can't get everything you want. Politicians of every stripe do this on a wide range of issues. A big increase in the minimum wage is a more equal outcome than what we have now, therefore it's a big step in the right direction. He's also praised nations like Denmark that are more socialist than capitalist specifically for being so. Etc. Quote:
Why? He wasn't far from being nominated and polling at the time showed him doing about as well as Hillary vis a vis Trump. It's not as if he was laughed off the stage. Quote:
Yes it is, actually: Quote:
In many of the countries that Sanders and those who agree with him ideologically praise, overall tax rates are significantly above 50%. By definition, that makes them more socialist than capitalist - the government controls the majority of the economy. Calling these countries socialist isn't any wronger than calling the US a capitalist one just because some of the economy is still controlled by the collective and we have some socialistic elements. It's an accurate description of what the primary, not exclusive, basis for the economy is. If one says 'completely socialist' or '100% socialist' etc., then yeah that's wrong - but that's not what most people who use the terms are out there saying. Last edited by Brian Swartz : 11-22-2018 at 09:53 PM. |
||||||
11-22-2018, 10:20 PM | #14359 | |
College Prospect
Join Date: Dec 2002
|
Quote:
In this article that you used, here's a better quote: 14 things Bernie Sanders has said about socialism - POLITICO "4. In an interview with Catherine Alison Hill for a master’s thesis she wrote at Cornell in 1989: “Socialism has a lot of different messages to different people. I think the issue of socialist ideology and what that meant or means is not terribly important. I think the positive of it is that it indicates to people that I am not a conventional politician. If they are not happy with the status quo, then that is a positive thing. The negative of it obviously is that there are people who equate it with totalitarianism and the Soviet Union.” It pretty much describes this conversation perfectly. |
|
11-23-2018, 12:23 AM | #14360 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
Economic democracy just means seeing some decentralization in the economy. More businesses operating as co-ops. Workers having a bigger say through unions. And the limiting of monopolies. Right now a handful of companies and individuals dictate how the country is run. I mean I don't agree with a lot of the stuff he says but I don't see him calling for seizing companies or any of that stuff. |
|
11-23-2018, 12:37 AM | #14361 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PDX
|
Call me crazy, but I feel like the threat of socialist politicians is that if they are elected en masse over the course of many years, history shows they *might* serve to effect systematic changes that would result in a fractional reduction of your take home income, based on hypotheticals and assumptions of things that have never actually occurred in the modern history of this country. Whereas if you're a person of color (or even an adjacent supporter/protestor), a white supremacist might stab you to death tomorrow, or at the very least yell racial slurs at your children on a daily basis, based on a long, factual demonstrable history of unchecked white supremacist violence and speech in America. Personally, I find the distinction incredibly easy to make, but I suppose your mileage may vary.
__________________
Last edited by thesloppy : Today at 05:35 PM. Last edited by thesloppy : 11-23-2018 at 12:41 AM. |
11-23-2018, 01:14 AM | #14362 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Newbury, England
|
Sounds like BS is talking more about communism rather than socialism. Socialism involves partial state ownership to regulate equality (edit: or reduce inequality), communism is full blown equality of ownership.
Do you know the difference between a Communist and a Socialist? | The Independent
__________________
'A song is a beautiful lie', Idlewild, Self Healer. When you're smiling, the whole world smiles with you. Sports! Last edited by AlexB : 11-23-2018 at 01:52 AM. |
11-23-2018, 01:34 AM | #14363 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PDX
|
I think cherry picking Bernie's most extreme quotes and then transferring those beliefs onto the entire base of Americans with even the slightest socialist leanings (having already been defined with the broadest brush possible) is disingenuous regardless of how define Bernie's personal politics.
To wit, the conservative posters on this site have many times stated that this board leans heavy liberal, but I would be surprised if you could find even a single post in the entire history of this board advocating for the total public ownership of private enterprise. On the other hand, I can recall multiple posts predicting Barack Obama's inevitable assassination, just off the top of my head, but again I suppose your mileage may vary.
