Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-02-2004, 06:32 PM   #1
Chief Rum
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Where Hip Hop lives
2004 Spring Training News Thread

I have no idea if this will work, but I will give it a shot.

I love baseball, and I know a bunch of you guys do, too. We're just about to start spring training games and really get the ball rolling.

Every year at this time, though, I find it extremely hard to follow all the goings-on. It's tedious to read team camp reports every day, and even if you do it, there's so much to take in, you'll forget half of it by the time you're done with it, much less later on in the season when you're trying to look smart talking baseball.

So I thought we could have this thread. We can post anything baseball related here, although preferably it would be limited to on-field stuff (position battles, potential trades, who's doing well and who's not, injuries, etc.)

We all have favorite teams. I was thinking it would be best if we simply every now and then tossed up something about the team or teams that we follow (along with commenting on other news items' if so desired). Important stuff like Opening Day lineup decisions or surprising cuts or injuries that could have a huge effect and so forth.

I think this will help us in two ways. One, we'll be able to follow baseball's general news flow without losing half a day (I have no doubt if we get enough people involved that most of the major stuff will be covered). Two, we'll all be better prepared for fantasy leagues, of which I know many of us are a part of.

No need to confirm you'll follow a team, and anyone can just post. Just if anyone has fantasy or just baseball on-field news from spring training, go ahead and post it. Even if it's obvious and we all already know it, it will be useful to have it all in one place.

Chief Rum
__________________
.
.

I would rather be wrong...Than live in the shadows of your song...My mind is open wide...And now I'm ready to start...You're not sure...You open the door...And step out into the dark...Now I'm ready.

Chief Rum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 06:38 PM   #2
Vince
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Willow Glen, CA
Great idea CR. I intend to follow Spring Training a little more than usual this year, so I'll chip in when I can.
__________________
Every time a Dodger scores a run, an angel has its wings ripped off by a demon, and is forced to tearfully beg the demon to cauterize the wounds.The demon will refuse, and the sobbing angel will lie in a puddle of angel blood and feathers for eternity, wondering why the Dodgers are allowed to score runs.That’s not me talking: that’s science. McCoveyChronicles.com.
Vince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 06:41 PM   #3
damnMikeBrown
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Cincinnati, 2 March '04:

This just in. The Cincinnati Reds have been demoted and are now a AAA team in the American Association. It is expected that Louisville will be called up to the Majors some time this week.

The commishoner, taking a moment to comment while unpacking the new shipment from Balco said "Cincinnati? Are they close to New York?".

/end

Last edited by damnMikeBrown : 03-02-2004 at 06:43 PM.
damnMikeBrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 06:47 PM   #4
Chief Rum
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Where Hip Hop lives
Quick report on the Angels...

Early on, Vlad Guerrero is showing no signs of discomfort in his back and has been launching the ball impressively and running with ease. He doesn't have any pain in his back from the herniated disk problems he had last season, but he said yesterday he will still where his back brace for a while as a precautionary measure...

...Several projected starters who had major injuries last year seem to be fine right now.

Troy Glaus had a shoulder injury that put him out for half the year. He elected to let it heal naturally, rather than have surgery and he says it feels fine. Glaus also had laser-eye surgery so he wouldn't have to wear contacts anymore.

Darin Erstad says he is feeling good after several injuries last year hit him. He is injury-prone, but it is thought his move to first base will stop him from running into walls and what not so much.

Adam Kennedy broke his hand inthe second to last day of last season, but he is fine. So is Benji Molina, who also broke his hand last year.

David Eckstein said he has never felt better. It was never really revealed that Eckstein played most of last season with leg problems (I forget what they were exactly) that limited his range and his swing.

Jarrod Washburn was also limited by an injury for much of the season last year. I forget the injury there, too, but it put him out of Opening Day last season and he worked throughout the rest of the year.

I haven't heard anything bad or good about Percival and his injuries from last year. Far as I know, he's fine. He arrived in camp and has been throwing along with everyone else, just haven't seen any news reports about him.

...Garrett Anderson (to CF), Tim Salmon (to DH), and Erstad (to 1B) have said they are all fine with the moves. Anderson and Erstad have experience at their new positions anyway, and Salmon, well, you don't need experience to be a DH, at least not in the field.

...Mike Scioscia has been saying he thinks his lineup will be as follows...

SS Eckstein
1B Erstad
RF Guerrero
CF Anderson
3B Glaus
LF Guillen
DH Salmon
C Molina
2B Kennedy

Scioscia also says he views the Glaus, Guillen, Salmon trio as pretty much interchangeable throughout their positions in the lineup, based on matchups.

...There was a lot of talk in the offseason about who would make up the five rotation spots, with at least seven major-league quality starters on the team. That's all fluff. Everyone pretty much knows the rotation will be Colon, Washburn, Escobar, Ortiz, Lackey, and that Aaron Sele and Scot Shields will be in the pen.

...Rumors are still going around about Wash or Ortiz being shipped out, but nothing specific. The ANgels would really like to trade Sele, but no one will take on his $8 M contract.

...Owner Arte Moreno has said resigning Garrett Anderson is his number one priority, but all team sides are saying it will get done, and don't seem concerned about the timing. GA's agent said they wanted a deal in place by Opening Day, but GA himself seems laid back about it all.

CR
__________________
.
.

I would rather be wrong...Than live in the shadows of your song...My mind is open wide...And now I'm ready to start...You're not sure...You open the door...And step out into the dark...Now I'm ready.
Chief Rum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 07:03 PM   #5
korme
Go Reds
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bloodbuzz Ohio
Gotta love the Angels this year.
korme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 07:33 PM   #6
MrBug708
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Whittier
Dodgers were just bought by a Boston fan whose never been to Dodger stadium.

So much for winning a playoff series *sigh*
MrBug708 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 07:48 PM   #7
dawgfan
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
Early injury news regarding the Mariners:

- RP Rafael Soriano has been shut-down with a strain in his oblique muscle. He's likely out of action for the next 2 weeks or so, though he is doing water workouts in the hydrotherapy pool. He's questionable at this point to start the season.

- C Dan Wilson felt a twinge in his oblique muscle a few days ago. He suffered a pulled oblique last year in Spring Training which slowed him down for the first few months of the season, so he and the M's are being very cautious with this recurrence of soreness.

- OF prospect Chris Snelling continues to be snakebit by injuries. Coming off of 2 knee surgeries, he had to shut down on his first day of BP when he aggravated an improperly healed hamate-bone injury he never knew he had. When doctors operated, they discovered he'd broken the bone previously and hadn't healed properly. They elected to remove the hook portion of the bone which was causing irritation in his wrist. He'll likely be out for a month or so.

Interesting position battles to watch:

- Bullpen: Closer will be Eddie Guardado with Kazu Sasaki returning to Japan. Shigetoshi Hasegawa will be used in a variety of roles, from backup closer to RH setup man to use as a "2nd lefty" due to his effectiveness against lefty batters. Prior to his injury Soriano was pencilled in as a prime setup man with an eye to him becoming a closer in the future. Julio Mateo is probably a lock to make the team as a middle guy after his success last year. Ron Villone and Mike Myers will compete with homegrown Matt Thornton to fill the role of lefty specialists in the pen. Soriano's injury may allow the M's to start with Villone as a long-man and Myers as a specialist.

