05-02-2009, 11:05 AM | #51 | |||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Quote:
To be quite honest, I'd rather have Congress be distracted than pass some of the stuff they seemingly want to do .
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
|||
05-02-2009, 11:06 AM | #52 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
I think it creates all kinds of problems in a small tournament. It's silly that the the SEC or ACC has the same reward as the Sun Belt. Maybe Vanderbilt should move to the Sun Belt. They'd be guaranteed a playoff spot every year. If conference champions are the majority of participants in a tournament, the talent in the conferences needs to be more evenly distributed. |
|
05-02-2009, 11:08 AM | #53 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
Quote:
Yes, my reply was an opinion to your opinion. Hopefully your head isn't quite so far up your own ass that you saw your statement to be some kind of fact. I suppose we shouldn't complain about things we already like in hopes that they might get even better :shrug: |
|
05-02-2009, 11:20 AM | #54 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
Quote:
In addition to the fairness, having a few supposedly weaker teams would give the big schools more motivation for the top seeds in the tournament, a decent counterpoint to the "this will ruin the regular season" brigade. |
|
05-02-2009, 11:38 AM | #55 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
Your opinion is valid. But it has nothing to do with whether the federal government should make decisions regarding athletic competition. You opinion is based on a preference about sports. Complain all you want. If there's enough complaints about a playoff (especially complaints that involve not spending money or tv time on the NCAA), then eventually, there will be a playoff, because it would be more profitable. Right now it wouldn't be, otherwise they'd do it. |
|
05-02-2009, 11:42 AM | #56 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Georgia
|
Quote:
Because nobody makes bad business decisions? There's no chance they think it wouldn't be more profitiable, but are wrong? That's the argument you're running with?
__________________
Top 10 Songs of the Year 1955-Present (1976 Added) Franchise Portfolio Draft Winner Fictional Character Draft Winner Television Family Draft Winner Build Your Own Hollywood Studio Draft Winner |
|
05-02-2009, 11:42 AM | #57 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
To be truly "fair", the NCAA would have to be setup like an American professional sport - for example, have different conferences and divisions that are as balanced as possible.
In the NCAA, that might involve a "American Conference, Southeast Division" that might have Georgia, Florida St, Florida, Vanderbilt, LSU, Miami, Mississippi St, Louisiana-Lafayette, Florida Atlantic, Troy. Guess who's not getting to the playoffs in that setup, no matter how many teams make it? You'd have the bigger schools succeed, because the bigger schools have more resources. Troy sure as hell ain't getting anywhere, even if they were the best old "Sun Belt" team, by far. So why should Troy be granted a clear path to a final 16 by getting to play weak programs? How does that make any sense for business, or fairness? And if you don't accept that premise (of bigger schools being better) as "fair", now you're talking a recruiting budget cap, or a high school entry draft or something. Last edited by molson : 05-02-2009 at 11:49 AM. |
05-02-2009, 11:43 AM | #58 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
They could very well be wrong. But that's their call to make. It isn't up to the government to correct bad business decisions (at least until recently) So is the new justification for congressional sports legislation "it would be better financially and they just don't know it"? That's pretty a scary precedent. Last edited by molson : 05-02-2009 at 11:44 AM. |
|
05-02-2009, 11:48 AM | #59 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Georgia
|
Quote:
I've already said in this thread that I support a playoff, but don't support government action here (although I did with steroids). I was just taking issue with your ridiculous argument that the playoffs wouldn't be more profitable because then the NCAA would be doing it.
__________________
Top 10 Songs of the Year 1955-Present (1976 Added) Franchise Portfolio Draft Winner Fictional Character Draft Winner Television Family Draft Winner Build Your Own Hollywood Studio Draft Winner |
|
05-02-2009, 11:49 AM | #60 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
I have no idea if that's true. But obviously the NCAA does, and they have the vote that counts. Why do you think there's no playoff if not money? There's more parties with their hands in the treasure chest now, with the big universities, bowls, etc. But that counts as money too. They obviously think there's more money to be made with the premiere programs being protected. They would rather have a 10-2 Georgia team in the playoffs (or just a BCS game) than an 8-3 Sun Belt Champion Troy. I can't say I blame them. Last edited by molson : 05-02-2009 at 11:53 AM. |
|
05-02-2009, 11:54 AM | #61 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Georgia
|
Quote:
My point was that they could have analyzed the situation and decided it would be less profit, and could be dead wrong. Your earlier statement was saying that one thing (the NCAA not having playoffs) proved the other (playoffs wouldn't be more profitable.)
