|
View Poll Results: Who will take the White House? | |||
Obama | 151 | 68.95% | |
McCain | 63 | 28.77% | |
Surprise? (Maybe Mr. Trout?) | 5 | 2.28% | |
Voters: 219. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
10-22-2008, 01:52 PM | #8101 |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Interesting look back at what was happening at this time 4 years ago. Kerry was ahead by 2-3 points in most polls, with only Zogby and Rasmussen showing Bush ahead.
Presidential Election Polls 2004 RNC Zogby Presidential Election Gallup Polls Press Releases Democratic Presidential Campaign Polls |
10-22-2008, 01:58 PM | #8102 | |
Poet in Residence
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Charleston, SC
|
Quote:
FiveThirtyEight.com |
|
10-22-2008, 02:00 PM | #8103 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
The likely voter screen on that is pretty strong pro-republican. The registered number is 47-37 Obama. After looking at the cross tabs I'm sure this is what I was polled on a few days ago.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
10-22-2008, 02:02 PM | #8104 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
That page only shows SUSA and ARG polls favoring Kerry. SUSA is solid, but ARG has a well earned reputation for being unreliable.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
10-22-2008, 02:03 PM | #8105 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Parañaque, Philippines
|
Why is it that you guys still use the electoral college thing?
__________________
Come and see. |
10-22-2008, 02:14 PM | #8106 | |
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Quote:
It's in the Constitution.
__________________
FBCB / FPB3 Mods |
|
10-22-2008, 02:16 PM | #8107 |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
|
10-22-2008, 02:22 PM | #8108 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
|
Quote:
It keeps New York and Los Angeles from deciding who the next President will be...
__________________
-- Greg -- Author of various FOF utilities |
|
10-22-2008, 02:25 PM | #8109 |
College Prospect
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Boston, MA
|
Plus it's fun fucking with all the people who can't read a poll.
|
10-22-2008, 02:26 PM | #8110 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
fuck murtha.
|
10-22-2008, 02:28 PM | #8111 |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkeley
|
Of course, to do that you have to make the vote of a citizen of Montana worth four times as much as the vote of a citizen of California...
Last edited by Daimyo : 10-22-2008 at 02:28 PM. |
10-22-2008, 02:38 PM | #8112 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
|
10-22-2008, 02:43 PM | #8113 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
|
10-22-2008, 03:06 PM | #8114 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
|
Quote:
I bet he provides at least four times as much food I never understood the electoral college until I saw the map of the 2000 election results and went "oh, now it makes sense".
__________________
-- Greg -- Author of various FOF utilities |
|
10-22-2008, 03:09 PM | #8115 |
World Champion Mis-speller
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Covington, Ga.
|
|
10-22-2008, 03:13 PM | #8116 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
Was it this map? As a country, we've decided that all that red is worth SOME kind of bonus, even though the actual votes behind them were basically a tie. You need broad popular and geographic support to win a presidential election in the US. I've never decided if that was a good idea or not, though I lean towards it. It kind of just fits in with the rest of our system, and the importance of states (small states have incredibly disproportinate senate representation, for example, and nobody seems to be up in arms over that). (This one's actually 2004 - 2000 didn't work for some reason). Last edited by molson : 10-22-2008 at 03:18 PM. |
|
10-22-2008, 03:27 PM | #8117 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Appleton, WI
|
Quote:
Here is the analogy I was thinking about. Assume I make the statement, "if the Green Bay Packers play an NFL game in Mexico, there will be a big fan turnout". I think in general we can assume this is a true statement. You definition of "big" may be different than mine, but it is hard to find fault with the statement. What I haven't said is that if and only if the Packers play in the NFL game will there be a big turnout. You could replace the Packers in my statement with the Bears, or the Patriots, or just about any team in the league (maybe not Miami) and that statement would still be true. The fact that I only gave one example doesn't mean that is the only true example. Now assume that I am the assistant coach of the Bears and a Packer assistant coach delightedly calls a Chicago talk-radio station to parrot my quote that "if the Green Bay Packers play an NFL game in Mexico, there will be a big fan turnout". It probably doesn't make me look good to the Chicago media. I may have been speaking about the Packers specifically for another reason, but because I didn't give more than one example, people can accurately quote me with just the one. This isn't a perfect analogy, but I am like Biden in this story. (Forget the fact that there are 2 presidential candidate and way more NFL teams.) Biden says that if Obama is elected, he will face a crisis from people who will want to test him. He didn't say that it is any different for McCain, but he (foolishly) didn't say anything at all about McCain. Now Palin can say the same thing Biden did with a changing around of the words which really doesn't change the meaning. Palin also hasn't said that the same wouldn't be true for McCain because she is just quoting Biden. When you hear 'if' from her, you associate that with 'if and only if' because she is on the side opposite you and you are expecting the attacks to be as strong as possible. That is the beauty of this situation for the Republicans. The Biden quote was pretty unambiguous. Reps can repeat the quote without embellishment and it sounds harsh. The Democrats have basically responded in two ways. 1 - it was a perfectly reasonable thing to say because every president faces challenges. 