__________________
Last edited by thesloppy : Today at 05:35 PM. Last edited by thesloppy : 11-23-2018 at 01:46 AM. |
11-23-2018, 03:02 AM | #14364 | ||||||
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
|
Quote:
Except it doesn't. Not once did I call Sanders a communist or equate him with them. I do agree with Marx that communism is the natural endpoint of socialist systems, but Sanders has never advocated for communism that I am aware of, and I didn't come within a thousand miles of accusing him of that. Quote:
No it doesn't. I mean again, this is just literal definition time. It doesn't fit what Sanders said, when he equated it to political democracy which is absolute equality; 1 person 1 vote. The term simply doesn't fit if you don't have collective ownership of the economy. I mean there are two words in the phrase. Those words aren't anti-trust or collective bargaining. Quote:
The irony drips. The slightest socialist leanings? Talk about being disingenous. As mentioned multiple times already, America has a number of socialist policies already implemented. A lot of them nobody runs around screaming about. I've also already said I support a lot of those items. I don't know a single decision-maker who can accurately be said NOT to have 'slightest socialist leanings', and I'm not the one redefining socialism here. That belongs to people who keep implying that if you're not talking Venezuela, you're not really talking about socialism. I've limited my assessment to those who it really belongs to; those who, Sanders being merely the most famous one of them in modern America, want an expansion of government control of the economy to the point where it is more public-controlled than private-controlled. I'm not trying to cherry-pick Sanders either. I want to represent his views fairly, despite the absolutely false accusation that a couple people have made in which I'm making him into a Stalinist. He isn't, and I haven't said so. But this whole 'he's just a democratic socialist, not a real one' thing is just silly. ** He's been a long-standing proponent of Eugene Debs, Socialist Party candidate for President in the early 20th century. In his own words, Sanders called Debs a radical socialist and revolutionary, and in a glowing not insulting sense. ** He's repeatedly flat-out just called himself a socialist. ** Endorsements of Finland, Sweden, Denmark etc. as models for the USA to follow are all over the place. Quote:
Quote:
Of course no matter how many quotes I produce people will still throw out the idea that I'm being extreme. But if you're really interested in what he thinks and not shooting the messenger, the first one here comes from a statement that came from his own official senate website. Sanders, and many others, use the terms socialism and democratic socialism interchangeably - which really indicates what democratic socialism actually means. Quote:
Second time someone's made this point, which I think is just a disconnect. I've been comparing things based on the political realm. I think the chance of a random white supremacist committing an act of violence is indeed much higher than a socialist doing so; I'm talking about the danger of a political movement enacting policy change that impacts the entire country. I mean, since we don't jail people for beliefs last I checked, the way to deal with people who are dangerous in the sense of individual violence is via law enforcement once they've crossed the line. Last edited by Brian Swartz : 11-23-2018 at 05:28 AM. |
||||||
11-23-2018, 07:31 AM | #14365 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
FWIW, see below discussion on what Bernie is.
From what I've read, he's not a true socialist but has socialist leanings. So maybe on a scale of 1-10, he's a 7-8. Political positions of Bernie Sanders - Wikipedia Quote:
Last edited by Edward64 : 11-23-2018 at 07:32 AM. |
|
11-23-2018, 10:33 AM | #14366 | |||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Quote:
Yes it does. Seriously, what is with this "literal definition time" where you don't actually use the literal definitions? Democracy is about each person getting a vote, which results in DIFFERENT OUTCOMES depending on how people vote. This is an incredible missing the point of what economic democracy actually means. Here is more reading: Economic democracy - Wikipedia Quote:
And the wiki article goes into detail about how different strands have different opinions, from full scale control of the means of production, to merely increasing the power of unions and (like Germany) mandating they get a voice at the Board of Directors. Quote:
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams Last edited by ISiddiqui : 11-23-2018 at 10:38 AM. |
|||
11-23-2018, 01:49 PM | #14367 | ||
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
|
Quote:
I respect your fairmindedness and intelligence considerably. I just don't get this though. Equality of outcome doesn't mean everyone must use their power the same way. When used in economic terms, literally nobody thinks it means that everyone must have the same car, live in the same city, buy the same food, have similar/identical houses, etc. It's about equalizing the power and then letting people choose how they use it. I am using the literal definition here, I specifically said 'collective ownership of the economy' in what you quoted. I.e., the economy is run by decisions of the people, not those of corporations and so on. For crying out loud, it was just a couple weeks ago, if that, when we had a discussion about the US Senate and how undemocratic it is. And I agreed then, and I agree now. More importantly, nobody tried to argue that it wasn't. Everyone was on-board with that being what democracy means, as they should have been, because it does. The Senate is a feature of a constitutional republic, not a democracy. But it's a lot more democratic than a system in which you merely have stronger unions or a voice on the Board. So seriously, and without trying to be pedantic, what the heck is democracy then if it means equal power to all people in terms of a legislature but it doesn't mean that at all in the economy? Is there some decoder ring or guidebook I can consult so I know when words don't actually mean what they mean, but they mean something completely different just because it's more fashionable to call them that these days, with no guarantee whatsoever they will still mean that five minutes from now? I must be behind the curve, because I thought that was what the dictionary was for, and that by combining the terms 'economic' and 'democracy' I could arrive at the meaning of economic democracy. I don't know what else to call this situation but Orwellian. Quote:
Last edited by Brian Swartz : 11-23-2018 at 02:50 PM. |
||
11-23-2018, 02:46 PM | #14368 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Surfside Beach,SC USA
|
So much winning: NY Supreme Court denies Trump Foundations attempts to dismiss, lawsuit will continue. Tweet about leftist judges in 3..2...1...
__________________
Coastal Carolina Baseball-2016 National Champion! 10/17/20-Coastal Football ranked in Top 25 for first time! |
11-23-2018, 02:50 PM | #14369 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
|
Maybe he felt the need to proclaim his thankfulness for his own accomplishments as President since so few - relatively - of his fellow citizens are fans of what he's done. Narcissism and lack of dignity on parade. I continue to hope he eventually turns the page and improves, but that's exceedingly unlikely unfortunately.
|
11-23-2018, 03:48 PM | #14370 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
Kudos to Fox News for doing the right thing.
I watched the replay and it was an immediate response and apology. Hopefully this Paulina will be blacklisted going forward. Fox News Apologizes For Guest Who Likened Hillary Clinton To ‘Herpes’ | HuffPost |
11-23-2018, 04:03 PM | #14371 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Quote:
Democracy literally means power or rule of the people. By adding more input by the workers of a corporation, through increased union representation or voices of the workers on the Board of Directors, it increases the rule of those corporations by the majority of the people who work for those corporations. That there be more democracy in the economy. You don't need full collective ownership of the means of production in order to move towards economic democracy. Perhaps if you wanted "pure" economic democracy, but we can also say similar things about pure capitalism vs. the pragmatic and more moderate sorts. Democratic elections are, IMO, the dictionary definition of the term equality of opportunity, but not equality of outcome (and the later becomes especially obvious if you are a big supporter of a third party). You all have equal opportunities to vote (well, sometimes..) but the outcomes are vastly different based on other people decide to vote. In the same way, in systems that promote more economic democracy, the workers have greater opportunities to be heard in the governance of corporations, but that doesn't mean everyone ends up gets the same pay (for instance). I really don't understand why this is so difficult to grasp and how it doesn't correspond to basic dictionary definitions of these terms. I think you've managed to set up a big ole strawman disconnected from historical usage of the term and you simply can't move from this strawman you've created even in the face of people telling you that your strawman is incorrect. And if you believe that to be an Orwellian change of definitions, then man, the Republic that is the US being called a Democracy all over the place must really rile you up.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams Last edited by ISiddiqui : 11-23-2018 at 04:07 PM. |
|
11-23-2018, 04:20 PM | #14372 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
For example, here is a Forbes article from 2016 by John Harvey, a Professor of Economics at Texas Christian University, shedding perhaps a bit more light on what democracy or democratic may mean in the context of an economy (and no, it doesn't automatically mean 'one person one share'):
Bernie Sanders As A Democratic Capitalist Quote:
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
|
11-23-2018, 04:44 PM | #14373 | ||
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
|
Quote:
Yes it does, because it is a Republic and the difference is more than semantic; the priorities in the two systems are not at all the same in many respects; it's not a trivial or merely surface-level distinction. Re; your description of democracy, would you then say that the entire board was wrong in describing elections for the US Senate as undemocratic? Quote:
Thanks for stating this as clearly as you have here. All I can say is I do not at all understand why no difference is seen between equality of power and sameness in how that power is used, two very different concepts. I don't think I can fruitfully go any further with that. Last edited by Brian Swartz : 11-23-2018 at 04:52 PM. |
||
11-23-2018, 05:01 PM | #14374 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Quote:
I think you are basically being very, very pedantic about these definitions and using them in ways that are not used in real world parlance. After all, by the literal letter of the word, there has never been a democracy in the history of the world (the Athenian democracy excluded lots of folks). And a procedure can be undemocratic and still be part of a Democracy (in addition to the EC and Senate in the US, the Athenian restrictions of citizenship and only men could vote in the Assembly were undemocratic limitations in the first Democracy).
