Quote:
Originally Posted by tanglewood
Barkeep, why are you attacking Alan T for not earnestly trying to make a lynch happen when you were so anti-lynch yesterday anyway?
Either you believe that a lynch yesterday was bad for the village, so Alan T actually helped the village even if for the wrong reasons. Or you believe that a lynch would have been good, which explains attacking Alan, but doesn't explain why you voted for no lynch and pushed it so heavily.
|
Either you were in favor of lynch you weren't. I wasn't. If you were in favor of a lynch, which Alan said he was leaning against all day before finally deciding to vote for someone, he should have voted for JE. That is the action consistent with lynching someone, since there was a chance for JE to be lynched. Alan's vote promoted not lynching someone, while not voting no lynch. Seems like he was trying to have it both ways. That is what I am criticising him about, as his actions weren't consistent with someone on either side of the debate, at that point in time.