Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-01-2005, 01:28 PM   #51
WSUCougar
Rider Of Rohan
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Port Angeles, WA or Helm's Deep
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkmsuf
He's too beefy.
You mean like a Gordita?
__________________
It's not the years...it's the mileage.

WSUCougar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 01:29 PM   #52
rkmsuf
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by WSUCougar
You mean like a Gordita?


If that helps you, yes.

Think of him as a Triple Cheeseburger.
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales
rkmsuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 01:30 PM   #53
Pacersfan46
H.S. Freshman Team
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Indianapolis
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkmsuf
If that helps you, yes.

Think of him as a Triple Cheeseburger.

Reminds me of when years back, McDonalds had their triple cheeseburgers for 99 cents.

Speaking of food .... WHERE'S MY DAMN PIZZA! I'm going to decapitate that Papa Johns guy.
Pacersfan46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 01:33 PM   #54
WSUCougar
Rider Of Rohan
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Port Angeles, WA or Helm's Deep
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacersfan46
WHERE'S MY DAMN PIZZA! I'm going to decapitate that Papa Johns guy.
Well, see, now we've got you. If a pizza guy gets decapitated anywhere near Indianapolis, you're toast, pal.
__________________
It's not the years...it's the mileage.
WSUCougar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 01:33 PM   #55
rkmsuf
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by WSUCougar
Well, see, now we've got you. If a pizza guy gets decapitated anywhere near Indianapolis, you're toast, pal.

that's true hunger to be inspired to decapitation.
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales
rkmsuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 01:39 PM   #56
Pacersfan46
H.S. Freshman Team
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Indianapolis
Quote:
Originally Posted by WSUCougar
Well, see, now we've got you. If a pizza guy gets decapitated anywhere near Indianapolis, you're toast, pal.


Damn ... that'd be messed up if it did happen .... you guys wouldn't call the cops thinking I'd really do it ..... would you?
Pacersfan46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 01:45 PM   #57
Maple Leafs
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by WSUCougar
So what's Raffy saying, he took collateral 'roid damage? He sat on an abandoned juice needle? A mosquito that had sucked blood from Canseco randomly landed on him next? I can't wait to hear more details...
Anyone know if his locker is next to Sosa's?
__________________
Down Goes Brown: Toronto Maple Leafs Humor and Analysis
Maple Leafs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 01:47 PM   #58
hhiipp
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: OH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacersfan46
Damn ... that'd be messed up if it did happen .... you guys wouldn't call the cops thinking I'd really do it ..... would you?

Sure we would, I mean someone from here did get Hornsmaniac fired.

Last edited by hhiipp : 08-01-2005 at 01:47 PM.
hhiipp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 01:48 PM   #59
hhiipp
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: OH
Dola, maybe it's second hand roids?
hhiipp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 01:55 PM   #60
Blackadar
Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fantasyland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator
Tony Gwynn may have been the last pure hitter.

Not Pujolis?

How about Ichiro?
Blackadar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 02:01 PM   #61
Cringer
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Edinburg,TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maple Leafs
Anyone know if his locker is next to Sosa's?

No, but rumor has it that he has some weird thing about having to use the toilet right after Sammy.
__________________
You Stole Fizzy Lifting drinks! You bumped into the ceiling which now has to be washed and steralized, so you get NOTHING! You lose!
Cringer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 02:03 PM   #62
rkmsuf
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Maybe Sosa gave him a swirly.
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales
rkmsuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 02:09 PM   #63
Pacersfan46
H.S. Freshman Team
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Indianapolis
Quote:
Originally Posted by hhiipp
Sure we would, I mean someone from here did get Hornsmaniac fired.

Huh, what of do you speak?
Pacersfan46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 02:16 PM   #64
hhiipp
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: OH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacersfan46
Huh, what of do you speak?

http://dynamic.gamespy.com/~fof/foru...ead.php?t=8914
hhiipp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 02:54 PM   #65
Raven
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Baltimore, MD
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maple Leafs
Anyone know if his locker is next to Sosa's?


Well Sammy sure as hell ain't using this year. If he is, then he needs to up the intake.
Raven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 02:59 PM   #66
HomerJSimpson
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Springfield, USA
Palmero confirmed on his conference call that it was steriods that he tested positive for, but he has no idea how it got into his system.
HomerJSimpson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 03:03 PM   #67
ISiddiqui
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackadar
Not Pujolis?

How about Ichiro?

