07-18-2005, 09:32 PM | #451 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PA
|
Quote:
|
|
07-18-2005, 09:46 PM | #452 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
|
Quote:
So you don't think that's extremism at its best? Why the double standard? |
|
07-18-2005, 10:01 PM | #453 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PA
|
Quote:
|
|
07-18-2005, 10:04 PM | #454 |
Grey Dog Software
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ by way of Belleville, IL
|
How about the 45 people that either accused Bill of sexual harrasment or were witnesses for the prosecution in the Whitewater, harrassment or other cases that just happened to get audited by the IRS?
Or perhaps you forgot the 25 people indicted and 19 convicted because of the 1996 Clinton-Gore fundraising scandals (per justice dept, year 2000)? James Riady, Johnny Chung, John Huang, and Charlie Trie. Read up on the interactions between the Clinton-Gore administrations and these "savory" fellows. I don't think either side can take the morale high ground on political slime tactics and shady dealings. Last edited by Arles : 07-18-2005 at 10:05 PM. |
07-18-2005, 10:16 PM | #455 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
|
Quote:
Only if you want to hear it a certain way. Imagine if Rove or someone like said the same thing, it would be blasted as the most extremist statement ever made. If you think Coulter is spouting anything else but dumb rhetoric just like Begala, then you just don't want to hear it. Besides, I think if you were add up all of the rhetoric and noise, it would come out even. It all stinks. |
|
07-18-2005, 10:46 PM | #456 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PA
|
Quote:
|
|
07-18-2005, 10:55 PM | #457 | |||
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PA
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
07-18-2005, 11:02 PM | #458 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
Quote:
you and America must require more!! dont stand for mediocrity or lowered standards!!!
__________________
Jacksonville-florida-homes-for-sale Putting a New Spin on Real Estate! ----------------------------------------------------------- Commissioner of the USFL USFL |
|
07-18-2005, 11:22 PM | #459 |
College Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle
|
I can't believe this thread is still going.
Last edited by Vinatieri for Prez : 07-18-2005 at 11:23 PM. |
07-18-2005, 11:44 PM | #460 | |
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Monroe, LA, USA
|
Quote:
Well, though I know you will find it incomprehensible, there are indeed some people with more than a rudimentary grasp of the English language who can and do disagree with your position on Durbin. I did not misconstrue his words, and he apologized for them in Congress. He could have made his point without those unfortunate comparisons. This, too, is a point reasonable people can disagree on. |
|
07-18-2005, 11:51 PM | #461 | |
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Monroe, LA, USA
|
Quote:
This slime job debate is quite amusing. And I really have no heart for it, since I think both the Clinton and Bush administrations and both sides in Congress have engaged in 'slime jobs' quite relentlessly over the past dozen years or so. It seems to be the way things are done in DC now. So you will get no more argument from me over whether Clinton-Carville was worse than Bush-Rove. A plague on both their houses. |
|
07-19-2005, 08:38 AM | #462 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Quote:
Quite. As Karl Rove himself told us, professionals compare Democrats to terrorists. |
|
07-19-2005, 09:02 AM | #463 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
My conclusions as of today:
1. We will find out that technically, no crime was committed. 2. The press & democratic partisans (myself included - the latter) who jumped on this have been seriously undermined by Wilson & Plame misrepresenting themselves & their story. 3. It should be clear that those who leaked the information did so to discredit the messenger (Wilson) in order to discredit the message (no Iraq-Niger connection). It would be refreshing to see Prosecutor Fitzgerald rebuke everyone involved, on both sides, for being so cavalier with things like the truth, our country's intelligence apparatus, etc... for the sake of political gain. 4. On the "I will fire anyone involved" issue (see below), Bush will continue to stall until he names a SC nominee, after which the story will die under that avalanche. Yes, I wanted Rove to be caught red-handed and sent to jail. But now that more actual information has come out in the past two weeks, I'm forced to conclude that the evidence that he or Libby committed an actual crime is just too weak. As someone who feels this Administration is filled with very misguided and dangerous individuals, this is very frustrating. As for Bush The Flip-Flopper: 9/29/03: McClellan: "If anyone in this administration was involved in it [the improper disclosure of an undercover CIA operative's identity], they would no longer be in this administration." 9/30/03: Bush: "If somebody did leak classified information, I'd like to know it, and we'll take the appropriate action." 7/18/05: Bush: "If someone committed a crime, they will no longer work in my administration." |
07-19-2005, 10:51 AM | #464 | |
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Monroe, LA, USA
|
Quote:
