Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Main Forums > Werewolf Games
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-10-2007, 01:08 PM   #1351
hoopsguy
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
Telle, can I get your thoughts on who is a wolf?

Seriously dead so far today.
hoopsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 01:11 PM   #1352
LoneStarGirl
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Little Rock, AR
I dont think Telle has left this thread in 4 days... he must really love Werewolf
LoneStarGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 01:13 PM   #1353
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoneStarGirl View Post
I dont think Telle has left this thread in 4 days... he must really love Werewolf

Telle= Mrs. Render
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 01:23 PM   #1354
hoopsguy
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
Telle = Mrs. Pass, I believe.
hoopsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 01:23 PM   #1355
hoopsguy
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
Oh wait, isn't that Lurker?
hoopsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 01:23 PM   #1356
Passacaglia
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Big Ten Country
I was really hoping Telle would pop in yesterday and give a rousing defense of RendeR. Or at least joined him for a duet.
Passacaglia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 01:24 PM   #1357
Passacaglia
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Big Ten Country
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoopsguy View Post
Oh wait, isn't that Lurker?

This post is right, and so is Lathum's.
Passacaglia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 01:54 PM   #1358
hoopsguy
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
So, whenever the rest of the people that are still alive in this game want to join me for some discussion, that would be cool.

No offense to the dead guys
hoopsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 02:09 PM   #1359
Alan T
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mass.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoopsguy View Post
So, whenever the rest of the people that are still alive in this game want to join me for some discussion, that would be cool.

No offense to the dead guys

Hoopsguy = Bruce Willis?


"I see dead people"
Alan T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 02:09 PM   #1360
Telle
College Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Buffalo, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Passacaglia View Post
I was really hoping Telle would pop in yesterday and give a rousing defense of RendeR. Or at least joined him for a duet.

Well I didn't get to the end of this gigantic thread until just now. It is rather entertaining though
Telle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 02:12 PM   #1361
hoopsguy
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan T View Post
Hoopsguy = Bruce Willis?


"I see dead people"

Come out to Sorcery Hill. We'll get together ... have a few laughs.
hoopsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 02:13 PM   #1362
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoopsguy View Post
So, whenever the rest of the people that are still alive in this game want to join me for some discussion, that would be cool.

No offense to the dead guys

I'm putting something together right now.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 02:32 PM   #1363
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
OK, here is my premise. Since RendeR was a first time wolf, I thought if I go through his posts and see what he had to say about and to those of us who are still alive, that we might get some idea about where to go today. So:

Quote:
Originally Posted by RendeR post 345
UNVOTE LSG
VOTE BARKEEP

This was a last minute switch (9:59 PM) to Barkeep that still kept him 1 short of a tie.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RendeR post 347
My reasons for voting LSG weren't strong enough to hold it that way and other have made some small case for BK so I went there instead.

Explaining the prior vote.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RendeR post 714
Excuse me? Just how do you back this claim up? You could be night killed just like everyone else...Unless of course...

In response to hoops' mention about not getting night killed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RendeR post 760
I'm beginning to think the Pass, path, ntn, hoops etc group that has been doing all the real talking may well be the wolves carrying on their own campaign of deceit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RendeR post 801
path is one of the others, I still have this nagging sensation that you're playing a very devious game of data mining and night kill setups...its so open as to seem transparent, and thats what bothers me...

Quote:
Originally Posted by RendeR post 881
I'm going to assume that was the holy water?

ANd yes, that would appear to clear BK completely in my book =)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RendeR post 927
We're past day 2 and he's still alive?

In response to why hoops might be a wolf.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RendeR post 985
Your vote carries a lot fo weight with me BK, based on all the other info about you, How solid are you on the trust in LSG? I'm willing to move if someone offers up some serious trust or vouches for LSG.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RendeR post 1026
Ok THIS post just reeks of a wolf scared out of his heavy woolen cloak. You've been on my list as well hoops and this sudden cheering for people to vote for 1 person and then pushing pass to swing his vote elsewhere is just too suspisiouc to me.

In response to a post by hoops.

So, the question is does this tell us anything. The mentions of those still alive:

hoops -- suggests may be a wolf four times and votes for him once.
path -- suggests may be a wolf two times, no votes.
ntn -- suggests may be a wolf once, no votes.
barkeep -- votes for once at deadline with explanation afterward. says the holy water clears him. also says that he trusts his judgement.
chief -- no mention.

