POL - "so who is BS'n me?"

[Flasch186]

Originally Posted by MrBigglesworth

I hate how I have to spell out everything. The Bush administration has taken the rhetorical leap to call the insurgency a group of terrorists, not the Democrats and not the media.

Bush admin logic:
1: The insurgents are terrorists
2: Terrorists can not be negotiated with
3: They are negotiating with the insurgents

Some of this does not add up.

It hink that most of everyone involved thinks there are two groups that are fighting there. One is foreign terrorists expanding their Jihad. The other is local warlords or Governors who feel outcast from the gov't. Perhaps there working with one of those groups.

[Flasch186]

Originally Posted by MrBug708

Why not save the thread and lip service about wanting debate. Just say Bush sucks go Dems!

because then I wouldnt get to hear from Glen or Arles or people who are from the other side, which I do want to hear. You, Obviously, dont. so dont come in these threads then. IT simple, save yourself the headache and time. Im fine.

[sterlingice]

Originally Posted by MrBigglesworth

That is a flip-flop.

No, this is a flip flop:



SI

[MrBigglesworth]

Originally Posted by Flasch186

It hink that most of everyone involved thinks there are two groups that are fighting there. One is foreign terrorists expanding their Jihad. The other is local warlords or Governors who feel outcast from the gov't. Perhaps there working with one of those groups.

I think the same thing, that there are two different groups. The problem is that the administration's rhetoric started last spring to put both of these groups together into one Zarqawi led terrorist group.It wasn't my idea to call all the insurgents terrorists, it was the administration's. And how many times have we heard the media or other posters here chastised for being liberal by calling the Iraqi fighters insurgents instead of terrorists?