OT: We're getting married! - Page 2

sachmo71 · 01-05-2005, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scooper

This marriage is doomed.

No, it's actually off to a pretty typical start.

gottimd · 01-05-2005, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkmsuf

I think he's gonna pork her

He is gonna give her the potato's

rkmsuf · 01-05-2005, 01:30 PM

I think he's gonna pork her

sachmo71 · 01-05-2005, 01:31 PM

Love on the internet...it's so unpredictable.

Now what if Lurker is Pass' alias? Then he could make love to himself!

Balldog · 01-05-2005, 01:31 PM

IS this the fastest to 50 thread?

Alan T · 01-05-2005, 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Passacaglia

Look, can't you see that nobody is believing your story? Like I said, it's gone too far. Everyone on this forum is looking at the details, and realizing that things don't add up. So I think it would be a good idea if you put and end to all of this right now.

I think my wife told me this quote once.. is it from a movie?

scooper · 01-05-2005, 01:31 PM

He's not gonna pork her, Russ.

sovereignstar · 01-05-2005, 01:32 PM

http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/%7Efof/f...27&postcount=1

I should get paid for this.

GrantDawg · 01-05-2005, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sovereignstar

http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/%7Efof/f...27&postcount=1

I should get paid for this.

So, Pass and lurker are attepting to draw us into something.

CamEdwards · 01-05-2005, 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Passacaglia

Okay, I may have made some stray references to lurker, but that was back when I thought this was all a joke. It's starting to get a little more serious, and a little more crazy now. The truth is, I'm already married. To a supermodel. So that proves then and there that this is all just a joke that's gone too far. I'm sorry for all of those that have been offended by this.

damn. this had all the makings of a classic thread. y'all just need to work on the believability factor.

Passacaglia · 01-05-2005, 01:36 PM

Okay, I may have made some stray references to lurker, but that was back when I thought this was all a joke. It's starting to get a little more serious, and a little more crazy now. The truth is, I'm already married. To a supermodel. So that proves then and there that this is all just a joke that's gone too far. I'm sorry for all of those that have been offended by this.

VPI97 · 01-05-2005, 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Passacaglia

Okay, I may have made some stray references to lurker, but that was back when I thought this was all a joke. It's starting to get a little more serious, and a little more crazy now. The truth is, I'm already married. To a supermodel. So that proves then and there that this is all just a joke that's gone too far. I'm sorry for all of those that have been offended by this.

I KNEW IT!

You're really Seal!

moriarty · 01-05-2005, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg

So, Pass and lurker are attepting to draw us into something.

We've been had.

JeeberD · 01-05-2005, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sovereignstar

http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/%7Efof/f...27&postcount=1

I should get paid for this.

http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/~fof/for...3&postcount=40

rkmsuf · 01-05-2005, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scooper

He's not gonna pork her, Russ.

He got his hands on her tits while he's typing a post.

sovereignstar · 01-05-2005, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Passacaglia

Okay, I may have made some stray references to lurker, but that was back when I thought this was all a joke. It's starting to get a little more serious, and a little more crazy now. The truth is, I'm already married. To a supermodel. So that proves then and there that this is all just a joke that's gone too far. I'm sorry for all of those that have been offended by this.

You're as crazy as that league you're trying to run. Where's the ignore function again?

Draft Dodger · 01-05-2005, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Passacaglia

Okay, I may have made some stray references to lurker, but that was back when I thought this was all a joke. It's starting to get a little more serious, and a little more crazy now. The truth is, I'm already married. To a supermodel. So that proves then and there that this is all just a joke that's gone too far. I'm sorry for all of those that have been offended by this.

you had me up until the "supermodel" part. but, kudos to the both of you. fun thread.

and great work by sovereignstar PI.

GrantDawg · 01-05-2005, 01:43 PM

Passy got banneded.

GrantDawg · 01-05-2005, 01:43 PM

Oops, sorry, boxeded.

Draft Dodger · 01-05-2005, 01:43 PM

also, who is LoneStarGirl?

sachmo71 · 01-05-2005, 01:44 PM

He was put in the box for fooling people?

Lorena · 01-05-2005, 01:48 PM

I damn myself for getting sucked in.

sachmo71 · 01-05-2005, 01:48 PM

Who's going to start the dictator thread?

rkmsuf · 01-05-2005, 01:48 PM

S-Dog is probably in on the ruse.

rkmsuf · 01-05-2005, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sachmo71

Who's going to start the dictator thread?

paging dr. shorty

Draft Dodger · 01-05-2005, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkmsuf

S-Dog is probably in on the ruse.

doubtful

rkmsuf · 01-05-2005, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger

doubtful

I know but just in case I wanted to be first to report it.