2 - if you parse the words in just the right way, you might see that the statement really wasn't about Obama. 1 is fairly weak because "every president faces challenges" doesn't address the "electing Obama will cause a crisis" statement. 2 is pointless because you can't parse away the words because it is fairly unambiguous. The real response should have been that Biden did in fact say that electing Obama will result in a crisis brought on to test him. Since the whole speech was about Obama in particular, his is the only name that was brought up. Had the discussion also included McCain, Biden would have commented that a different crisis would have come up to challenge him. A second decent response would have been to say that Obama will face a crisis because he is young and people will want to test him. Obama will show everyone that he knows what to do and he will win the challenge. I think this is really what Biden was going for, but he didn't say it very well. In the current state of "gotcha politics", the first reaction is always to deny. Once you deny, you look worse when you keep denying. Had they thought a little more and owned their statement with an amendment to make it more clear, they would have been better off. |
|
10-22-2008, 03:35 PM | #8118 |
Coordinator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
you are right in the above and I take back everything I said. Thank you for taking the time to explain the positions.
__________________
Jacksonville-florida-homes-for-sale Putting a New Spin on Real Estate! ----------------------------------------------------------- Commissioner of the USFL USFL |
10-22-2008, 03:55 PM | #8119 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
I don't think the whole quote thing is a big deal, but I heard the audio of Palin's response this morning, it wasn't really a hardcore attack, she said, "Why is he saying that, if I had said that you guys would be clobbering me. I'd like to hear him explain what he meant". Pretty reasonable sentiment.
Last edited by molson : 10-22-2008 at 03:55 PM. |
10-22-2008, 03:59 PM | #8120 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
Cheap, easy and reliable. What's not to like?
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
10-22-2008, 04:02 PM | #8121 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Some people are uptight about the government "collecting data" like that (whether or not that info is actually retained). Like they'll be able to track us or something. I agree it's the right thing to do though. It's not that friggen complicated. We've accomplished much more impressive stuff as a species then have a reliable voting process. Last edited by molson : 10-22-2008 at 04:02 PM. |
10-22-2008, 04:07 PM | #8122 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
Quote:
I had a problem with the 'if' and attached an existing 'and only if' that didnt exist. When analyzing that the second part actually was attached in my head and hence forth removed and than reanalyzed, I realize that I was wrong. I agree that she wouldve been hammered for it but only due to the bias towards ratings/readers.
__________________
Jacksonville-florida-homes-for-sale Putting a New Spin on Real Estate! ----------------------------------------------------------- Commissioner of the USFL USFL |
|
10-22-2008, 04:34 PM | #8123 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Georgia
|
Quote:
Okay, but what's silly about this argument is it still happens on the state level. For example, look at California. Look at all that red, but the state still went to Kerry. Also look at Pennsylvania, Oregon, or Washington. The electoral college doesn't force you to have broad geographic support. You can still take the entirety of a state's electoral votes by appealing to the urban areas. I still can't figure out how on earth people think it's okay to say people who live close together deserve less voting power than people who live far apart.
__________________
Top 10 Songs of the Year 1955-Present (1976 Added) Franchise Portfolio Draft Winner Fictional Character Draft Winner Television Family Draft Winner Build Your Own Hollywood Studio Draft Winner |
|
10-22-2008, 04:38 PM | #8124 |
Death Herald
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Le stelle la notte sono grandi e luminose nel cuore profondo del Texas
|
There's another map I saw that painted a more realistic picture. That one is absolute, 100% or 0%. I'll see if I can find it again, but it showed shaded boxes depending on the closeness of the vote, with white where there was a 50/50 split, and gradually getting darker blue or red as it went towards 100%. There were a lot of light colored counties on that one.
