03-06-2007, 09:41 PM | #451 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
Wooot!!!!
Steelers signed a RFA Punter. Try to match that, SF, after we put all kinds of poison pills in there!!!. j/k, I have no idea what the contract structure is like. |
03-06-2007, 09:57 PM | #452 |
Grey Dog Software
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ by way of Belleville, IL
|
I would hope a 2nd round pick at WR in this class could beat out Welker long term and probably match him this season. He looks like a Tim Dwight without the explosiveness. A total of 687 yards and 1 TD for 60+ catches seems like pretty poor production.
You could probably get one of Robert Meachem, Anthony Gonzalez or Craig Davis with that second round pick. And not only would he be a heck of a lot cheaper than Welker, he would have a much higher upside. Last edited by Arles : 03-06-2007 at 09:58 PM. |
03-06-2007, 10:05 PM | #453 |
College Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: South Florida
|
I think the attraction of Welker is that he is a total effort guy who plays way beyond expectations.
|
03-06-2007, 10:05 PM | #454 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
One rumor going around now is that the Pats already signed Stallworth. This, despite other rumors saying he's still visiting the Titans and other teams. I hope if it's true, it's just a one year deal. But if it is true, he becomes a legitimate #1 receiver IF he can stay healthy.
|
03-06-2007, 10:07 PM | #455 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
Quote:
Most mocks (and that's obv not saying much) have Meachem in the first round and Gonzalez in the early second at least. I'm haven't read much on Davis, but I do like Welker, and his complete game. He takes Maroney out of the KR/PR job and is a solid #2 receiver. |
|
03-06-2007, 10:08 PM | #456 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
Quote:
I'd be pretty surprised if he signed a one-year deal in this market, where he is one of the better FAs (of any position) out there. |
|
03-06-2007, 10:13 PM | #457 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
I agree and the numbers going around was 6yrs/30 million. I can't imagine this isn't backloaded, if true. That seems like an aweful lot for an injury prone receiver. But I do think he'd become the best receiver (maybe second behind Branch) Brady has thrown to.
|
03-06-2007, 10:14 PM | #458 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
YEah, it's deep of mediocre to good WR prospects after the first couple. Basically, the thinking here is that you're going to get the same kind of WR prospect in the late 3rd round as you will in the late 2nd round. Don't forget too that they are looking at probably 3rd rounder and another later one as compensatory picks. There's enough there to grab a good WR prospect in the 3rd round if you have to. |
|
03-06-2007, 10:22 PM | #459 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
Quote:
A little OT but how do compensatory picks exactly work? |
|
03-06-2007, 10:25 PM | #460 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
As stated before, he had Joey Harrington throwing to him. 67 catches is damn good. Better than anyone on the Pats last season, and that was with Tom Brady throwing them the ball. As for the guys you mentioned, first, none of them will be around by late second round. Second, I think they are all still crapshoots. I'll take Welker over them. |
|
03-06-2007, 10:29 PM | #461 |
Grey Dog Software
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ by way of Belleville, IL
|
Eigh, I'm not big on 5-9 receivers with low YPC and few TDs. He's not going to be much of a factor in the red zone and he can't stretch the field. I think there will be many WRs in the 2nd and third round better (and cheaper) than Welker (throw in Steve Smith from USC as well).
On other news, Daniel Graham got paid: "Graham ended up with a five-year, $30 million deal from the Broncos that included $15 million in guarantees." Last edited by Arles : 03-06-2007 at 10:31 PM. |
03-06-2007, 10:30 PM | #462 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
Some complex formula, but basically it breaks down to the contracts of the guys you lost via FA(guys who you didnt cut) compared to the value of FA contracts you signed(guys who weren't cut). Players essentially offset each other and whatever your net remainder contracts end up being, get slotted in some formula. Then you get a pick in a corresponding round, which you can't trade. So, if you lose 3 FA's, one signs a 6 year 42m deal, one a 3/9m, and one a 4/8m deal, and sign one guy to a 3/12m deal. You'd most likely get a 3rd for the 6/42 guy, and your signed 3/12 guy would offset your other two losses. Although there may be enough of a remainder there so that you'd get a 7th for net value lost....something to that effect. Last edited by stevew : 03-06-2007 at 10:31 PM. |
03-06-2007, 10:37 PM | #463 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
Hmm, that may be part of it, but one important factor is the performance of the players as well, including games started I believe. Suffice it to say, that the NFL has never made the formula public. |
|
03-06-2007, 10:38 PM | #464 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
Wow. That is shocking. He is a very good blocking TE that is an average/above average receiver. He is not Antonio Gates. There is no way the Pats would have paid anywhere close to that and I would have killed them if they had. Last edited by Vinatieri for Prez : 03-06-2007 at 10:38 PM. |
|
03-06-2007, 10:43 PM | #465 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
Quote:
Agreed, Kyle Brady completely fills the Graham role of blocking TE and Watson is just what he was last year, a hopefully premier receiving TE. |
|
03-06-2007, 10:46 PM | #466 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
So wait... 10 million guaranteed for a number 2/3 WR and return man good, 15 million guaranteed for one of the top 5-10 TE's in the game bad? Rose tinted glasses are fun, I guess.