- Catcher: Ben Davis is expected to grab the starting job and start living up to expectations on him as a hitter.

- Third Base: Scott Speizio is expected to be the full-time third baseman, a position he hasn't played extensively in a few years. The M's are counting on him providing much better production than they got out of Jeff Cirillo, though they will lose something defensively.

- Outfield: With the loss of Mike Cameron and the signing of Raul Ibanez, Randy Winn will shift to CF with Ibanez in LF. There is some speculation the M's will be watching the Central Division race closely to see if either or both Magglio Ordonez and Carlos Beltran will become available.

The M's rotation seems set with returning starters Jamie Moyer, Joel Pineiro, Freddy Garcia, Gil Meche and Ryan Fleming. The M's will be watching Meche closely to see if he can hold up physically - last season, returning from 2 years of major shoulder injuries he started off strong but faded badly in the 2nd half of the season. Garcia will also be closely watched - he has #1 starter stuff but has struggled with major inconsistency for the last 1.5 seasons. The M's have highly regarded prospects in Clint Nageotte, Travis Blackley and Rett Johnson waiting in AAA Tacoma. These three would be prime candidates to replace an injured or traded starter, and will be key trading chips if the M's look to acquire a big bat during the season.
dawgfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 07:50 PM   #8
WSUCougar
Rider Of Rohan
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Port Angeles, WA or Helm's Deep
Questions abound with the Cardinals heading into Spring Training. Key issues of the moment are RHP Woody Williams' tendonitis, and the contract status of SS Edgar Renteria and RHP Matt Morris in the wake of the Pujols signing.

A bright spot so far (and admittedly it's VERY early) has been the lively stuff of pitchers Cris Carpenter and Alan Benes. The former is expected to compete for a role in the rotation, while Benes is a long shot returning to his original team. Both are rebounding from arm injuries.
__________________
It's not the years...it's the mileage.
WSUCougar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 07:51 PM   #9
Vince
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Willow Glen, CA
dawgfan - with the huge pickups by the Angels, and the A's always seeming to find a way to win even after losing huge names, how do you expect the M's to fare this year?
__________________
Every time a Dodger scores a run, an angel has its wings ripped off by a demon, and is forced to tearfully beg the demon to cauterize the wounds.The demon will refuse, and the sobbing angel will lie in a puddle of angel blood and feathers for eternity, wondering why the Dodgers are allowed to score runs.That’s not me talking: that’s science. McCoveyChronicles.com.
Vince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 07:59 PM   #10
dawgfan
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vince
dawgfan - with the huge pickups by the Angels, and the A's always seeming to find a way to win even after losing huge names, how do you expect the M's to fare this year?

The Angels made some great moves picking up Vlad and Colon. That said, based off of last season they have a lot of ground to make up. I tend to agree with the assessment made by Rob Neyer that while the Angels have improved a great deal, they aren't necessarily clear favorites over the A's and Mariners. They were 19 games back of the A's and 16 games back of the Mariners; the A's may slip a bit losing Tejada and Foulke, while M's seemed to essentially tread water with their moves.

It wouldn't surprise me if the Angels win the division, but the early hype that they are clear favorites seems a bit overoptimistic to me - on paper, I'd say Oakland, Seattle and Anaheim are fairly even. The downside to the M's is that they're a year older; can Edgar stay healthy, can Olerud bounce back, will Ichiro continue his slide from great to merely good, will the improvements in offense with Aurillia, Speizio and Ibanez offset the decline in fielding? Can a team that has started strong and then faded the last 2 seasons avoid that fate?

One upside to the M's is that they are in a better position financially this year to make a big move during the season if the opportunity is there. I'd like this team better if they could acquire Ordonez or Beltran, but who knows if either will become available, and if so how much they'll cost in terms of prospects.

I think the M's will likely be in the playoff mix, and I'm certainly not conceding anything to Anaheim at this point - I'm expecting a competitive race.
dawgfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 08:18 PM   #11
Vince
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Willow Glen, CA
Well, here's a tremendous site run by a few friends of mine on the Giants. Feel free to check it out...they've got some great stuff there.

www.fogball.com
__________________
Every time a Dodger scores a run, an angel has its wings ripped off by a demon, and is forced to tearfully beg the demon to cauterize the wounds.The demon will refuse, and the sobbing angel will lie in a puddle of angel blood and feathers for eternity, wondering why the Dodgers are allowed to score runs.That’s not me talking: that’s science. McCoveyChronicles.com.
Vince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 08:21 PM   #12
Chief Rum
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Where Hip Hop lives
Nothing is for sure in the AL West. All three of the top teams can be expected to play well, and even the Rangers are no slouch for a last place team.

That said, you better not count on last year's results as an indicator of the Angels' likelihood to succeed last season. If you check out my Angels report above, you'll note the ton of injuries they had last year. That and inconsistent starting pitching was pretty much the reasons they fell back. They had the same talent as when they won the Series, about the same as the A's and M's had last year. It was just that for the Angels a lot of that talent was either on the DL or apparently dealing with the usual post-Series swoon.

To that team--which is essentially intact, minus Spiezio and Brad Fullmer--they have added the aforementioned guys in Colon and Escobar and Guerrero and Guillen.

Like I said, nothing is a given in the competitive AL West. All three teams have proven it. But in my mind, it is clear the Angels have the most talent now, and if they stay healthy and the new guys mold together well with the holdovers, they are going to be very, very good and should [key word] win the AL West by a single digit lead.

But that's why we play the games.

dawgfan, any reason you think Spiezio will be much worse on the field? Was Cirillo so great? I had never known him to be a great fielder, although that could just be ignorance on my part. Just so you know, Speizio played a lot of third base last season when Glaus was gone for the last half of the season. Also, Spiezio was excellent at first--I am talking Gold Glove excellent (he got jobbed in 2002). He showed fine range to both sides and his glovework was incredible. He robbed so many doubles the past three seasons, it was brutal. Third base puts the emphasis on the opposite side, of course, when it comes to stopping doubles, and he will see more shots and have to make his throws across the field, but he held up well at 3B last season and is pretty versatile. I have a feeling you won't be concerned about him defensively, and his wing seems well suited for Safeco. Great all-around guy, too. I miss him.

BTW, I think Wilson's injury pretty much hands that catching job to Davis. See, now that's good stuff to know. It makes me put Davis higher upin my fantasy charts.

CR
__________________
.
.

I would rather be wrong...Than live in the shadows of your song...My mind is open wide...And now I'm ready to start...You're not sure...You open the door...And step out into the dark...Now I'm ready.
Chief Rum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 08:25 PM   #13
Vince
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Willow Glen, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Rum
dawgfan, any reason you think Spiezio will be much worse on the field? Was Cirillo so great? I had never known him to be a great fielder, although that could just be ignorance on my part. Just so you know, Speizio played a lot of third base last season when Glaus was gone for the last half of the season. Also, Spiezio was excellent at first--I am talking Gold Glove excellent (he got jobbed in 2002). He showed fine range to both sides and his glovework was incredible. He robbed so many doubles the past three seasons, it was brutal. Third base puts the emphasis on the opposite side, of course, when it comes to stopping doubles, and he will see more shots and have to make his throws across the field, but he held up well at 3B last season and is pretty versatile. I have a feeling you won't be concerned about him defensively, and his wing seems well suited for Safeco. Great all-around guy, too. I miss him.

