Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   The Biden Presidency - 2020 (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=97045)

Flasch186 02-05-2024 07:12 AM

I did the isidewith.com and landed on Doug Burgum & Joe Manchin

If Manchin runs I’ll vote for him because I believe in surveys & statistics which can help remove emotion

Biden was 3rd though so I’ll vote for Biden if Manchin doesn’t


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JPhillips 02-05-2024 09:39 AM

We know that most independents lean one way or the other. I think culturally the I'm a conservative not a Republican mindset is a lot more prevalent than Dem leaning independents.

albionmoonlight 02-05-2024 10:05 AM

Several studies have found that there are very few true well-informed independents. Almost all of them have a pretty strong lean.

There are more low-information/low-turnout voters that might come off as independent. The sort of people who get excited by a Reagan or an Obama but otherwise have better things to do than all of us weirdos in this thread :-)

NobodyHere 02-05-2024 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186 (Post 3425624)
I did the isidewith.com and landed on Doug Burgum & Joe Manchin

If Manchin runs I’ll vote for him because I believe in surveys & statistics which can help remove emotion

Biden was 3rd though so I’ll vote for Biden if Manchin doesn’t


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


isidewith.com has me at 47% with Joe Biden and 64% with Joe Exotic.

I know who I'm voting for!

Radii 02-05-2024 11:02 AM

75% Joe Exotic for me. (95% Cornel West, 85% Biden, 11% Trump). Biden was higher than I expected.

Edward64 02-05-2024 11:48 AM

79% for Dean Phillips and Ryan Binkley (who?).
74% for Joe Manchin

I can see Manchin, don't know enough about Phillips.

Joe Exotic is 33%.

Lathum 02-05-2024 12:28 PM

88% Biden
8% Trump

RainMaker 02-05-2024 01:41 PM

Is that site owned by a coal baron or something?

GrantDawg 02-05-2024 02:55 PM

I got Cornell West at 91%, yet the issues I disagree with him are complete deal-breakers. I mean first of all he is a complete fruit-cake, but beyond that. Then there was Dean Phillips at 90%, who I probably did agree with until he became a stooge for the Republicans which again is a deal-breaker. Then there is Biden at 89%.

What I really was interested in was the ideologies. 89% for both Feminism and Saint-Simonianism (which I literally have never heard of), then 88% Environmentalism.

RainMaker 02-05-2024 08:24 PM


cuervo72 02-05-2024 08:52 PM

Yeah, well...


RainMaker 02-05-2024 10:26 PM

How about whoever scores highest on an MMSE gets to be President?

larrymcg421 02-06-2024 08:22 AM

I don't like those sites because matching views does not necessarily make someone a better President. For example, if there was an exact clone of me, I would still pick Biden over that person 100% of the time.

molson 02-06-2024 08:45 AM

The person who matches my own views the most exactly is myself, and I sure as hell would never vote for me, I'd be a really shitty president.

I've felt that way with real candidates who have popped up on those things. Saying out loud what your legislative policy position is doesn't really demonstrate much about your ability to be an effective president, or what kind of president you'll be.

RainMaker 02-06-2024 05:12 PM

Probably best if they keep him away from cameras till the election.



JPhillips 02-06-2024 05:23 PM

The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case where Joe Deters was listed as the prosecutor and he's now on the court. He says he will not recuse.

GrantDawg 02-06-2024 05:48 PM

The vote to impeach the Homeland Security secretary failed. Even the meaningless symbolic crap the GOP tries to do can't get through.

Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk

cuervo72 02-06-2024 06:47 PM

I mean, no, that doesn't look good but I'd be lying if I said I haven't done that in meetings.

Edward64 02-06-2024 06:56 PM

And the standalone Israel bill fails also.

Nice cluster

Lathum 02-06-2024 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3425795)
And the standalone Israel bill fails also.

Nice cluster


It is almost as if they bunch of things together so everyone gets something they want that could work!

bronconick 02-06-2024 07:36 PM



Their ineptness is truly astounding.

JPhillips 02-08-2024 03:23 PM

There's a possibility that the bullshit hit job by Robert Hur ends up leading to a different Dem candidate who smokes Trump. If there's karma it's what the GOP hit machine deserves.

