5.0c Stats--What's the word?

[Ben E Lou]

I saw someone mention that there may be an issue with too many QB's putting up good numbers. How have others found the stats in this version?

[Solecismic]

I've run some test seasons, and it's just not true. I think the person reporting the problem was using a third-party utility to generate a random player file, and that's inevitably going to cause skewed statistics.

[FBPro]

Thanks Jim.

[amdaily]

Originally Posted by Solecismic

I've run some test seasons, and it's just not true. I think the person reporting the problem was using a third-party utility to generate a random player file, and that's inevitably going to cause skewed statistics.

That was me, and I'll retract my previous statement (for now anyways ) and leave everyone with 1 token of advise:

Injuries must be set at 200 for realistic league wide stats

In the post where I suggested there was something something still wrong, injuries were set at 150. I ended up getting an average (over 3 seasons)league wide total of 462 INT. However, the NFL average is 537. On the surface, this was quite a difference.

Upon putitng injuries up at 200, it forced some of the elite QB's to miss a game or two, and with their inferior backups playing, league wide INT's rose to a average of 542 - amuch more realistic result.