I think you are right on all counts. However, I still think the investigation might hold some surprises. I am of the opinion, for example, that the CIA is full of leaks and leakers, both pro and anti-administration. BTW, here is a succinct* summary of the whole affair as it stands today from Slate magazine. http://www.slate.com/id/2122963/ *I use the word 'succinct' with trepidation, since both you and Mr. Bigglesworth have pointed out that my command of the English language is substandard. |
|
07-19-2005, 12:52 PM | #465 | ||
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
Quote:
I agree with you that this is a possibility. It will be interesting to see the final report, especially as I have a pretty high regard for Fitzgerald (who is also in the process of dismantling Daley's administration in Chicago). Quote:
I usually take "succinct" to mean "short and to the point". While the article is short, it's more just a rehashing of various commentary which is, at this point, being beaten to death. But that's OK, I'm not going to beat you up over it. One angle I haven't seen anyone take is the idea that the CIA has been trying to be difficult in this, and other, cases, for the Bush Admin. There is some evidence to indicate that the rank-and-file at the CIA have been unhappy with the administration and were downright livid over the appointment of Porter Goss, for instance. I can't say it makes me happy to see that agency so politicized. Having said that, and on yet another point, I'm more and more of the opinion that we have too many disparate intelligence agencies, from the CIA to the FBI to the NSA to the intelligence parts of the various Armed Forces. It would be nice if this was addressed by some Administration at some point. Last edited by flere-imsaho : 07-19-2005 at 12:52 PM. |
||
07-19-2005, 04:27 PM | #466 | ||
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PA
|
Quote:
Quote:
To anyone with a fundamental grasp of the English language, it is clear that he is saying that terrorists want to kill us. Which really isn't an outrageous statement. So, in summary, not only could nobody provide any recent Dem slime jobs, but the rhetoric provided was, like the Durbin quote, completely made up. This is why it is impossible to have any kind of decent conversation. The right lies, plain and simple, whether it be Schiavo, SS, Iraq, or even a speech by Paul Begala. It's impossible to wade through the bullshit. |
||
07-19-2005, 04:42 PM | #467 | |
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Monroe, LA, USA
|
Quote:
I am glad to know that you are the only one here with a fundamental grasp of the English language. However, I think you need to take a close look at Begala's use of the personal pronoun "they" in the context of his remarks. The antecedent of "they" is not nearly so clear as you argue. There is a clear trail from "they want to kill us" straight to the Republicans. Let's follow the pronoun, starting with "they want to kill us". "they want to kill us" "they want to kill me and my children" "they want my children to be comforted that while they didn't protect me because they cut my taxes, my children won't have to pay any money on the money they inherit" Nowhere does Mr. Begala indicate that the antecedent of "they" has changed. He just asserts that "they" want to kill him and comfort his children with a lower death tax. Note also that in your citation, Mr. Begala refers to Bin Laden initially in the singular, and Republicans initially in the plural. So I might ask this: Where precisely does the antecedent of "they" change? Show it where I can see it, not where you assume it is. But perhaps Mr. Begala was foaming at the mouth by this time and in a fit of Democratic fervor, so maybe his wording was unclear. |
|
07-19-2005, 04:58 PM | #468 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Appleton, WI
|
I think you have to go with fervor and unclear wording. In this sentence:
Quote:
The wording was terrible since the ideas don't make sense if the meaning of 'they' doesn't change. |
|
07-19-2005, 05:10 PM | #469 | |
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Monroe, LA, USA
|
Quote:
Lol, but I think you have to look at the conditional "if" here. He says THEY want to kill his children. But then he says IF THEY don't kill his children, then THEY will comfort his children with tax breaks. After all, earlier, he said THEY did a poor job of defending him. So I think it can be argued either way. If he is arguing that Republicans actions in the war on terror place him and his children in danger, then it does make sense. |
|
07-19-2005, 05:27 PM | #470 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Appleton, WI
|
Quote:
I don't think you can argue conditional logic here. He was on a roll with his speech, and he sounds like he wasn't being that careful in his word choice. |
|
07-19-2005, 06:03 PM | #471 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PA
|
Quote:
Here, JW is attempting to prove that the charred tree is the result of an alien landing. He expects me to believe that Begala was accusing the Republicans of trying to kill him and fly planes into buildings, and not terrorists, even though Begala, while having a partisan history, has no record of incendiary comments. It would be much more respectable to just admit that he fell for the right wing ruse the same as I did, and admit that he was as wrong as I was. |
|
07-19-2005, 07:32 PM | #472 | |
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Monroe, LA, USA
|
Quote:
