12-16-2009, 09:21 AM | #51 | ||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Btw, I come from the other side of lynchjim. I work for the US government enforcing ERISA, making sure companies follow health care regulations for the group health plans, and I completely agree with lynchjim's observations on pre-ex and mandates. I wonder who that makes a shill for?
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
||
12-16-2009, 09:36 AM | #52 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
The issue with pre-existing conditions and mandates is common sense. Why in the world would private entities agree to "insure" (read: pay for) people with known expensive conditions? Even if these entities are non-profit? Even with the "greedy profit motive" aside, it still makes no sense.
If we force insurance companies to pay for people with pre-existing conditions, the result will be insurance companies needing to offset these costs with higher premiums on healthy (or at least currently healthy) people. To me, the eventual outcome of this is that healthy people don't pay insurance premiums until they develop a costly condition, at which point they get "insurance". Of course, you can force them to own insurance, which is basically forcing them (or their employer) to pay into, in effect, a national system of "health care cost distribution". So, if you're going to do all this, through a complex system involving 50 states and hundreds of insurance companies, might it not be better, simpler, and easier simply have the government pay for everything, and distribute the cost to all taxpayers evenly? Oh wait, but then we get death panels. My bad. |
12-16-2009, 09:37 AM | #53 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hartford
|
Quote:
Oh, insurance companies are killing people. Well when you put it like that I'm convinced. |
|
12-16-2009, 09:40 AM | #54 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hartford
|
Quote:
I think most people agree there should be coverage for everyone. I really don't know many (any) who don't agree with that. This bill is a fiscal boondoggle though. Even if it truly was deficit neutral for a decade (if it is it's only because they tax for 3 years before they spend any money), in the decades after it would make the bank bailouts look like chump change. |
|
12-16-2009, 09:40 AM | #55 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
quite the well-reasoned and simple explanation.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
12-16-2009, 09:43 AM | #56 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hartford
|
Quote:
Why don't you do some research on how things really are tracking going forward in Europe and we'll catch up after that. The demographics don't work in the future. There are too many old people and not enough workers. Some of the countries are starting to fray and when the demos catch up with them it will turn south quickly. Raise taxes? Are you a senator or just a lowly member of the House? |
|
12-16-2009, 09:48 AM | #57 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
There is no way to construct a healthcare reform bill that would gain GOP support. They've decided, rightly I think, that Obama losing offers greater political gain than any other option. Now I think it's a cynical game to play with people who are dying due to lack of insurance, but it is what it is.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
12-16-2009, 09:51 AM | #58 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
|
12-16-2009, 09:52 AM | #59 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hartford
|
Quote:
To even ask the question you've got a lot more faith in government then I do. It could potentially be simpler, but I don't see any way in the world that it could be better. This isn't with respect to your post but I'm not in the mood to hear about Europe and Canada. Give me a call when: A. The US doesn't have to play defender of freedom to the world and can move spending from the military to health care. B: Americans are willing to be treated like patients in those countries. Chicago has more MRI machines then Canada. Let me know when Americans are willing to stop having expensive tests like that. C: The sort of medical providers you'd want treating you are willing to work for what medical professionals in those countries make. My wife has a cousin who is a brain surgeon in a European country with socialized medicine and has a standard of living about 4 levels below us. Oooooohhh.. our system is so much better then you Americans... but if someone tries to invade us please stand up to them. |
|
12-16-2009, 09:53 AM | #60 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Quote:
Arguably the demographics work worse for our private/public (don't forget Medicare) system. Future workers will be paying more in taxes to pay for Medicare (because more people will be on Medicare than even before, just due to aging, not even the increased costs due to this bill) while also paying more in health care premiums because of the ever-rising cost of health care itself. At least a fully-public system can: 1. Use huge economies of scale to aggregate and manage cost inflation. 2. Adjust based on demographic trends by tapping sources of funding not available to private entities. |
|
12-16-2009, 09:56 AM | #61 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
|
Quote:
