![]() |
![]() |
#801 | |||
World Champion Mis-speller
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Covington, Ga.
|
Quote:
Agreed. Doesn't mean it wouldn't be worth trying. I think Biden is very much a long-shot now. Anyone else would be as well, but at least they might have something other than "I'm not Trump" to energize people about. Quote:
No it wasn't. I think there was a reasonable assumption then that he was not going to run again if he won. There was definitely a wink and a nod from his campaign at the time, and based on his age it only seemed logical that he wouldn't. He wasn't my choice then, but there was some good argument at the time that he was exactly what we needed for that election (established, stable, known, respected), but his decline mentally and physically, especially in the last year, makes him a liability now. Quote:
Last edited by GrantDawg : Yesterday at 02:59 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#802 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
Shapiro and Whitmer easily won races against a Trump candidate in states Biden has to win. I think either one would carry Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan which is all the Dems need. They have 4 months to make their case and unlike Biden, they can make the rounds giving interviews and giving speeches. They can't do worse than Biden. And the problem with Biden is he is destroying the Democratic base of voters which will be difficult to recover from in 2028 and beyond. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#803 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
|
Quote:
I don't think it's as clear cut as you make it out to be. It's not showing up in polling. Dem polling shows there's more support for Biden remaining the nominee. Only 29% of dems polled since the debate are for replacing him. Independents are split, but someone more to the left than Biden risks alienating them. Only 30% of black voters polled are for replacing him. Access to this page has been denied |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#804 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
If half of independents and a third of your own party think you should step down, you're a pretty shitty candidate. And even if you are just viewing it from an electoral lens, do you really think it is good for the country to have a guy with huge cognitive issues in office for another 4 years? Seems pretty bad for the country. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#805 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
There are not huge cognitive issues. This is you being purposefully disingenuous yet again.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#806 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
You simply can't pass over the black VP for a white guy and expect it not to matter. No Dem can win without heavy support from black women.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#807 |
General Manager
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
You can do whatever it takes to win. And no one gives a shit about Kamala.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#808 | |
This guy has posted so much, his fingers are about to fall off.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: In Absentia
|
Quote:
This may be true in fact, but I've had several people in casual conversation (hiardresser, neighbor, co-worker) all say Biden looked, sounded and acted like he was somewhat debilitated. Not many people know what it takes to run the country, but everyone has an older relative who you have to watch out for and keep from harming themselves because they don't know any better. That's the vibe Biden gave off on Thursday, and it'll be damn near impossible to recover from it.
__________________
M's pitcher Miguel Batista: "Now, I feel like I've had everything. I've talked pitching with Sandy Koufax, had Kenny G play for me. Maybe if I could have an interview with God, then I'd be served. I'd be complete." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#809 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
He may not have huge cognitive issues. Hes probably fine to sit on the couch, watch the game with and have some intelligent conversation, but he does not appear mentally fit to be president another four years.
Last edited by Danny : Yesterday at 06:58 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#810 |
General Manager
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Kind of an ominous story. Maybe he will do what's best and drop out.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/202...ess-rcna159591 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#811 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
If it truly is a family decision and they tell him he should stay in the race I firmly believe they are more like the power hungry family the right paints them as than I would have believed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#812 |
n00b
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Who fucking cares about a debate? This is the most ridiculous news cycle I've ever seen. I'm mentioned what Trump did during the debate that should immediately disqualify him from ever holding office again, don't forget the crimes!
I got a compromise, make Obama VP and we can have 4 more years of Barry, I'm down like a clown, charlie Brown. Just to let you know the ridiculous hit pieces are coming out, Joe Biden’s Childhood Neighbor: ‘It’s Time To Go’. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#813 | |
n00b
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Quote:
I'm sorry, but none of that is remotely true. You need to hold the trifecta, pres,house & senate. You need 50 senators willing to nuke the filibuster, you have 48ish right now. (murkowski is waffling on sides ATM, she could be 49) You pass legislation telling the extreme court to go fuck itself on abortion, regulation and really any crazy right wing mumbo jumbo. Don't forget bri...tipping judges! Last edited by Saul Goode : Yesterday at 08:57 PM. Reason: Murkowski |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#814 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
|
Congress can't pass legislation telling the Court to do that. That's not how it works.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#815 | |
n00b
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Quote:
Yes, that is how it works. Overriding judicial decisions, while always an important tool in Congress’s legislative toolbox, has fallen by the wayside over the last two decades. Congress repeatedly changed the size of the court for political ends and revoked the court’s ability to review a case When Congress introduced more bills that would limit the court’s power, the court struck down fewer laws Even where the court has ruled on constitutional grounds, there is often much room left to legislate the boundaries, Overrides can be passed, These statutory overrides offer a road map for progressives left paralyzed by the court’s new composition should not lose sight of Congress’s power to temper or reverse existing court decisions. One key way that Congress can regulate federal courts is by establishing the scope of their jurisdiction. Last edited by Saul Goode : Yesterday at 09:59 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#816 | |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Quote:
If you don't think the debate reinforcing what peoples biggest concern about Biden has been for the last year you aren't paying attention. He wasn't just bad, he was an absolute disaster. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#817 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
|
If you change the size of the court, the other side changes it again when they are in power and you've effectively removed one of the three co-equal branches of government. The court simply rules however the current side in power makes them rule, and if they won't do it on their own, you add enough justices until they do.