I find the mentions regarding Barkeep most interesting. A last minute switch that does not put him in actual danger of getting lynched. No mention of suspicion about him before or after this point, as a matter of fact says he trusts him.

After going through this, I end up wondering most about Barkeep and Chief Rum.

VOTE BARKEEP
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 02:36 PM   #1364
hoopsguy
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
Path, if you are going to head for one of those two I think Rum makes more sense. BK's switch at 9:00PM helped hang Ardent instead of me.

Obviously that doesn't mean jack if you think that BK and I could be wolves together, along with Ardent. But that would make all three of us idiots for putting ourselves in that position. So if you accept that I am a villager, and I was lined up against a wolf (Ardent), then what motivation would BK have to swing his vote right at the deadline?
hoopsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 02:54 PM   #1365
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoopsguy View Post
Path, if you are going to head for one of those two I think Rum makes more sense. BK's switch at 9:00PM helped hang Ardent instead of me.

Obviously that doesn't mean jack if you think that BK and I could be wolves together, along with Ardent. But that would make all three of us idiots for putting ourselves in that position. So if you accept that I am a villager, and I was lined up against a wolf (Ardent), then what motivation would BK have to swing his vote right at the deadline?

Fair point and I didn't take that into account. I'm thinking there's one wolf left -- none of RendeR's other threats seemed to come to fruition yesterday so I discount the conversion talk.

And Chief's omission from Render's posts is interesting also. I will say that after going through those I feel much better about you than I did.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 02:55 PM   #1366
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Dola, what are your thoughts about ntn?
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 03:03 PM   #1367
hoopsguy
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
The crux of the issue for me is whether the wolves were caught flat-footed at the end with my vote with AE. I believe they would like to avoid being grouped together, so that at least one of them would vote for AE. If they knew a tie was helping their cause by no lynch (I'm planning to search on this when I get home tonight) then they had to feel pretty secure about their position.

Would Chief, as a wolf, have gotten a ball rolling on AE knowing that there was a good chance I would follow him, instead of jumping on the status quo between you and I as villagers (if you are a villager)? It doesn't seem to hold much value for that day, but might have played well the following day. I'm not sure how much of a reach this is or not. And I'm not sure what to make of his post-lynch comments where he didn't want to take credit for "getting" AE, which would normally be credit a wolf would want if they had sacrificed one of their own.

NTN came in as the third vote on Ardent, making it a little more interesting. The wolves still had RendeR hanging out on LSG, who then flipped over to make it 5-3 as we headed into the final 15-20 minutes. Would he have moved off Ardent and over to me with another minute or two of time? Not sure.

If the wolves were united on me, well you (Path) are the only one left who voted in that direction at this point.

I'm thinking that search on the ties could be compelling. I would encourage someone else to conduct a parallel effort (just search "tie" every page) in the event that the wolves have a silence potion or something else that could prevent posting as we head down the stretch tonight.
hoopsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 03:08 PM   #1368
hoopsguy
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
NTN has been my most consistent supporter this game. He passed me an item that would probably have value for the wolves (unless they already had one) earlier in the game. He has generally accepted my viewpoints. I would be more suspicious of him if AE had not been playing the same game before turning on me post-Lathum (later in the day, not coming out firing). However, I don't think the wolves would have multiple people adopt that strategy. Right now I'm leaning towards Chief over you.

I know that I over-analyze situations based on my interactions with people, rather than taking the game as a whole. Every once in awhile it provides keen insight, but a lot of the time I start obsessing over a smaller point that I misjudge/misvalue.

Back at you - do you have strong feelings one way or another on NTN?

Path, going back to earlier in the game, why did you react so strongly to my suggestions on the Eternal Bond potion? If you trusted Path, then why did you seem upset that I suggested you pass it to him? I got your vote almost immediately after that, for appearing "wolfish".
hoopsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 03:08 PM   #1369
Barkeep49
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
path: I don't quite get your evidence against me, honestly. It seems to me that you think I'm a wolf since a wolf voted for me because I wasn't the vote leader at the time, is that correct?

I really think you're falling into the same trap hoops did: I come out vocal against you so you think I'm a wolf. Either that or you are a wolf and know I'm a villager and want to knock me out since time and time again I've been against you.