Lathum 02-08-2024 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3425897)
There's a possibility that the bullshit hit job by Robert Hur ends up leading to a different Dem candidate who smokes Trump. If there's karma it's what the GOP hit machine deserves.


Please let thins happen.

I will vote Biden if it comes to it, but he isn't fit. Him refusing to appear for an interview at the superbowl was the last straw. You don't turn down free exposure like that without a very good reason.

molson 02-08-2024 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3425897)
There's a possibility that the bullshit hit job by Robert Hur ends up leading to a different Dem candidate who smokes Trump. If there's karma it's what the GOP hit machine deserves.


What's the mechanism that could lead to that? Would he have to drop out?

JPhillips 02-08-2024 03:38 PM

Yes. I think he's the nominee if he's running as most of the delegates are pledged by vote. If he's out it makes the convention a free for all. Harris has to be the favorite, but a Dem governor could also slip in.

Still by far the most likely thing is Biden runs, but this hit job is going to do a lot of real damage.

Brian Swartz 02-08-2024 03:50 PM

I really don't understand the idea that there's any realistic idea of Biden getting replaced at this point. That's something that just doesn't happen. For better or worse, he's the candidate unless he is tragically dead or close to it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by molson
Saying out loud what your legislative policy position is doesn't really demonstrate much about your ability to be an effective president, or what kind of president you'll be.


Totally agree, but it's what people tend to vote on when it isn't an automatic party support vote. Every time the question comes up around here 'what if so-and-so ran for president' and it's someone of good character/judgement but who disagrees on policy, it's almost always 'I'd never vote for anyone who supports issue X'.

I remember back in my younger years watching some of the Bush-Dukakis stuff, and the media decrying the negativity of the campaign while also ignoring the various policy positions the candidates were putting out. Which isn't exactly the same thing you're talking about, but it's related; there's what people say they care about, and what they actually vote on. Party affiliation and more broadly policy issues are what most people actually vote on when they haven't fixated on a candidate for unusual personal reasons (Obama, Trump, etc).

flere-imsaho 02-08-2024 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3425905)
I really don't understand the idea that there's any realistic idea of Biden getting replaced at this point. That's something that just doesn't happen. For better or worse, he's the candidate unless he is tragically dead or close to it.


:+1:

RainMaker 02-08-2024 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3425905)
For better or worse, he's the candidate unless he is tragically dead or close to it.


Sounds like he's more or less dead upstairs. Not terribly surprising if you've heard him speak over the past year.

Edward64 02-08-2024 05:28 PM

Great job, Joe.

Somehow, also spread more of the wealth to friendlier, developing countries.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/...d-us-107034221
Quote:

For the first time in more than two decades, Mexico last year surpassed China as the leading source of goods imported by the United States. The shift reflects the growing tensions between Washington and Beijing as well as U.S. efforts to import from countries that are friendlier and closer to home.

Figures released Wednesday by the U.S. Commerce Department show that the value of goods imported by the United States from Mexico rose nearly 5% from 2022 to 2023, to more than $475 billion. At the same time, the value of Chinese imports tumbled 20% to $427 billion.

JPhillips 02-08-2024 06:09 PM

The media is making all the same choices as in 2016. Look at the banner headlines at the top of CNN.

Quote:

Takeaways from scathing report into Biden's handling of classified documents

Quote:

Justices signaled they may side with Trump in historic case

RainMaker 02-08-2024 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3425921)
The media is making all the same choices as in 2016. Look at the banner headlines at the top of CNN.


What is it you want them to say? It's a pretty damning report. The President being mentally unsound and committing crimes is going to get covered by the news.

RainMaker 02-08-2024 06:43 PM

This feels like a big moment.



Lathum 02-08-2024 06:55 PM

I suspect he is going to highlight the difference between his docs case and Trumps.

If you're expecting an announcement suspending the campaign I think youre mistaken

The reaction will be predictable. The right will say he is a bumbling fool and cherry pick sound bites and the left will say dark Brandon came out swinging.

Lathum 02-08-2024 07:00 PM

well that didn't take long...

Lathum 02-08-2024 07:02 PM

and him forgetting the name of the church while talking about his dead son is the bumbling sound bite

Lathum 02-08-2024 07:07 PM

him continuing to blame his staff is a bad look.

