Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-04-2009, 05:31 PM   #1
Young Drachma
Dark Cloud
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Mountain West Conference proposes 8-team CFB playoff

Mountain West Conference proposes college football playoff - ESPN

Quote:
NEW YORK -- The Mountain West Conference wants to lead the fight for a major college football playoff.

The MWC presented the BCS with a proposal Wednesday to create an eight-team playoff system that would allow greater access to the national championship game to teams outside the six most powerful leagues.

Commissioner Craig Thompson and four university leaders from the MWC announced details on a conference call and the entire 2½-page proposal was posted on the league's Web site.

"I will put this as bluntly as a I can," said Tom Buchanan, University of Wyoming president and chairman of the MWC board of directors. "We all believe that change is needed. The current system is not fair and somebody needs to stand up and say that and ask for dialogue amongst all the parties involved.

"Our goal is to find a system that is best for college football."

The next BCS meeting is scheduled for April in Pasadena, Calif.

"I would strongly suggest this will be a conversation topic," Thompson said.

Thompson would not speculate how the proposal will be received, but the chances of it being met with anything other than a resounding "No thank you" from the commissioners of the six automatic qualifying conferences seems remote -- at best.

The Bowl Championship Series last summer shot down a proposal brought by Southeastern Conference commissioner Mike Slive that would have created a four-team playoff.

One of the reasons commissioners from the Big East, Big 12, Pac-10 and Big Ten gave for being against the so-called plus-one model Slive presented was a fear that any playoff system would inevitably expand.

Even in the SEC and Atlantic Coast Conference, which also supported a plus-one, there are no signs university presidents want an NFL-style playoff system.

Meanwhile, fans and many members of the media grow more vocal in support of a playoff each time the current BCS format, which only gives two teams a chance to win a national title in the postseason, fails to produce totally satisfying results.

Now, the Mountain West is vowing to be an advocate for those frustrated by the BCS.

"This is not a gesture on our part," San Diego State University president Stephen Weber said. "There is a fundamental unfairness here that I think the whole country is aware of and somebody's got to stand up and confront that unfairness."

The conferences with automatic access to the five BCS games are the Big East, Big Ten, Big 12, SEC, ACC and Pac-10.

The call for change comes after a season in which MWC champion Utah was the only unbeaten major team but was never seriously in the running to play in the BCS title game. Florida beat Oklahoma for the championship, while the Utes finished No. 2 after beating Alabama in the Sugar Bowl.

The MWC's proposal has four parts. The first creates a new way to determine which conferences receive automatic bids to the big-money bowls. The current criteria weigh the BCS rankings of teams in each league.

It's a system that makes it difficult for the Mountain West, Western Athletic Conference, Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference and Sun Belt to earn an automatic bid because those teams usually don't fare as well in the major polls. The BCS standings rely heavily on the USA Today coaches' poll and the Harris Interactive poll.

Under the MWC's proposal, a conference would qualify for an automatic bid if its teams have a winning percentage of at least .400 in games against the current automatic qualifying leagues over a two-year period.

Using that standard, the MWC would join the other six leagues as automatic qualifiers starting next season.

Part two of the proposal suggests doing away with the BCS standings and creating a 12-member committee to pick which teams receive at-large bids, and to select and seed the eight teams chosen for the playoff.

The BCS has previously discussed using a selection committee to determine which teams play for the national title and the idea was dismissed.

Under the MWC's proposal, the four current BCS games -- the Sugar, Orange, Rose and Fiesta bowls -- would host the four first-round playoff games. Another BCS bowl would be awarded to a current non-BCS game and would host the lowest ranked of the 10 teams selected in a game with no championship implications.

The semifinals would be played about a week later, with the current BCS bowls given the opportunity to host those games.

The championship game would be played a week after that, and again the current BCS bowls would be given the opportunity to host.

While bowl organizers from the Fiesta, Sugar and Orange bowl have said they would be open to a playoff format, the Rose Bowl -- which has a long-standing and profitable relationship with the Big Ten and Pac-10 -- has been resistant to such change.

The final part of the MWC's proposal calls for each of the 11 major conferences and Notre Dame to have equal representation on the BCS presidential oversight committee and for revenues to be distributed equally among all leagues.

Currently, the five non-BCS conferences have one vote when the BCS makes decisions and those leagues receive far less revenue from year to year, unless one of its teams earns a spot in a BCS game.