I'll put aside my unreasoned hatred for Spiezio aside for the moment (damn game 6...damn it to hell!).

CR, as far as I know (and I know nothing of Spiezio's defensive ability), Cirillo is one of the better fielding 3Bs in the league. I'd think that barring a few players, anyone would be a step down in defense from Cirillo.
__________________
Every time a Dodger scores a run, an angel has its wings ripped off by a demon, and is forced to tearfully beg the demon to cauterize the wounds.The demon will refuse, and the sobbing angel will lie in a puddle of angel blood and feathers for eternity, wondering why the Dodgers are allowed to score runs.That’s not me talking: that’s science. McCoveyChronicles.com.
Vince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 08:29 PM   #14
sterlingice
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
Garth Brooks had the biggest hits (and an error) in Royals camp today. Go figure. The only other news today is that Affeldt blew 3 people away in 10 pitches and Santiago was one of the "Steroid Six" and he promptly no commented.

SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out!

Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!"
Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!"


sterlingice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 08:39 PM   #15
Carligula
H.S. Freshman Team
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Oakland, CA
A few notes from the A's camp:

- The Chavez contract talks have gone from "It's a done deal, we'll work it out in a few days" to "It'll take a few weeks, but it should get done" to... silence. Looks like he's gone.

- Mark Mulder (back spasms) and Rich Harden (sore shoulder) are both slightly hurt and threw BP for the first time in several days yesterday. I would be more than a little concerned about Harden, but it's his non-throwing shoulder.

- If the pitchers can be believed, they think Damian Miller's the greatest thing since sliced bread. If they're happy, the A's will not lose much at all by trading Hernandez; he almost certainly had a career year and wouldn't have hit anything near that even if they had brought him back.

- The A's are talking up Michael Rouse as a backup infielder; if he makes the team he would probably take Frankie Menechino's spot. Except for a few good months in 2000 or so before he got hurt, it has never been entirely clear to me what, exactly, Menechino does that someone else couldn't do at least as well.

- DH/OF? Jermaine Dye is healthy and has come through a grueling offseason workout program in the best shape of his life. I'll believe it when I see it.

- P Jim Mecir is healthy. As above, I'll believe that when... scratch that, I'll never believe it.

- For you fantasy-league types, Arthur Lee Rhodes is scheduled to be the closer. The A's do not tend to switch closers in the middle of the season, so even if he sucks he should be good for 35-40 saves.
Carligula is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 08:42 PM   #16
sterlingice
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carligula
A few notes from the A's camp:

- The Chavez contract talks have gone from "It's a done deal, we'll work it out in a few days" to "It'll take a few weeks, but it should get done" to... silence. Looks like he's gone.

Gee... where have you guys seen this act before?

SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out!

Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!"
Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!"


sterlingice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 09:12 PM   #17
dawgfan
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
Chief -

Cirillo is an excellent fielder. Had he not been so horrible with the bat the last couple of seasons he would've received serious GG consideration. While Speizio may have been good at 1B, he's definitely a step down at 3B from Cirillo as a fielder.

We'll see about the Angels - I expect them to be good, but even with Colon and Escobar added, I have some doubts about the pitching. Escobar isn't that great and has yet to crack 200 IP; Lackey slumped in his sophomore season; Washburn is good but regressed a bit last year; Colon is potentially very good, but he wasn't that great last year and with his conditioning you have to wonder when injuries may start setting in; Ortiz was a disappointment last year. The bullpen was very good, but Percival remains a bit of an injury risk.

As an Angels fan I'd expect you to feel like the 2002 season was the real talent level of the team while 2001 and 2003 were the aberrations; we'll see. I suspect 2002 was a peak that will be hard to duplicate. As I said, it wouldn't shock me to see the Angels do very well this season, but I just don't see it as a slam-dunk that they are clear AL West favorites.
dawgfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 09:49 PM   #18
henry296
College Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
The biggest position battle in Orioles camp is for second base between Jerry Hairston and Brian Roberts. Could have some fantasy impact as the winner should be the leadoff hitter and score some runs with the O's new offense plus both have decent speed and steal a decent amount of bases.

Hairston has been the starter but missed half of last year and Roberts played well. However, early in camp Roberts has back spasms and will miss the first couple of spring training games.
__________________
"It's a great day for hockey" - "Badger" Bob Johnson
henry296 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 09:53 PM   #19
sterlingice
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
Great thread, Chief

SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out!

Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!"
Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!"


sterlingice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 11:49 PM   #20
Chief Rum
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Where Hip Hop lives
Actually, dawgfan, we weren't bad in 2001 or in 2000 either. It's just no one noticed with the A's and M's doing so well. If you look back at the past four seasons, last year is more the aberration, not 2002. If it weren't for a weird history of bad Septembers, we would have won 90 games in both 2000 and 2001. Conquering that odd September thing (which really started in '95 when we let you guys back into the race) was a big issue in the 2002 season.

Some notes on the guys we have pitching that you see concerns,

Escobar-- he doesn't have 200+ ip, because the Jays never figured out how to use him. Even last year, he wasn't starting until halfway through the year. His entire time in Toronto was spent splitting time between the pen and the rotation. He may have other issues, but if you're riding your hopes on his durability, I assure you that's an issue that isn't a proven bad thing for him yet.

Washburn-- was hurt most of last year. All you have to do is look at his numbers the past four seasons, and you will see that. Easily his worst season (and he still led our starters in ERA).

Colon-- You're right that you have to think at anby time a guy in Colon's condition will finally break down. But the fact is, he has always carried around a lot of weight, and he has 200+ ip in every year except his rookie season and I think three years ago (where he had 170-180 or so). The guy is a horse. Sure, there's an injury risk there, but you have to admit there's a lot more evidence to suggest he's going to be just fine. I'm much more concerned he will give up too many homers than I am that he will get hurt.

Lackey-- Kid wins Game 7 of the Series and everyone loves him, and you think he isn't going to be effected by that? Lackey had a bad sophomore slump to start off, but he was much better in the second half and in September he was very strong. Everything I have read (including non-Angels sources) indicates a general belief that he was going through the usual maturity growing p[ains and that the stuff he was showing at the end of the year is his real stuff.

Oritz-- Only guy I agree completely with. To be honest, I would like to deal Ortiz, and let Scot Shields start. I don't think Ortiz is ever going to really harness his stuff. He gives up too many homeruns and he is too inconsistent by far. He was really luck to get 15 wins last year with his ERA--he got a lot of run support.

But let's say I am wrong, that Colon gets hurt, Escobar plays bad, whatever. We also have Scot Shields, Aaron Sele, Kevin Gregg, and fireballer Chris Bootcheck, among others to back them up. Shields and Gregg both showed they have major league stuff last year. Sele, as you well know, can get it done with veteran savvy--sure he won't star, but that's a decent arm to throw in there if needed. Bootchecxk has a triple-digit fastball, and a load of talent. And that doesn't even consider superstar pitchers on the way in Bobby Jensk and Ervin Santana that aren't all that far off. Both of those pitchers are rated among the best prospects in baseball.