You know Ichiro is on the Japanese juice. It just makes him get infield hits instead of Home Runs. Their steroid technology hasn't caught up to ours yet .
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages"
-Tennessee Williams
ISiddiqui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 03:34 PM   #68
panerd
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
What gets me is how much shit McGwire got for being at least somewhat honest. All of the other players can just flat out lie and the media gives them a pass but McGwire decides to be ambigous and his whole legacy is tarnished.
panerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 03:45 PM   #69
WSUCougar
Rider Of Rohan
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Port Angeles, WA or Helm's Deep
Well, I like Big Mac and all, but damn. He acted like a teenager trying to talk his way past his Dad. Palmeiro at least sounded convincing in front of Congress.
__________________
It's not the years...it's the mileage.
WSUCougar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 03:50 PM   #70
Blackadar
Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fantasyland
Quote:
Originally Posted by panerd
What gets me is how much shit McGwire got for being at least somewhat honest. All of the other players can just flat out lie and the media gives them a pass but McGwire decides to be ambigous and his whole legacy is tarnished.

I agree. The questions they were asking McGwire were setup questions - "have you ever used steroids?" and stuff like that. Well, damn - when Mac started his career, 'roids were LEGAL. So if he says yes, but only when they were legal, he confirms steriod use AND they'll think he's a liar.
Blackadar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 03:58 PM   #71
Chubby
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Syracuse, NY
i'll go out on a limb and say Raffy gets a pretty serious injury in the next month. No roids = no recovery, see Bonds, Barry.
Chubby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 04:03 PM   #72
vtbub
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Burlington, VT USA
Any legal eagles wanna PM me?
__________________


vtbub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 04:35 PM   #73
TroyF
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackadar
I agree. The questions they were asking McGwire were setup questions - "have you ever used steroids?" and stuff like that. Well, damn - when Mac started his career, 'roids were LEGAL. So if he says yes, but only when they were legal, he confirms steriod use AND they'll think he's a liar.

No, they were never legal. They weren't banned from baseball, but they were against US law.

But BigMac didn't tell the truth. He didn't lie. He just kept sidestepping question after question.

Palmero came off as convincing because of how he answered the questions. That's certainly ruined now, but it does nothing to save BigMac from the shame he put himself in that day.

The sad thing? The only person who was probably telling the truth to the senate that day was none other than Jose Canseco. At its face, he was the least believable guy in that room. But nothing he said that day (I'm not talking about the book where there were lies and errors) in front of congress seems to be pretty dead on.
TroyF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 05:51 PM   #74
kcchief19
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Kansas City, MO
Quote:
Originally Posted by TroyF
The sad thing? The only person who was probably telling the truth to the senate that day was none other than Jose Canseco.
Surprisingly, this seems to be the direction it's headed. Canseco was the only one who admitted steroid use and the people he fingered are slowly being revealed as closet users.

FWIW, while the collective bargaining agreement does not allow the MLB to confirm that steroids are the cause of the suspension, you automatically know because the 10-game suspension and subsequent repeat violations penalities for violation of the league's drug policy are the only mandated penalties in the CBA and they only apply to performance enhancers. MLB can suspend players for illegal drug use (i.e. cocaine) but can only do so after the player has been caught by the police and then the penalties fall under either conduct or best interest of baseball.

The "I-didn't-know-they-were-steroids" defense doesn't work very well in this case. Oddly, Palmeiro's Viagra pimping makes me less likely to believe him because they would suggest that he is a "anything for an advantage" guy.
kcchief19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 06:00 PM   #75
kcchief19
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Kansas City, MO
Quote:
Originally Posted by panerd
What gets me is how much shit McGwire got for being at least somewhat honest. All of the other players can just flat out lie and the media gives them a pass but McGwire decides to be ambigous and his whole legacy is tarnished.
I don't know if I understand this. Palmeiro didn't get grief earlier because a lot of people believed he was telling the truth that he didn't use steroids. Jose Canseco got a lot more crap than McGwire did, and I think Bonds has too.

I also think the case for McGwire being "somewhat honest" is weak. He has been asked if he used steroids and he refuses to answer the question. If people ask you a simple yes or not question and your answer is "I'm not going to go into the past or talk about my past," then people are going to conclude that you used steroids. He may not have "lied," but he appears dishonest.

McGwire has done everything he could to keep his legacy. We're not talking about a court of law, we're talking about public opinion --I don't think he deserves milk and cookies for being evasive.
kcchief19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 06:03 PM   #76
JonInMiddleGA
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
Put me in the camp of those who were surprised to very surprised when they heard this one today.