I'm not sure I mentioned this here- but I've been fairly impressed with what Pelosi has done in the House with rounding up the troops and getting votes done. A much better health care bill, cap and trade, financial regulation, card check, and more are already signed, sealed, and delivered. I never liked her, but I've been impressed by how things have gone in the past 3 years in the House so I've had to change my opinion. So, here's the big "but". It turns out Reid is as bad as we thought he was. He has a much more difficult situation to deal with but he's unwilling to do anything even with his job in jeopardy. A lot of this lies at his feet because you know if, say, Tom DeLay were running things on the Democratic side and, mercifully, he's not as they don't tend to employ lesser demons, Lieberman wouldn't just be threatened with losing his seat but the life of his firstborn and his firstborn's firstborn. SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out! Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!" Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!" |
|
12-16-2009, 09:57 AM | #62 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
we also have higher GDP than those other countries and thus can pay higher salaries to the medical professionals that we have and will have going forward. we also already have all of those machines - not like they're all going to up and magically dissapear. your point A is very well-taken and true though. wayyyyyyy too much spending going into the military-industrial complex in this country as a result of our playing unilateral defender of the free world.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
12-16-2009, 09:58 AM | #63 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
|
Quote:
What about the soldiers that die for unecessary wars? What about police officers that die fighting the war on drugs? Nah, government accountability is only needed for the private health care industry. |
|
12-16-2009, 09:58 AM | #64 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
That's just flat-out wrong. A 'take it or leave it' stance by Democrats would put the crosshairs squarely on the GOP and result in much less backlash against the Dems. They could show that they really mean that they want true reform. As it is, the Democrats look like a group looking to stay in office for 4-6 more years rather than anyone looking out for the interests of 'people dying due to a lack of insurance'. Once again, the Dems have the power and promised to do something. So do something already. |
|
12-16-2009, 09:58 AM | #65 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
|
Quote:
Uh, the Patriot Act passed the Senate with 98 yes votes. That is bi-partisan support, not the majority cramming something down the throat of the minority. NCLB passed the Senate with 87 to 10. Again, this was a bi-partisan vote. Also, VT, MN, and NE both senators voted against it, 3 R and 7 D voted against the bill. Tax cuts are arguably the one conservative item he passed. My point is that the GOP was in a position to shove anything down the throats of the Dems. They did not do so. They split the committee chairs with the Dems, which frustrated many GOP members. You had Trent Lott removed from his leadership position, due in part to the way he handled the Dems. Outside of the war and associated legislation, much of what Bush passed was not conservative. That was one of my problems with him, he ran as a conservative, and governed as a moderate. |
|
12-16-2009, 09:59 AM | #66 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Big Ten Country
|
Quote:
Those machines cost a LOT to operate, though. It's not so much the fact that we have the machines -- it's that we're accustomed to having those tests performed more often. |
|
12-16-2009, 10:00 AM | #67 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
|
Quote:
Well, our solution of pricing the poorest 30% of the populace out of the market so they have no care is a much better model. SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out! Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!" Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!" Last edited by sterlingice : 12-16-2009 at 10:01 AM. |
|
12-16-2009, 10:02 AM | #68 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hartford
|
Quote:
Once you build a single payer system and there is no incentive whatsoever for the individual to control costs at a personal level you can forget any chance of managing cost inflation. All you need to see is how people utilize their employer plans once they reach their deductible and out of pocket limits. They get care just for the sake of getting care. The only way to ever slow down the cost of health care growth is to force people to take care of themselves. If you've got a non-financial way to do that I'd love to hear it. The demographics are an issue here as well as there, the difference is that no one here is pounding their chest about how great the system is. Many of those countries are about to watch their programs strangle their economy. We probably are as well, but running to their method that worked 15 years ago is no way to solve our problem. |
|
12-16-2009, 10:04 AM | #69 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hartford
|
Quote:
If you really believe that you might want to start over. First of all you might want to be aware of Medicaid, secondly stop confusing 'health care' and 'health insurance'. Stop by your local emergency room for a crash course. |
|
12-16-2009, 10:06 AM | #70 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hartford
|
|
12-16-2009, 10:08 AM | #71 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
But you can't compromise with a party that sees defeat as their primary goal. Bush ran up some big vote totals because Dems negotiated in good faith. On HCR the Gang of Six's Republicans made it very plain over the summer that any bill would be opposed. They're set to filibuster every major piece of legislation, which the Dems didn't do under Bush.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
12-16-2009, 10:08 AM | #72 | ||||
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Quote:
