IGN or Gamespot?

MizzouRah · 05-15-2003, 10:07 AM

I'm thinking about subscribing to one of these online gaming sites and wondered which one is better for content and coverage?

IGN is only $19.95/yr or $5.95/mo.

Gamespot is $24.95/yr or $4.95/mo.

I like both sites, but with E3 going on, I want to see some movies of games I'm pumped about... we all know that's not free.

Anyone a member of one/both of these sites? If so, are you happy with the coverage and content?

Thanks,

Todd

condors · 05-15-2003, 10:18 AM

i am a member of ign

not sure its worth it though

sometimes the info is really good sometimes i wonder why i wasted my time reading it

MizzouRah · 05-15-2003, 10:24 AM

Just watching videos of the latest and greatest would be a plus for me.

Todd

Franklinnoble · 05-15-2003, 11:38 AM

Bah. I want my news for free, dammit.

sterlingice · 05-15-2003, 03:08 PM

I just look at the free content between both and it's all good.

SI

Kodos · 05-15-2003, 03:34 PM

I subscribe to IGN and am happy with it. However, I don't download movies at all, so I can't help on that part of your question.

CHEMICAL SOLDIER · 05-15-2003, 03:44 PM

I dont know why I have to pay for info that should be free .

MizzouRah · 05-15-2003, 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CHEMICAL SOLDIER
I dont know why I have to pay for info that should be free .

I agree, but if I want to see some movies of Madden, HL2, NHL 2004, etc.. I need to purchase at least a month's membership.

I think I'm going with Gamespot, I like the way everything is laid out on their site.

Todd

Mega · 05-16-2003, 06:38 AM

I like IGN better, but I think I really like IGN from 3 years ago better. Right now I think they are about equal. Gamespot has better news coverage in general, IGN has better reviews in general. But, Gamespot has Reader Reviews just a click away, and IGN does a better job of sniffing out and reporting on cool "B" games. If it is just for E3, I would probably go with Gamespot's superior reporting.

As for why one would have to pay for infromation that should be free, it is the same logic by which people pay for magazines, newspapers, etc. A. You are paying for someone to look for, screen through, digest, and present the information to you in a useful and conveinent fashion. B. You are paying for the medium by which the information is transmited, since you are not psychically gleening said information from the ether.

MizzouRah · 05-16-2003, 09:10 AM

Quote:

If it is just for E3, I would probably go with Gamespot's superior reporting.

Bingo! EXACTLY what I want it for. I finally get to see NCAA 2004 movies, Half Life 2 movies, Madden 2004 movies, SSX 3 movies, etc...

Todd

CHEMICAL SOLDIER · 05-16-2003, 01:32 PM

I have dial up modem so trying to DL those movies would take months .

AgPete · 05-16-2003, 09:42 PM

I subscribe to Gamespot but one of the main reasons why is so I can have a high-speed download service. I believe FilePlanet charges close to fifty dollars a year while you can get the same demos, game videos, patches, map packs, etc. at Gamespot for twenty something dollars a year. The E3 videos are pretty cool but I wish they were better quality, I'd gladly lengthen the download time for better quality full-screen videos. I've found IGN useful for some games though. In particular, the title specific MMORPG message boards. Very smart community with some of the titles and you can find out a lot about the games.

05-15-2003, 03:08 PM	#5
sterlingice Hall Of Famer Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Back in Houston!	I just look at the free content between both and it's all good. SI __________________ Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out! Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!" Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!"

05-15-2003, 03:44 PM	#7
CHEMICAL SOLDIER College Starter Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Henderson, Nevada	I dont know why I have to pay for info that should be free . __________________ Toujour Pret

05-16-2003, 01:32 PM	#11
CHEMICAL SOLDIER College Starter Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Henderson, Nevada	I have dial up modem so trying to DL those movies would take months . __________________ Toujour Pret

05-16-2003, 09:42 PM	#12
AgPete College Prospect Join Date: Jan 2001	I subscribe to Gamespot but one of the main reasons why is so I can have a high-speed download service. I believe FilePlanet charges close to fifty dollars a year while you can get the same demos, game videos, patches, map packs, etc. at Gamespot for twenty something dollars a year. The E3 videos are pretty cool but I wish they were better quality, I'd gladly lengthen the download time for better quality full-screen videos. I've found IGN useful for some games though. In particular, the title specific MMORPG message boards. Very smart community with some of the titles and you can find out a lot about the games. __________________ Click here for the FOF2004 World Football League Dynasty (WFL) - Football Goes Global! OOTP5 Psychology Experiment (Incomplete but fun read for MLB fans.) The FOFC All-Time NFL Team - Voted on by FOFC members.

05-15-2003, 10:18 AM	#2
condors College Starter Join Date: Oct 2000	i am a member of ign not sure its worth it though sometimes the info is really good sometimes i wonder why i wasted my time reading it

05-15-2003, 10:24 AM	#3
MizzouRah Hall Of Famer Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Troy, Mo	Just watching videos of the latest and greatest would be a plus for me. Todd

05-15-2003, 11:38 AM	#4
Franklinnoble Banned Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Placerville, CA	Bah. I want my news for free, dammit.

05-15-2003, 03:34 PM	#6
Kodos Resident Alien Join Date: Jun 2001	I subscribe to IGN and am happy with it. However, I don't download movies at all, so I can't help on that part of your question.

05-16-2003, 06:38 AM	#9
Mega n00b Join Date: Apr 2003	I like IGN better, but I think I really like IGN from 3 years ago better. Right now I think they are about equal. Gamespot has better news coverage in general, IGN has better reviews in general. But, Gamespot has Reader Reviews just a click away, and IGN does a better job of sniffing out and reporting on cool "B" games. If it is just for E3, I would probably go with Gamespot's superior reporting. As for why one would have to pay for infromation that should be free, it is the same logic by which people pay for magazines, newspapers, etc. A. You are paying for someone to look for, screen through, digest, and present the information to you in a useful and conveinent fashion. B. You are paying for the medium by which the information is transmited, since you are not psychically gleening said information from the ether.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)