Not because of his testimony really, but more because of what someone else mentioned earlier, the lack of any real monster season to make him stand out. That said though, I thought Canseco was the most credible witness throughout the whole round of public commentary.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis
JonInMiddleGA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 06:05 PM   #77
Jets80
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by panerd
What gets me is how much shit McGwire got for being at least somewhat honest. All of the other players can just flat out lie and the media gives them a pass but McGwire decides to be ambigous and his whole legacy is tarnished.

Honest ?? McGwire wasn't honest at all. He took the 5th and wouldn't say a word.
Jets80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 06:14 PM   #78
Buccaneer
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
Good (that Palmy got busted). What a hypoctical and ignorant asshole. I am to the point that I really hope that none of the 1990s sluggers make it the Hall. Yes, including McGwire. Fans whine and cry about Rose ruining the "integrity" of the game. I would say steriods usage had far more effect on the game as a whole. I now regret rooting for Big Mac in 1998 and I hope that when history looks back on 1995-2004, they will recognize it as a period as bad as the 1910s. I have been turned off from baseball since the mid-1990s, excepting for 1998 (the Selig Era?) for the same reason I deplore the "power and aggressiveness" trend in all sports in the past 10 years - the instant gratification of a commercialistic entertainment and selfish endeavors at the expense of sportmanship and natural abilities. Not saying what happened in previous eras were clean but certainly not to the extent of what had been going on.

So there.
Buccaneer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 06:38 PM   #79
Rizon
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Alot of people owe me money now. I've said that viagra dude has been on the shit for years now.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pumpy Tudors View Post
It's hard to throw a good shot with a drunk blonde wrapped around me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suicane75 View Post
I don't think I'd stop even if I found a dick.
Rizon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 06:39 PM   #80
panerd
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcchief19
I don't know if I understand this. Palmeiro didn't get grief earlier because a lot of people believed he was telling the truth that he didn't use steroids. Jose Canseco got a lot more crap than McGwire did, and I think Bonds has too.

I also think the case for McGwire being "somewhat honest" is weak. He has been asked if he used steroids and he refuses to answer the question. If people ask you a simple yes or not question and your answer is "I'm not going to go into the past or talk about my past," then people are going to conclude that you used steroids. He may not have "lied," but he appears dishonest.

McGwire has done everything he could to keep his legacy. We're not talking about a court of law, we're talking about public opinion --I don't think he deserves milk and cookies for being evasive.

I guess my wording may have thrown my original point off. Following the hearing everyone was ripping on McGwire for his evasiveness and cheering Palmeiro for his finger-pointing. I just say kudos to McGwire for at least not outright lying to us like Palmeiro (and I am 99% certain Sosa) did.
panerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 06:42 PM   #81
panerd
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jets80
Honest ?? McGwire wasn't honest at all. He took the 5th and wouldn't say a word.

For one, I agree that McGwire almost certainly used steriods. But I also agree with his statement about the past. Imagine this exchange...

"Did you use steriods?"
"No"
"Did Terry Steinbach?"
"No"
"Did Walt Weiss"
"I take the 5th"

He was preempting this situation of indirectly implicating teammates and managers (clears throat) by not answering any questions.
panerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 07:07 PM   #82
dawgfan
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
If I remember correctly from previous articles and discussions about this subject, some legal supplements have the potential to contain elements that would show up as a positive on a test for steroids. Before I go condemning Palmeiro and assuming he's lying, I'd like to see this presumption refuted. Because if it's true that you can get positive results on a steroids test for traces of substances included in legal supplements, then I feel compelled to believe that Palmeiro is telling the truth.

That said, this whole issue has received enough publicity in the last year that any player that isn't having doctors and nutritionists scrutinizing every kind of supplement and drug they put in their body to make sure they won't accidentally get a positive on a steroid test is a moron and deserves what they get.

As for Bucc's tired old rant, he's just bitter that the game has changed and the numbers he was used to seeing in the game when he was growing up are no longer the norm. Sorry Bucc, steroids are only a small part of explaining the offensive boom from the '90's on.
dawgfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 07:17 PM   #83
Buccaneer
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
When I was growing up, baseball players wore tight-fitting softball uniforms and porn stashes. That can't be any better.

Besides, look around at FOFC. You will see others praising how the game improved or become more watchable this season. You think it's a coincident?

Oh I get it now. Offensive boom and rock-em-sock-em sports sell more video games.
Buccaneer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 07:19 PM   #84
Philliesfan980
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Exton, PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buccaneer
When I was growing up, baseball players wore tight-fitting softball uniforms and porn stashes. That can't be any better.

