Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   FOFC Archive (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   Bigger bust: Ryan Leaf or JaMarcus Russell? (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=77605)

Kodos 04-28-2010 09:17 AM

Bigger bust: Ryan Leaf or JaMarcus Russell?
 
You make the call!

Kodos 04-28-2010 09:20 AM

I vote for Russell. At least Leaf can blame some of his bustiness on a wrist injury. But both belong on Mt. Bustmore.

JonInMiddleGA 04-28-2010 09:20 AM

Leaf, largely because there was more reasonable hope that he might be good or at least serviceable someday.

Ksyrup 04-28-2010 09:24 AM

Yeah, I'd say Leaf. I recall significant concerns about Russell; Leaf was back-and-forth with Manning as #1 pick, AND he failed spectacularly with the blow-ups at fans and everything. Russell's just been terrible and lazy.

cartman 04-28-2010 09:26 AM

Russell definitely has the bigger moobs. Oh, not that kind of bust.

Tigercat 04-28-2010 09:29 AM

Akili Smith is the biggest QB bust of the last 20 years. I voted Ryan Leaf just because he is the closest to Akili Smith (in time frame), so he has more of Akili Smith's stink on him.

albionmoonlight 04-28-2010 09:33 AM

I think that the fact that Leaf has the Manning comparisons there and the fact that Leaf also had the blow-ups at the media and the fact that a lot of people at the time of the draft kinda thought that Russell may not be all that swings it in Leaf's favor.

As we noted in the JaMarcus thread, the fact that "The Raiders could have had Kevin Kolb" does not have quite the same bust effect as "the Chargers might have gotten Payton Manning."

BYU 14 04-28-2010 09:36 AM

I picked Leaf, only because he was pretty much universally annoited as a legend in the making and there were plenty of concerns about Russell, which the Raiders chose to ignore anyway.

Albionmoonlight makes a great point with the Kolb / Manning comparison as well.....

DaddyTorgo 04-28-2010 09:40 AM

Leaf - but Russell is right up there (ahead of say Akili Smith)

JPhillips 04-28-2010 09:43 AM

Until Russell's in prison it has to be Leaf.

Tigercat 04-28-2010 09:45 AM

I suppose if you put in warning signs Akili Smith isn't the biggest bust. He wasn't any good until his senior year at Oregon (JR and Leaf had their big seasons as juniors at least, and decided to come out right away.) He rocketed to top 3 pick because of workout performances.

But Akili Smith's on field performance is just so, so much worse than any other top 3 pick QB you can put him up against. He was so bad he really should have never, ever seen the field even to gauge his talent level. It had to be clear in practice he would never make it.

Kodos 04-28-2010 09:50 AM

Where does Tim Couch rank in the pantheon of bust QBs?

CleBrownsfan 04-28-2010 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kodos (Post 2274047)
Where does Tim Couch rank in the pantheon of bust QBs?


He's up there but was drafted to an expansion team who inserted him in as a started WAY to early. Bust yes - but a horrible situation he was put in.

Ksyrup 04-28-2010 10:02 AM

Couch, to me, is kinda like David Carr. In the right situation, he might have been a dependable starting QB. But given their situations, they were more or less shellshocked out of the league.

CleBrownsfan 04-28-2010 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 2274058)
Couch, to me, is kinda like David Carr. In the right situation, he might have been a dependable starting QB. But given their situations, they were more or less shellshocked out of the league.


Couldn't agree any more...

spleen1015 04-28-2010 10:17 AM

Leaf without a doubt. People thought he was going to be good.

NorvTurnerOverdrive 04-28-2010 10:18 AM

i voted russell simply because he went 1 and leaf went 2.

if anything the leaf pick helped sd in the long run because they were so snakebit they passed on vick and ended up with lt and brees.

although there was 4 years of sportstalk hell. and they let brees walk for nothing...

my logic's falling in on itself.

Celeval 04-28-2010 10:34 AM

Ryan Leaf was a far worse player.

Leaf:
1998: 111-245 (45.3%), 1289 yards, 2 TD, 15 Int (39.0 Rating)
2000: 161-322 (50.0%), 1883 yards, 11 TD, 18 Int (56.2 Rating)
2001: 45-88 (51.1%), 494 yards, TD, 3 Int (57.7 Rating)

Russell:
2007: 36-66 (54.5%), 373 yards, 2 TD, 4 Int (55.9 Rating)
2008: 198-368 (53.8%), 2423 yards, 13 TD, 8 Int (77.1 Rating)
2009: 120-246 (48.8%), 1287 yards, 3 TD, 11 Int (50.0 Rating)

Russell had at least one year that was close to average as a starting quarterback; and after that season, looked like he might still develop into something. Leaf never got out of horrible.

Surtt 04-28-2010 10:41 AM

Went with Leaf, have to consider the Oakland factor. I don't think anyone considered Russell 1.1 worthy other then Al.

molson 04-28-2010 11:14 AM

Considering Russell already had the nickname "JaBustus" before he was even drafted, I have to go with Leaf.