The BCS agreed to a new, four-year TV deal with ESPN last year that will go into effect in 2010. That deal was negotiated using the current BCS format. While ESPN has said it would not stand in the way if the BCS wanted to change, the new deal allows the BCS to put off making any drastic changes until at least the 2014 season.

"This is a matter for the BCS and it's therefore inappropriate for us to comment," ESPN spokesman Josh Krulewitz said Wednesday.

The MWC has not signed the new deal with ESPN and has until April 20, 2010, to do so. Thompson said he's not sure how long the conference will hold out.

"Now is the time to have the conversation about change in the current system, because we have a contract in front of us that will extend the status quo for another four years and we want to have the conversation now, not four years from now," Buchanan said.

Information from The Associated Press was used in this report.

Young Drachma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 05:33 PM   #2
Pumpy Tudors
Bounty Hunter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
This has about as much chance of making change as a newsstand vendor if you hand him a $1000 bill.

Yeah, I stretched the hell out of that one.
__________________
No, I am not Batman, and I will not repair your food processor.

Last edited by Pumpy Tudors : 03-04-2009 at 05:33 PM.
Pumpy Tudors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 05:55 PM   #3
Passacaglia
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Big Ten Country
Quote:
While bowl organizers from the Fiesta, Sugar and Orange bowl have said they would be open to a playoff format, the Rose Bowl -- which has a long-standing and profitable relationship with the Big Ten and Pac-10 -- has been resistant to such change.

I love the Rose Bowl. Seriously.
Passacaglia is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 06:16 PM   #4
OldGiants
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Location, Location, Location
I'm all for an 8 team playoff as long as no Mountain West team is ever in it.
__________________
"The case of Great Britain is the most astonishing in this matter of inequality of rights in world soccer championships. The way they explained it to me as a child, God is one but He's three: Father, Son and Holy Ghost. I could never understand it. And I still don't understand why Great Britain is one but she's four....while [others] continue to be no more than one despite the diverse nationalities that make them up." Eduardo Galeano, SOCCER IN SUN AND SHADOW
OldGiants is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 08:16 PM   #5
remper
Mascot
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldGiants View Post
I'm all for an 8 team playoff as long as no Mountain West team is ever in it.

either you're being sarcastic, in which case... haha

if you're serious, how could you not consider the Utes one of the top eight teams last year?
remper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 08:19 PM   #6
sterlingice
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
It's not like they ever embarrassed a top-5 team from a major conference in a major bowl game

SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out!

Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!"
Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!"



Last edited by sterlingice : 03-04-2009 at 08:19 PM.
sterlingice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 08:44 PM   #7
Big Fo
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Still not good enough, though the idea of Norte Dame having as much representation on the committee as the SEC or Big 12 makes me smile.

I prefer the sixteen team playoff with eleven conference champions and five wild cards better. I don't think either is going to happen any time soon.
Big Fo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 08:48 PM   #8
sterlingice
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Fo View Post
Still not good enough, though the idea of Norte Dame having as much representation on the committee as the SEC or Big 12 makes me smile.

I prefer the sixteen team playoff with eleven conference champions and five wild cards better. I don't think either is going to happen any time soon.

My personal favorite solution as well

SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out!

Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!"
Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!"


sterlingice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 09:19 PM   #9
BradS
n00b
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Get their heads out of the sand, it's the only way to fly.

"This is not a gesture on our part," San Diego State University president Stephen Weber said. "There is a fundamental unfairness here that I think the whole country is aware of and somebody's got to stand up and confront that unfairness."
BradS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 11:23 PM   #10
JeeberD
General Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Town of Flower Mound
Fuck the Mountain Worst Conference, yo...
__________________
UTEP Miners!!!

I solemnly swear to never cheer for TO
JeeberD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 08:57 AM   #11
Mizzou B-ball fan
General Manager
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Looks like this proposal will be considered relatively soon........

Radical BCS restructuring proposal to get inspection - The Denver Post
Mizzou B-ball fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 09:08 AM   #12
RomaGoth
Favored Bitch #2
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Here
Even if something does come of this, it won't be for a long time...

"With TV and bowl contracts signed through the 2014 bowl season, any changes in the BCS won't occur until January 2015 — the 2014 regular season."

I love college football, but their method of determining a champion is such a freakin' joke.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suicane75
Pumpy, come sit on my lap and tell me all your troubles and woes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Cloud
None of this shit is personal. It's the internet.
RomaGoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.