Quote:
|
Originally Posted by yabanci
lol, maybe you should pay closer attention to world events. Then again, cheerleaders always do have trouble following what's going on in the game.
|
Linky?
Or maybe I can just stay in the dark about _____.
EDIT - Here is a link to UNOCAL's press release from early 1999 and their withdrawal from any project -
http://www.unocal.com/uclnews/99news/021699.htm
And here is an analysis (from 10/02 but I couldn't quickly find anything more recent)
http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/afghan.html which concludes
Quote:
Due to its location between the oil and natural gas reserves of the Caspian Basin and the Indian Ocean, Afghanistan has long been mentioned as a potential pipeline route, though in the near term, several obstacles will likely prevent Afghanistan from becoming an energy transit corridor. Unocal had pursued a possible natural gas pipeline from Turmenistan to Pakistan in the mid-1990s, but pulled out after the U.S. missile strikes against Afghanistan in August 1998. The new Afghan government under President Karzai has tried to revive the pipeline plan, and talks have been held between the governments of Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Turkmenistan in 2002 on the issue, but a signing ceremony for a framework agreement between the governments has been delayed until at least December 2002.
Given the obstacles to development of a natural gas pipeline across Afghanistan, it seems unlikely that such an idea will make any progress in the near future, and no major Western companies have expressed interest in reviving the project. The security situation in Afghanistan is one obvious major risk, and the tensions between India and Pakistan make it unlikely that such a pipeline could be extended into India, which unlike Pakistan has sufficient immediate demand for imported natural gas to justify a project of such magnitude. Financial problems in the utility sector in India, which would be the major consumer of the natural gas, also could pose a problem.
|