|
View Poll Results: Who do you pick? | |||
Terry Bradshaw | 32 | 45.71% | |
Dan Marino | 33 | 47.14% | |
Retire and become a trout fisher | 5 | 7.14% | |
Voters: 70. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
07-20-2006, 12:44 PM | #51 | |||
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Great Northwest
|
Quote:
Montana and Young will kick all their assses! edit - the 3 sss is to show my seriousnesss!
__________________
Los Angeles Dodgers Check out the FOFC Groups on Facebook! and Reddit! DON'T REPORT ME BRO! |
|||
07-20-2006, 12:48 PM | #52 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2001
|
on a separate note, what happened to that pjstp20 guy who was the big dolphin fan? he could be dangerous in the saban era.
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales |
07-20-2006, 12:51 PM | #53 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Black Hole
|
I tipped the scales in Bradshaw's favor! I'd pick him over Marino because Bradshaw would fit in with the Patriots offense and philosophy a lot better than Marino. A much better plug and play choice.
|
07-20-2006, 03:24 PM | #54 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2003
|
The reason I picked to use Bradshaw over say Montana is because Montana is generally given alot of credit for all of the Niners SB wins, where Bradshaw's contributions are often downplayed even though he won 4.
Needless to say, I voted for Bradshaw as I feel like some players have the right intangibles to be a winner - when it came time for him to come up big for the win, he did. It's been alot closer then I thought it would be though, I thought it had the potential to be a blow-out on either end. |
07-20-2006, 03:43 PM | #55 | |
Morgado's Favorite Forum Fascist
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Greensboro, NC
|
Quote:
__________________
The media don't understand the kinds of problems and pressures 54 million come wit'! |
|
07-20-2006, 03:48 PM | #56 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Mexico
|
Quote:
You must have an outstanding memory. I can't even remember who the Pats QB before Brady was. |
|
07-20-2006, 04:18 PM | #57 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Huntington, WV
|
Quote:
There was a Patriots QB before Brady? Blasphemy.
__________________
|
|
07-20-2006, 04:32 PM | #58 | |
Hokie, Hokie, Hokie, Hi
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Kennesaw, GA
|
Quote:
|
|
07-20-2006, 05:03 PM | #59 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
|
I'll be 38 this year, I grew up 3 hours from Pittsburgh during the 70's, I watched Bradshaw play. I'll take marino, thank you.
Terry was a great handoff man, and looked flawless when the running game dominated....and that happened all the time for those teams. Bradshaw was NOT a come back QB, he was not a major pressure QB, when severely pressed to pull one out of his ass, all he generally got was a handfull of shyte. In his defense, the DEFENSE in Pitt all those years controlled the football games. he never really had to win on his own. Marino? as has been said, no running game. Good defenses? sometimes, not every time and certainly not dominating styles either. if you look at what Dan did, you'll see game by game that those good defenses were more a result of him running up the score early and the defense playing 11 DB's for a half. Bradshaw was good, he was enthusiastic and he was a leader, but seriously, I saw the man play every week. Give me a marino, Fouts or even Bartkowski when the chips are down and you need a quarterback to win you a game late. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|