If the U.S. government administrates programs so much more poorly than private entities, then why are even the most vehement HCR opponents so attached to Medicare? If the U.S. government administrates programs so much more poorly than private entities, why is the Veterans Health Administration such a success? Quote:
For someone who purports to be cost-conscious, I'm surprised that you're unwilling to look for cost savings in the vast military budget, especially with the many egregious examples that are ripe for the picking. Quote:
I lived in England and was a patient in that system. My quality of care was just as good as the quality of care I've received in the U.S., and I have excellent insurance. Further, I'll bet that a resident of East London has far more equitable access to an MRI than a resident of the South Side of Chicago. Quote:
How do you define "4 levels"? Is he unhappy? Why doesn't he quit practicing or move to the States? On the down side, he gets paid less. On the plus side, he probably doesn't have student loans to pay and almost certainly doesn't have to pay for a ridiculous level of malpractice insurance. And anyway, how is the cause of "providing coverage for everyone", which you admit should be the goal, served by making every doctor a millionaire? |
||||
12-16-2009, 10:10 AM | #73 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
I'm not arguing the Dems have handled things well, but there was no way to garner GOP support. They haven't been negotiating in good faith, and, yes, the Dems should have had the sense to go it alone. However, the moderates don't roll that way and now we'll get a shit sandwich of a bill that won't be nearly as effective as it could have been.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
12-16-2009, 10:14 AM | #74 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
I don't think the primary issue is insurance costs. The problem is the continuing increase in costs for providers and services. Regardless of whether it's a government program or private insurance the only solution is to reduce the rate of growth for expenditures. That means doctors and drug companies and medical service providers need to accept that they can't continue to have income rise well above inflation.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
12-16-2009, 10:17 AM | #75 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Quote:
You're taking anecdotal evidence and trying to extrapolate it into data. Due to having a toddler, my family blew through our deductible much earlier this year, and also our out-of-pocket maximum as well. So by your logic, I'm heading off to get a chest X-Ray whenever I feel a bit wheezy, or a CAT scan when I have a headache, and I always pick brand name drugs over generics, right? If what you say were true, then everyone in my position would abuse the system, right? And all these insurance companies would be bankrupted by our egregious expenses, right? But they're not, which means there's a flaw in your reasoning. |
|
12-16-2009, 10:18 AM | #76 | ||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
|
Quote:
That sounded a lot more impressive until I looked up populations. Chicago has almost 10M (9.52M in the MSA) versus 33.1M in Canada in 2007. Wow: Chicago has basically 1/3rd the population of Canada. Hell, NYC + LA are almost as populous as all of Canada (31.8M vs 22.1M). Never realized how few people lived in Canada. That still means there are 1/3rd the MRI machines in Canada vs the US, at the minimum. But, who can afford to get an MRI? Hell, I know a lot of us are afraid to get basic blood tests because it's a fight to get back the $200+ that we get charged for preventative care. Lord knows if I were actually ever seriously hurt, I'd spend most of my time in the hospital bed worrying about how badly bankrupt I'm going to be, even tho I've been told I have good coverage. And that a lot of people don't know how covered they actually are because they've never gotten seriously sick so they think their coverage is fine. I swear I need a lawyer just to go through my insurance renewals at work and we "streamline" stuff compared to a lot of companies. It seems like we're trying really hard to protect the super high levels of care that only the wealthiest 2-10% of the population can afford at the expense of the other 90%. Quote:
What European country? We're not talking about Eastern Europe, right? And what is 4 levels below us? Can he only buy a BMW instead of a set of Porsches or is he having problems feeding his family and paying his student loans (which he probably doesn't have)? Again, it's not like we only have the best and the brightest in that field right now. Just like any other field, there are good doctors and there are bad doctors. I've already been reading lots of stories about how we're badly short on primary care physicians in this country. Right now. Today. Not because off what we're talking about doing. But right now. Because of the system in place. So what we have now is a really mercenary force that only goes into the fields that make the most money. I'm not sure how that really equals better care, just that you have a greedier bastard treating you. SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out! Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!" Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!" |
||
12-16-2009, 10:32 AM | #77 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
I thought chronic disease management and end of life care were the biggies in health costs. I don't think some extra office visits make much of a difference given the dollar amounts we're talking about.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
12-16-2009, 10:39 AM | #78 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Quote:
Oh, I agree. I was just responding to the point I think Jim's trying to make that in a UHC system people will just take advantage of everything because it's free to them. It's demonstrably not the case, and even if they did (as you point out), it might not be the major cost factor anyway. |