And even if all of our pitchers stop going after the fifth inning and we lose Percival--we still have one heck of a bullpen. This is the best pen in baseball. That's been proven two years running now. Everyone has been asking Stoneman about Brendan Donnelly and K-Rod. These guys are dominating. K-Rod is the same guy you all saw in the postseason two years ago. He quietly had a very solid "rookie" year. Donnelly went into the All Star break with a sub-1.00 ERA and ended up with brilliant numbers ont he year. These are the guys we have setting up Percy. They are both very capable of closing. We also have Ben Weber, who hasn't had an ERA higher than 3.00 in 3-4 seasons, I believe. He's one of the best middle relievers in the biz. And until we get injuries in the rotation, we still have that starting rotation depth in the pen. SHields was just as great in the pen as he was starting, and that's where he will be to start the year, along with Sele as well.

And that doesn't even talk about if Percy is healthy. Everyone knows what he is capable of when he's healthy.

It's going to take a lot of things going wrong at once to mess up this staff. I'm not saying it can't happen. Heck, with the Angels' odd bad luck history, anything's possible. But I wouldn't place any bets on that luck. They seem just about as solid as you can be with their all around pitching depth and arm quality.

I'm much more concerned that the position players stay healthy and return to form than I am about the pitching.

BTW, even with all the problems and injuries last season, the Angels still had the 6th best ERA in the AL.

CR
__________________
.
.

I would rather be wrong...Than live in the shadows of your song...My mind is open wide...And now I'm ready to start...You're not sure...You open the door...And step out into the dark...Now I'm ready.
Chief Rum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 11:56 PM   #21
Neuqua
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago, Ill
Achilles heel? Cubs say no
Expected to be out at least 5 days

Advance ticket sales called 'mind-boggling'
Mar 1, 2004

By Paul Sullivan
Tribune staff reporter

March 1, 2004, 10:39 PM CST

MESA, Ariz. -- Mark Prior's season got off to a rocky start Monday when the Cubs shut him down with an inflamed right Achilles' tendon.

Prior likely won't be allowed to throw for 7 to 10 more days. Instead of six Cactus League starts, Prior may get only three or four starts if he's pushed back a couple of weeks.

"I don't foresee this being so long where I'm going to miss a whole lot," Prior said. "I might not get six whole starts, but as long as I get a few times off the mound ... I might not be able to go as much as I want Day One, but I don't think it's going to affect me in the regular season."

Prior said he first noticed the injury last September, but received treatment on it and continued pitching. The Cubs managed to keep it a secret until Monday, even though Prior had a magnetic resonance imaging test performed on the heel last Friday.

The MRI found no structural damage, but the injury could be easily aggravated because it's on the foot he pushes off with during his delivery.

"I hope it's not a nuisance like it was last year," he said. "But if it is, it's something we'll take care of and push through."

Trainer Dave Groeschner said the chances of Prior not being able to start the season are "pretty slim."

"If it was the season right now, could he go out and pitch? Absolutely," Groeschner said. "We're being pretty aggressive with the treatment right now. If it was the season, we'd get him out there to pitch, and Mark would want to do that. But we have an opportunity right now to get rid of this."

Manager Dusty Baker said the Cubs are simply taking a "conservative" approach.

"We're not that concerned," he said. "Things happen. I don't care who you are, you're always susceptible to something happening. I'd rather have it happen now and hopefully we can get this thing over with."

Prior spoke to former Cub ace Ferguson Jenkins, who told him he blew out his Achilles' and missed six months one season. "It's not something we're taking lightly," Prior said.

Prior pitched off a mound during the first week of spring training, but has sat out the last few days after a recurrence of the pain. Groeschner pointed to the wet fields, increased running after a relatively inactive off-season and Prior's "monster calves" as factors in the injury.

"We thought over the winter it would heal," Baker said. "He has those big old legs and calves, and I'm sure that put some kind of pressure on it."

Baker said there are plenty of pitchers in line to take Prior's innings the first two weeks of exhibition games.

General manager Jim Hendry said reliever Mike Remlinger, rehabbing slowly from off-season shoulder surgery, is 50-50 to start the season with the team. If Kent Mercker's sore back doesn't respond to treatment, the Cubs could face the prospect of having to use one or two inexperienced left-handers out of the pen in April.

Baker mentioned lefties Carlos Vasquez, Renyel Pinto, Felix Sanchez and Jimmy Anderson as possible candidates. Vasquez and Pinto pitched in Class A last year, Sanchez was in Double A and Anderson has a career 5.43 earned-run average in three-plus major-league seasons.

Hendry said he would not look outside the organization for another left-hander, and Baker didn't seem concerned.

"I come into every spring counting on a guy I didn't count on," Baker said.

Looks like this spring will be no different.
__________________
Our Deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that most frightens us. We ask ourselves, 'Who am I to be brilliant, gorgeous, talented, fabulous?' Actually, who are you not to be?

Last edited by Neuqua : 03-02-2004 at 11:56 PM.
Neuqua is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 12:21 AM   #22
dawgfan
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Rum
Actually, dawgfan, we weren't bad in 2001 or in 2000 either. It's just no one noticed with the A's and M's doing so well. If you look back at the past four seasons, last year is more the aberration, not 2002. If it weren't for a weird history of bad Septembers, we would have won 90 games in both 2000 and 2001. Conquering that odd September thing (which really started in '95 when we let you guys back into the race) was a big issue in the 2002 season.

I gotta call you on this one - the Angels win totals for the last 4 seasons:

77
99 - Won the W.S.
75
82

Which year is the aberration?

Look, I understand Anaheim had a lot of injuries last season, and the natural inclination in Spring is to play the eternal optimist with your favorite team. Maybe the Angels had an inordinate amount of injuries last season. Maybe they were unusually fortunate in 2002 when everything went just right. I suspect the true level of ability of Anaheim was better than they showed last year, and not quite as good as they showed in 2002. If you split the difference that's 88 wins - a good team. Adding Colon and Vlad are definite plusses, with Escobar and Guillen nice additions (though not as likely to be major impacts).

Oh, and Seattle has had some real bad Septembers lately, but the M's have still won 93 games each of the last 2 years despite their late-season swoons. September counts too...

As for the pitchers, Lackey wouldn't be the first guy to have a sophomore slump and then rebound from it. He also wouldn't be the first guy to perform quite well in his first season then decline after the league gets a good scouting report on him.

I know Escobar hasn't ever been a full-time starter before thus never cracking 200 IP, but regardless of why he hasn't, it still has to be a bit of a concern - can he hold up with that many innings for a year?

Colon will likely be real good.

I would be disappointed as an Angels fan if they won less than 90 games this season. Will 90 win the division? Probably not; despite the loss of Foulke and Tejada and the health concerns over Mark Mulder, you can't really rule the A's out of contention just yet, and the M's, despite their age, also deserve the benefit of the doubt given their history. I suspect 95 wins might win the division, and I think the Angels are capable of that, but I'm not sure they're that much more likely to reach that mark than Seattle or Oakland (though this could be the year Oakland backslides just a bit).

Like I said, I expect a close race. Weird things happen in baseball, so that prediction could well turn out to be way off, but that's how I see it shaping up.

Last edited by dawgfan : 03-03-2004 at 12:23 AM.
dawgfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 12:45 AM   #23
mckerney
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
This just in from Fort Myers...


...Joe Mauer is still awesome.
mckerney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 12:46 AM   #24
Chief Rum
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Where Hip Hop lives
I'm not saying anything about the competitiveness of the M's and A's. I know they will be good, and I know the AL West is going to be a tough division. I'm just saying if you're counting on some of the things you're counting on, than I want to play you in poker, because you're making some bad bets.