Arles is right, there is no way Steve Smith isn't there at the end of the second round and you can pay him 750k a year to do the same job. Last edited by bhlloy : 03-06-2007 at 10:47 PM. |
03-06-2007, 10:52 PM | #467 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
Huh? First, that's a 50% increase in guaranteed money. Second, Welker also gets 3 million less a season (50% of Graham). Third, you are smoking something if you think Graham is a top 5-10 TE in the league. Fourth, Pats have greater need for a WR than a TE. Graham wasn't even the best TE on the Pats for crying out loud. The Broncos just paid #1 WR price for a blocking TE. Last edited by Vinatieri for Prez : 03-06-2007 at 10:59 PM. |
|
03-06-2007, 10:53 PM | #468 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
Quote:
I don't see Graham as a top 10 TE at all. He's solid, but the Pats lose nothing by putting Kyle Brady in his place. In fact Brady has proven to be quite a bit more durable than Graham, and he's a lot older. |
|
03-06-2007, 10:54 PM | #469 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
|
03-06-2007, 10:59 PM | #470 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Mexico
|
Understatement of the year. |
03-06-2007, 10:59 PM | #471 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
I'm an idiot. Graham clearly isn't one of the top 5-10 TE's in the league. I was thinking of Ben Watson.
I still think the Pats overpaid a lot to get Welker, given the WR's that are going to be available in the second. |
03-06-2007, 11:00 PM | #472 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
Quote:
I know nothing about Welker other than his name is similar to the guy that voices Freddie of Scooby-Doo. But the point of going from catching balls thrown by Joey to catching from Brady is excellent. Hell, the fact that he could stay on the field at all after catching a few of those "look-behind-ya" passes shows that he might actually be Superman! |
|
03-06-2007, 11:04 PM | #473 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
|
03-06-2007, 11:12 PM | #474 | |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Georgia
|
Quote:
I'd disagree a little bit, though the gist of your point is well taken. I think Graham is an outstanding blocking TE but no better than average receiver. I've always held my breath whenever they threw to Graham. If it was a nearly impossible catch to make, he stood a chance to make the catch. But if it was a routine, normal throw - which most Brady passes are - I've seen him drop too many of those to be comfortable with him as a receiver. But a very, very good blocker as you say. Good for him though that he got a big payday. He works hard.
__________________
-Beargrowlz [email protected] TCY Golden Scribe Winner - Bear Goes Home "The measure of a man's real character is what he would do if he knew he would never be found out." --Thomas B. Macaulay |
|
03-06-2007, 11:13 PM | #475 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
|
03-06-2007, 11:25 PM | #476 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Hampshire
|
Quote:
Awesome thanks!! Always been confused by this, and now I get it! |
|
03-06-2007, 11:43 PM | #477 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
It's good info, but the correlation between comp picks and success maybe somewhat reverse of that the author says. He says comp picks lead to wins. I would say wins lead to comp picks. Players on successful teams are ripe for FA signings away from the team, which leads to getting the comp. pick. Some are willing to sign a backup O-lineman from the Pats (Tom Ashworth), but no one is too interested in a backup on the Browns. I never realized Brady was a comp. pick though. |
|
03-06-2007, 11:58 PM | #478 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
Quote:
Good teams tend to have a lot of good players, and therefore have to lose some to FA just cause the money is not there to pay everyone. Which pretty much ties into your theory. |
|
03-07-2007, 07:23 AM | #479 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
|
Quote:
That's going to be written on his tombstone. I feel for the guy, because he does seem to get those injuries (hamstring, etc.) that end up nagging him. I don't think that he has ever been healthy for a full season. That said, from everything I have seen, he is a really nice guy (especially for a WR), and I hope that he does manage to get paid and land on a team that is a good fit for him. |
|
03-07-2007, 07:27 AM | #480 |
This guy has posted so much, his fingers are about to fall off.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: In Absentia
|
Denver loves having a solid TE to catch those passes on the QB bootlegs. I guess Putzier hasn't developed as quickly as they hoped? I don't know, seems like an awful lot of money for someone who isn't going to morph into Shannon Sharpe overnight.
