04-11-2007, 01:21 PM | #51 | |||
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
You must not have read lungs' post on the subject. Quote:
And how do you do this, exactly? Regulation? |
|||
04-11-2007, 01:35 PM | #52 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wayne, PA
|
|
04-11-2007, 01:48 PM | #53 | |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Georgia
|
Quote:
Sure you believe this argument, or you wouldn't think there's a need to increase the pay and benefits for such jobs. It will, as you state, increase costs to the American consumer and mean lower profits for business, both of which are anethema to most Americans IMHO.
__________________
-Beargrowlz [email protected] TCY Golden Scribe Winner - Bear Goes Home "The measure of a man's real character is what he would do if he knew he would never be found out." --Thomas B. Macaulay |
|
04-11-2007, 02:01 PM | #54 | ||
lolzcat
Join Date: May 2001
Location: williamsburg, va
|
Quote:
Have you looked at the unemployment rate lately?
__________________
Text Sports Network - Bringing you statistical information for several FOF MP leagues in one convenient site Quote:
|
||
04-11-2007, 02:05 PM | #55 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
|
04-11-2007, 02:18 PM | #56 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
I was wondering about that, but figured it wouldn't do any good to mention it. No sense letting reality get in the way of a good delusion.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
04-11-2007, 02:25 PM | #57 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
|
04-11-2007, 02:34 PM | #58 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
There are only so many windmills that a man can tilt at in a single day before crashing to the ground
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
04-11-2007, 02:43 PM | #59 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
|
04-11-2007, 02:49 PM | #60 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Just to help with the visualization, make sure that I'm tilting further & further to the right
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
04-11-2007, 02:51 PM | #61 | |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Georgia
|
Quote:
Heh, the only righty in Athens.
__________________
-Beargrowlz [email protected] TCY Golden Scribe Winner - Bear Goes Home "The measure of a man's real character is what he would do if he knew he would never be found out." --Thomas B. Macaulay |
|
04-11-2007, 03:01 PM | #62 | ||
lolzcat
Join Date: May 2001
Location: williamsburg, va
|
Quote:
Yeah, I know, I know... There are certain blatant things that I just can't let go sometimes.
__________________
Text Sports Network - Bringing you statistical information for several FOF MP leagues in one convenient site Quote:
|
||
04-12-2007, 04:01 AM | #63 | |||
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
04-12-2007, 09:00 AM | #64 | |||
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Still waiting for your responses/explanations PSU. Convince me you've actually thought about this, and you aren't just parroting talk show talking points. |
|||
04-12-2007, 12:55 PM | #65 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wayne, PA
|
Quote:
Well, for one thing many immigrants who come to this nation illegally actually wind up on welfare (how they can do this without a social security number I don't know, I think many times they are able to do this through their children who are citizens, but this is a debate for another day) and as a result, many citizen tax payers are taking up the burden. Now this doesn't mean all illegals are on welfare either. What I think we should do is simply scale back welfare all together, for everyone...even U.S. citizens. What we save in taxes would enable employers to provide better wages to actual U.S. citizens who might not ordinarily be working because they were on welfare. The one kink I see in all of this is the fact that unemployment is currently at only 5%, which in essence is essentially total employment. People forget that truthfully 5% of the population is simply unemployable for various reasons. Last edited by PSUColonel : 04-12-2007 at 01:22 PM. |
|
04-12-2007, 01:16 PM | #66 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Prairie du Sac, WI
|
Quote:
And that's a pretty big kink. |
|
04-12-2007, 01:25 PM | #67 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
You do realize that welfare is a very small percentage of the budget and a minuscule portion of the GDP? You could completely eliminate welfare(not including medicaid) and it wouldn't balance the budget and wouldn't lower your taxes a penny.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
04-12-2007, 01:30 PM | #68 | |||
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Quote:
Not after the 1996 Welfare reform bill, they don't. In some cases they can use stolen or counterfeit SSNs, but this is highly risky. The statistics most people like to point to are the benefits they can receive that are intended solely for the support of their U.S.-born children, but the GAO shows that this, at best, makes up only 2-3% of overall welfare expenditures. Quote:
And yet, it's estimated that roughly 2/3rds of illegal aliens pay taxes, apparently in some sort of hope that this will eventually help their case to gain citizenship. Quote:
So here's your plan: 1. Cut welfare. 2. Use those savings to cut taxes. 3. Employers, out of their own volition, pay better wages. Personally, I think there's a disconnect between steps #2 and #3. |
|||
04-12-2007, 01:47 PM | #69 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wayne, PA
|
My suggestion is that we stop paying welfare to HEALTHY people who do not work, but instead, we should use welfare as a supplement to those who work for low wages. This is scaling back welfare. There should be two different types of wages, 1) a minimum wage, and 2) a welfare wage. This way minimum wage can remain where it is in each state, and not need to be raised. The Welfare Wage would be based upon each state’s average living wage. If a legal worker earns less than his or her state’s living wage, the government will supplement those wages to bring those workers up to that wage amount. Therefore if a state’s minimum wage is $6.15 per hour, and their standard of living constitutes a wage of $10.00 per our; the welfare wage would be $3.85 per hour.
