View Single Post
Old 04-27-2010, 02:40 PM   #40
Daimyo
College Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkeley
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanGarion View Post
No where in the law does it say it was stolen. Apple doesn't even claim it was stolen. Finding something regardless that it's still property of the owner for 3 years does not automatically make it stolen. Until Apple comes out and claims it stolen I think we need to stop claiming it was as well. I really don't care either way. It just bugs me seeing people saying it was stolen when it wasn't.

Except California law is pretty clear on the finder's responsibility:

Quote:
2080.1. (a) If the owner is unknown or has not claimed the
property, the person saving or finding the property shall, if the
property is of the value of one hundred dollars ($100) or more,
within a reasonable time turn the property over to the police
department of the city or city and county, if found therein, or to
the sheriff's department of the county if found outside of city
limits, and shall make an affidavit, stating when and where he or she
found or saved the property, particularly describing it.

It became stolen the moment the finder sold it to Gizmodo.

Article 1. Lost Money and Goods - Sections 2080-2080.10 - California Civil Code - California Code :: Justia
Daimyo is offline   Reply With Quote