To use one of Mr. Bigglesworth's tactics and include a condescending insult in my post: Here is Mr. Bigglesworth trying to twist Begala's very clear words to put a square peg into a round hole. I'm just using Begala's own words. Occam's Razor is on my side here. You are the one having to interpret his words. I am giving the simplest explanation, which is that he meant exactly what he said. With your explanation, we have to rely as a matter of faith that WHAT HE REALLY MEANT was what you are saying. Let's take a look at what he actually said again. "But if THEY just kill me and not my children, THEY want my children to be comforted that while THEY didn't protect me because THEY cut my taxes, my children won't have to pay any money on the money THEY inherit." Let's see. He uses THEY five times in the same sentence. It is clear that the last four uses refer to Republicans. Yet you want us to believe that the first use refers to the terrorists, even though Begala gives us no clue at all in the sentence that this is what he meant. I am very surprised that someone with such wonderous command of the English language as compared to, for example, mine, has such a hard time understanding such a simple idea. THEY are evil. Who is evil? The Republicans. And look at the very next sentence: "You know, that is bullshit national defense and we should say that." I think he is clearly saying Republican policy might get him and his children killed. Certainly you don't disagree with that? Last edited by JW : 07-19-2005 at 07:34 PM. |
|
07-19-2005, 07:40 PM | #473 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Appleton, WI
|
Quote:
I have to ask....do you really believe everything you just wrote? |
|
07-19-2005, 08:33 PM | #474 | |
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Monroe, LA, USA
|
Quote:
Okay, I will cease and desist. I'm just responding to Bigglesworth's barbs, since he likes to play that silly game. I believe Begala mispoke in the heat of the moment. I do, however, think it could be argued that perhaps this was a Freudian slip, that he said what he really feels, but that he didn't really mean to say it that way. I also believe anyone hearing what he said or reading it later could have reasonably come to the conclusion that he was saying Republicans want to kill him. The wording is that unclear. And I believe Bigglesworth is wrong in that respect, that this is not an attempt to put words into his mouth, but an example of him speaking so unclearly that his meaning is unclear and open to various interpretations. This is apparent because of the immediate reaction from several sources after his speech. I think it would be interesting to hear Begala clarify his words. I haven't heard of a clarification yet, though that doesn't mean he hasn't done so. |
|
07-19-2005, 08:42 PM | #475 | |||
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PA
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
07-19-2005, 09:17 PM | #476 | |
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Monroe, LA, USA
|
Quote:
Goodness, chill. This is an internet forum, and you like to play games on it. And I didn't post a lie. Begala said what he said, and what he said is open to interpretation. I think his muddled words revealed his heart. You pointed out no lie, just that your interpretation of his confused words is different from other interpretations by people who apparently don't understand English as well as you do. I would like to hear his clarification of his remarks. |
|
07-19-2005, 09:29 PM | #477 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PA
|
George W Bush said that Democrats are holding terrorists, and that if they don't give them up he will kill them all!!!
Quote:
JW, please don't play any games and deny that he said that. |
|
07-19-2005, 09:42 PM | #478 | |
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Monroe, LA, USA
|
Quote:
Tit, tat, tit, tat. Begala's "they" is still unclear. Show me again, based on his words, how we can be absolutely certain that your interpretation of his words is correct. Show me how you arrive at an antecedent of the first "they" (in the sentence with five "they's") that is not "Republicans". Diagram that sentence for me. BTW, I don't deny that Bush said what you quote him as saying. Happy? Finally, I did a thorough internet search on Begala's speech, and all I can come up with are people arguing over what Begal meant. I found a very good discussion of his vague pronoun antecedents at one site that basically paralleled mine. The best that can be said is that his words were confusing. You are 100% wrong in supposing that it is perfectly clear what he meant. Nevertheless, I just think he went off the deep end for a minute and just spluttered, which comes out very poorly when you read it or hear it. During my own days of speaking to the media, I sometimes had to go back and look at the tape to see if I actually said what I meant to say, lol. We can keep at this all night. (Well, no, because I have other things to do, like sleep.) But if you can agree that Begala's words were terribly unclear and can be interpreted by reasonable people in several ways as spoken, then I will agree that he doesn't really think Republicans want to kill him. Last edited by JW : 07-19-2005 at 09:50 PM. |
|
07-19-2005, 10:05 PM | #479 |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PA
|
He mentioned that 'they' were flying planes into buildings, intent on attacking NY and DC, and wanting to kill us. That sounds more like terrorists to me than GOP, but according to you reasonable people may differ. Perhaps you hold the GOP in that low esteem, but I don't think Begala is that insane.