|
04-12-2007, 02:00 PM | #70 |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Georgia
|
Yeah, it's a myth that illegals end up on welfare. Illegals can't obtain welfare (except for one specific instance) and even legal aliens have an inordinantly difficult time qualifying compared to American citizens.
Illegals cannot obtain TANF or Food Stamps legally. They could use false social security numbers, but evenetually that will catch up with them and the welfare agency will shut them off just as they would any American committing welfare fraud. The one instance where undocumented aliens can qualify for welfare is for emergency medicaid. That's when a doctor signs a statement that the medical treatment the alien is receiving is life saving - though doctors sign it for birth and delivery as well, which technically probably doesn't qualify but the government lets it go. The children of undocumented aliens born in the United States howeverm do qualify for welfare. They are after all, U.S. citizens by birthright. PSUColonel's program is interesting in that it would encourage work. But there are two major problems with it. 1) There are far more Americans working at below the living wage than are not working and receiving welfare. Implementing such a plan would cost significantly more in government expenditure than retaining the current system., increasing the size of government and no doubt necessittating new taxes. 2) Are you really prepared to watch hundreds of thousands of children die and be shelterless because their parents are lazy? Or do you pay benefits for the children and not the parents?
__________________
-Beargrowlz [email protected] TCY Golden Scribe Winner - Bear Goes Home "The measure of a man's real character is what he would do if he knew he would never be found out." --Thomas B. Macaulay Last edited by beargrowlz : 04-12-2007 at 02:00 PM. |
04-12-2007, 02:01 PM | #71 |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Georgia
|
dola.
In the interest of accuracy I should also add that undocumented aliens also do qualify for local public education.
__________________
-Beargrowlz [email protected] TCY Golden Scribe Winner - Bear Goes Home "The measure of a man's real character is what he would do if he knew he would never be found out." --Thomas B. Macaulay |
04-12-2007, 02:10 PM | #72 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
I commend PSU on posting a proposal, but there is another hole in it. If you are going to subsidize wages up to a living wage amount employers will have no reason to offer anything but minimum as long as the salary stays at living wage level. If living wage is 10/hr why would I ever offer 7 or 8 dollars an hour when the government is going to cover anything from minimum to 10?
It's a nice idea, but I don't think it would do much more than give businesses a huge windfall.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
04-12-2007, 02:23 PM | #73 | |||
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: usually sunny SoCal
|
Quote:
Quote:
Seriously, why are you having so many children if you can't afford to feed, clothe, house 'em? I just don't understand this... full disclosure: single, no kids.
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
04-12-2007, 02:27 PM | #74 | |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Georgia
|
Quote:
Because people don't think rationally. I'm not saying having children if you can't care for them is smart. The best advice as a CPS Case Manager I can give clients is not to have kids. But even though sayings like "If you can't feed 'em don't breed 'em" are cute (and good advice), it still doesn't alleviate the problem or answer the question. If the parents can't or won't care for their children, someone has to. If no one will, the state has to or they die.
__________________
-Beargrowlz [email protected] TCY Golden Scribe Winner - Bear Goes Home "The measure of a man's real character is what he would do if he knew he would never be found out." --Thomas B. Macaulay Last edited by beargrowlz : 04-12-2007 at 02:27 PM. |
|
04-12-2007, 02:28 PM | #75 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Huntington, WV
|
Quote:
I agree with many of your points, as I believe we should close immigration to this country completely (at least in the short term), but it's not because of national security. I believe that the next major attack with be from a person legally in this country. The terrorists know that the best way to purpetrate an attack is to recruit from within. There's a bunch of disenfranchised people out there that are easy pickings for this sort of thing. No, my major concern is the affect immigration, especially illegal, has on social programs in this country. When so many legal residents are not getting the help they need, when so many people are on the streets, we should not be wasting resources on people not in this country legally. That's my major issue. I wish the laws were to be changed that illegal immigrants not be eligible for any socially funded programs.