__________________
Thinkin' of a master plan 'Cuz ain't nuthin' but sweat inside my hand So I dig into my pocket, all my money is spent So I dig deeper but still comin' up with lint |
10-22-2008, 04:41 PM | #8125 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Washington, DC
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't electoral votes based on population? Its not so much that Wyoming's votes are worth more. It's just that a close win in a state is just as valuable as a landslide win.
__________________
Sixteen Colors ANSI/ASCII Art Archive "...the better half of the Moores..." -cthomer5000 |
10-22-2008, 04:49 PM | #8126 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The DMV
|
Quote:
Here is the "Purple America" map of the 2000 Election... |
|
10-22-2008, 04:53 PM | #8127 | ||
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Georgia
|
Quote:
Well, it doesn't work out exactly tied to population. Every state gets a minimum of 3 electoral votes, no matter how small they are, so some states are getting more than they would if there was a flat population per electoral vote ratio. Quote:
That is one of the silliest parts of the electoral college. If we really had three viable partoes, people would be winning all the electoral votes in a state with less than 40% of the vote.
__________________
Top 10 Songs of the Year 1955-Present (1976 Added) Franchise Portfolio Draft Winner Fictional Character Draft Winner Television Family Draft Winner Build Your Own Hollywood Studio Draft Winner |
||
10-22-2008, 04:55 PM | #8128 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The DMV
|
Quote:
Electoral votes are the sum of a state's Senators + Representatives. Since all states have 2 senators, smaller states have a very slight over-representation in the electoral college relative to their populations. |
|
10-22-2008, 05:11 PM | #8129 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Prairie du Sac, WI
|
No wonder I'm voting for Obama, he has secretly been hypnotizing us!
http://www.pennypresslv.com/Obama%27...s_Speeches.pdf Last edited by lungs : 10-22-2008 at 05:11 PM. |
10-22-2008, 05:15 PM | #8130 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
That's up to the states though. They could proportion it out by county, congressional district etc. (Maine and Nebraska do the latter, though they've always had sweeps and have never split the vote). Last edited by molson : 10-22-2008 at 05:17 PM. |
|
10-22-2008, 05:18 PM | #8131 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
I like those shaded maps except I think they're too easy to give a "split" color. 60/40 is a pretty dominant margin, but the map just gives slightly varying shades of red-blue.
|
10-22-2008, 05:23 PM | #8132 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Georgia
|
There's a proposal I've seen from some states meant to make the electoral college meaningless. The idea is that the state will allocate their electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote. However, it doesn't go into effect until enough states (that make up 270 electoral votes) also pass the law.
__________________
Top 10 Songs of the Year 1955-Present (1976 Added) Franchise Portfolio Draft Winner Fictional Character Draft Winner Television Family Draft Winner Build Your Own Hollywood Studio Draft Winner |
10-22-2008, 05:41 PM | #8133 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Washington, DC
|
the bottom thing is neat: 2008 Electoral Map Predictions: 10-14-2008 | Political Maps (found it from the purple map above)
EDIT: Embedded
__________________
Sixteen Colors ANSI/ASCII Art Archive "...the better half of the Moores..." -cthomer5000 Last edited by lordscarlet : 10-22-2008 at 05:50 PM. |
10-22-2008, 05:51 PM | #8134 |
Quarterback
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: London, England
|
|
10-22-2008, 06:19 PM | #8135 | |
High School JV
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Quote:
A third party would capable of preventing both of the two main parties from achieving a majority would have a huge impact on the electoral college itself. It's very likely that if a third party could do that, they could demand almost anything from the main parties....In a close election, that party might only need to win one or two states. |
|
10-22-2008, 06:20 PM | #8136 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
|
To me, the election has boiled down to a simple view:
I will not vote Democrat because of substance. I will not vote Republican because of style. There are more ways than one to vote against a one-party government and I may exercise that right. But I will not I will not help the Republicans carry Colorado for the presidency. |
10-22-2008, 06:22 PM | #8137 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
|
Another Election Prediction:
45% of the population would vote for Obama (including those against McCain). 45% of the population would vote for McCain (including those against Obama). The key will be what percentage of the population will actually get out and vote for (or against) a candidate. Last edited by Buccaneer : 10-22-2008 at 06:45 PM. |
10-22-2008, 06:40 PM | #8138 | |
Torchbearer
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: On Lake Harriet
|
Quote:
I'm not sure I follow. Do you mean that 45% of the population would vote for Obama if they voted? And the key is seeing how many of those who would vote for Obama actually show up to vote for Obama? |
|
10-22-2008, 06:45 PM | #8139 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
|
Yes, I meant "would" (as in theoretically). My brain said 'would' but my fingers typed 'will'.