|
07-20-2005, 10:21 AM | #480 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Internets
|
Quote:
Unlike you, Arles, I actually have some knowledge and appreciation of history. I opposed ridiculous foreign interventions when they were the democrats pipe dream for changing the world. I supported free trade and engagement as strategies for dealing with "rogue" regimes when it used to be the GOP strategy. I have voted for the GOP, libertarian party, and the Dems for President. I generally support a split government because I believe government functions best when it is not run by ideologues (like you and Bush). I know your narrow worldview requires you to pigeonhole me in a little box, but I am no "lefty" and many views I have do not belong in your silly categorization system. You, on the other hand, are indefensibly a partisan hack with no semblance of intellectual honesty.
__________________
I do mind, the Dude minds. This will not stand, ya know, this aggression will not stand, man. - The Dude |
|
07-20-2005, 10:22 AM | #481 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Conyers GA
|
Ouch.
|
07-20-2005, 10:28 AM | #482 | |
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Monroe, LA, USA
|
Quote:
I think Begala got so worked up with hatred for the right that he became nearly incomprehensible, leaving others on the left to explain what he apparently really meant. |
|
07-20-2005, 10:44 AM | #483 | |||
Grey Dog Software
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ by way of Belleville, IL
|
Quote:
The difference is I openly admit it and try to take that inheirant bias into account when making decisions, whereas you completely ignore it hoping if you don't acknowledge it that it will not exist. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
07-20-2005, 11:05 AM | #484 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Internets
|
Quote:
And yet again, you don't get it. I oppose ideologues with power. If Chubby ran the USA, I would be horribly opposed to him. It has nothing to do with "left" or "right." It has to do with power and those who exercise it without wisdom. My "party" is anti-ideology. Your "party" is blindly parroting whatever the day's right-wing talking points are. If JoninmiddleGA is fascist (of which there can be little doubt), then you are proto-fascist (even though you disagree with Jon). You make evil possible by having no ability to differentiate "truth" from "falsehood." You and Jon are just two variations on what is ruining this country and I oppose you both for it.
__________________
I do mind, the Dude minds. This will not stand, ya know, this aggression will not stand, man. - The Dude |
|
07-20-2005, 12:22 PM | #485 |
Grey Dog Software
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ by way of Belleville, IL
|
For someone who disdains being placed in a "silly categorization system", you certainly have no problem doing the same to others. John, if you want to think you are some crusading "anti-idealogue" who is able to look at all situations with a completely open mind, then far be it for me to burst your bubble.
Just remember, your actions dictate how people view you much more than any statements you make regarding how you would like people to view you. But, then again, for a sell-professed anti-ideologue, anyone who doesn't view you in the above terms you setup for yourself must be blindly partisan, right? |
07-20-2005, 12:42 PM | #486 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Fresno, CA
|
I'm surprised this thread is still around, It was a number of pages back when I left for vacation. I haven't read it all, but I'm hoping the last five pages aren't just filled the type of bickering at the top of this page.