__________________
M's pitcher Miguel Batista: "Now, I feel like I've had everything. I've talked pitching with Sandy Koufax, had Kenny G play for me. Maybe if I could have an interview with God, then I'd be served. I'd be complete." |
03-07-2007, 07:38 AM | #481 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
|
Quote:
No disrespect taken. Calling the Benson/Haslett/Brooks Saints anything other than a "bad organization" abuses the English language beyond all recognition. As I said earlier in this thread, any team that can sign him to a contract without a lot of guaranteed money is possibly getting a great player for a year. In 2004, he got 1,400 yards and 11 touchdowns with Aaron freaking Brooks throwing to him. Adjusting those numbers to account for the Aaron Brooks factor, we can see that had he had Tom Brady throwing to him, he would have gotten eleventy-billion yards and infinity touchdowns. Joe Horn also, more than other players, has always taken professional stuff personally. So I think that the "shoulder chip" factor cannot be overlooked and you are right to focus on it. All that said, I wonder if the Patriots are the best fit for him. It's all rumor and speculation, but apparently Joe Horn really likes being a #1 receiver, and I wonder if he will be able to check his ego at the door--especially for a team like the Patriots that will demand it. Saints fans who went to the games said that during the last few games when he was sitting out injured, he just sat by himself on the bench and sulked--in comparison to other injured/inactive players who were still participating in sideline huddles, coaching, etc. Of course, that kind of sulking might indicate a guy who just needed a change of scenery, or it might indicate a guy who won't play well with others if he isn't the alpha dog on the offense. Hard to tell. I actually see him ending up in Atlanta. He will get to play the Saints at least twice and will get a situation similar to what he had in New Orleans--no real leader on offense, so he can take the "superstar/leader" role on for himself. All that said, he sure was a great player for us and really was the face of the franchise for quite a few years there. I'm sad that he didn't get to retire a Saint. |
|
03-07-2007, 07:40 AM | #482 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
Quote:
Putzier was traded last year to the Texans Ksyrup. The guy who hasn't developed, evidently, is Tony Schefler. I think they spent a second round pick on the guy and he seemed to play well a lot of last year, but he blocks like crap. Alexander is an OK blocker, but nothing special. Graham is a pretty solid blocker and is a better receiver than Alexander. Maybe Schefler will end up being the third down TE and Graham will be the first and second down guy who can block well and catch a few passes in the meantime. All that said, I think they overpaid. |
|
03-07-2007, 07:42 AM | #483 |
This guy has posted so much, his fingers are about to fall off.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: In Absentia
|
That's who I was thinking of - Schefler, the rookie from Western Michigan or something like that?
__________________
M's pitcher Miguel Batista: "Now, I feel like I've had everything. I've talked pitching with Sandy Koufax, had Kenny G play for me. Maybe if I could have an interview with God, then I'd be served. I'd be complete." |
03-07-2007, 07:52 AM | #484 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
|
Before Free Agency started, a few websites had Graham as one of the possible value picks of Free Agency. The idea, of course, being that he was a very good blocker and a decent receiver and some team might be able to pick him up on the cheap and end up making a smart play. Of course, once everyone starts thinking of a guy as an underrated value pickup, then he, at some point, morphs into an overrated overpaid guy. I think that teams forget that part of what made him attractive in the first place was the idea that he would come cheap (either in terms of money or trade or draft picks or whatever). Call it the Ben Wallace effect. |
03-07-2007, 08:03 AM | #485 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
|
Are there any OLB's left on the market for the Steelers?
I am starting the grass roots effort to have them look at Georges Laraque...if A Gates can go from basketball to football, why can't big George make a switch too?
__________________
"Do you guys play fast tempos with odd time signatures?" "Yeah" "Cool!!" |
03-07-2007, 08:40 AM | #486 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
Quote:
Oh, I get why they did it. Seattle was after him hard as well and if Denver wanted him, they had to give a big offer. In the end, I do think they overpaid. I also think if you are going to overpay anyone other than a superstar, Graham is the type of guy you do it to. He's a hard worker with a good attitude. If he were the lone pass catching TE, he'd probably average around 45 to 50 catches a year. He'll block and isn't going to throw a fit if he's not getting the ball thrown to him. I can also see the Broncos using some 2 TE sets with Walker and Marshall at the WR spots while Graham and Schefler man the TE spots. I think that'd be a pretty dangerous formation. You'd have 4 big TE/WR. You could run with a lot of success out of that formation. You would also have the ability for any of the four pass catchers to stretch the defense. (both Schefler and Graham have the ability to go deep over the middle) I can live with the few guys we've signed so far. It looks like Shanahan is giving Cutler some more options on offense. The way our offense looked last year, that can only be a good thing. |
|
03-07-2007, 11:44 AM | #487 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2001
|
Quote:
Good luck with Watson. I happen to think he's highly overrated. Guy disappeared for half the season last year and to me doesn't have any extra fight in him. I think Thomas might be the better player eventually. Everyone wants to put Watson in the mold of Gates. He needs to step it up.
