Quote:
The last time I checked, Afghanistan doesn't have huge oil reserves.
|
A specious argument, in my opinion. Clearly Afghanistan was attacked because it harbored terrorists, not because of concern over its governmental style. I support our attack against Afghanistan.
Quote:
Based on your statement, we should invoke military action in a large portion of countries around the world, including China, since brutal dictatorships are far more common than democracies.
|
I'm not sure what part of my post you're getting this from. The government is the one that has been justifying its actions in Iraq as removing a brutal dictator. I wouldn't support using that same standard carried out around the world, we already have plenty of work to do in the war against terrorism. We have a long history with Iraq, and various baggage from the previous war, possible WMDs, national interest in the country's oil, etc. Saying that this war is simply to remove a brutal dictator insults the intelligence of the American people. The government should be clear and honest about its reasons for doing things.
Quote:
The current focus is on stamping out countries that actively support terrorist attacks against the US. I don't believe Pakistan meets that objective.
|
Many would argue Iraq is simply a sideshow taking us away from our "focus."