Lathum 02-08-2024 07:09 PM

president of mexico......that's going to kill him

RainMaker 02-08-2024 07:10 PM

Did he hire Desantis campaign staffers? Who the fuck thought this was a good idea?

RainMaker 02-08-2024 07:12 PM

The President of Mexico, Sisi. Dude is cooked and this is bordering on elder abuse.

Lathum 02-08-2024 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3425931)
The President of Mexico, Sisi. Dude is cooked and this is bordering on elder abuse.


Even CNN is skewering him about it.

RainMaker 02-08-2024 07:21 PM

If Dems cared at all about winning, they'd get Mark Kelly on every national media appearance they can and then have Biden say he won't run and elect Kelly at the convention. Pitch it as this American hero stepping up in a time of crisis to take on Trump. That's the only chance they have although it sure fucking feels like they want to lose.

JPhillips 02-08-2024 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3425922)
What is it you want them to say? It's a pretty damning report. The President being mentally unsound and committing crimes is going to get covered by the news.


Trump has a thousand scandals, but saying that sounds unfair, so they let him off the hook. There's no way to compare any scandal with Trump and Biden and not see Trump is several orders of magnitude worse.

Lathum 02-08-2024 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3425935)
Trump has a thousand scandals, but saying that sounds unfair, so they let him off the hook. There's no way to compare any scandal with Trump and Biden and not see Trump is several orders of magnitude worse.


Orange man bad isn't winning this cycle like it did in 2020. At this point Biden will be lucky to win 1 of the 6-7 swing states he needs.

He's a disaster and it isn't going to get better.

sovereignstar v2 02-08-2024 07:33 PM

Panic setting in around this place like 2020 Election Day. Pace yourselves, it's only February.

Lathum 02-08-2024 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sovereignstar v2 (Post 3425937)
Panic setting in around this place like 2020 Election Day. Pace yourselves, it's only February.


The problem is Biden isn't getting any younger

RainMaker 02-08-2024 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3425935)
Trump has a thousand scandals, but saying that sounds unfair, so they let him off the hook. There's no way to compare any scandal with Trump and Biden and not see Trump is several orders of magnitude worse.


I don't want Trump to be President either and think he should pay for his crimes too. You can in fact think with men are criminals and unfit for office.

JPhillips 02-08-2024 07:44 PM

Biden's not a criminal and saying so is absolutely ridiculous.

RainMaker 02-08-2024 07:58 PM

Every single one of us would be spending a decade behind bars if we were that careless with classified materials.

Also being a war criminal is a criminal too.

Lathum 02-08-2024 08:01 PM

Does anyone really think Inauguration day 2029 Biden will be even remotely cognitively sound?

miked 02-08-2024 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3425935)
Trump has a thousand scandals, but saying that sounds unfair, so they let him off the hook. There's no way to compare any scandal with Trump and Biden and not see Trump is several orders of magnitude worse.


Not to his base. The thing is, his base loves it and gets off on it, Biden's base actually cares about governance and would seemingly let Trump win because Biden is not perfectly what they want.

JPhillips 02-08-2024 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3425942)
Every single one of us would be spending a decade behind bars if we were that careless with classified materials.

Also being a war criminal is a criminal too.


lol No.

Biden, Pence, and others have the same issue, they had documents they shouldn't have. But when asked to return them they did. None of them went to jail.

GrantDawg 02-08-2024 08:18 PM

Well, any one of us would be in jail because the only way we could have the documents would be considered espionage. We didn't have a security officer hand them to us as a part of our job. That is not the case for Biden or Pence.

Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk

RainMaker 02-08-2024 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miked (Post 3425944)
Not to his base. The thing is, his base loves it and gets off on it, Biden's base actually cares about governance and would seemingly let Trump win because Biden is not perfectly what they want.


Democrats, notoriously known for caring about governance.

RainMaker 02-08-2024 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3425946)
Biden, Pence, and others have the same issue, they had documents they shouldn't have.


Definition of a crime. This country only prosecutes lower level employees for this crime though. Not the rich and powerful.

RainMaker 02-08-2024 09:50 PM

And regardless if you think the laws should apply to powerful people or not, the bigger issue is the guy doesn't have the mental capacity for the job. We're going on a daily basis of him forgetting things, mumbling, or just mixing things up. Not the guy you want in charge as he continues to enter us into more wars (proxy or not).