Besides, look around at FOFC. You will see others praising how the game improved or become more watchable this season. You think it's a coincident?

Oh I get it now. Offensive boom and rock-em-sock-em sports sell more video games.


I really have an urge to read Emmit13's dynasty about Darryl Strawberry

Last edited by Philliesfan980 : 08-01-2005 at 07:19 PM.
Philliesfan980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 07:24 PM   #85
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
Quote:
Originally Posted by dawgfan
If I remember correctly from previous articles and discussions about this subject, some legal supplements have the potential to contain elements that would show up as a positive on a test for steroids. Before I go condemning Palmeiro and assuming he's lying, I'd like to see this presumption refuted. Because if it's true that you can get positive results on a steroids test for traces of substances included in legal supplements, then I feel compelled to believe that Palmeiro is telling the truth.

That said, this whole issue has received enough publicity in the last year that any player that isn't having doctors and nutritionists scrutinizing every kind of supplement and drug they put in their body to make sure they won't accidentally get a positive on a steroid test is a moron and deserves what they get.

You answered paragraph 1 with paragraph 2. But that's besides the point...I refuse to ever believe these "I unknowingly ingested an illegal steroid" arguments every player who has tested positive has used. Why? Simple...

Not one player has even attempted to make this is a big deal!

If I'm a baseball player, and I regularly take Legal Substance X, and it turns out after a random test that Legal Substance X actually contains small amounts of Illegal Substance Y, you can be sure as hell that I'm not going to hide behind the "confidentiality" of these tests and not tell the public exactly what I tested positive for. I would call a press conference, say something like "It turns out that Legal Substance X contains Illegal Substance Y. Here's a copy of the drug test. Here's a copy of the list of ingredients in my Legal Substance. As you can see, it actually contains a small amount of Illegal Substance Y. This was not made public. I will be suing the makers of Legal Substance X for damages and negligence."

If a player really mistakenly took a steroid, through no fault of his own, do you really think he would stand idly by while his public reputation gets ripped to shreds?
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 07:30 PM   #86
QuikSand
lolzcat
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
The simplest explanation is, as always a strong contender:

Palmeiro is/was a longtime steroid user, more or less just like Canseco said he was.
When asked to testify, he decided to use the "righteous indignation" tact, to best represent innocence.
By doing so, he was essentially gambling that he would never get caught using.
Now he has been caught, and resorts to the convenient "mistaken test result" excuse because some people might believe it.
He is a user, a cheater, and a liar.


So far, there is no other "fact pattern" that I find to be as likely as this one.
QuikSand is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 07:32 PM   #87
terpkristin
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ashburn, VA
A side note here: just watched the re-broadcast of last Thursday's "The Daily Show" where Jon Stewart interviewed Bob Costas. It was interesting to hear Bob Costas talk about Raffy and say he was willing to believe Raffy's statement that he'd never used 'roids but then today to get this news....just seemed like interesting timing, in retrospect.

/tk
terpkristin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 07:37 PM   #88
Buccaneer
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuikSand
The simplest explanation is, as always a strong contender:

Palmeiro is/was a longtime steroid user, more or less just like Canseco said he was.
When asked to testify, he decided to use the "righteous indignation" tact, to best represent innocence.
By doing so, he was essentially gambling that he would never get caught using.
Now he has been caught, and resorts to the convenient "mistaken test result" excuse because some people might believe it.
He is a user, a cheater, and a liar.

So far, there is no other "fact pattern" that I find to be as likely as this one.

Do you think that's what McGwire did as well, except it was more in preserving his legacy instead of fear of getting caught?
Buccaneer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 07:38 PM   #89
dawgfan
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Logan
You answered paragraph 1 with paragraph 2. But that's besides the point...I refuse to ever believe these "I unknowingly ingested an illegal steroid" arguments every player who has tested positive has used. Why? Simple...

Not one player has even attempted to make this is a big deal!

If I'm a baseball player, and I regularly take Legal Substance X, and it turns out after a random test that Legal Substance X actually contains small amounts of Illegal Substance Y, you can be sure as hell that I'm not going to hide behind the "confidentiality" of these tests and not tell the public exactly what I tested positive for. I would call a press conference, say something like "It turns out that Legal Substance X contains Illegal Substance Y. Here's a copy of the drug test. Here's a copy of the list of ingredients in my Legal Substance. As you can see, it actually contains a small amount of Illegal Substance Y. This was not made public. I will be suing the makers of Legal Substance X for damages and negligence."