You just posted the win totals. You didn't note that that 82-win season was an above-.500 season, which is solid. You also don't note that the worst season--the 75-win season--was in a year when the Angels were in the same division as two 100-game winners in the A's and M's, and that the Angels were right in the middle of the wildcard race in late August. Yes, the September collapse was bad, and yes, Septembers count. But to say that Angels team was bad or indicative of a string of losing years like you would have, is completely misleading things.

I said either of those teams could have won 90 games. I don't think that's much of a stretch from how they were performing. It was exactly the sort of thinking you are doing now that led people to assume the Angels would be nothing in 2002. I knew better. I had watched the team and saw them put up good seasons in '95, '97, '98, and '00 with essentially the same corps of players, and come within a bad September of being very respectable in '01, too--in baseball's toughest division. I saw that and I knew if the Angels could stay healhty, they would surprise some pople. Surprised people enough to have a 116-win season team in '01 sitting nad watching them in the playoffs the next year.

Much of that core remains even now. All it needs to do is stay healhty.

As for Lackey, yes, some pitchers collapse when the league figures them out, but you are ignoring the fact Lackey had a very good second half. That doesn't really abide with your theory at all. That much more goes along with a guy coming off of a supreme high who is also very young, and finally getting it together, then it does a league figuring a guy out. If they had, Lackey would have been miserable the entire year, not just before the break.

You're right that Escobar hasn't been proven to be a 200 ip pitcher. But you're calling it an automatic fault. That's incorrect. It's an unknown. Neither you nor I know if he will be strong through 200 ip-plus. That's not a positive or a negative, at the moment. Not until we know more.

One thing we do have in our favor in there, is that if Escobar does falter, we have the pen to back him up. I notice you still haven't mentioned our pen...

CR
__________________
.
.

I would rather be wrong...Than live in the shadows of your song...My mind is open wide...And now I'm ready to start...You're not sure...You open the door...And step out into the dark...Now I'm ready.

Last edited by Chief Rum : 03-03-2004 at 01:49 AM.
Chief Rum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 01:41 AM   #25
Terps
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by henry296
The biggest position battle in Orioles camp is for second base between Jerry Hairston and Brian Roberts. Could have some fantasy impact as the winner should be the leadoff hitter and score some runs with the O's new offense plus both have decent speed and steal a decent amount of bases.

Hairston has been the starter but missed half of last year and Roberts played well. However, early in camp Roberts has back spasms and will miss the first couple of spring training games.

I wish they would just trade one of them already. I think it's pretty evident that one of them is going to have to go, because McLemore is likely to be the utility man, and Rule 5 pick Jose Bautista will probably stay on the 25 man roster all season like they did with Jose Morban last year.

I see them having Palmeiro, Hairston OR Roberts, Tejada, Mora, Lopez, Bigbie, Matos, Gibbons, McLemore, Bautista, Gil, Cust, and either Segui or Cordova(whichever one can stay healthy through ST.)

In other O's ST news, Adam Loewen is scheduled to pitch in Wednesday's intersquad game, Jose Morban finally arrives to camp after having visa problems, and Denny Bautista and Eddy Rodriguez still haven't reported because of visa problems.
Terps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 02:25 AM   #26
dawgfan
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Rum
I'm not saying anything about the competitiveness of the M's and A's. I know they will be good, and I know the AL West is going to be a tough division. I'm just saying if you're counting on some of the things you're counting on, than I want to play you in poker, because you're making some bad bets.

Really? 3 of the 4 seasons listed the Angels averaged 78 wins. In the other one they notched 99 wins. Regardless of how the end result is acheived, whether it be slumping in September, injuries, tough competition - the number of victories at the end of the season is what counts. As an Angels fan you're taking the most optimistic view of the why, which I completely relate to. I'm just pointing out that, based on the results, the season that looks like an aberration is 2002.

Like I keep saying, I expect the Angels to be good this season - at least 90 wins good. I expect them to be right there with the A's and Mariners. I don't expect them to run away with the division, though anyone that's studied baseball knows that funny things can happen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Rum
You just posted the win totals. You didn't note that that 82-win season was an above-.500 season, which is solid. You also don't note that the worst season--the 75-win season--was in a year when the Angels were in the same division as two 100-game winners in the A's and M's, and that the Angels were right in the middle of the wildcard race in late August. Yes, the September collapse was bad, and yes, Septembers count. But to say that Angels team was bad or indicative of a string of losing years like you would have, is completely misleading things.

The 82 win season was solid, but it was also 17 wins away from 2002, which is a significant amount. I didn't say, nor was I trying to imply that the other 3 seasons were indicative of the Angels being bad - merely that when used as comparison to the 2002 season, it seemed to suggest that the 2002 team was a bit of an aberration.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Rum
I said either of those teams could have won 90 games. I don't think that's much of a stretch from how they were performing. It was exactly the sort of thinking you are doing now that led people to assume the Angels would be nothing in 2002. I knew better. I had watched the team and saw them put up good seasons in '95, '97, '98, and '00 with essentially the same corps of players, and come within a bad September of being very respectable in '01, too--in baseball's toughest division. I saw that and I knew if the Angels could stay healhty, they would surprise some pople. Surprised people enough to have a 116-win season team in '01 sitting nad watching them in the playoffs the next year.

I've never denied that the Angels had a great season in 2002, and it wasn't a complete surprise. I don't think though, given the evidence that it's too out of line to suggest that the 2002 team was an example of a team having a season where things just seemed to go right.

Until the AL Championship Series, the same thing could've been said about the Mariners' 2001 season - I don't think anyone seriously believes they were one of the all-time greatest baseball teams just because they won 116 games, merely that they were a very good team that just had things really go their way that year (until they ran into the damn Yankees...)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Rum
Much of that core remains even now. All it needs to do is stay healhty.

That's a key for pretty much any baseball team.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Rum
As for Lackey, yes, some pitchers collapse when the league figures them out, but you are ignoring the fact Lackey had a very good second half. That doesn't really abide with your theory at all. That much more goes along with a guy coming off of a supreme high who is also very young, and finally getting it together, then it does a league figuring a guy out. If they had, Lackey would have been miserable the entire year, not just before the break.

If you studied half-season trends of the kind you point out for Lackey, you'd find that as often as not those trends don't accurately predict future performance. Can his performance be accurately explained by your theory? That's one possibility, but it's certainly not the only one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Rum
You're right that Escobar hasn't been proven to be a 200 ip pitcher. But you're calling it an automatic fault. That's incorrect. It's an unknown. Neither you nor I know if he will be strong through 200 ip-plus. That's not a positive or a negative, at the moment. Not until we know more.

No, I didn't call it automatic fault - in fact I called it exactly what you did, an unknown.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Rum
One thing we do have in our favor in there, is that if Escobar does falter, we have the pen to back him up. I notice you still haven't mentioned our pen...

You guys have had a good pen, but I don't think it's that much better than Seattle's.
dawgfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 03:40 AM   #27
Chief Rum
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Where Hip Hop lives
Quote:
Originally Posted by dawgfan
Really? 3 of the 4 seasons listed the Angels averaged 78 wins. In the other one they notched 99 wins. Regardless of how the end result is acheived, whether it be slumping in September, injuries, tough competition - the number of victories at the end of the season is what counts. As an Angels fan you're taking the most optimistic view of the why, which I completely relate to. I'm just pointing out that, based on the results, the season that looks like an aberration is 2002.

