|
View Poll Results: How is Obama doing? (poll started 6/6) | |||
Great - above my expectations | 18 | 6.87% | |
Good - met most of my expectations | 66 | 25.19% | |
Average - so so, disappointed a little | 64 | 24.43% | |
Bad - sold us out | 101 | 38.55% | |
Trout - don't know yet | 13 | 4.96% | |
Voters: 262. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
01-14-2010, 10:46 PM | #7351 |
Stadium Announcer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Burke, VA
|
On a slightly related note, a new Suffolk University poll in MA has Scott Brown up by 4 over Martha Coakley. This is simply stunning. Support for the healthcare plan in MA (according to the poll) is at 36% with disapproval at 51%. (This, btw, in a poll with 15% of the respondents as Republicans)
Poll shocker: Scott Brown surges ahead in Senate race - BostonHerald.com I still can't fathom Brown winning next Tuesday, but I'm curious what the Massachusetts contingent thinks now that the election is less than a week away.
__________________
I don't want the world. I just want your half. |
01-14-2010, 11:34 PM | #7352 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Nate Silver is calling it a toss-up and I'd trust his analysis over anyone's in the game. It'll be interesting to see what happens. I can see it going both ways. Republicans see the chance to steal a seat here and show up in huge force to put him over the top. On the other hand I could see the recent polls scaring Democrats into taking the election serious and showing up to save the seat.
As a neutral observer, I like seeing close races that get people involved. Hate seats that are just passed down amongst a party. Brown doesn't seem like the prototypical Republican. Has a bit of an independent streak it looks like. His stance on health care seems a tad hypocritical from previous positions, but such is politics. I think he'd be a decent choice although probably couldn't vote for him due to his bigotry toward homosexuals. |
01-15-2010, 06:42 AM | #7353 |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
|
01-15-2010, 07:09 AM | #7354 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
That portion of the Herald article noting that 60%+ think that Coakley will win is pretty interesting. I'm not sure what the exact party breakdown is, but my guess is that there's some GOP voters in that number who also think the race is Coakley's that may be surprised this morning to find out otherwise. It could easily energize the GOP base to come out as well knowing that the Dem. majority in Massachusetts isn't as solid for this election. Either way, it looks like we're going to see a ton of coverage of this race in the upcoming days. Anyone else notice that Obama hasn't gone to Massachusetts yet to back Coakley? This seems to stand in stark contrast to his statements yesterday that he would back the Democrat candidates in any way necessary next November. There was someone on the local news this morning mentioning that Obama may not want to back Coakley and risk further damage to his coattails (though I'd argue that damage has already been done). |
|
01-15-2010, 07:13 AM | #7355 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
I think all the MA polls are suspect because nobody has a clear read on who will actually vote. There's another poll out today that has Coakley up by 8. Off year elections are hard enough to predict, but this special election in this environment is going to leave a lot of pollsters with egg on their face.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
01-15-2010, 07:23 AM | #7356 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
Just for the record, I think Coakley will win. But I think it's pretty clear that this will be a telling result as to the political climate change from one year ago no matter who wins. |
|
01-15-2010, 07:35 AM | #7357 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
I don't think there's any doubt that enthusiasm is on the side of the Republicans, but I don't think you can read too much into any single race. NY-23 didn't forecast this race, so I'm not sure this race forecasts November. At some point the local candidates have to be important factors and Coakley comes off as an uninspiring party hack IMO.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
01-15-2010, 07:35 AM | #7358 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bahston Mass
|
I think it will be difficult for Obama to campaign here with everything going on in Haiti. That would look worse than not coming, in my opinion.