__________________
|
|
04-12-2007, 02:30 PM | #76 | ||
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: usually sunny SoCal
|
Quote:
so, how come so many people are adopting foreign kids (china, vietnam come to mind) rather than american kids? Is our legal system that screwed up?
__________________
Quote:
|
||
04-12-2007, 02:33 PM | #77 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Quote:
But we're not, really. The amount of resources that end up being spent on illegal aliens is a very, very small of overall expenditures of this kind, which are, in turn, a very, very small part of the overall government budget. Debt service or the war in Iraq, just to pick two examples, dwarf the expenditures we're talking about. |
|
04-12-2007, 02:37 PM | #78 | |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Georgia
|
Quote:
I can't answer about foreign nations adoption process, but there are serious issues with our's. First and foremost, many, perhaps most of the children in our foster care system have serious mental health issues because of the way they were raised - or not raised. You need to remember that kids who enter foster care are there because they were either physically or sexually abused or neglected to the point that an overworked, understaffed, underpaid state agency that has trouble retaining workers for more than a year had to step in and remove them from the home. So the kids have a lot of baggage people don't want. Second, even after a child enters foster care, it's extraordinarily difficult to terminate parental rights, and no one can adopt that child until his or her parent's have their rights terminated in court. All a parent has to do in order to avoid TPR is to agree and follow a case plan. Then they are free to abuse or neglect all over again. Then once the TPR is done, assuming adoptive parents come forward to adopt a foster kid, they have to go through the legal system - which is admittedly beyond how I am involved with the kids, so I don't know a heck of a lot about that end.
__________________
-Beargrowlz [email protected] TCY Golden Scribe Winner - Bear Goes Home "The measure of a man's real character is what he would do if he knew he would never be found out." --Thomas B. Macaulay |
|
04-12-2007, 02:39 PM | #79 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Huntington, WV
|
Quote:
On the grand scale of things, you're absolutely right. In the last big thread about this someone posted the amount of money social programs utilize for the benefit of illegal aliens, and it was somewhere in the amount of 10 billion (or roundabout there). That's pocket change if you're looking at it from an overall perspective, but I'm looking at it as 10 billiion that could be spent helping those here legally. To me, it all comes down to priority, I guess, and to me the priorities in this country when it comes to social programs have always been screwy.
__________________
|
|
04-12-2007, 02:54 PM | #80 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Quote:
Yes, but the 1996 Welfare Reform Act really cut all that down. My point is that this particular well is dry. I understand your point about priorities, but to be honest, there are much bigger blocks of money to target. Heck, there was $1 billion in Iraq redevelopment money which essentially went missing. There's billions being sent overseas to Afghanistan & Iraq to provide services we don't provide to all of our own citizens. Not to mention that a lot of DoD R&D projects easily blow through as much money as this gap. |
|
04-12-2007, 03:36 PM | #81 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Mexico
|
That was pretty funny, I have to admit. |
04-12-2007, 03:41 PM | #82 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
As some one who's adopted from China let me give you some of my reasons for choosing international adoption over domestic. Be aware that I'm talking about newborns and not foster care children. The birthmother generally chooses the adoptive parents. This leads to a high degree of uncertainty in the process. You may get a child very quickly or you may wait years. This alone is enough to scare a lot of folks off. More than that, though, is the whole sense of competition in the process. You are trying to sell yourselves as parents to in most cases a young, not very educated girl with little to no parenting experience. It leads to a lot of choices being made on income and looks. As stated above the parental rights issue is a major concern. Most likely it won't be an issue, but birthmothers do change their mind occasionally ad when they do you really have very little recourse. Imagine having a child for a year and then that child being taken away. While we are now an interracial family, adopting a black child would be far more difficult for us and the child. Race and racism in the US is still a conversation dominated by white/black issues. Adopting a black child would expose the child and us to situations that we aren't prepared to deal with. Let me be clear that these are problems that will come both from whites and blacks. There is a vocal part of the black community that doesn't believe white parents should have black children. Foreign adoption is a much more predictable and accepted practice in the US than domestic adoption. In most cases it costs more, but the ability to know the steps of the process is very beneficial to waiting parents.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
04-12-2007, 05:32 PM | #83 |
H.S. Freshman Team
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Missouri
|
JPhilipps-
Hey man, we just finalized our second from Korea! He is watching his big sis ride her hippitty hop and cackling with envy. To add to what JPhillipps and Bear have already stated, when we adopted our little ones, everything legally is as if they were born to us. In the U.S. the uncertainty is a killer. Way too much legal risk. We went through the whole domestic process, all the while being told that they really didn't want nor need us, as they really wanted to just put the kids back with their biological parents. We waited for probably two years for a referral of anything close to a healthy child and it just wasn't going to happen. Most of the time when we came close to adopting older children we were told that we would have to have an open adoption. This began to seem way too much like babysitting until the parents were able to "handle" having a child and could come back and try to regain custody. We really were like most normal people and just wanted to have a family.