I think our wolf is either NTN or path. I would love to listen to evidence against ntn, and could be swayed in that direction. However, for reasons I've talked about on multiple days I'm going to stick with path for today.

Vote path
Barkeep49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 03:10 PM   #1370
Barkeep49
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
hoops, I'm confused... you think CR started the run on AE as a wolf?
Barkeep49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 03:20 PM   #1371
hoopsguy
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
Barkeep, Path is the easiest candidate for me to look at because his vote was on me in the AE race.

But wolves always want to avoid linkage, and if they thought the worst they could get was a tie then why not stay split up? RendeR stayed on LSG until the race tightened up to 4-3, then moved over to me. With a minute to go, it was 5-3.

Look at AE's reaction when he learned he was dead. He appeared to be really caught off-guard. Possibly because it didn't need to go down like that? That one of his own was stranded with a vote on him?

I've more or less talked myself believing this position over the course of yesterday and today. Maybe I'm thinking too hard here - they might have just piled on me with the idea of defending "well of course we went after Hoops, look what happened with Lathum!" and hoped that attention didn't go back to AE the next day.

So then it is Chief Rum or NTN. I'm not voting for you for reasons already mentioned - as far as I'm concerned, if you are the last wolf then you are probably going to win this game.

Maybe I should go back and look at voting records and see who conspicuously avoided being grouped with AE and RendeR ... that is project #2 for this evening.
hoopsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 03:21 PM   #1372
hoopsguy
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barkeep49 View Post
hoops, I'm confused... you think CR started the run on AE as a wolf?

What is more likely, CR starting the run with the first vote to make it 4-1 or NTN continuing it as a wolf to make it 4-3. Assuming both know that they have another vote in hand with RendeR sitting on LSG, thus giving them 5 of 9 votes at the time even without their vote?
hoopsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 03:25 PM   #1373
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barkeep49 View Post
path: I don't quite get your evidence against me, honestly. It seems to me that you think I'm a wolf since a wolf voted for me because I wasn't the vote leader at the time, is that correct?

I really think you're falling into the same trap hoops did: I come out vocal against you so you think I'm a wolf. Either that or you are a wolf and know I'm a villager and want to knock me out since time and time again I've been against you.

I think our wolf is either NTN or path. I would love to listen to evidence against ntn, and could be swayed in that direction. However, for reasons I've talked about on multiple days I'm going to stick with path for today.

Vote path

I'd like to think you'd give me credit to be a better player than to vote you just because you came out against me. I didn't get the reasons why you did (you said it was because I defended you), and that is what piqued my interest more than the fact that you came out against me. Again, I think coming out strong against someone is a technique you use often, so that in itself doesn't say anything IMO.

The reason I put my initial vote your way today after going through Render's posts is not simply because he voted for you.

He voted for you at 9:59. That still put you one short of being lynched and did not save the person who he switched from. It was an odd vote, and one that reeks of a late switch to a fellow wolf in order to be able to say later "hey, I voted for Barkeep", if you had been found lupine. I can't think of any other reason for him to make that switch.

The other thing was that out of the five of us who are left, the only one he mentioned trust for in thread was you. As a first time wolf, I think that is interesting.

Now, he only mentioned ntn in passing and didn't mention Chief at all, so it is very possible that he was bound and determined not to link himself with any of his fellow wolves at all. But I thought the interactions regarding you rang loudest in my mind.

I still don't understand the evidence against me, other than the fact that out of everyone who voted for hoops in the AE/hoops showdown has been outed or killed except for me. Other than that, the argument seems to boil down to the fact that I helped Pass and Swaggs with both items and recipes so that means that I must be trying to elbow my way into a position of trust. And frankly, that is a very weak argument.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 03:45 PM   #1374
hoopsguy
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
Votes - I didn't focus on Day 1 but it is easy enough to pull them up. It was the no lynch/lynch discussion.

Day 2:
Ardent - Izulde
RendeR - Barkeep
Path - Izulde
NTN - Path
Rum - Barkeep

Day 3:
Ardent - Lathum
RendeR - Lathum
Path - Lathum
NTN - Barkeep
Chief - Barkeep

Day 4:
Ardent - Hoops
RendeR - Hoops
Path - Hoops
NTN - Ardent
Chief - Ardent

Notice that Path votes in line with both wolves not only on the critical Day 4 vote but also in the non-critical Day 3 vote (non-critical unless BK is a wolf, which again doesn't add up for me). I don't see this as an experienced wolf play. Path is looking good to me here, in an odd sort of way.