__________________
There's no I in Teamocil, at least not where you'd think |
01-15-2010, 07:46 AM | #7359 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
I'll believe it when it happens. The Herald is also the righter of the two daily papers (and the smaller). I wonder if the questions in that Suffolk poll break down why people are against the healthcare plan, or if they just lump it all together. You probably have a mix of folks here who go "we already have our own version and this will just cost us more" and "it doesn't go far enough" people.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
01-15-2010, 07:47 AM | #7360 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
Independent? He voted with Republican leadership 96% of the time. And I think his stance against homosexuals and particularly also votes to hold-the-line or cut education spending will end up hurting him.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
01-15-2010, 07:49 AM | #7361 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
dude have you watched the news? there was a fucking earthquake that decimated hati! i'd say that's a little more important than this one race. The party sent senior political operatives here...unfortunately that's probably the best they will do. Bill Clinton was supposed to come to town also...not sure if that will happen now.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
01-15-2010, 07:51 AM | #7362 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
I think the fact that he holds firm to those stances and still has a chance to win a Senate seat in Massachusetts is incredible. If you told someone what you just posted and they were unaware of the poll data, there's no way you would think he would be within 25 points of the Democrat candidate. |
|
01-15-2010, 08:06 AM | #7363 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
Is Obama running the cleanup effort? At maximum, that's taking up 15 minutes of his time each day. Let's not be silly here. |
|
01-15-2010, 08:32 AM | #7364 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Just went through the marginals of the Suffolk poll. People are so damned inconsistent. Most like the MA healthcare law, but most also think MA can't afford it. Some percentage of people that favor national healthcare also favor Brown.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
01-15-2010, 08:36 AM | #7365 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
Perhaps some of you east coasters (or Mass. residents) can help me out a bit. How, if any, will the Massachusetts health care process be affected by the national law if passed? My guess is that things will change very little in Mass. compared to most states, but that's merely a guess. Hence the reason I'm asking. |
|
01-15-2010, 08:37 AM | #7366 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
|
Quote:
No, but I do think he's spending a decent amount of time trying to get money and coordinating with the people on the ground with how to spend it and how best he can help. SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out! Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!" Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!" |
|
01-15-2010, 08:46 AM | #7367 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
If our president can't delegate that responsibility out to his staff, we've got far worse problems than we ever imagined. I'm going to give Obama the benefit of the doubt and assume he's a better leader than that. I'm almost sure of it. |
|
01-15-2010, 08:59 AM | #7368 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
and yet if he came here you'd be crowing about how he has better things to be doing and should be worrying about them.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
01-15-2010, 09:12 AM | #7369 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bahston Mass
|
This is one of the more moronic side discussions we've had here. You really think Obama campaigning would be politically expedient for him with what's going on?
__________________
There's no I in Teamocil, at least not where you'd think |
01-15-2010, 09:19 AM | #7370 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
I think the reality is that he realizes it would be politically a disaster and is just upset that somebody in the administration was smart enough to realize that too and make the correct decision, thus depriving him of an easy target.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. Last edited by DaddyTorgo : 01-15-2010 at 09:20 AM. |
|
01-15-2010, 09:20 AM | #7371 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
|
Haiti is now a huge matter of national importance for our country's leader? Wow you guys sure drink the stateist kool-aid! You have to be kidding right? I agree with MBBF if Obama spends more than 10 minutes of his own time on this it would be the equivalent of McCain suspending his campaign for the economic downtrun.
|
01-15-2010, 09:21 AM | #7372 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
You're absolutely right. It's probably best that he doesn't go up there anyway. He could actually hurt Coakley's chances at this point. |
|
01-15-2010, 09:22 AM | #7373 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
Guess that really shouldn't surprise me...as a libertarian you do seem to have this staunch isolationist standpoint (much like the platform of the party although i'm sure there are differences) and your reaction is probably "oh well it didn't happen to us...let's pull back and defend our borders and let all the people in Hati just fend for themselves."
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
01-15-2010, 09:23 AM | #7374 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bahston Mass
|
I'm only speaking politically, panerd. I agree that Obama is not currently pulling people from the rubble.
Thanks for the gratis condescension, though. Next time see if you can work sheeple in there.
