11-14-2008, 10:41 PM | #51 | ||
Coordinator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
Well I dont however we disagree, I think, in that youre ok with Religious groups becoming involved in Politics and keep their tax exemption while I am not.
__________________
Jacksonville-florida-homes-for-sale Putting a New Spin on Real Estate! ----------------------------------------------------------- Commissioner of the USFL USFL |
||
11-14-2008, 10:46 PM | #52 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
I'm not going to give up you yet. What if a group of people organize in their shared belief that the Iraq War was unjust and that George W. Bush should be held accountable. At their meeting, they all pitch in for pizza at the next meeting, and to rent out a local hotel's ballroom. We should tax them too? They've all paid taxes already on their income, etc - they should pay more here to politically assemble? The business example just doesn't mesh. You sell a product or service to an outside, unrelated third party and take the cash. You're seeing the cash for the first time. You should be taxed on it. Last edited by molson : 11-14-2008 at 10:47 PM. |
|
11-14-2008, 10:48 PM | #53 |
Coordinator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
that sounds like a club TBH
__________________
Jacksonville-florida-homes-for-sale Putting a New Spin on Real Estate! ----------------------------------------------------------- Commissioner of the USFL USFL |
11-14-2008, 10:50 PM | #54 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
I don't think a priest using a "trigger word" like "Obama" should trigger taxation. I don't even think a priest using a "trigger action" like referencing Obama in a church policy should do so. I really don't care what they do in politics. Churches should be entitled to opinions just like anyone else. A much bigger issue (to me) would be if they became too heavily involved in business (i.e. Scientology). This is only an issue here because this particular church expresses an anti-Obama viewpoint. If it were anti-Bush you wouldn't give a shit. Last edited by molson : 11-14-2008 at 10:50 PM. |
|
11-14-2008, 10:50 PM | #55 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
|
11-14-2008, 10:54 PM | #56 |
Coordinator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
you know the difference(s) but this debate is silly and unproductive.
__________________
Jacksonville-florida-homes-for-sale Putting a New Spin on Real Estate! ----------------------------------------------------------- Commissioner of the USFL USFL |
11-14-2008, 10:56 PM | #57 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Georgia
|
Well, I guess I could just start the Church of Larry, which focuses on a more modern interpretation of the Bible, but is really just a front for progressive political action. Now I shouldn't have to pay taxes according to molson.
__________________
Top 10 Songs of the Year 1955-Present (1976 Added) Franchise Portfolio Draft Winner Fictional Character Draft Winner Television Family Draft Winner Build Your Own Hollywood Studio Draft Winner Last edited by larrymcg421 : 11-14-2008 at 10:56 PM. |
11-14-2008, 10:57 PM | #58 | ||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
Quote:
Seems to me that you just want to discriminate against businesses who don't have the same beliefs as your Church. |
||
11-14-2008, 11:10 PM | #59 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
Well you're saying religion should be tax-exempt unless they get involved in politics, which I agree with (though we probably disagree on the degree of necessary "involvement"). My last few posts were directed at rainmaker, who thinks all religions should be taxed regardless of politics. |
|
11-14-2008, 11:12 PM | #60 |
Coordinator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
im not saying religion by itself should be taxed but i think that that may have been a convenient slip of the finger.
__________________
Jacksonville-florida-homes-for-sale Putting a New Spin on Real Estate! ----------------------------------------------------------- Commissioner of the USFL USFL |
11-14-2008, 11:13 PM | #61 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
Last edited by RainMaker : 11-14-2008 at 11:14 PM. |
|
11-14-2008, 11:15 PM | #62 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
What if a church doesn't make a profit? They come up short and rely on volunteer employees to make up the difference (like most churches). They still offer a "service". Is your issue when churches try to expand, or put money away for a rainy day? I'm not trying to cross-examine you, I'm just curious about your views. Last edited by molson : 11-14-2008 at 11:15 PM. |
|
11-14-2008, 11:24 PM | #63 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
My issue is with those who abuse the system. Guys like Creflo Dollar who has his tax exempt church buy him a Rolls Royce. Or Pat Robertson who owns a mansion with a private air strip that he can land his private jet on. Tax exempt status was supposed to be a way to help charitible entities financially. Instead it has been used by some in Churches to hoards millions and millions of tax free dollars for personal gain. |
|
11-14-2008, 11:57 PM | #64 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
I really don't see anything unusual or wrong with anything that molson is arguing. As long as no one is questioning my right to call this priest a douchebag, I don't see a problem with anything.
