01-13-2005, 03:21 AM | #51 | ||||||||
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||
01-13-2005, 03:54 AM | #52 |
H.S. Freshman Team
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
I don't advocate that, exactly. I think it is a good idea worth serious consideration, for two reasons: 1) It really, really needs done - there are people all over the world that seriously need some freaking help; 2) It should give us a combat hardened, experienced military with sky-high morale (which any strategy gamer knows is the key to any conflict).
|
01-13-2005, 04:02 AM | #53 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
|
Quote:
As for 2) we already have that. |
|
01-13-2005, 04:28 AM | #54 | |||
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Green Bay, WI
|
Quote:
Okay. Now, if we withdraw, suddenly Europe is faced with hard decisions, and the US once again gets painted in a poor light. If we're making decisions about our military based on how the world will view us, this is not a fight we can win. If we're making decisions based on consistency and moral correctness, then that's another matter. Quote:
They're still constitutionally enjoined from having an overseas military. That's the thing. The troops they've sent have been from their "Homeland Defense" sector. Until they change their constitution, any standing military they'd present is illegal under their own laws. Quote:
Thing is, though, our carriers give us the ability to project power. The carriers don't *have* to be in the big middle of things to be efffective. That radius of control also limits the effectiveness of inbound action groups, since we can intercept them from some way out. Now, subs are harder to acquire and engage, certainly, but that's what our own subs are for, and given that the subs China is buying are of Russian manufacture, I'm not sure they'd really fit their intended purpose. I think the idea is more to get the Chinese Navy a quick leg up so that they have the pieces while they work on enhancing the effectiveness of those pieces. They have to know that a sea war over Taiwan is not going to be a winnable fight for them unless they can get allies involved and split the attention of our navy. They have the nuclear option, of course, but would they loose the nukes over a Taiwanese breakaway? |
|||
01-13-2005, 04:33 AM | #55 | |
Morgado's Favorite Forum Fascist
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Greensboro, NC
|
Quote:
a) be selective, and get criticized for being selective; or b) do nothing, and get criticized for not caring.
__________________
The media don't understand the kinds of problems and pressures 54 million come wit'! |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|