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
|
11-23-2018, 05:10 PM | #14375 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2013
|
Major Trump administration climate report says damages are 'intensifying across the country' - Los Angeles Times
Now where did the administration put that rug to sweep this under?
__________________
"I am God's prophet, and I need an attorney" |
11-23-2018, 05:25 PM | #14376 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
|
And yet those people I rub shoulders with and occasionally discuss politics with have no issue with calling the USA a republic. Most of them are pretty apathetic and just think our government is corrupt and stop there without any real abiding political interest or ideology, but they still don't object to 'my' definition of republic/democracy as one example, some of them having known the difference themselves since taking social studies in early high school. I find that the variability in language is much more pronounced among established elites.
Last edited by Brian Swartz : 11-23-2018 at 05:25 PM. |
11-23-2018, 05:25 PM | #14377 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
I just want to pull this out. I'm not sure where you're getting your info, but the 2015 OECD stats don't have a single country with taxation over 50% of GDP.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
11-23-2018, 05:36 PM | #14378 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
|
That's true on what OECD measures, which is income tax. For example, 36% in Denmark, 43% in Sweden. Both countries also have a 25% VAT which is not taken into account by the OECD because it isn't what they are trying to calculate, and so on.
|
11-23-2018, 07:01 PM | #14379 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
The chart I looked at claimed to be measuring all taxation as a percentage of GDP.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
11-23-2018, 07:05 PM | #14380 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
|
Link? I can't find any OECD measure like that, though admittedly I don't spend a lot of time reviewing their data.
|
11-23-2018, 07:20 PM | #14381 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
You can find a number of different charts by searching tax as a percentage of GDP OECD. The definition of total tax revenue is:
Quote:
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
11-23-2018, 07:37 PM | #14382 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
|
Having looked at that more, it seems there is a disconnect at some level - I'm not sure where it is, I don't know the technical of economics well enough on that score - between tax revenue and government revenue. OECD's figures for the latter are higher. Regardless of that, the 2015 set which does seem to the be most recent complete one lists the following nations as having government spending at 50% or higher of GDP:
Austria Belgium Denmark Finland France Greece Hungary Italy Numbers are slightly lower than what I've read elsewhere, and I'm not sure why that is but I have no reason not to conclude that OECD is accurate and that some nations - Sweden in particular - are less socialized than I thought. |
11-24-2018, 03:03 AM | #14383 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Newbury, England
|
Just because spendng is more than 50% doesn’t mean taxation is over 50%. The vast majority of nations run budget deficits
My understanding falls about where the World Bank credit comes from to enable these deficits: governments usually project reducing the rate of increase of GDP as a victory, rather than reducing the deficit itself, which suggests papering over the cracks, refinancing, or similar. Which in turn are short term measures, and can maybe help explain Cyprus, Greece, Ireland, Italy, etc (I’m sure there will be other examples elsewhere in the world, they’re just the ones I am more aware of given my location)
__________________
'A song is a beautiful lie', Idlewild, Self Healer. When you're smiling, the whole world smiles with you. Sports! Last edited by AlexB : 11-24-2018 at 03:04 AM. |
11-24-2018, 07:42 AM | #14384 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
I didn't read BS quote on "overall tax rates are significantly above 50%" as a % of GDP measure.