Ben E Lou · 01-05-2005, 01:55 PM

He/they was/were ___/both suspended. This led me to check on some IP's. The lurker and Passacaglia accounts share not one, but TWO unique IP's. When I say unique, I mean that they are IP's that have never been used to access this board by any other individual. I only have record of the "lurker" account having posted from four IP's *ever*, and two of them are exact matches for "Passacaglia" IP's. This is *extremely* strong evidence that "Passacaglia's" statement in this thread "I don't know who lurker is" is a lie. I only see two possibilities here:

1. The two accounts are from two different people who know each other. Based on the threads that several of you pointed us to, if that is the case, then the two of them decided to troll the board with this thread.

2. There is one person using both accounts. If this is the case, then both accounts would receive bans for this thread. Period. Paragraph.

Because I cannot prove #2 to my satisfaction, I won't issue a banning. However, based on all of the stuff I've read today from the past (never noticed it at all before, frankly....didn't know or remember that "lurker" was supposed to be a girl and to be romantically linked with "Passacaglia"), at the very *best* this thread is some serious, intentionally-planned trolling.

One month in the box for both accounts.

{Slams down gavel.}

Alan T · 01-05-2005, 01:58 PM

Or... they could just be having fun with friends on a message board to have fun with what should be good news celebrated by everyone because they are both happy and being silly....

I guess I must be the only one who read this whole thing and just assumed it was all in fun the whole time.

Draft Dodger · 01-05-2005, 01:58 PM

if lurker posts pics of herself, can she get out early?

sovereignstar · 01-05-2005, 01:58 PM

That's gonna hurt his recruiting for the FCFL.

Glengoyne · 01-05-2005, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sachmo71

Love on the internet...it's so unpredictable.

Now what if Lurker is Pass' alias? Then he could make love to himself!

It'd be far from the first time that type of thing happened here at FOFC.

GrantDawg · 01-05-2005, 01:59 PM

One month? Ouch! Someone is in a bad mood.

rkmsuf · 01-05-2005, 01:59 PM

I wonder if they'll hold the wedding ceremony in the box. I'm told they have a lovely chapel there.

Maple Leafs · 01-05-2005, 02:02 PM

This thread was so brilliant in concept, and so poor in execution.

I think I'll go cheer myself up by re-reading Kysyrup's "uncomfortable" thread.

rkmsuf · 01-05-2005, 02:02 PM

It's possibly a historic day. First female suspension perhaps. I don't think the box has a women's shower.

Crapshoot · 01-05-2005, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T

Or... they could just be having fun with friends on a message board to have fun with what should be good news celebrated by everyone because they are both happy and being silly....

I guess I must be the only one who read this whole thing and just assumed it was all in fun the whole time.

Me too- that was how I saw it.

Zippo · 01-05-2005, 02:03 PM

this thread is stupid.

Ben E Lou · 01-05-2005, 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg

One month? Ouch! Someone is in a bad mood.

Actually, I'm in a rather chipper mood today.

GrantDawg · 01-05-2005, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog

Actually, I'm in a rather chipper mood today.

he hums as he puts away the bloody axe...

MylesKnight · 01-05-2005, 02:05 PM

BIG UPS!!! CONGRATS!!!

Lorena · 01-05-2005, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maple Leafs

This thread was so brilliant in concept, and so poor in execution.

I think I'll go cheer myself up by re-reading Kysyrup's "uncomfortable" thread.

Will someone kindly post this thread? I'd luv 2 read it.

Thnx fellas

GrantDawg · 01-05-2005, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dodgerchick

Will someone kindly post this thread? I'd luv 2 read it.

Thnx fellas

Wait a second....after this thread we need a couple of pics and eye-witness ID to prove you really are a chick.

sabotai · 01-05-2005, 02:08 PM

This thread is trolling and deserves a 1 month suspension, but someone starting a thread just to say "No hockey! Thank god!" is not trolling in the least bit......hmm.

3ric · 01-05-2005, 02:08 PM

Pass and Lurker's comments on the FCFL board:
hxxp://64.246.11.123/users5/fofcollegefootball/index.cgi?board=General_Discussion&action=display&num=1104929104&start=1

sabotai · 01-05-2005, 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg

Wait a second....after this thread we need a couple of pics and eye-witness ID to prove you really are a chick.

I agree. All women on FOFC should have to post several pics of themselves in order to prove that they are in fact women. SD, make it so.

GrantDawg · 01-05-2005, 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sabotai

This thread is trolling and deserves a 1 month suspension, but someone starting a thread just to say "No hockey! Thank god!" is not trolling in the least bit......hmm.

Move that to the correct thread: http://http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/~...ad.php?t=34166

Too serious for in here.

Ragone · 01-05-2005, 02:11 PM

If they lived together at some point.. couldn't that explain the unique ip's.. using the same computer would do that

sabotai · 01-05-2005, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg

Move that to the correct thread: http://http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/~...ad.php?t=34166

Too serious for in here.

Oh damn, my bad. I'll dance around in my underwear to bring down the seriousness if that will help.

01-05-2005, 01:30 PM	#54
rkmsuf Head Coach Join Date: Dec 2001	I think he's gonna pork her __________________ "Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales

01-05-2005, 01:43 PM	#71
Draft Dodger Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Keene, NH	also, who is LoneStarGirl? __________________ Mile High Hockey

01-05-2005, 01:48 PM	#73
Lorena Unregistered Join Date: May 2004	I damn myself for getting sucked in. Last edited by Lorena : 01-05-2005 at 01:48 PM.