|
12-16-2009, 10:56 AM | #79 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
|
Quote:
I would disagree that the Dems negotiated in good faith. The Dems fought GWB on every major piece of legislation from say summer of 03 on. They threatened fillibusters and other items. I'll say now what I said them, if you believe in what you are doing, force the other side to fillibuster. Typically, a fillibuster makes the opposing side look like fools. Don't let them get away with a threat, call their bluff. |
|
12-16-2009, 11:33 AM | #80 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Quote:
So the Democrats negotiated in good faith with the GOP and Bush for the first 2 1/2 years of his Presidency, by your metric (with which I agree, by the way). As opposed to the GOP now, which has negotiated in good faith with the Democrats and Obama since...? Key legislation: Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act (May, 2001) - 230/197, 62-38 (if I read the details correctly, elements of this were passed through the reconciliation process to avoid filibusters) Authorization of Military Force (Sept, 2001) - 420-1, 98-0 USA PATRIOT Act (Oct, 2001) - 357-66, 98-1 No Child Left Behind (May/June, 2001) - 384-45, 91-8; (Dec, 2001 - after conference committees) - 381-41, 87-10 Iraq War Resolution (Oct, 2002) - 297-133, 77-23 Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act (May, 2003) - 231-200, 50-50 (Cheney tiebreaker) Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act (Nov, 2003) - 281-142, 64-34 Medicare Modernization Act (June/July 2003) - 216-215, "unanimous"; (Dec, 2003 - after conference committees) - 220-215, 54-44 There was little in the way of major legislation passed in 2004. Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (April, 2005) - 302-126, 74-25 Energy Policy Act (July, 2005) - 275-156, 74-26 USA PATRIOT Act Reauthorization (July, 2005) - 257-171, "unanimous"; (Dec 2005/Mar 2006 - after conference committees) - 251-174, 89-10 Military Commissions Act (Sept/Oct 2006) - 250-170, 65-34 Also of note are that all of Bush's 12 vetoes came from 2006 onwards (the Democrats gained control of the House & Senate in the 2006 elections, but some vetos happened just before this). |
|
12-16-2009, 11:34 AM | #81 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Diego via Sausalito via San Jose via San Diego
|
Welcome to Washington DC everyone!!! Where a politicians only job is to do whatever it takes to get relected (since there's no term limits) and not what is best for their constituents, regardless of what party they align themselves with.
__________________
I'm no longer a Chargers fan, they are dead to me Coming this summer to a movie theater near you: The Adventures of Jedikooter: Part 4 |
12-16-2009, 11:39 AM | #82 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
A filibuster doesn't make people look like fools. The procedures are such that it's much harder on the majority than the minority to force an old fashioned filibuster. It's gotten to the point where sixty votes in the Senate is seen as the norm when it was never meant to be used to such a degree.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
12-16-2009, 12:16 PM | #83 | |||
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Muskogee, OK USA
|
Quote:
If the system is such a success, then why did I wait nearly two months to get a MRI for a possibly debilitating neurological disorder (multiple scelorisis) or further degeneration of my cervical spine? The ONLY reason I even got in that early is because I requested a night appointment, or it would have been 3-4 months. Then, I get to wait another 3 weeks to find out what it is that I have. Yup, it's a great system alright! While I admit that the quality of care has improved significantly over the years, there are still too long of waits, overstressed overworked and undercompensated staff, and inefficency in the process of providing care to veterans. I attend several veterans organization meetings and as much as 75% of veterans are dissatisfied with the system. What makes it worst is that the VA don't even listen to us when we complain about the system! They brush us off in our surveys because they don't get adequate resources to carry out what they are here to do: treat veterans.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
12-16-2009, 02:02 PM | #84 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Here is Ezra Klein (no conservative):
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezr..._insurers.html Quote:
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
|
12-16-2009, 03:29 PM | #85 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Black Hole
|
Quote:
Or would that just not work? Last edited by Raiders Army : 12-16-2009 at 03:29 PM. |
|
12-16-2009, 04:01 PM | #86 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
I'd be in favor of some sort of discount for getting a physical/check up, but being healthy is too much of a lottery. Many diseases have genetic components that can't be controlled no matter how healthy your lifestyle may be. It doesn't seem fair to punish people because they are predisposed to MS or breast cancer.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
12-16-2009, 04:18 PM | #87 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Black Hole
|
Quote:
Ah, you're absolutely correct. Comparing auto insurance where you have control over tickets/accidents isn't the same as health insurance. |
|
12-16-2009, 04:21 PM | #88 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: San Jose, CA
|
Quote:
Standard of living 4 levels below us? What does that mean? He can't order useless crap from the Brookstone catalog? And it's not like we don't ask other countries to stand with us when we go to war.