Below is an article with an analysis. http://www.institutmolinari.org/IMG/...en-eu-2017.pdf Quote:
For the list of countries discussed so far, there is a breakdown on page 8. For "Real Tax Rate", the definition is (Social Security Contributions + Income Tax + VAT ) / Real Gross Salary Austria - 54.28% Belgium - 56.74% Denmark - 41.41% Finland - 46.36% France - 57.41% Greece - 52.10% Hungary - 50.88% Italy - 51.56% Sweden - 47.40% So bottom line - many do have over 50+%, many do have in 40+% range. |
|
11-24-2018, 08:09 AM | #14385 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
That's a little apples to oranges. I was using national taxation as a percentage of GDP while your study looks at taxation on one worker's income level.
And here's what started this: Quote:
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers Last edited by JPhillips : 11-24-2018 at 08:11 AM. |
|
11-24-2018, 10:28 AM | #14386 |
This guy has posted so much, his fingers are about to fall off.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: In Absentia
|
That's like arguing temperature versus feels like. I don't really care if the temperature is 28, if it feels like 10, it's frickin' 10.
__________________
M's pitcher Miguel Batista: "Now, I feel like I've had everything. I've talked pitching with Sandy Koufax, had Kenny G play for me. Maybe if I could have an interview with God, then I'd be served. I'd be complete." |
11-24-2018, 12:54 PM | #14387 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
|
The original point though was how much of the economy is controlled collectively. Taxation compared to GDP doesn't measure that either, because it's comparing something on opposite sides of the balance sheet so that's apples to oranges as well. Government deficit spending as cited by AlexB contributes to increasing GDP - I didn't use the GDP comparison partly for that reason. But if we want to use GDP, then total government spending is the most relevant thing to compare it to.
|
11-24-2018, 01:19 PM | #14388 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
I'm not arguing for or against any method as I don't think any of these measurements shows how much or little socialism there is. I was simply correcting your point about several countries being taxed over 50% and the only way to measure that would be taxation as a percentage of GDP.
edit: For example, China has taxation at about 20% of GDP and spending at about 32% of GDP, while the USA is 26% and 36%. I don't think many would argue the US is much more socialist than China.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers Last edited by JPhillips : 11-24-2018 at 01:25 PM. |
11-24-2018, 01:34 PM | #14389 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
|
It's not the case that it's the only way to measure it though, as I pointed out. Taxation/GDP is a revenue to spending comparison, which is always going to be inherently flawed. Measures such as Edward64's link is more to the point in that case.
Last edited by Brian Swartz : 11-24-2018 at 01:35 PM. |
11-24-2018, 02:41 PM | #14390 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
But that's just one specific income.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
11-24-2018, 03:40 PM | #14391 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PDX
|
Quote:
Yeah, in this case it seems like all the arguing and links have just confirmed that the 'sniff test' is probably more effective than any individual chart or particular tax formula. That said, I feel like the truth that gets reinforced from this conversation is that when American conservatives talk about "Socialism" they are referring almost exclusively to a relatively high tax rate (and the things that lead you there), as opposed to any kind of specific governmental/economic policy. Defining what does and doesn't comprise socialism in other countries is a sizable red herring if everyone knows we're just talking about relatively higher taxes here.
__________________
Last edited by thesloppy : Today at 05:35 PM. Last edited by thesloppy : 11-24-2018 at 03:46 PM. |
|
11-24-2018, 04:22 PM | #14392 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Quote:
You are moving goalposts (again). Do those people have any issue with people calling the US a Democracy? Because your issue is trying to redefine the popular definition of Democracy, not whether or not people are fine if someone calls it a Republic (which is a more exact definition). In my experience, it's usually the elites or the well-off that go "Actually the US is a Republic, not a Democracy" (generally to defend some undemocratic practice), whereas most regular people refer to the US as a Democracy. Generally it seems to be the academic elites that like the rigid definitions (for instance in the capitalism/socialism definitions) while the regular people define terms in ways that make the most sense (though that gets somewhat maddening as socialism can be defined in like 10 different ways depending on the people you are dealing with - as thesloppy refers to above about how some see socialism as equaling higher taxes). Some rigidity in definitions is ok, but when it becomes too rigid that nothing can fit it, then it becomes farcical.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams Last edited by ISiddiqui : 11-24-2018 at 04:27 PM. |
|
11-24-2018, 04:36 PM | #14393 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
TBH I sense both sides are trying to explain their POV and there are nuances that are being missed.
