Quote:
Originally Posted by SackAttack
Because you often get what you pay for? Just a thought. As I mentioned upthread, Skimping on bridge maintenance cost the state more than it saved. Spending as little as possible isn't always the best route.
|
Not when one side had leverage on you. This removed that leverage they had. There isn't a shortage of teachers out there either. They are still being paid well above market value.
And if this is about having the best teachers, why would you be against a measure that removed things like binding arbitration which made it near impossible to fire a bad teacher?