So, I'll be deciding between Chief and NTN. Flip a coin? Maybe, but hopefully some post dredging later helps me feel less random about my pick.
hoopsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 03:49 PM   #1375
Barkeep49
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoopsguy View Post
Barkeep, Path is the easiest candidate for me to look at because his vote was on me in the AE race.

But wolves always want to avoid linkage, and if they thought the worst they could get was a tie then why not stay split up? RendeR stayed on LSG until the race tightened up to 4-3, then moved over to me. With a minute to go, it was 5-3.

Look at AE's reaction when he learned he was dead. He appeared to be really caught off-guard. Possibly because it didn't need to go down like that? That one of his own was stranded with a vote on him?

I've more or less talked myself believing this position over the course of yesterday and today. Maybe I'm thinking too hard here - they might have just piled on me with the idea of defending "well of course we went after Hoops, look what happened with Lathum!" and hoped that attention didn't go back to AE the next day.

So then it is Chief Rum or NTN. I'm not voting for you for reasons already mentioned - as far as I'm concerned, if you are the last wolf then you are probably going to win this game.

Maybe I should go back and look at voting records and see who conspicuously avoided being grouped with AE and RendeR ... that is project #2 for this evening.

Ok, the thing is that Render's vote against you should have been the nail in the coffin. It should have been what won the wolves the game. By getting rid of you they were looking at a 4-3 the next day. If only one villager voted against another villager the wolves would have won the game. At that point, so close to the end of the game, I, as a wolf, would have been willing to risk putting all of the eggs in one basket. As I see it lynching you wins the wolves the game. Lynching anyone else does not. The only way I see CR as a wolf is if Pass had also been a wolf. By making sure AE gets lynched instead of you it effectively builds in trust by being the lynching on a wolf. Otherwise, I just don't see the motivation, in what was an end game, for the wolves to try and make themselves look good by voting for another wolf.

That, path, is the biggest evidence, I feel, against you. I feel your game has been off, but more than that I think the wolves would have been willing to do whatever it took to lynch a villager on that day since essentially it should have won them the game.
Barkeep49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 03:50 PM   #1376
Barkeep49
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
Hmm. Hoops voting analysis is interesting, actually. That's fairly good evidence of his innocence.
Barkeep49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 03:50 PM   #1377
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoopsguy View Post
Notice that Path votes in line with both wolves not only on the critical Day 4 vote but also in the non-critical Day 3 vote (non-critical unless BK is a wolf, which again doesn't add up for me). I don't see this as an experienced wolf play. Path is looking good to me here, in an odd sort of way.

Besides the fact that I've had heat on me, now I can see why I haven't been night killed. I'm doing their work for them.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 03:52 PM   #1378
Passacaglia
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Big Ten Country
Quote:
Originally Posted by Telle View Post
Well I didn't get to the end of this gigantic thread until just now. It is rather entertaining though

If you actually made it through all 28 pages, you should play next time!
Passacaglia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 03:53 PM   #1379
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Well, putting our thoughts together there is really only one option left.

UNVOTE BARKEEP
VOTE NTNDEACON
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 03:55 PM   #1380
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barkeep49 View Post
That, path, is the biggest evidence, I feel, against you. I feel your game has been off, but more than that I think the wolves would have been willing to do whatever it took to lynch a villager on that day since essentially it should have won them the game.

I mentioned that before and agree. I haven't been able to read this game at all.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 03:56 PM   #1381
Barkeep49
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
Quote:
Originally Posted by Passacaglia View Post
If you actually made it through all 28 pages, you should play next time!
I second that thought.
Barkeep49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 03:56 PM   #1382
LoneStarGirl
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Little Rock, AR
Quote:
Originally Posted by Passacaglia View Post
If you actually made it through all 28 pages, you should play next time!

Agreed, we need more girls in here (Lurker???) and you can probably sing better than Render too.
LoneStarGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 03:57 PM   #1383
Barkeep49
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
So I'm going to go ahead and unvote path, but want to hear what CR thinks before casting my vote against ntn.

Unvote path
Barkeep49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 04:05 PM   #1384
Telle
College Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Buffalo, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Passacaglia View Post
If you actually made it through all 28 pages, you should play next time!