__________________
"I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me." |
04-13-2007, 01:16 PM | #84 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Arlington, VA
|
Quote:
As depressing as it may be, the FBI and DHS are finding just that. A subcommittee of the House Homeland Security Committee has been conducting a number of hearings and briefings on this domestic radicalization. Flere's examples are well made, and I would throw in a couple more -- Jose Padilla, the SoCal cell busted in 2005 (http://www.fbi.gov/page2/sept05/ca_indict090105.htm) the London bombers (UK citizens, but the same deal). Also worth noting are the US citizens that have joined up with al Qaeda. This New Yorker article about one of bin Laden's top advisers, Azzam the American, is disturbing on a number of levels: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2...khatchadourian |
|
04-13-2007, 01:38 PM | #85 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wayne, PA
|
Quote:
I agree that this is a real threat, and that it's one that is increasing, but you'll also notice I said "majority", not "all". |
|
04-13-2007, 03:14 PM | #86 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Arlington, VA
|
Quote:
I know you did. A majority of the arrests and prosecutions inside the US for terrorism-related charges lately has been homegrown folks. At least, that is the way it was presented by the FBI to House Members. No one asked them for exact numbers, so I don't have them at my fingertips. I'll give you a safe out. I think Flere (and subsequently, myself) was speaking of US interests and targets purely within our borders, in which case evidence is growing that we are looking at domestic perpetrators, as unthinkable as that may be. What you wrote may have meant US interests globally, in which case a vast majority of the plotters are not American. To bring this tangent back to the main discussion, the Tom Tancredos of the world (and someone earlier in this thread, I believe) have hypothesized that Middle Eastern terrorists might be going to Mexico, posing as Mexicans, and then hiring coyotes or devising other schemes to get themselves across the border. There is no documentary evidence of that happening. Meaning that, of the thousands caught on the Southern border sneaking in over the past few years, none have turned out to be terrorists of Middle Eastern origin. I can think of a couple of cases where we got folks on the Northern border, including the so-called Millennium Bomber Ahmed Ressam, caught in Port Angeles, WA in 2000. But he entered legally. None of this should be construed as negating the need for appropriate fences, barriers, agents and technology on the land borders to increase our operational control. But the anti-terrorism gains from this are very modest in comparison to the costs. |
|
04-14-2007, 02:01 AM | #87 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wayne, PA
|
I actually agree. Forgive me for my sometimes short and blunt comments, but I don't often enough have time to articulate my full views here on a message board. Many Muslims have taken up occupancy in French quarters, and that is likely the reason you see more muslim criminals, or potential criminals coming from the north. However I feel it is a matter of time before they discover the reasons for coming from the south. Just my opinion.
Last edited by PSUColonel : 04-14-2007 at 02:02 AM. |
06-28-2007, 01:39 PM | #88 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
Well, Immigration bill went down in flames.
I am an immigrant myself and other than for the bad taste of 'amnesty', thought we needed some sort of reform. Really liked the point based, skilled based criteria. |
06-28-2007, 07:34 PM | #89 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
|
Can you have imagined the immense beaucracy it would have taken to manage the details in that bill? And do you think they would have been able to manage it right? Would we have gotten the benefits from such legislature in relation to the costs?
|
06-28-2007, 08:37 PM | #90 | |
Poet in Residence
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Charleston, SC
|
Quote:
That's part of the point -- job creation, anyway. Last edited by NoMyths : 06-28-2007 at 08:37 PM. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|