Though I wonder if more people would have been onto Leaf sucking if the internet had been around to the degree it is today.

Noop 04-28-2010 11:31 AM

Leaf by a country mile.

JediKooter 04-28-2010 11:31 AM

I picked Russell. First, he's a Raider. Second, he's lazier than what Leaf was. Third, he actually had some talent to throw to. Fourth, he's a Raider. Fifth, he never exploded on a reporter like Leaf had the balls to.

miked 04-28-2010 11:47 AM

Leaf was paid about 11M in guarantees, Russell nearly 35M. It's a no-brainer.

SteveMax58 04-28-2010 11:57 AM

I chose Russell...but should have gone Leaf. I had actually forgot how terrible Leaf really was. After I voted I went and looked up his stats...friggin atrocious.

Not that Russell's were much better...but Leaf was more universally considered a future star where Russell had a ton of detractors (myself included) that did not believe he would amount to much in the NFL. I had thought his potential was to be the next Byron Leftwich...which really isnt what you should be drafting at 1.1.

Passacaglia 04-28-2010 12:03 PM

No love for Andre Ware?

miked 04-28-2010 12:10 PM

David Klingler?

GoSeahawks 04-28-2010 12:18 PM

Ryan Leaf hands down. With all the questions surrounding JR's work ethic coming into the draft, I think this outcome was somewhat predictable.

Cringer 04-28-2010 12:25 PM

Leaf would probably be my #1 all time, but others to consider:

Art Schlicter (sp?)
Dan McGwire (although maybe living in Washington state at the time distorts my view, still he had expectations)
That red-headed Raider named Todd M-something edit: Moranivich? Maranivich? something like that.....

Cringer 04-28-2010 12:28 PM

Oh, and most Bear QBs.

MikeVic 04-28-2010 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cringer (Post 2274168)
Oh, and most Bear QBs.


Sexy Rexy and McNown worked out well.

flere-imsaho 04-28-2010 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Surtt (Post 2274091)
Went with Leaf, have to consider the Oakland factor. I don't think anyone considered Russell 1.1 worthy other then Al.


Peter King. This was back when I read MMQB on si.com on a regular basis and after the previous season ended all of a sudden Russell was all King could talk about (and I, who paid little attention to college football, had no idea who he was talking about).

Mustang 04-28-2010 12:50 PM

Peter King is an idiot.

jbergey22 04-28-2010 12:55 PM

Since I thought Leaf was going to be awesome and expected Russell to be average at best Id have to go with Leaf on this one. Classic case of potential outweighing production in Russell's case and of course the Raiders fell for it.

Karlifornia 04-28-2010 12:56 PM

Russell at least had one half of a season where he showed some promise of eventual improvement. Leaf didn't even have that.

TroyF 04-28-2010 01:10 PM

I picked Russel. Simply because he went #1 and Leaf went #2. I don't like the Kolb/Manning analogy. The Chargers couldn't have had Peyton Manning. They picked second. The two QB's taken after Leaf were Charlie Batch (end of round 2) and Brian Greise (end of round 3, 1 pick ahead of Hines Ward) Matt Hasselbach was selected in the sixth round by the way.

As for QB busts, I'm very disappointed nobody has mentioned Kelly Stouffer. Kelly was picked #6 in the 1987 draft.

He held out the entire year, was traded to the Seahawks and then started playing. Here is what ole Kelly did:

He played in 22 games, started 16 of those games.

He attempted 447 passes, completing 51.5% of those passes for 2333 yards. (5.3 yards per pass attempt) He averaged 106 passing yards per game.

He thre 7 TD's and 19 INT's. His career rating was 54.5

He also was sacked 50 times and fumbled the ball 20 times.

In 1992 he appeared in 9 games and finished second in the league in fumbles.

He's the single worst QB I've ever seen play live (and I've seen plenty of bad ones, the Raiders are in our division after all)

MrBug708 04-28-2010 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeVic (Post 2274173)
Sexy Rexy and McNown worked out well.


:(

albionmoonlight 04-28-2010 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TroyF (Post 2274197)
I picked Russel. Simply because he went #1 and Leaf went #2. I don't like the Kolb/Manning analogy. The Chargers couldn't have had Peyton Manning. They picked second. The two QB's taken after Leaf were Charlie Batch (end of round 2) and Brian Greise (end of round 3, 1 pick ahead of Hines Ward) Matt Hasselbach was selected in the sixth round by the way.


The Chargers could not have had Manning. But Manning/Leaf are forever locked into a discussion of Leaf's bustiness. Even if Indy never for a second considered taking Leaf, the tenor of the pre-draft discussion certainly caused everyone to consider the two together.

Being a bust is, in part, about perception.