__________________
Top 10 Songs of the Year 1955-Present (1976 Added) Franchise Portfolio Draft Winner Fictional Character Draft Winner Television Family Draft Winner Build Your Own Hollywood Studio Draft Winner |
|
05-02-2009, 11:57 AM | #62 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
No, I didn't mean that, but I can see how it reads that way. I agree that they absolutely could have analyzed the situation, and be dead wrong on the money. I didn't mean to say anything's proven (except what the NCAA's current opinion is). |
|
05-02-2009, 12:22 PM | #63 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Good to know Rep. Barton has time for both secession and playoffs.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
05-02-2009, 12:33 PM | #64 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
Quote:
I know it's the "party line" but I don't want them to do 8 teams where everyone agrees to the system, then 4 years from now team #9 and some conference feels left out and then they bitch and it gets changed to 16 or whatever. Agree to whatever system then stop bitching about it and don't try to change it down the line. And yes I know this is not what is happening now I just don't want to see it keep changing. I guess my bigger fear is you have power conference teams playing to go undefeated against inferior teams instead of playing prime time matchups in nonconference as the 12th game was intended to do. And you have "midmajors" start to do the same just to make the "playoff" |
|
05-02-2009, 12:38 PM | #65 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
Quote:
why would they have to be undefeated? It's about the best teams and if 5 teams have 1 or 2 losses and only 4 make it don't they have an argument too? What if a three loss teams wins the ACC and the team they beat suffered their only loss in that game? There are just too many holes in the 8 team playoff system just as there are in the current system. |
|
05-02-2009, 01:14 PM | #66 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Black Hole
|
Just run the tournament for the regular season. The losers would fight it out in a losers' bracket and we'd really know who was ranked #26, #58, or #111 at the end of the year.
|
05-02-2009, 01:15 PM | #67 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Black Hole
|
BTW, that was a joke.
|
05-02-2009, 05:07 PM | #68 | |
Stadium Announcer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Burke, VA
|
Quote:
Yes please. I would much prefer this to the idea that Congress (or any other governmental entity) has the authority to involve itself in the outcome of a sporting event.
__________________
I don't want the world. I just want your half. |
|
05-02-2009, 06:25 PM | #69 | |
Roster Filler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cicero
|
Quote:
No, but obviously their misleading labeling of the BCS champion as the national champion has fooled you. The NCAA does not award a championship in football. Period. Never have.
__________________
http://www.nateandellie.net Now featuring twice the babies for the same low price! Last edited by Samdari : 05-02-2009 at 06:25 PM. |
|
05-02-2009, 06:31 PM | #70 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
Great, so what's the problem then? They choose not to award a championship. So nobody has unfair lack of access to it. |
|
05-02-2009, 06:48 PM | #71 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Big Ten Country
|
Well if it's the BCS Championship, shouldn't non-BCS school be completely ineligible. Maybe the non-BCS conferences and Notre Dame should form a Division 1 and one-and-a-half A.
Last edited by Passacaglia : 05-02-2009 at 06:49 PM. |
05-02-2009, 07:35 PM | #72 | |
Bonafide Seminole Fan
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Miami
|
Quote:
That is false. They award championships to all non FBS divisions.
__________________
Subby's favorite woman hater. |
|
05-03-2009, 10:26 AM | #73 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Location, Location, Location
|
Absolutely, and if the West Mountain (which is what the Congressionals were calling them, apparently) want to play in a championship, they should prove it by entering I-A (or whatever its called these days) and seeing if they can beat the Richmonds and JMUs first. Which is where the Potato States of the world belong in the first place.
__________________
"The case of Great Britain is the most astonishing in this matter of inequality of rights in world soccer championships. The way they explained it to me as a child, God is one but He's three: Father, Son and Holy Ghost. I could never understand it. And I still don't understand why Great Britain is one but she's four....while [others] continue to be no more than one despite the diverse nationalities that make them up." Eduardo Galeano, SOCCER IN SUN AND SHADOW |
05-03-2009, 08:02 PM | #74 |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
I love the argument that a playoff would make the other bowls meaningless. I thought they already were meaningless. There's a lot of teams out there that use the second-tier and below bowls as the first preseason game of the next season.
|
05-03-2009, 08:11 PM | #75 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
The federal government steps in to make decisions for monopolies all the time. I don't see why the NCAA should be treated differently from your local electric or gas company. |
|
05-03-2009, 08:39 PM | #76 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
|
The current system is terrible, fraudulent and lends itself to behinds teh scenes scheming by the "in crowd" of the big conference schools leaving anyone not in that group sitting outside looking in.
It must be changed because its a joke and more often than not, it fails miserably to provide quality bowl games which the public spends obscene amounts of money on. If it takes the government sticking a cattle prod up the NCAA's ass to get a true playoff system in place, so be it. For my own opinion: 8 conferences of 9 teams each, current conferences with MORE than 9 teams will decide on their own, which teams will move to new/different or lower division play. Each team plays 8 conference games (1 with each conference rival) + 2 out of conference games against teams within the other 7 conferences. This gives us a 10 game season for ALL teams with a higher quality of schedules due to the inability of top end schools to schedule shit teams out of conference. All current conference championship games are eliminated. The winner of the conference season has the best record overall (yes INCLUDING the OOC games) If tOSU and Mishitgan are both 10-1 at the end of teh season the head to head game decides who moves on. You want a shot at the title? WIN, period. The 8 conference winners then get seeded RANDOMLY to eliminate complaints of "but they played a weak conference I should get to play them first not this other really good team". 3 rounds, 1 champion, no more whining and bitching because people THINK this team or that team was better. If you're best, you WIN, period. Its fair and equitable to everyone in the 72 team field. The other 50+ teams currently in the top division get shuffled downward. Relegation systems could be considered to allow growth and change in the top division. Teams NOT in the playoffs can still be offered bowl games and bowl games can continue their current status of holiday entertainment and a financial and image building benefit for the schools involved. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|