|
11-15-2008, 07:19 AM | #65 |
Coordinator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
except that we have to make up for that portion of the budget deficit for those that 'should' lost their exemption. (again Im not talking about those who shouldnt)
__________________
Jacksonville-florida-homes-for-sale Putting a New Spin on Real Estate! ----------------------------------------------------------- Commissioner of the USFL USFL Last edited by Flasch186 : 11-15-2008 at 07:19 AM. |
11-15-2008, 07:31 AM | #66 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Bona fide religious organizations enjoy a much wider exemption from tax and land use laws than do ordinnary not-for-profit organizations. It's not just the exemption from paying taxes on "business activities" that's at stake, it's a pretty complete free pass on taxes of all kinds -- no obligation to collect sales tax when selling stuff, no obligation to pay property tax on land and buildings, broad exceptions from many land use restrictions, and so forth. By and large, you simply are not entitled to that sort of treatment simply by being a nonprofit, or even a charity. It's being a religion that entitles you to the "hands off" treatment afforded under the first amendment (with the interpreted principle that the power to tax is the power to destroy).
If a religious organization, bound to stay within that limitation in order to receive this sort of wide special treatment by all governments, decides to step outside that role and begin telling its members how to vote on candidates or issues, then it has betrayed its mission as a religious organization and has instead become a political action organization, which merits different treatment under tax and other laws. Obviously it's fairly tough to determine exactly where the line is between saying that it's a religious tenet that a practice like abortion is wrong, and directing members to act in a certain way, but that's essentially what we are in for once we determine that the government has no business interfering with the free practice of religion. |
11-15-2008, 08:07 AM | #67 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Wasn't there a big challenge to the ban on political advocacy a few weeks ago?
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
11-15-2008, 08:51 AM | #68 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Appleton, WI
|
Quote:
Like most of the rest of your posts in this thread, you jumped on this way too hard. I don't feel threatened that a church called everyone who voted for Obama a sinner. That you got that at all from my posts shows that you aren't reading. What I said is that churches should stay out of politics if they don't want the government being in their business. If the Government is taking a hands-off stance with the church, why shouldn't the church do the same thing? If the church wants to start endorsing candidates and try to affect the political process, they shouldn't be surprised if religious freedoms are impacted. Religion heavily intertwined with Government lead to all kinds of problems in Europe many years ago. That is why keeping them separate was so important to our founding fathers. From a religious standpoint, I am offended that any priest would call someone a sinner for a vote. I voted for McCain, so this isn't a personal attack on me. Calling my opponents sinner for their vote is offensive. It is cheap manipulation which would only be worse if this got big play before the election such that it could influence the election. |
|
11-15-2008, 01:54 PM | #69 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Quote:
Yep, exactly. Molson, I wonder if you are fine with the anti-GW Bush group getting a pass on property taxes if they buy some place they can all meet or don't have to collect sales taxes well selling shirts.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
|
11-15-2008, 05:38 PM | #70 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Here
|
The idea behind the tax exempt status of churches is so that the government does not tax some religions out of existence purely on the basis of not liking them.
And seriously, since I physically have the bulletin, he also says we should support and pray for Obama and his presidency. I think everyone knows I'm a crazy liberal, but your hatred of organized religion borders on lunacy. |
11-15-2008, 08:17 PM | #71 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
I miss the good old days when priests only made the news for impersonating Michael Jackson.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|