Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-02-2004, 10:54 PM   #401
Warhammer
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
But the Rams the next season could have handled the Falcons. They would have jumped on the Falcons early, and their defense which was better than the Vikes would have held them. Or the 2001 team could have done it, one of the best teams to have not won the Super Bowl.
Warhammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004, 11:16 PM   #402
tucker342
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Iowa City, IA
Great dynasty!

Hopefully the 49ers will do better next time
tucker342 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 06:15 AM   #403
sterlingice
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
*cough*Golden Scribe*cough*

SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out!

Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!"
Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!"


sterlingice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 11:12 AM   #404
Wolfpack
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warhammer
But the Rams the next season could have handled the Falcons. They would have jumped on the Falcons early, and their defense which was better than the Vikes would have held them. Or the 2001 team could have done it, one of the best teams to have not won the Super Bowl.

1998 Minnesota outscored opponents 556-296
1999 St. Louis outscored opponents 526-242
1998 Atlanta outscored opponents 442-289

It is conceivable that would be the case. Atlanta definitely had the worst offense of the three and St. Louis had the best defense. However, in the tournament, none of these teams ever met one another, so Atlanta is more the "survivor" of this event than the "best team".

For the record, the 2002 Bucs had a 346-196 scoring ratio, not bad until you consider that both the 2000 Ravens and Titans were better, ratio-wise. The Titans had a 346-191 ratio, while the Ravens were 333-165.
Wolfpack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 AM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.