Like I keep saying, I expect the Angels to be good this season - at least 90 wins good. I expect them to be right there with the A's and Mariners. I don't expect them to run away with the division, though anyone that's studied baseball knows that funny things can happen.

My original poiint with that was that the Angels weren't bad in 2000 or 2001 like they were in 2003. They were a solid team in both seasons. You suggested they were bad in those years. I am telling you as a daily observer of those teams that they were much better than you're saying.

You're basing your view on wins alone. I am pointing out the relative quality of the teams. The teams in 2000 and 2001 did not differ in quality too much from 2002. In 2003, thanks to the fact half the team was on the DL, and those who weren't were having bad seasons, that team was worse than any Angels team since 1999. I have merely been saying that in talent and level of play, the teams of 2000 and 2001 were much closer to the 2002 team than in 2003. I realize that you would have to accept my observations on that, but, God's honest truth, it's true. The 2000 and 2001 seasons were the same as the 2002 team in quality of play, except they had a bit worse luck and maybe lacked one or two key players (Lackey, Appier).

It was these observations on which I was basing my comments about these teams. I'm asking you to look beyond the wins here. I'm talking about the quality on the field. It was on these observations that I based my belief that the Angels could be pretty good in 2002, and it turned out I was right.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dawgfan
The 82 win season was solid, but it was also 17 wins away from 2002, which is a significant amount. I didn't say, nor was I trying to imply that the other 3 seasons were indicative of the Angels being bad - merely that when used as comparison to the 2002 season, it seemed to suggest that the 2002 team was a bit of an aberration.

Answered above. Different perspectives.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dawgfan
I've never denied that the Angels had a great season in 2002, and it wasn't a complete surprise. I don't think though, given the evidence that it's too out of line to suggest that the 2002 team was an example of a team having a season where things just seemed to go right.

Until the AL Championship Series, the same thing could've been said about the Mariners' 2001 season - I don't think anyone seriously believes they were one of the all-time greatest baseball teams just because they won 116 games, merely that they were a very good team that just had things really go their way that year (until they ran into the damn Yankees...)

Never said the 2002 team didn't have a lot go its way. In fact, that actually lends credence to my observations, because if we take your reasoning that the Angels had some extraordinary good runs of luck in 2002, and note my observations of bad runs of luck in prior years, it goes to show that the 2002 team wasn't all that different from the 2000 or 2001 team in quality of play. And it certainly wasn't too different from a roster composition perspective. The Angels lineup and rotation didn't change much at all in those seasons.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dawgfan
That's a key for pretty much any baseball team.

Not all teams when they stay healthy stand a very good chance at winning their divisions. I'll bet the Devil Rays could fail to lose one single player to even as much as a hangnail all season, and they won't come within 20 games of first place in the AL East.

I merely noted that if the Angels stay healthy, they could be a very good team again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dawgfan
If you studied half-season trends of the kind you point out for Lackey, you'd find that as often as not those trends don't accurately predict future performance. Can his performance be accurately explained by your theory? That's one possibility, but it's certainly not the only one.

Actually, I pointed that out in response to your theory on how he will perform this year. I never said a good end of year performance automatically becomes a good start to the next year. I'm just noting that it is evidence of improvement, that may have come from maturity or experience, that he can take over into the new season.

Then you tossed out your theory that the league had figured out Lackey. To which I pointed out that his second half performance seems to run against the logic of your theory.

Lackey is far from a lock for anything. We both agree on that. But we disagree on degree here. There are indications he can be good again this season. The fact is that in seven of the ten months he is pitched, he has been very good. Scouts continue to say he has great stuff. Performance can only be helped by experience. He isn't too old to be losing physical skills. And his late success indicates that the league hasn't "figured him out". All of these indications point to the likelihood he could be solid this season.

To this, you say "anything can happen", more or less. The only evidence you have is a bad start to the 2003 season, something that is quite possibly explained by coming off of a Series win and dealing with the pressure of success as a young kid in the spotlight.

I don't think I am off my rocker to say there is more evidence to suggest a return to form than what you would suggest.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dawgfan
No, I didn't call it automatic fault - in fact I called it exactly what you did, an unknown.

Context, dawgfan. I had just finished making a positive assessment of the Angels. You were counterpointing my post. As such, you were coming from a negative perception. Since you didn't actually say Escobar was an unknown above 200 ip, but merely stated his failure to yet do so, in that context, it reads very much like it was Escobar's failure to not have pitched 200 ip. It is in that way that you assessed an automatic fault, even if you didn't say it in so many words.

You never once said it was an unknown actually. You just stated what he hasn't done. How did you think that would read? Like impartiality or as a negative? All I did with that was note that Escobar's failure wasn't really his fault, but that of the Bluejays, who failed to determine what role was best for him and then leave him there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dawgfan
You guys have had a good pen, but I don't think it's that much better than Seattle's.

I never said Seattle's pen was bad. That is irrelevant. My observation on the pen was solely in response to your questioning Percival's durability and the effect his loss would cause, and on how the pen was strong enough to compensate if any of the factors you brought up about our starting pitching surfaced.

Chief Rum
__________________
.
.

I would rather be wrong...Than live in the shadows of your song...My mind is open wide...And now I'm ready to start...You're not sure...You open the door...And step out into the dark...Now I'm ready.

Last edited by Chief Rum : 03-03-2004 at 03:54 AM.
Chief Rum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 04:12 AM   #28
Chief Rum
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Where Hip Hop lives
dola,

Obviously, dawgfan, we are both coming from biased perspectives and neither of us are going to change the other's mind. I didn't start this thread so we could bicker about whether the Angels are going to be good this year. If you want to respond to my above post, fine, but barring any outright falsehoods in said post (which I don't think you would do), I won't respond and we can just return to the business of dispensing spring training news and discussing the upcoming season.

Good luck this season. I'm sure it will be an exciting race in the AL West.

CR
__________________
.
.

I would rather be wrong...Than live in the shadows of your song...My mind is open wide...And now I'm ready to start...You're not sure...You open the door...And step out into the dark...Now I'm ready.
Chief Rum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 01:06 PM   #29
korme
Go Reds
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bloodbuzz Ohio
Looks like recent Reds signee John Vanderwal may miss the entire 2004 season.
korme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 01:14 PM   #30
Lucky Jim
Mascot
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Since this seems to be an AL West heavy thread at the moment, some more Rangers trade possibilities here:
hxxp://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/spring2004/columns/story?columnist=klapisch_bob&id=1749776

Soriano to the Mets?
Lucky Jim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 01:19 PM   #31
John Galt
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Internets
early news regarding the Yankees:

It is hard to be a Yankees fan this year. I grew up rooting for the Yankees during the years when they didn't win anything. I rooted for Mattingly and he was my favorite player. I went through the Tartabull years, Billy Martin every other year, Brien Taylor, and the rest of the missteps. So, when they finally broke through and won with a team I really liked, it was fun. And then we won again and again, and it was fun.

Now, it isn't so much fun anymore. Routing against George (but for the Yankees) doesn't work anymore. I want a team to move to DC so I can cheer for my hometown. I still love the Yankees, but the fun is gone.