__________________
There's no I in Teamocil, at least not where you'd think Last edited by Ronnie Dobbs2 : 01-15-2010 at 09:24 AM. |
01-15-2010, 09:23 AM | #7375 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
Exactly. If it was an earthquake in California, there's no question that DT and Ronnie's assessment would be spot-on. In Haiti, it's an excuse at best to avoid the possible egg on Obama's face. |
|
01-15-2010, 09:25 AM | #7376 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
Interesting that you would make a point containing nothing even remotely close to what panerd was saying. We can help Haiti to the utmost of our resources and abilities without the president spending more than 15 minutes a day getting an update on progress. |
|
01-15-2010, 09:56 AM | #7377 | ||
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
01-15-2010, 10:06 AM | #7378 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
That's all well and good, but at this point Haiti doesn't have a government or a police force in any real sense. By most accounts there is no "nation" as we understand it.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
01-15-2010, 10:07 AM | #7379 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
I'm sure if Obama was here campaigning for Coakley you'd be bitching about how he ought to be spending his time elsewhere doing more important things. Whether that was Hati or something else. You're just upset that he's not so you can't bash him for doing that. It's not a matter of him being "on the ground pulling people out of the rubble." It's a matter of perception - it would be perceived (and be used as such by political opponents) as being "tacky" or "out of touch with the real world" or however else you want to label it, if he went campaigning while there's this massive disaster-relief effort going on what...700 miles from our shores. It would seem very "unpresidential" if you will.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
01-15-2010, 10:14 AM | #7380 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
So now we're arguing what I would think in situations that aren't happening? I certainly understand your frustration, but your defensiveness is misplaced. Feel free to continue to discuss things that aren't happening. I'm going to discuss what is happening and how it relates to current events. |
|
01-15-2010, 10:17 AM | #7381 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bahston Mass
|
As far as the MA Senate race goes, I'm pretty excited to see how it ends up. Even Nate Silver referred to it as a "toss-up" earlier today. Still unsure which way I'll vote, but Coakley botched this terribly. She is not a particularly enthralling candidate in the first place and has acted like the seat is an entitlement. At the very least, it's nice to see the Dems actually have to fight for something up here.
__________________
There's no I in Teamocil, at least not where you'd think |
01-15-2010, 10:18 AM | #7382 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
that's not what you're doing. you're discussing hypothetical reasons for why he isn't up here campaigning.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
01-15-2010, 10:20 AM | #7383 |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
|
01-15-2010, 10:22 AM | #7384 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
I agree that Coakley was a pretty terrible choice. I would have much much rather seen Capuano, or else somebody else completely. Coakley is a pretty boring candidate overall. She doesn't do a lot to...inspire me. That being said - I can't see voting for someone with Brown's social positions (healthcare, abortion, homosexuals, etc.), and as I've tried to point out to people...if Brown were to somehow manage to win he wouldn't go into the Senate as a "moderate Republican" or anything. In order to get national GOP funding and not be tea-bagged in his next election he'd have to conform to the "standard GOP platform" on all those hot-button issues. So it wouldn't be electing a "moderate Republican" or an "independent-thinking Republican." It'd be much worse than that.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
01-15-2010, 10:23 AM | #7385 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
lmao. unless you have some sort of actual tangible proof then yes, it is by definition hypothetical. and the "political climate" that you're in touch with is...well i'll just stop there, because I think everyone knows.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. Last edited by DaddyTorgo : 01-15-2010 at 10:24 AM. |
|
01-15-2010, 10:34 AM | #7386 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
|
Quote:
True, but it is a true Libertarian response. Every major Libertarian scholar I have ever read has done anything but call for isolationism. They call for non-interventionism. (Which I believe was Obama's stance until he became president) They don't believe in policing the world, making alliances that bring you into other people's shit, starting wars that cause more problems than they solve... It is just like the "war" on drugs. The Libertarian answer is anything but legalizing everything so that anyone can inject themselves to the death with bad and evil drugs. They feel like our current policy is a complete waste of money and in reality is just another tax on the poor. I won't call DaddyTorgo lazy in his incorrect generalizations ("oh well it didn't happen to us...let's pull back and defend our borders and let all the people in Hati just fend for themselves.") because I was brought up the same way and told my whole life by teachers, professors, and news outlets how wacky the Libertarians are. If people actually picked up a book and read what they really believe they may have same enlightening that I freely admit I had. We don't have to do the same stupid things over and over just because this country is great and why fix small problems. Why not make it even better? Last edited by panerd : 01-15-2010 at 10:36 AM. |
|
01-15-2010, 10:42 AM | #7387 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
I just think the essay you posted comes from a guy living in a dream world. Defend property rights? How to you propose to do that without a functioning government or police force? Any decisions along those lines aren't a big concern when people don't have food water or shelter. There are bigger problems at the moment than trade policy.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
01-15-2010, 10:50 AM | #7388 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
|
Quote:
Though I am sure I will get blasted with some sort of "too soon" argument here I think we can all agree that a lot of those buildings collapsed and people died due to the intense poverty and poor building structure of the country. The San Francisco earthquake was about the same scale in a city that is just as big if not bigger and 63 people died. Does this make the Haiti victims less tragic? Does this mean we shouldn't give money privately? You know the answer. But the question is where does all the pre-earthquake aid really go? There are plenty of countries that have implemented free markets that have made bigger strides that Haiti. So will we change our future policies on similar countries? Doubtful. I keep hearing that we can save the world! But we then when I ask why Haiti is so poor hear that maybe we can't save the world. Choose one or the other, unfortunately I think the second statement is a lot closer to the truth so why flush all this money down the drain? |
|
01-15-2010, 10:57 AM | #7389 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
thanks for not calling me lazy. actually just buried under a mountain of work...i really should leave this thread for the day, but it's a nice...diversion every so often
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
01-15-2010, 11:27 AM | #7390 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bahston Mass
|
Quote:
I was a solid Brown vote until the debate. I don't think he came off all that well. I agree that he's not much of a free-thinking Republican and his stance on gay marriage does turn me off (though I see that issue as having less importance in a Congressional race, personally). Right now, I'm between Brown (who is closer to me than Coakley) and Kennedy (who I agree with a lot, but will obviously not win). It's not often I get to have a vote here in MA that will mean much of anything, so I'm new to this.