Maybe instead of Kolb, you could use Brady Quinn, since he was the other big name QB in that draft. But I think that you end up in the same place as Kevin Kolb there. Neither of those guys is Payton Manning.

lordscarlet 04-28-2010 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cringer (Post 2274167)
Leaf would probably be my #1 all time, but others to consider:

Art Schlicter (sp?)
Dan McGwire (although maybe living in Washington state at the time distorts my view, still he had expectations)
That red-headed Raider named Todd M-something edit: Moranivich? Maranivich? something like that.....


Heath Shuler.

Solecismic 04-28-2010 01:55 PM

Leaf, Smith and Russell are the big three over the last decade or so. Smith was a huge prospect - he, McNabb and Couch all had the same 6.80 grade from PFW coming out. Russell received a 6.65.

I'd give it to Leaf based on hype and just how dreadful he did perform.

Other notables since 1998: Cade McNown, J.P. Losman, John Beck, Brian Brohm, Marques Tuiasosopo (the best high school player I've ever seen play).

TroyF 04-28-2010 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight (Post 2274205)
The Chargers could not have had Manning. But Manning/Leaf are forever locked into a discussion of Leaf's bustiness. Even if Indy never for a second considered taking Leaf, the tenor of the pre-draft discussion certainly caused everyone to consider the two together.

Being a bust is, in part, about perception.

Maybe instead of Kolb, you could use Brady Quinn, since he was the other big name QB in that draft. But I think that you end up in the same place as Kevin Kolb there. Neither of those guys is Payton Manning.


Maybe, I just use players taken after the pick. It's like saying the Detroit Pistons whiffed by not taking Lebron James. Well, they had the #2 pick, they couldn't have had him. You can say they screwed up by not taking Melo, Wade or Bosh.

Now, lets say it came out the Chargers could have had the #1 pick by trading the #2 a third rounder and a fourth rounder but passed it up? Now I can see comparing Leaf to Manning in bust/boom terms. I guess it's all how each individual looks at it.

flere-imsaho 04-28-2010 02:09 PM

Yeah, Todd Marinovich was also a pretty big bust, though did he get picked #1?

korme 04-28-2010 02:09 PM

Jumping the gun a bit are we? Like it or not, the jury's still out on Russell. He's still on an NFL team, only 24 years old. Come on.

SackAttack 04-28-2010 02:13 PM

Gotta be Leaf, if only because of context. He went #1 in a draft where there were, according to the experts, two #1-worthy choices, and the guy taken after him had a monster career, while Leaf...didn't. After Russell, there wasn't a QB taken 'til Brady Quinn at #22.

As somebody else pointed out, Leaf's always gonna have that "what coulda been" comparison.

JonInMiddleGA 04-28-2010 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by korme (Post 2274227)
Like it or not, the jury's still out on Russell.


Actually, if he ends up being released by the Raiders, the jury will have returned with its verdict.

He might serve his sentence, get a reprieve, end up on work-release & cure cancer ... but the sentence will have been formally passed if they cut him.

Young Drachma 04-28-2010 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flere-imsaho (Post 2274226)
Yeah, Todd Marinovich was also a pretty big bust, though did he get picked #1?


Todd Marinovich Bio - Drug Problems of QB Todd Marinovich - Esquire

Here's a recent story about him in Esquire. He was picked 1st overall, but drug problems were the culprit in his life.

Young Drachma 04-28-2010 02:23 PM

Someone else will sign Russell once he's released. To do what and for how long, is anyone's guess, but...he's not entirely done yet. Though the reaper is certainly lurking on whatever is left of his career.

Ksyrup 04-28-2010 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SackAttack (Post 2274229)
Gotta be Leaf, if only because of context. He went #1 in a draft where there were, according to the experts, two #1-worthy choices, and the guy taken after him had a monster career, while Leaf...didn't. After Russell, there wasn't a QB taken 'til Brady Quinn at #22.

As somebody else pointed out, Leaf's always gonna have that "what coulda been" comparison.


Leaf went #2. Manning went #1.

Ksyrup 04-28-2010 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark Cloud (Post 2274242)
Todd Marinovich Bio - Drug Problems of QB Todd Marinovich - Esquire

Here's a recent story about him in Esquire. He was picked 1st overall, but drug problems were the culprit in his life.


ESPN the Mag, I think it was, did a recent story on his dad's training MMA fighters, and part of it was, of course, discussing/interviewing Todd.

bhlloy 04-28-2010 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark Cloud (Post 2274243)
Someone else will sign Russell once he's released. To do what and for how long, is anyone's guess, but...he's not entirely done yet. Though the reaper is certainly lurking on whatever is left of his career.


Russell is in David Carr land if the Raiders release him. Nobody is going to give him a starting job. Best he can hope for is a backup position in a good situation, actually work hard and develop his skills and hope a starting job opens up a couple of years down the road. I think he's done, but it's not over quite yet.

dubb93 04-28-2010 02:33 PM

If you are no better than 3rd string on the Raiders how much career can you really have left? Russell has been all time bad. I don't see someone giving him a shot at #2. I mean what if he actually has to take the field?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.