I'm definitely thinking about it! This looks like fun
Telle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 04:15 PM   #1385
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Telle View Post
I'm definitely thinking about it! This looks like fun

Yay! I like having new people play.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 04:21 PM   #1386
ntndeacon
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoopsguy View Post
The crux of the issue for me is whether the wolves were caught flat-footed at the end with my vote with AE. I believe they would like to avoid being grouped together, so that at least one of them would vote for AE. If they knew a tie was helping their cause by no lynch (I'm planning to search on this when I get home tonight) then they had to feel pretty secure about their position.

Would Chief, as a wolf, have gotten a ball rolling on AE knowing that there was a good chance I would follow him, instead of jumping on the status quo between you and I as villagers (if you are a villager)? It doesn't seem to hold much value for that day, but might have played well the following day. I'm not sure how much of a reach this is or not. And I'm not sure what to make of his post-lynch comments where he didn't want to take credit for "getting" AE, which would normally be credit a wolf would want if they had sacrificed one of their own.

NTN came in as the third vote on Ardent, making it a little more interesting. The wolves still had RendeR hanging out on LSG, who then flipped over to make it 5-3 as we headed into the final 15-20 minutes. Would he have moved off Ardent and over to me with another minute or two of time? Not sure.

I am not sure the question has merit as it is written, for if we have another minite or two, then those votes moving onto Ardent would have happened a minute or two later as well. That is the purpose of last minute shifts to make it impossible to react regardless of where you stand.

As far as my intent, It seemed that there was a start of a movement toward AE when I voted. I expect that there had been a little time to react, then I would have chosen not to react, and stay put.
ntndeacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 04:31 PM   #1387
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoopsguy View Post
Path, going back to earlier in the game, why did you react so strongly to my suggestions on the Eternal Bond potion? If you trusted Path, then why did you seem upset that I suggested you pass it to him? I got your vote almost immediately after that, for appearing "wolfish".


Almost missed this.

I've just spent the last 10 minutes going back through day 2 and 3 and don't see this. I see you mentioning the eternal bond recipe, but I voted for Izulde that day. The next morning I don't see anything either.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 05:11 PM   #1388
ntndeacon
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
I need to quickly make a vote here since iwill be out til at least 9:30 Central time. Hopefully I last til then since it seems like a couple folks mistakenly think I a m the last wolf. This probably isn't the best vote for self preservation, since he is yet to vote, but this will at least be somewhere you may look next. since if Idie today, then tomorrow will make or break who wins.

Vote Chief Rum
ntndeacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 06:55 PM   #1389
hoopsguy
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
Not much new on my trip home. Guess I'll come back closer to deadline and hope to find people around for the discussion.
hoopsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 06:59 PM   #1390
st.cronin
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Mexico
There are four dead people lurking in the forum right now.
__________________
co-commish: bb-bbcf.net

knives out
st.cronin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 07:03 PM   #1391
Swaggs
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Boo!
__________________
DOWN WITH HATTRICK!!!
The RWBL
Are you reading In The Bleachers?
Swaggs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 07:18 PM   #1392
LoneStarGirl
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Little Rock, AR
I think we are all anxious to see who the last bad guy is
LoneStarGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 07:19 PM   #1393
Barkeep49
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoneStarGirl View Post
I think we are all anxious to see who the last bad guy is
I know I am.
Barkeep49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 07:20 PM   #1394
Alan T
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mass.
me too!
Alan T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 07:31 PM   #1395
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Man, my connection is sloooooooooow. I'll check back later.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 07:40 PM   #1396
Passacaglia
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Big Ten Country
I told Alan this before, but this is the most interested I've been in a game as a dead person.
Passacaglia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 08:07 PM   #1397
Barkeep49
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan T View Post
me too!
Oh that's reassuring. Even the GM doesn't know who the bad guy is. Man.
Barkeep49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 08:09 PM   #1398
hoopsguy
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
Just finishing dinner, will be around for final wrap-up chat/vote in about 15 minutes.
hoopsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 08:28 PM   #1399
hoopsguy
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
OK, so does anyone have a vote count?
hoopsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2007, 08:35 PM   #1400
hoopsguy
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
And Telle does not supply the vote count. Boo!

Vote count, as of Post #1399:
NTN - Path (1379)
Rum - NTN (1388)
hoopsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 AM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.