|
I just pointed those two examples out as instances where "anything to do with terrorism" or "terrorism anywhere" will net people unexpectedly (if the laws are applied logically).
My take on this is that at least Blair (I hope) is not being hypocritical about who is and isn't a practitioner of terrorism: terrorism is terrorism no matter who practices it and no matter the intent (that is, if the letter of the law is observed).
|