Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-30-2007, 01:24 PM   #1
mgadfly
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
psychologists--cnn article

This morning on CNN.com there is an article discussing punishment to parents that leave a child in the car too long. Part of the article is a quote from a professor at the University of South Florida.

Quote:
It's easy to forget your keys or that cup of coffee on the roof. But a child?

The awful truth, experts say, is that the stressed-out brain can bury a thought -- something as trite as a coffee cup or crucial as a baby -- and go on autopilot. While researchers once thought the different parts of the brain worked in conjunction with each other, they now realize that different portions dominate at different times.

"The value of the item is not only not relevant in these competing memory systems," says memory expert David Diamond, an associate psychology professor at the University of South Florida. "But, in fact, we can be more complacent because we tell ourselves, 'There's no way I would forget my child."'

I'm working on a case where notice and memory are an important part of the issue (it isn't a criminal case where a parent left a kid in a car) and I'm wondering if anyone here has a good enough understanding of this area of psychology to know if David Diamond's view is supported by science?

Thanks for any help.

mgadfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2007, 09:42 PM   #2
ThunderingHERD
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgadfly View Post
This morning on CNN.com there is an article discussing punishment to parents that leave a child in the car too long. Part of the article is a quote from a professor at the University of South Florida.



I'm working on a case where notice and memory are an important part of the issue (it isn't a criminal case where a parent left a kid in a car) and I'm wondering if anyone here has a good enough understanding of this area of psychology to know if David Diamond's view is supported by science?

Thanks for any help.

There are a lot of different issues here. I wouldn't say that we "become more complacent because we tell ourselves, 'There's no way I would forget my child.'" The idea of forgetting the child is never considered at all, so there's no additional weight given to the child. With "prospective memory" (remembering to do something in the future) the important thing is the cues used to trigger the memory. If no cue is encoded for remembering the child then it will be very easy to forget. Lets say everyday I run into the post office for five minutes with my kid in the car--I do it everyday, it's only five minute, so it never occurs to me to encode a cue for remembering to get the kid. Now let's say I run into an old friend in the post office--chances are it's not going to occur to me that I need to be concerned with the kid out in the car.
__________________
"I'm losing my edge--to better looking people... with better ideas... and more talent. And who are actually really, really nice."

"Everyone's a voyeurist--they're watching me watch them watch me right now."
ThunderingHERD is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41 AM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.