There is a natural back-and-forth when SCOTUS thinks Congress has overstepped and Congress disagrees, but ultimately the court has the power to say when that has happened and again, without that, the court can no longer serve it's purpose. Most of what has happened to the court is in fact Congress's fault, with the increasing politicization (it was always there, but not to the same degree) over the past 40 years of how appointments are handled. This is not a SCOTUS issue, it is a Congressional issue, which ultimately comes back to it being an electorate issue. When the goal becomes to win the political game at absolutely any cost, you've already destroyed the value of any victory you might achieve. Congress has zero power to 'reverse existing court decisions'. Last edited by Brian Swartz : Yesterday at 09:13 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#818 |
n00b
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
It always amazes me how little the average person knows about politics. I find it hilarious you think the supreme Court are a bunch of kings issuing decrees.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#819 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
They can pass abortion protections which nullifies Dobbs. The Democrats just hasn't found it important. And I think it's fine to expand the court. Even if both sides do it, it makes every Justice less powerful which is a good thing. Especially since you can just buy them. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#820 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
|
I don't think that, and they aren't. There is however, a reason why they have oversight over Congress and, aside from impeachments, not the other way around after they've made decisions.
Quote:
Might as well just absolish the court if you're going to do that. There's no point in going through the pro forma exercise of keeping it around if you're just going to pretend it doesn't exist in practice anyway. Last edited by Brian Swartz : Yesterday at 09:22 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#821 |
"Dutch"
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Tampa, FL
|
Saw this on X and checked ChatGPT to verify.
Election Year First Debate Date 2024 June 27, 2024 2020 September 29, 2020 2016 September 26, 2016 2012 October 3, 2012 2008 September 26, 2008 2004 September 30, 2004 2000 October 3, 2000 1996 October 6, 1996 The Democrats knew what was up and needed a date ASAP to get the machine fired up as soon as possible. It’s the right call, Biden hasn’t been in charge and if the DNC wins again, at least they’ll have somebody in office that can be in the actual executive branch and it’s not run by a bunch of unelected extreme left minders. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#822 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
![]() Quote:
Id never vote Trumpso ill be voting for Biden regardless but as someone who is fairly liberal, id have strongly considered a moderate non MAGA republican over Biden this election given his current state. (Of course with no teump, its probably been some other maga nut id never vote for anyway) Last edited by Danny : Yesterday at 09:26 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#823 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
It's the job of Congress to be oversight for the court too. The Judicial branch does not have complete and total power. Checks and balances work both ways. There's no point in pretending the courts are anything but a way for wealthy people to buy their way around laws. You don't have to keep up this charade about them being some honorable branch of government that ieeps the otuer branches in check. Clarence will let you dump nuclear waste into the water supply if you take him to Tahiti for a weekend getaway. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#824 | ||
n00b
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Quote:
I guess if you say it, it makes it true? Access to this page has been denied oh for christ sake, Five times Congress overrode the Supreme Court They can pass legislation overriding a decision. I don't know what else you want. Quote:
Again, not true at all. You can now legally brib...tip judges, destroy regulations, really whatever the extreme king court wants to do. It's a zero-sum game. They have the control now and get to make up whatever asinine rules the con judges can be paid off for. Last edited by Saul Goode : Yesterday at 09:52 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#825 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
Quote:
any republican that would get through would NOT AT ALL be a moderate. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#826 |
General Manager
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Another post debate poll. Wonder if some of these are coming out internally and that's why Biden is having a family discussion.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|