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales |
|
03-07-2007, 12:05 PM | #488 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Newbury, England
|
As I posted when the Welker thing first broke, sorry to see him go, and the contract isn't too bad for the first three years - he'll be cut/restructured then anyway.
For some of the questions as to how good he is, to me Welker = Wayne Chrebet = Ricky Proehl, guts and effort player, good athlete, tough & will be quickly become a fan favourite.
__________________
'A song is a beautiful lie', Idlewild, Self Healer. When you're smiling, the whole world smiles with you. Sports! |
03-07-2007, 12:06 PM | #489 |
This guy has posted so much, his fingers are about to fall off.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: In Absentia
|
He's no Tom Waddle, though.
__________________
M's pitcher Miguel Batista: "Now, I feel like I've had everything. I've talked pitching with Sandy Koufax, had Kenny G play for me. Maybe if I could have an interview with God, then I'd be served. I'd be complete." |
03-07-2007, 12:56 PM | #490 |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Georgia
|
Pats re-signed special teams captain Larry Izzo.
Not real earth shattering, but a solid gunner. Cheers.
__________________
-Beargrowlz [email protected] TCY Golden Scribe Winner - Bear Goes Home "The measure of a man's real character is what he would do if he knew he would never be found out." --Thomas B. Macaulay |
03-07-2007, 06:30 PM | #491 |
College Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SE
|
__________________
GM RayCo Raiders-est. 2004-2012 Charter member of the IHOF-RayCo GM GM Tennessee Titans PFL 2011-2014 GM Tennessee Titans FOWL 2020-2025 |
03-07-2007, 09:45 PM | #492 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Burke, VA
|
D'oh - so much for the Ravens getting him back on the cheap - looks like Jamal Lewis signed with the Brownies....
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200....ap/index.html |
03-08-2007, 02:07 AM | #493 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
|
Quote:
I like Daniel Graham. I can certainly see why we didn't try to sign him too hard as we had cover in that area and more pressing needs, but I'll be rooting for him (not even gonna qualify that with an 'except against NE' since Denver beats us every time anyway). He does tend to drop easy balls and gets nagging injuries frequently, but he's probably the best blocking TE in the league, makes some amazing catches (that build the hype and make the easy drops that much worse) and by all accounts is one of the best citizens in the NFL. Even donated a kidney to his sister with no guarantee he'd be able to keep playing,and now gets to go back homem at least where he played college ball. |
|
03-08-2007, 12:12 PM | #494 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
No problem, they traded two 3rds and 7th for Willis McGahee (which sure seems low) http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2791831 |
|
03-08-2007, 12:18 PM | #495 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2001
|
Quote:
guy is way overrated you want 3.8 ypc then he is your man
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales |
|
03-08-2007, 12:28 PM | #496 |
Dearly Missed
(9/25/77-12/23/08) Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: DC Suburbs
|
And if you want 3.4 YPC?
__________________
NAFL New Orleans Saints GM/Co-Commish MP Career Record: 114-85 NAFL Super Bowl XI Champs In memory of Gavin Anthony: 7/22/08-7/26/08 |
03-08-2007, 12:30 PM | #497 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Washington, DC
|
Because that Bills line is so great to run behind?
__________________
Sixteen Colors ANSI/ASCII Art Archive "...the better half of the Moores..." -cthomer5000 |
03-08-2007, 12:32 PM | #498 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
|
03-08-2007, 12:33 PM | #499 |
College Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle
|
Here is some more info on how comp. picks work, and in particular, the Pats situation. From an interview with Scott Pioli:
“We now have six picks and sometime between now and the draft, they’ll be announcing compensatory picks. We anticipate for all the free agents we lost last year that we have another four picks coming to us, compensatory picks. We’re looking at, on draft day, at this point having 10 picks. Four of those picks, compensatory picks, will be picks we get that can not be traded. … We’re projecting those will be anywhere between a fourth [rounder] and sixth [rounder], because they have a very complicated formula that seems to be changing every year in the league office that is based on a number of different factors that include the amount of money that the contract is signed for by the player when they leave through unrestricted free agency, but there is also a component of play-time during the season that is factored in there. We know we’re going to have a seventh and we’re projecting two six’s and just trying to figure out what that David Givens pick will be, as his play time was affected by his injury this year.” |
03-08-2007, 12:34 PM | #500 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2001
|
You would probably be looking at Edge then. He nailed it right on the nose last year. Impressive.
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|