As for my position on Rove and the "leaking" of a CIA operative's name. I think the ship has pretty well sailed on any realistic thoughts of that particular charge being brought. As for the motivation behind the leak. It seems to me that the details that have been released indicate he was connecting the dots for the reporter. The wife's CIA affiliation was only used to show how she was part of the chain of events that sent Wilson to Africa. It certainly doesn't seem to have been done in retribution. I still don't think it is clear exactly how covert Plame/Wilson was. There have been some reports that those who knew her knew where she went to work, and others that maintain that she was covert. As for the CIA's request for an investigation, that is apparently their standard procedure when one of their employee's affiliation is revealed. I read one article indicatint that those requests come at the rate of about one a week. I don't think that is quite as damning as some have suggested. As for this last page. I think JW was one of the more cogent posters earlier in the thread, but he is hurting himself by holding Begala's comments to his narrow interpretation. Oh and John. Face it, you are a partisan lefty. You wear it on your sleeve. You aren't helping your intellectual integrity rating by maintaining otherwise. You might be an independent thinker, and sometimes disagree with the left or agree with the right, but that doesn't make you independent. If we held a poll on your left/right/center affiliation, the trout would get more votes than the center, and the right column would be extraneous. Being partisan isn't necessarily a bad thing, I'm considered quite partisan to the right here on this board, eventhough I often take positions contrary to the Republican party in general. My family considers me a right wing whacko, my wife's family think I'm a closet liberal. Go figure. The thing that shouldn't really be in dispute is that your image here is one of a raging liberal. |
07-20-2005, 12:50 PM | #487 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Syracuse, NY
|
Quote:
What do you mean "if"? I did for 8 years, you voted for me. Traitor... |
|
07-20-2005, 01:00 PM | #488 | |
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Monroe, LA, USA
|
Quote:
Well, if you read the thread you will see I was only holding Begala to the narrow interpretation for Mr. Bigglesworth, and not for everyone else. I just decided since Mr. B chose to question my command of the English language, that he and I could have some fun on unclear pronoun antecedents. I do feel Begala's comments were so muddled that reasonable people can (and still are, if you do a google search) arguing about what he really meant. But I will give him the benefit of the doubt, except where Mr. B is concerned. |
|
07-20-2005, 01:14 PM | #489 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: South Florida
|
Quote:
Considering the Dems liked to say the Republicans wanted to "starve our kids" during budget debates over school lunch programs, I don't think it is such a reach to conclude that Begala wants people to think that the GOP wants to kill him. Of course, we are talking about DC and DC insiders. Only in DC is a budget cut considered a cut in the rate of growth from one year to the next. |
|
07-20-2005, 01:23 PM | #490 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Internets
|
Quote:
The simple test for me is that while I am heavily critical of the GOP (mostly because they have become the party of idealogues), I would be equally afraid if Ted Kennedy were running this country. Bill Clinton was far from a "good" president in my mind and I think he is roughly the equivalent of Bush I in terms of ideologue-ness. Dubya, on the other hand, is the most ideological president the U.S. has had since F.D.R. (maybe Kennedy). I hold many views (tolerance, valuing diversity, respect for individualism) that have become part of what people consider "leftist." However, I am in way committed to the values of a "partisan left." I don't believe anything the Dems talking points say. I don't hold any leftist politician in particularly high regard. And I don't really care for any left-wing organization. So, how I am a "partisan" lefty is really beyond me. It conflates someone with values on the left with someone who is committed to a party and its politicians. There is a BIG difference.
__________________
I do mind, the Dude minds. This will not stand, ya know, this aggression will not stand, man. - The Dude |
|
07-20-2005, 01:50 PM | #491 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Fresno, CA
|
Quote:
Fair enough. I see where you are coming from, and understand that. I was just stating that perception is reality, and that your perception of yourself differs from the perception I believe most here have of you. |
|
07-20-2005, 02:00 PM | #492 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
|
The problem, JW, is that you're talking about a transcript, which mean's Begala's words have been stripped of any non-word communication (i.e. inflection, body language, etc...). While I can see your point based on a very narrow reading of the actual words, it looks to me to be too big of a leap to make when, in hearing, it may have sounded (and been meant), very, very differently.
|
07-20-2005, 04:42 PM | #493 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Internets
|
Quote:
I'm not going to disagree with you on this. You are 100% right.
__________________
I do mind, the Dude minds. This will not stand, ya know, this aggression will not stand, man. - The Dude |
|
07-20-2005, 10:31 PM | #494 | |
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Monroe, LA, USA
|
Quote:
I agree. |
|
07-20-2005, 11:53 PM | #495 |
College Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle
|
After reading the last couple of pages: JW and credibility, never the twain shall meet.
|
07-21-2005, 12:06 AM | #496 | |
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Monroe, LA, USA
|
Quote:
If you say so, and I have no fundamental grasp of the English language either. |
|
07-21-2005, 07:33 AM | #497 | |
Retired
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fantasyland
|
Quote:
I'd have to tend to agree. Arles has turned into the Bubba Wheels Republican on this board. |
|
07-21-2005, 12:14 PM | #498 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
|
Hmm....that 'S' could stand for anything!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...002517_pf.html Quote:
|
|
07-21-2005, 12:24 PM | #499 |
Coordinator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
ouch...that S stands for scandalous behavior regardless of whether Rove broke the "law". He needs to have a higher moral set.
__________________
Jacksonville-florida-homes-for-sale Putting a New Spin on Real Estate! ----------------------------------------------------------- Commissioner of the USFL USFL |
07-21-2005, 01:36 PM | #500 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PA
|
Quote:
*Does not apply to incidents related to Watergate, Iran-Contra |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|