You guys are too cerebral for me but this is how one common person (e.g. me) looks at it. Hope it helps. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.a7468074d8d6 Quote:
|
|
11-24-2018, 06:57 PM | #14394 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Surfside Beach,SC USA
|
Corey Lewandowski and David Bossie have a new book coming out Tuesday and the Washington Post got an advance copy. I'm sure it was going to be full of remorse and apology for their views on Trump...uh no chance in hell. It's called Trump's Enemies: How the Deep State is undermining the Presidency, and its full of every far-right conspiracy theory out there. I'm sure we'll be seeing it in Trump's tweets too:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.b316041a1dcb Corey was just on CNN this week too-wasn't talking about the book, but clearly there are some Trump supporters who should not be on mainstream media ever again.
__________________
Coastal Carolina Baseball-2016 National Champion! 10/17/20-Coastal Football ranked in Top 25 for first time! Last edited by Thomkal : 11-24-2018 at 07:00 PM. |
11-24-2018, 08:20 PM | #14395 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
I'll never understand why CNN keeps booking guests that have signed Trump's NDA.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
11-24-2018, 09:57 PM | #14396 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Quote:
I completely agree with that definition, fwiw.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
|
11-25-2018, 12:27 AM | #14397 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
This is a good article, thanks for posting. I think the issue that some people have is that the representative democracy isn't representing everyone equally. The Senate for instance is probably the most glaring one. Wyoming has one Senator for every 290,000 people. Texas has one Senator for every 14 million. Then you have gerrymandering which aims to unfairly distribute representation in the House. Both parties do it and it should be something that is abolished. Then of course you have Washington DC which despite having a larger population than Vermont and Wyoming, has zero representation in the House and Senate. A bit of a disgrace for a country that's freedom centered around no taxation without representation. |
|
11-25-2018, 12:36 AM | #14398 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
When comparing tax rates between countries, you have to factor in the benefits received.
For instance, many of those high tax countries have national health care. In this country 10% of our income goes toward health care. So add that 10% on to your current tax rate. Then you have to take the employer contribution from payroll taxes. That's another 7.65%. Now factor in how much you're paying in property taxes each year. How much sales tax you pay. When all is said and done, I bet most middle class people are paying around 50% of their income to taxes. |
11-25-2018, 06:53 AM | #14399 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
Quote:
Admittedly tough to compare apples-to-apples between US and EU countries above. For your 10% healthcare example, the US government does "subsidize" our healthcare by allowing corporations/us take tax deductions for contribution of healthcare costs. It's obviously not as straight forward EU but there is some and no idea how to measure the true delta. For the employer payroll tax contribution, the above article did not factor that into their equation either for employees. I would not be surprised if EU employer portion was significantly higher than 7.65%. Same for property tax. Sales tax comment is fair. GA sales tax is 4% which would be roughly equivalent to the VAT. My postulates in re: to "benefits" are: 1) EU countries all-in taxes to employees are much higher than the US 2) EU countries all-in taxes to employers are much higher than the US 3) EU do provide "better" services (e.g. healthcare, education) with the taxes, and they provide "worse" services (e.g. paid days off, difficulty in firing employees) 4) US is still the better country warts and all (I'm obviously biased), there are more pros than cons |
|
11-25-2018, 09:37 AM | #14400 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Newbury, England
|
UK employer contributions are 13.8% for reference
__________________
'A song is a beautiful lie', Idlewild, Self Healer. When you're smiling, the whole world smiles with you. Sports! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 63 (0 members and 63 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|