For actual scouting reports, consult any website or newspaper, because there is WAY too much coverage already.
__________________
I do mind, the Dude minds. This will not stand, ya know, this aggression will not stand, man. - The Dude
John Galt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 01:22 PM   #32
Ksyrup
This guy has posted so much, his fingers are about to fall off.
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: In Absentia
This is from SI's Postcard from Camp series, about the Phillies:


By Michael Farber, SI.com


Player I Saw Whom I Really Liked
Pat Burrell. Roberto Hernandez was throwing lights-out batting practice Sunday, with so much pop on his fastball and so much break on his slider that neither Ricky Ledee nor A.J. Hinch hit a fair ball. Then Burrell stepped in with instructions to do some situational hitting. As manager Larry Bowa yelled, "Runner on third, no outs," Burrell scorched a line drive to left for a money, albeit virtual, RBI.

When Hernandez came off the mound, he was beaming. "That was a slider," he told Burrell. "You really kept your shoulder in. You didn't dive at it like you were doing last year." Burrell fell off a cliff in 2003, his average dipping 71 points, his home runs falling by 17 and his RBI total dropping from 116 to 64 despite a hefty 522 at-bats in the middle of a lineup that included Jim Thome and Bobby Abreu. If the left fielder finds his stroke, the Phillies should have the most potent lineup in the NL East.

Team's biggest strengths
The pitching staff, top to bottom. The Philadelphia rotation might not have the marquee appeal of the Houston Astros or Chicago Cubs, but there is no soft place to land when the starters are Kevin Millwood, Randy Wolf, Vicente Padilla, newcomer Eric Milton and Brett Myers, who might have better stuff than any of them.

General manager Ed Wade polished off the staff by trading for closer Billy Wagner and signing setup man Tim Worrell, whom the Phillies initially had envisioned as a possible closer before moving on Wagner. With lefty Rheal Cormier, who had a stealthily fabulous season in 2003, and Hernandez to work one or two innings, Philadelphia's bullpen is loaded. The Phillies' staff also will benefit from a second season under pitching coach Joe Kerrigan, who grated on some of the players with his vaunted "program" but should be smart enough to ease off so the starters don't flame out as they did during the final five weeks of 2003.

Team's biggest weakness
Strikeouts. For Philadelphia, the ABCs of spring training fundamentals start with the letter K. The Phillies simply make too many nonproductive outs. They struck out a club-record 1,155 times in 2003, led by Thome's NL-high 182. Thome hit 47 home runs and drove in 131 runs and power guys are generally free to flail away, sort of. But there is no excuse for the 113 times that shortstop Jimmy Rollins, a high-in-the-order hitter, whiffed. Rollins, who in three big-league seasons never has had fewer than 100 strikeouts or more than 54 walks despite a strike zone the size of a mailbox, spent two weeks working with Tony Gwynn this winter in an effort to become a line-drive machine, something he had pledged he would do last year. Clubhouse confidential
As his mother Joyce battles lung cancer back in Illinois, Thome has given up chewing tobacco. ... Thome was sorting through a box of baseball cards by his locker Sunday. He collected them as a child, starting in the early 1980s, and still keeps them at his mother's home. His favorites? Don Mattingly, Dave Winfield and the Cubs and Cardinals teams of the era. "I remember when I got my own card for the first time," he said. "Awesome. When you're a kid, the first thing you dream about is being up in the bottom of the ninth in the seventh game of the World Series. Then when you get to the majors, the first thing you think about is your baseball card. What pose you'll be shown in." ... Former Philadelphia OF Jay Johnstone once said that "when the games are rained out, Phillies fans go to the airport to boo bad landings." Despite their reputation, the 100 or so Phillies rooters at new Bright House Networks Field on Sunday were delightful. They applauded when CF Marlon Byrd handed a man a broken bat, kibitzed with GM Wade and broke into a loud cheer when Thome hit a ball onto the knoll behind the fence in left-center off Worrell. The grinning pitcher shouted at Thome, "You have a pass list?"
__________________
M's pitcher Miguel Batista: "Now, I feel like I've had everything. I've talked pitching with Sandy Koufax, had Kenny G play for me. Maybe if I could have an interview with God, then I'd be served. I'd be complete."
Ksyrup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 01:25 PM   #33
corbes
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Phillies talk.

Pat Burrell is off to a decent start in Clearwater. But then, he was great in batting practice last year, even during his slump. Have to see how he does in real live games...

Bobby Abreu supposedly reported in the best shape of his career...

Jimmy Rollins has promised to put the ball in play this year, and stop trying to hit homers. In early intrasquad games, he has tried to bunt his way on base... He's promised this before, though, so it remains to be seen whether he's still hitting line drives in May.

Cole Hamels will likely start the season at Lakewood (A), although people are clamoring for him to move up to Reading (AA)...
corbes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 01:25 PM   #34
corbes
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Hey, Phillies crossposting. Who'da thunk?
corbes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 01:27 PM   #35
rkmsuf
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by corbes
Hey, Phillies crossposting. Who'da thunk?

You should be concentrating on the FOFC golf...I hear VJ is looking good this week...
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales
rkmsuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 01:30 PM   #36
corbes
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkmsuf
You should be concentrating on the FOFC golf...I hear VJ is looking good this week...

Hey, Vijay's not playing! You can't confuse ME with your jedi mind tricks!
corbes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 01:31 PM   #37
rkmsuf
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by corbes
Hey, Vijay's not playing! You can't confuse ME with your jedi mind tricks!

Blimy...
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales
rkmsuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 01:41 PM   #38
SackAttack
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Green Bay, WI
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shorty3281
Looks like recent Reds signee John Vanderwal may miss the entire 2004 season.

He was ancient when he played for the Dodgers 10 years ago. When is he just gonna hang 'em up?
SackAttack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 02:17 PM   #39
HornedFrog Purple
Hattrick Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Fort Worthless, Tx
This just in, the Rangers will suck. 90 losses or more.
__________________
King of All FOFC Media!!!
IHOF: Fort Worthless Fury- 2004 AOC Deep South Champions (not acknowledged via conspiracy)
HornedFrog Purple is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 02:24 PM   #40
MikeVic
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hometown of Canada
I will be following the Jays' season more closely at the beginning than in previous years. I think their hitting is great, and they did try to improve their pitching. We at least have 1 good guy in the pen.. Hopefully Hentgen can return to his Cy Young form *cough*...

I got no news on Spring Training though.
MikeVic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2004, 03:11 PM   #41
Vince
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Willow Glen, CA
The only real news I have about the Giants that's worth anything, and most of it comes from fogball...

The Giants enter ST with 4 slots in their rotation pretty much set:

1) Schmidt
2) Williams
3) Tomko
4) Rueter

It's the fifth slot that's the kicker. For that 5th starter, the Giants have 5 options, and I list them by how likely they are to receive starts (in my opinion).

1) Dustin Hermanson
He looked pretty good at the end of the year last year, and could do a more than adequate job this season. Word on the street is that he's developed a new pitch, which caused his success in SF last season (it couldn't be because Pac Bell is a good pitcher's park, could it?). He's likely to have the #5 slot in the rotation come opening day, and barring implosion, will probably hold it for a solid chunk of the season, losing starts only to give the prospects a chance. I'd guess about 15-20 starts for him.