__________________
There's no I in Teamocil, at least not where you'd think |
|
01-15-2010, 11:27 AM | #7391 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
You're arguing two different things. It's fine to talk about economic development, but that's very different from disaster relief. I'm not going to defend the various Haitian dictators, but those discussions don't mean anything when people are struggling to stay alive. btw- It's fascinating that you use an example of effective government regulation to argue for libertarian policies.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
01-15-2010, 11:54 AM | #7392 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Poor MBBF:
Quote:
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
01-15-2010, 12:32 PM | #7393 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Quote:
I wonder, though, how many people choose to purchase insurance vs. have it provided by their employer? I'm going to assume (but I'm happy to be proven wrong) that the vast majority of the insured simply have it provided by their employer and so there's no decision-making involved (realistically). |
|
01-15-2010, 12:45 PM | #7394 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
wow...i knew the numbers were bad, but i didn't realize they were quite this bad
Quote:
And yet Karl Rove thinks Congressional Dems will run up more debt by October than Bush did in all his years?? Puhleeze!
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
01-15-2010, 12:45 PM | #7395 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Apr 2005
|
Obama is coming to the state to back Coakley on Sunday (according to boston.com).
|
01-15-2010, 12:46 PM | #7396 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
That's MUCH different than a formal visit. I thought you were politically savvy enough to know that, but perhaps you're not. Quote:
If so, that's an interesting turnabout from their previous stance. Last edited by Mizzou B-ball fan : 01-15-2010 at 12:47 PM. |
|
01-15-2010, 12:47 PM | #7397 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
Suffolk University. 1/11-13. Likely voters. MoE 4.4%. Martha Coakley 46% Scott Brown 50% Suffolk isn't a fantastic pollster -- they're in the lower half of the pollster rankings at FiveThirtyEight and completely missed the New Jersey governor's race. But since they missed New Jersey by putting the Democrat nine points up a week before he lost, that may be scant comfort. In the end, we come back to the fact that special elections are tough to poll and we just won't know who was right until Tuesday night.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
01-15-2010, 12:55 PM | #7398 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Apr 2005
|
Quote:
Coakley just comes across as arrogant and has made some mistakes that reflect that. The misspelling of Massachusetts in one her ads, the "Kennedy" seat, the stance on Catholic health care workers probably shouldn't work in the ER and her bodyguard/supporter/handler pushing down a reporter. |
|
01-15-2010, 12:57 PM | #7399 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
you realize only 50% of those things you cited were directly attributable to her - the "kennedy seat" comments (insofar as she has made them herself), and the stance on catholic healthcare workers (which in reality is just an opinion, nobody's going to legislate that). The other things were entirely out of her control.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
01-15-2010, 01:09 PM | #7400 | |||
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Quote:
Well good, because it would be a misleading argument to say we're spending the money solely to prevent the deaths of 22,000 people. Quote:
Well good, because surely that would result in even more deaths. Quote:
This is a simplistic argument. You're drawing a direct-line correlation between the number of people served and the number who die from medical mistakes. Since the 195,000 number (I presume) includes the uninsured, how much does the number go down because the number of uninsured who die from medical mistakes (due to needing treatment for conditions that were preventable) no longer need those procedures? How much less busy are ERs because they no longer have to provide primary care for the uninsured? How many fewer people die because the uninsured are no longer being turfed to the most overworked (i.e. public) hospitals? Further, the argument ignores the many efforts across the country that have both improved care and reduced cost. |
|||
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 32 (0 members and 32 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|