|
10-22-2008, 09:05 PM | #8140 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Another election cycle, another instance of Republicans telling me that I'm anti-American. As Jon Stewart said, "Republicans love America, but just hate half the people living in it."
|
10-22-2008, 09:37 PM | #8141 | |
Stadium Announcer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Burke, VA
|
Quote:
I've been called a racist, a fascist, a corporatist, paranoid, delusional, evil... and that was just the last phone call with my mom the Democrat! Seriously, again I feel the need to point out that the emnity on the right is equaled by the emnity on the left, and good people on both sides become targets of it.
__________________
I don't want the world. I just want your half. |
|
10-22-2008, 10:10 PM | #8142 |
Coordinator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
I have no idea since im a guy but I heard Palin spent up to $150K on clothes....is that a lot for a Pol? i honestly have no clue and since I got married I even have less of a clue and have stopped buying clothes for myself entirely (mostly since what I buy gets met with shakes of the head and disapproval which is repeated when I attempt to wear said item(s) and then get pushed into something bought for me.....by her.) plus Im not a Pol..
__________________
Jacksonville-florida-homes-for-sale Putting a New Spin on Real Estate! ----------------------------------------------------------- Commissioner of the USFL USFL Last edited by Flasch186 : 10-22-2008 at 10:23 PM. |
10-22-2008, 10:22 PM | #8143 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
It seems to be unprecedented. It's also fun to note that the RNC had to foot the bill because McCain-Feingold made that sort of purchase with candidate funds illegal. It's another thing that doesn't really matter substantively, but Lord does it make the McCain team look even more inept.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
10-23-2008, 07:38 AM | #8144 |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
|
10-23-2008, 07:39 AM | #8145 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Here are three fake commercials for McCain done by Hollywood directors. The first one isn't great, but the last two are pretty good.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers Last edited by JPhillips : 10-23-2008 at 07:40 AM. |
10-23-2008, 07:42 AM | #8146 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
Male candidates spend thousands of dollars on suits, but nobody cares. If she didn't get more fashionable clothes and upgrade her appearance, we'd here the cries of how poor her appearance was. Female politicians walk a tightrope of fashion at all times. Male politicians put on one of their 20 navy suits with a red tie and think nothing of it. |
|
10-23-2008, 07:52 AM | #8147 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mass.
|
How is Palin's wardrobe any worse than John Edwards' haircut? Both were stupid stories and not a big deal at all. Sure it probably hurts their attempts at the "common person" feeling like that candidate understands them when they spend more on clothes or a haircut then many people can spend on things like food... but otherwise does it really matter? Of course I probably feel that way about 85% of the random things people bring up against Democrats or against Republicans in this thread trying it to make the candidate look like the worst person ever
|
10-23-2008, 07:54 AM | #8148 |
Coordinator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
their not any different. The haircut I have a point of reference on and KNOW that that is a ridiculous way to spend your money! I dont even know how much a suit costs and the one time I had to buy one was years ago and I was absolutely blown away by how expensive they seemed to be. If someone only bought suits I could easily see how you could get to 150K....That might only be about 35 suits....which 35 suits is a lot IMO but perhaps suits can be even more expensive than I imagine.
__________________
Jacksonville-florida-homes-for-sale Putting a New Spin on Real Estate! ----------------------------------------------------------- Commissioner of the USFL USFL Last edited by Flasch186 : 10-23-2008 at 07:55 AM. |
10-23-2008, 07:55 AM | #8149 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Stuck in Yinzerville, PA
|
|
10-23-2008, 07:59 AM | #8150 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
|
It's as I always suspected- there are no people in Maine or Vermont SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out! Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!" Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!" |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|