If a player really mistakenly took a steroid, through no fault of his own, do you really think he would stand idly by while his public reputation gets ripped to shreds?

You haven't thought this through enough. Let's assume for the moment that Palmeiro is telling the truth that he never knowingly took steroids. He might guess that a legal supplement he took was the source. However, if he specifies this source, he's got to go to great lengths to prove it, or you can bet he'll be sued by the makers of that supplement. He'd need to show that the product he took consistently causes positive steroids tests, and he'd need to provide convincing evidence that he indeed was taking this supplement, and not just having his agent run around testing every product on the market to find one that gives a consistent false positive.

It certainly wouldn't surprise me if Palmeiro was knowingly taking steroids. However I'm yet to be convinced that his denial isn't plausible.
dawgfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 07:43 PM   #90
QuikSand
lolzcat
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buccaneer
Do you think that's what McGwire did as well, except it was more in preserving his legacy instead of fear of getting caught?

I think McGwire was also a long time user, and simply chose a different strategy in his testimony. Anyone who reads his non-answers as being anything but an admission of his own use is simply hearing what he wants to hear.
QuikSand is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 07:49 PM   #91
ISiddiqui
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buccanear
I am to the point that I really hope that none of the 1990s sluggers make it the Hall. Yes, including McGwire.

Well prepare to be disappointed . I'm sure that McGwire, Sosa, and Bonds will make it. As for others, I'm sure some will get in eventually. Who they'll be? Have no idea.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages"
-Tennessee Williams
ISiddiqui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 07:50 PM   #92
dawgfan
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buccaneer
When I was growing up, baseball players wore tight-fitting softball uniforms and porn stashes. That can't be any better.

Besides, look around at FOFC. You will see others praising how the game improved or become more watchable this season. You think it's a coincident?

Oh I get it now. Offensive boom and rock-em-sock-em sports sell more video games.

Get real Bucc - offensive production has helped spur attendence for MLB in the last decade in the wake of the last strike. The general population likes the homerun more than the 2-1 pitching duel.

Others are praising how the game has improved this year? Maybe that's selective hearing on your part. Can you please point out a significant change in the game this year from last that isn't normal statistical variation? Do you suppose the fact that there are as many as 17 teams at the beginning of August with a reasonable shot at the post-season might influence people to be excited with baseball this year?

You've obviously made up your mind that steroids are the primary reason for the offensive boom of the last 10+ years despite plenty of evidence suggesting there are many other factors that are as important if not much more so. The decline in home runs this season has been minimal, with overall numbers still ranking with the numbers from 2-3 seasons ago (despite the injuries to Bonds and Thome).
dawgfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 08:02 PM   #93
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
Quote:
Originally Posted by dawgfan
You haven't thought this through enough. Let's assume for the moment that Palmeiro is telling the truth that he never knowingly took steroids. He might guess that a legal supplement he took was the source. However, if he specifies this source, he's got to go to great lengths to prove it, or you can bet he'll be sued by the makers of that supplement. He'd need to show that the product he took consistently causes positive steroids tests, and he'd need to provide convincing evidence that he indeed was taking this supplement, and not just having his agent run around testing every product on the market to find one that gives a consistent false positive.

It certainly wouldn't surprise me if Palmeiro was knowingly taking steroids. However I'm yet to be convinced that his denial isn't plausible.

Actually, I did think it through enough . I would still go to any lengths necessary to prove my innocence, especially in this time when there is such sentiment against ballplayers who test positive...especially when I have gone before Congress to testify about my innocence, while I now look like a complete fool...especially when my legacy is depending on it...etc.
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 08:06 PM   #94
ISiddiqui
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
Quote:
Originally Posted by dawgfan
You've obviously made up your mind that steroids are the primary reason for the offensive boom of the last 10+ years despite plenty of evidence suggesting there are many other factors that are as important if not much more so. The decline in home runs this season has been minimal, with overall numbers still ranking with the numbers from 2-3 seasons ago (despite the injuries to Bonds and Thome).

Indeed. I remember, I think it was a Jason Stark article that the entire different between this year and last year wrt to HRs could be explained by Bonds' injury and the off years that Thome and one or two other sluggers had. For all the carping over the less HRs, it really isn't that big of a drop at all. It may have even happened without the testing (ie, within the statistical variance).
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages"
-Tennessee Williams
ISiddiqui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 08:07 PM   #95
Buccaneer
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
The "general population" likes to have its wars broadcast like video games as well. Can one not in the video game business decry the turn-offs of sports and the hype-frenzied media (like those here talking about espn)?
Buccaneer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 08:08 PM   #96
dawgfan
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Logan
Actually, I did think it through enough . I would still go to any lengths necessary to prove my innocence, especially in this time when there is such sentiment against ballplayers who test positive...especially when I have gone before Congress to testify about my innocence, while I now look like a complete fool...especially when my legacy is depending on it...etc.