__________________
Look into the mind of a crazy man (NSFW) http://www.whitepowerupdate.wordpress.com |
|
12-16-2009, 04:21 PM | #89 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
some of the limitations of this new legislation as far as ways insurance companies could still game the system?
so they're required to provide coverage for people with say kidney disease? Maybe they just won't have any nephrologists in their network. and maybe their out-of-network paperwork will be 10x as complicated as it is now. also a worry with this new bill: because subsidies don't kick in until 2014, it's possible that in a nightmare scenario, they could be dramatically cut or even eliminated before seeing the light of day. In the absence of any systemic reform, then, we face the unpleasant possibility that with a realignment of power in Washington, DC, we could end up with a mandate -- and fewer, or even no, subsidies.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. Last edited by DaddyTorgo : 12-16-2009 at 04:22 PM. |
12-16-2009, 04:25 PM | #90 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Satellite of Love
|
Quote:
My brother's insurance gives him X% off per month for joining a health/fitness club. I forget the exact numbers, but the money he gets off per month more than makes up for the cost of membership. |
|
12-16-2009, 04:30 PM | #91 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
pulling this out - wouldn't this just be a kick in the fucking balls. dream scenario for the insurance companies too - a government requirement to buy their product, no incentive to lower cost, and no help for those who can't afford it.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
12-16-2009, 05:09 PM | #92 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: The State of Insanity
|
Angry liberals: Why didn't Obama fight? - - POLITICO.com
This sums up the situation well. Especially this bit of wishful thinking: Dean said there are some good elements in the bill, but lawmakers should pull the plug and revisit the issue in Obama’s second term, unless Democrats are willing to shortcut a GOP filibuster. “No one will think this is health care reform. This is not even insurance reform,” he said. It's not a given Obama will have a second term! You take what you can get, because you will never come this far again!
__________________
Check out Foz's New Video Game Site, An 8-bit Mind in an 8GB world! http://an8bitmind.com Last edited by SirFozzie : 12-16-2009 at 05:14 PM. |
12-16-2009, 05:51 PM | #93 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
|
Quote:
Is that the same thing as those supporting the passage of the bill only because it will give brownie points to the Democrats in hoping that the Republicans don't realize any gain in 2010? I swear, some of the comments I have read (not here, per se) is all about making their party look good at the expense of making the enemy party look bad. That's why it's funny to see the many partisans trying to debate this (when it doesn't really affect most of them) while trying not to say it's all about political power and self-esteem. |
|
12-16-2009, 06:53 PM | #94 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hartford
|
Quote:
It's not anecdotal evidence. It's actuarial science.. you know the type of work that would be done to figure out what healthcare costs will be. Maybe everyone won't abuse the system, but if you don't think that people know how to utilize their health insurance to best serve them then you need to start over. It's not even worth debating, it's reality. |
|
12-16-2009, 06:56 PM | #95 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hartford
|
Quote:
Sure if you want to qualify your statement with "everyone" it's not true. For someone as bright as you are, you are pretty out of touch with how people behave. |
|
12-16-2009, 06:59 PM | #96 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hartford
|
Quote:
I'll be honest. I have no idea where the military can cut costs. I don't have any knowledge about how they spend the money or if it's appropriate. I assume that there are people (I'm guessing a small minority) who push for things to be handled correctly. I also know nothing about the Veteran's Health Administration. I'm assuming they have something to do with Walter Reed, and if they do then they are a disgrace, not something that should be aspired to. |
|
12-16-2009, 07:01 PM | #97 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hartford
|
Quote:
No, it means I've spent a week with them in WESTERN Europe and the standard of living pales in comparison to the people that live in my upper middle class neighborhood in eastern Connecticut. He's a brain surgeon, my neighbors are firemen and work on IT help desks. |
|
12-16-2009, 07:06 PM | #98 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hartford
|
Quote:
Isn't that financial? Many employers are giving people money for taking part in wellness programs in the hope that this drives down their long term costs. The programs cost money though so it's mostly large employers. I don't know many people in the insurance industry who wouldn't support preventative care being provided at no copay and no costs to members. The problem becomes that in the short term this drives costs UP and many employers aren't in a position to increase their costs in the short term especially since many industries experience enough turnover that it's a wasted investment. |
|
12-16-2009, 07:10 PM | #99 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hartford
|
This is the thing that gets me about this entire debate: The idea that the government will do a better job controlling costs then insurance companies is so wrong that it's painful. The human resources that the insurance companies are using to try and control costs are so much better then what the government would use they can't even be compared. Health care costs are out of control for a thousand reasons, the profits of insurance companies are a drop in the bucket.
|
12-16-2009, 07:15 PM | #100 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hartford
|
Quote:
The chart is impossible to make sense of, but it seems that in France the GPs make 1/3 what they make in the United States. Of course there are a ton of factors that come into play, but if you don't think that reducing what doctor's make will drive some talented people away from the field... I don't know what to tell you. Some people are motivated by the desire to help others and it won't matter, but plenty are motivated by material desires. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|