01-05-2005, 01:48 PM	#75
rkmsuf Head Coach Join Date: Dec 2001	S-Dog is probably in on the ruse. __________________ "Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales

01-05-2005, 01:55 PM	#79
Ben E Lou Morgado's Favorite Forum Fascist Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Greensboro, NC	He/they was/were ___/both suspended. This led me to check on some IP's. The lurker and Passacaglia accounts share not one, but TWO unique IP's. When I say unique, I mean that they are IP's that have never been used to access this board by any other individual. I only have record of the "lurker" account having posted from four IP's ever, and two of them are exact matches for "Passacaglia" IP's. This is extremely strong evidence that "Passacaglia's" statement in this thread "I don't know who lurker is" is a lie. I only see two possibilities here: 1. The two accounts are from two different people who know each other. Based on the threads that several of you pointed us to, if that is the case, then the two of them decided to troll the board with this thread. 2. There is one person using both accounts. If this is the case, then both accounts would receive bans for this thread. Period. Paragraph. Because I cannot prove #2 to my satisfaction, I won't issue a banning. However, based on all of the stuff I've read today from the past (never noticed it at all before, frankly....didn't know or remember that "lurker" was supposed to be a girl and to be romantically linked with "Passacaglia"), at the very best this thread is some serious, intentionally-planned trolling. One month in the box for both accounts. {Slams down gavel.} __________________ The media don't understand the kinds of problems and pressures 54 million come wit'! Last edited by Ben E Lou : 01-05-2005 at 01:56 PM.

01-05-2005, 01:31 PM	#55
sachmo71 The boy who cried Trout Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: TX	Love on the internet...it's so unpredictable. Now what if Lurker is Pass' alias? Then he could make love to himself!

01-05-2005, 01:31 PM	#56
Balldog Pro Rookie Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Macomb, MI	IS this the fastest to 50 thread?

01-05-2005, 01:31 PM	#58
scooper College Benchwarmer Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Cinn City	He's not gonna pork her, Russ.

01-05-2005, 01:32 PM	#59
sovereignstar Pro Starter Join Date: Feb 2004	http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/%7Efof/f...27&postcount=1 I should get paid for this.

01-05-2005, 01:36 PM	#62
Passacaglia Coordinator Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Big Ten Country	Okay, I may have made some stray references to lurker, but that was back when I thought this was all a joke. It's starting to get a little more serious, and a little more crazy now. The truth is, I'm already married. To a supermodel. So that proves then and there that this is all just a joke that's gone too far. I'm sorry for all of those that have been offended by this.

01-05-2005, 01:43 PM	#69
GrantDawg World Champion Mis-speller Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Covington, Ga.	Passy got banneded.

01-05-2005, 01:44 PM	#72
sachmo71 The boy who cried Trout Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: TX	He was put in the box for fooling people?

01-05-2005, 01:58 PM	#80
Alan T Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Mass.	Or... they could just be having fun with friends on a message board to have fun with what should be good news celebrated by everyone because they are both happy and being silly.... I guess I must be the only one who read this whole thing and just assumed it was all in fun the whole time.

01-05-2005, 01:59 PM	#84
GrantDawg World Champion Mis-speller Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Covington, Ga.	One month? Ouch! Someone is in a bad mood.

01-05-2005, 02:02 PM	#86
Maple Leafs Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2002	This thread was so brilliant in concept, and so poor in execution. I think I'll go cheer myself up by re-reading Kysyrup's "uncomfortable" thread. __________________ Down Goes Brown: Toronto Maple Leafs Humor and Analysis

01-05-2005, 02:03 PM	#89
Zippo High School JV Join Date: Jan 2004	this thread is stupid.

01-05-2005, 02:05 PM	#92
MylesKnight College Benchwarmer Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Neptune Beach, Florida	BIG UPS!!! CONGRATS!!! __________________ IT'S ALL ABOUT THE BLACK & GOLD!!

01-05-2005, 02:08 PM	#95
sabotai General Manager Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: The Satellite of Love	This thread is trolling and deserves a 1 month suspension, but someone starting a thread just to say "No hockey! Thank god!" is not trolling in the least bit......hmm.

01-05-2005, 02:08 PM	#96
3ric College Starter Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: Sweden	Pass and Lurker's comments on the FCFL board: hxxp://64.246.11.123/users5/fofcollegefootball/index.cgi?board=General_Discussion&action=display&num=1104929104&start=1 __________________ San Diego Chargers (HFL) - Lappland Reindeers (WOOF) - Gothenburg Giants (IHOF) Indiana: A TCY VC - year 2044 - the longest running dynasty ever on FOFC!

01-05-2005, 02:11 PM	#99
Ragone Pro Rookie Join Date: May 2002 Location: Kansas City, Mo	If they lived together at some point.. couldn't that explain the unique ip's.. using the same computer would do that

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)