Quote:
Originally Posted by GrantDawg
That's not a surprised though. "No set candidate" always fair better than an actual human. Voters project their own values to "no set candidate", and that magic candidate has no negative traits that any human is going to have.
|
Y'aint wrong.
It's similar to how the broad national "generic R vs generic D" poll stuff has very little bearing on actual outcomes ... because those two don't run against each other and we don't vote on a single precinct basis.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis
|