Then I guess we disagree on the consequences. I figure that, if Palmeiro is telling the truth, it means he and his team haven't been able to get consistent enough results in testing his supplements to feel like they can name it publicly and deal with the almost certain lawsuit to follow from that company. I don't find that implausible.

I also find it plausible that he's lying, and that he knowingly took steroids. But I'm not convinced enough that the alternative isn't plausible to dismiss it either.
dawgfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 08:15 PM   #97
Crapshoot
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buccaneer
Good (that Palmy got busted). What a hypoctical and ignorant asshole. I am to the point that I really hope that none of the 1990s sluggers make it the Hall. Yes, including McGwire. Fans whine and cry about Rose ruining the "integrity" of the game. I would say steriods usage had far more effect on the game as a whole. I now regret rooting for Big Mac in 1998 and I hope that when history looks back on 1995-2004, they will recognize it as a period as bad as the 1910s. I have been turned off from baseball since the mid-1990s, excepting for 1998 (the Selig Era?) for the same reason I deplore the "power and aggressiveness" trend in all sports in the past 10 years - the instant gratification of a commercialistic entertainment and selfish endeavors at the expense of sportmanship and natural abilities. Not saying what happened in previous eras were clean but certainly not to the extent of what had been going on.

So there.

And back in your day, they walked 6 miles uphill in the snow both ways, in the scorching heat, barefoot, with bricks on their back. Or perhaps the amphetamines, or speed, or outright fucking racism, didn't affect baseball in this way. No one knows what the benefits of steroids are - for example, 90-95% of baseball fans believe this to be the greatest offensive era, when the 30's were higher. Steroids may have helped hitters, pitchers, whoever - we don't know. Without knowing what the actual effects were/are, throwing the baby out with the bathwater in an act of self-righteousness does no one any good.
Crapshoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 08:20 PM   #98
Chubby
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Syracuse, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crapshoot
And back in your day, they walked 6 miles uphill in the snow both ways, in the scorching heat, barefoot, with bricks on their back. Or perhaps the amphetamines, or speed, or outright fucking racism, didn't affect baseball in this way. No one knows what the benefits of steroids are - for example, 90-95% of baseball fans believe this to be the greatest offensive era, when the 30's were higher. Steroids may have helped hitters, pitchers, whoever - we don't know. Without knowing what the actual effects were/are, throwing the baby out with the bathwater in an act of self-righteousness does no one any good.

steroids help recovery injury. of course, unless you actually take themselves yourself and see the results some people won't believe it. gee, i can't imagine why it's taking Barry so long to come back from his knee injury (which required 2 further surgeries)...
Chubby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 08:30 PM   #99
Samdari
Roster Filler
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cicero
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuikSand
The simplest explanation is, as always a strong contender:

Palmeiro is/was a longtime steroid user, more or less just like Canseco said he was.
When asked to testify, he decided to use the "righteous indignation" tact, to best represent innocence.
By doing so, he was essentially gambling that he would never get caught using.
Now he has been caught, and resorts to the convenient "mistaken test result" excuse because some people might believe it.
He is a user, a cheater, and a liar.


So far, there is no other "fact pattern" that I find to be as likely as this one.

I find one likely enough to consider.

Palmeiro never obtained what he thought were steroids and injected/took them.

However, like most baseball players he took supplements, a label which allows companies to essentially sell any substance they want as long as they do not promise to cure any disease or illness. Said supplement containted something on the banned list.

Not to give him a free ride, as players need to be held solely responsible for what goes into their bodies, and if such a substance was in his body he deserves the requisite punishment. But given the supplement market, and what people can get away selling as supplements, I certainly find this "fact pattern" to be highly plausible.
__________________
http://www.nateandellie.net Now featuring twice the babies for the same low price!
Samdari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005, 08:35 PM   #100
QuikSand
lolzcat
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samdari
...I certainly find this "fact pattern" to be highly plausible.

And the fact that you, and plenty of other fairly reasonable people, find this "highly plausible" is exactly why it's the first thing used by pretty much every guilty party who gets caught and publicly embarassed.
QuikSand is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 AM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.