2) Kevin Correia
Played really solid last season...putting up a 3.66 ERA in 10 appearances (7 starts, 3 bullpen apps) in the bigs (~ 40 IP). Has some inconsistencies, though, such as a high walk rate, which could limit his use immediately. He's only 23, and if he can build off of last year's success, he could be great. Probably 5-10 starts for him.

3) Ryan Jensen
After a very solid rookie season in 2002 (170 IP, 30 Starts, 4.51 ERA), the Giants were hopefull that he'd develop into a regular starter...but after injuries in the beginning of last season and sub-par performance in the minors, his ability to pitch at the major league level is questionable. He's either hit or miss...he might get 0 starts, he might get 10 or 15.

4) Noah Lowry
I honestly don't know much about Lowry, except that he's a pretty well-touted prospect in the Giant system. He pitched something like 5 innings last season, and looked decent...but is he ready to start games for a big league club? Expect him to get some innings, and probably a start or three at some point this year.

5) Merkin Valdez
This was 'the other guy' in the Russ Ortiz deal, and he looked absolutely lights-out last season in A ball. He's on the 40 man roster for Spring Training, but is still pretty raw. I can't imagine him starting the season on the ML roster, but AAA isn't too far a stretch for the numbers he posted last season (166 ks, 48 BB in 156 IP with a 2.25 ERA). If he has a solid year in AA or AAA, he could see some action late in the season.

Some people think that Brower is an option for our fifth starter, but with so many younger guys that are close to major league ready, I don't think that a mediocre long reliever/spot starter should get a shot at our rotation.
__________________
Every time a Dodger scores a run, an angel has its wings ripped off by a demon, and is forced to tearfully beg the demon to cauterize the wounds.The demon will refuse, and the sobbing angel will lie in a puddle of angel blood and feathers for eternity, wondering why the Dodgers are allowed to score runs.That’s not me talking: that’s science. McCoveyChronicles.com.
Vince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2004, 01:33 AM   #42
Chief Rum
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Where Hip Hop lives
Bump. Nothing to report on the Angels today.

CR
__________________
.
.

I would rather be wrong...Than live in the shadows of your song...My mind is open wide...And now I'm ready to start...You're not sure...You open the door...And step out into the dark...Now I'm ready.
Chief Rum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2004, 08:16 AM   #43
henry296
College Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Quick Pirates update:

Bobby Hill, acquired from the Cubs last season lead off the game with a HR and later doubled and showed no ill effects from last years back injury. It doesn't matter that it was against Manatee Junior College

Todd
__________________
"It's a great day for hockey" - "Badger" Bob Johnson
henry296 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2004, 05:59 PM   #44
dawgfan
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
Edgar Martinez has been bothered by a strained neck muscle that's kept him out of the last 2 Spring games. He's listed as day-to-day, though manager Bob Melvin expects him to play today. Something to keep an eye on...

Also, injured reliever Rafael Soriano had to postpone his first day of playing catch in his recovery from a strained oblique as he felt something wrong while exercising yesterday. He'll try again tomorrow.

Minor League prospect Rett Johnson, a SP, has left camp due to personal reasons. It's not known at the moment when he expects to return, though his teammate Clint Nageotte said he expects him back.

Veteran reliever Norm Charlton officially retired after having to undergo his 3rd shoulder operation in as many years.

Minor league prospect Travis Blackley, a LH SP looked impressive in his first action of the Spring. He and Clint Nageotte are the M's top pitching prospects; if any M's starter is traded or injured, they are likely the top candidates to replace them in the rotation, and they'll likely be involved in any trade talks the M's have in trying to acquire another hitter.

Speculation is beginning to grow that the M's are considering bringing Ken Griffey Jr. back. The biggest issues would be his health, his attitude (can he handle not being the man and being just another guy in the clubhouse), and how much of his salary they'd be on the hook for.

SP Freddie Garcia has reported in the best shape of his career and appears to be the most focused he's ever been. He's a free-agent next year, and will have the extra motivation of being in a contract drive. If he can overcome his extreme inconsistency, he has the stuff to be a very good starter and could be a good sleeper pick in Fantasy Drafts.
dawgfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2004, 06:01 PM   #45
Ksyrup
This guy has posted so much, his fingers are about to fall off.
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: In Absentia
Phil Nevin hurt his shoulder again.
__________________
M's pitcher Miguel Batista: "Now, I feel like I've had everything. I've talked pitching with Sandy Koufax, had Kenny G play for me. Maybe if I could have an interview with God, then I'd be served. I'd be complete."
Ksyrup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2004, 06:48 PM   #46
WSUCougar
Rider Of Rohan
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Port Angeles, WA or Helm's Deep
A key early moment approaches for the Redbirds, when rehab project RHP Cris Carpenter takes the Spring mound for the first time tomorrow. With Woody Williams still nursing his tendonitis, and the question marks that abound in the pitching staff as a whole, it would be fantastic if Carpenter could stake a claim for a rotation slot.

Meanwhile, Bo Hart is making a solid early plug for the regular 2B job. He is clearly better defensively than Marlon Anderson, and has also been hitting better out of the gate. Anderson may figure in the LF mix...along with holdovers Kerry Robinson and So Taguchi, newcomer Greg Vaughn (okay, "new" is probably not the right word), and ex-Card castoff Ray Lankford. There are a few other possibilities, too.

The Cards are 0-4 prior to today's game against the Twins...
__________________
It's not the years...it's the mileage.
WSUCougar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2004, 08:31 PM   #47
Young Drachma
Dark Cloud
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeVic
I will be following the Jays' season more closely at the beginning than in previous years. I think their hitting is great, and they did try to improve their pitching. We at least have 1 good guy in the pen.. Hopefully Hentgen can return to his Cy Young form *cough*...

I got no news on Spring Training though.

He wasn't really all that bad in Baltimore when he was there. Not great, but he'll get more run support in Toronto. I think Lilly has potential too. I just hope Rogers starts to spend money around July when they're still in the hunt, because that would return those of us that have been fans for ages of the "glory years." I think too many of the regimes have tried to do anything to remind fans of the years when this franchise was one of the best in baseball.

If they get smart and start following the example set by Gillick and Co. from 85-93, they would be a lot better off.
__________________
Current Dynasty:The Zenith of Professional Basketball Careers (FBPB/FBCB)
FBCB / FPB3 Mods
Young Drachma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2004, 08:51 PM   #48
Buccaneer
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ksyrup
Phil Nevin hurt his shoulder again.

I was going to post that. He should be ready by Opening Day. By then, they will have tatooed on his head, "NO DIVING FOR GROUND BALLS". Pads are deep (for the first time ever), they can move Klesko back to 1B and have Long or Nady start in the OF. Opening Day at the Pet will be special (except Moores got Jimmy Carter throwing out the first pitch ).
Buccaneer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2004, 11:51 PM   #49
dawgfan
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buccaneer
(except Moores got Jimmy Carter throwing out the first pitch ).



How horrible. Politics aside, how can you not appreciate the guy?
dawgfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2004, 01:25 AM   #50
sterlingice
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
Quote:
Originally Posted by dawgfan


How horrible. Politics aside, how can you not appreciate the guy?

Bucc just hates low cost charity housing. It's his way

SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out!

Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!"
Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!"


sterlingice is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:00 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.