JPhillips 02-09-2024 06:33 AM

Horseshit. Watch his presser from yesterday and it's clear he's very informed and mentally alert.

I wish the Dem nominee was younger, but the choice is Biden or Trump and there's no measure where Trump isn't worse.

Edward64 02-09-2024 06:37 AM

I do forget names and words sometimes. Yeah, that's normal part of aging and that's life.

But when that happens, I recognize that I'm struggling to recall and accommodate in some other way (e.g. instead of using the word, use a phrase/description).

Joe doesn't seem to realize he's struggling and just goes on.

Access to this page has been denied
Quote:

President Biden on Thursday confused the leaders of Mexico and Egypt during a press conference in which he forcefully rebutted a special counsel report that offered a harsh assessment of his memory and recall abilities.
Yup, I believe below is the truth.

Quote:

Biden delivered remarks from the White House in which he sharply pushed back against conclusions from special counsel Robert Hur that the president presented during an interview with investigators as “a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.”
What he's done as President means nothing re: accusation of his memory. He has a bunch of people to help and guide him.

Quote:

“My memory’s fine. Take a look at what I’ve done since I became president… how did that happen? I guess I just forgot what was going on,” Biden said, striking a sarcastic tone.

Personally, if it's between Joe & Trump, I'd still take Joe because I trust his "support group" more than Trump and his. But yeah, if Trump wasn't in the picture, I'd lean towards someone else.

He needs to present & perform well in the debates (if they happen).

albionmoonlight 02-09-2024 06:40 AM

Couple thoughts:

1. Dems wanting to replace Biden with a "more popular" candidate are ignoring the fact that once someone becomes the nominee, they get attacked and lose popularity. Ride or die with Biden.

2. This is a bad report that attacks his biggest weakness. No way around that. He's lucky it came out in February and not October.

Lathum 02-09-2024 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3425964)
Horseshit. Watch his presser from yesterday and it's clear he's very informed and mentally alert.

I wish the Dem nominee was younger, but the choice is Biden or Trump and there's no measure where Trump isn't worse.


I'll vote Biden over Trump every time, but he is not mentally alert and he is getting worse.

He forgot the name of the church his sons funeral was at then confused Mexico and Egypt. Every time he speaks he has these gaffes. They aren't taking the free publicity of doing a super bowl interview. There is no way 5 years from now he is even remotely fit to still be serving.

His arrogance and refusal to step aside is going to get Trump reelected.

Lathum 02-09-2024 07:21 AM

On predict it Trump is at .47 and Biden .40. Biden is down .03. Newsome is up to .10

Edward64 02-09-2024 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3425167)
I've mentioned earlier that as Project Manager implementing systems, it's normal to create a "risk log" where it describes the risk, then probability of risk (VH-H-M-L), then severity/impact of risk (VH-H-M-L). I'd then review with client (public) and create a mitigation or contingency strategy for the more significant risks.

Generalizing ...

8) Extensive claims of fraud; Very-High Probability; Very-High Impact

Bottom-line to me. It can't be ignored, something needs to be done. It's like you see a train headed towards you, you need to take some action.



I'm glad to read they've started thinking about the "risk log" and all the possible bad things that could happen. Need to come up with contingency/mitigation plans.

Biden officials confront limits of federal response in exercise preparing for 2024 election threats | CNN Politics
Quote:

When senior national security officials gathered in the White House Situation Room in December to prepare for the 2024 election, they faced a pair of stark, simulated scenarios that tested the limits of any federal response to election-related chaos, four people familiar with the meeting told CNN.

What if Chinese operatives created a fake AI-generated video showing a Senate candidate destroying ballots? And how should federal agencies respond if violence erupts at polling stations on Election Day?

For nearly an hour, the No. 2 officials at the FBI, CIA and departments of Homeland Security and Justice wrestled with how to respond to the deepfake video, including whether and how to notify the public about the activity if they weren’t sure that China was behind it, the sources told CNN.


Whatever they come up with, it needs to become public. There needs to be transparency so we all understand the "process" of how stuff will be identified and handled.

cuervo72 02-09-2024 07:52 AM

I swear, am I the only one who ever has words escape him? I was at the doctor's Wednesday and I totally forgot the word "hernia." Just couldn't find it, and once you know you can't find a word it just makes it worse ("shit, I can't find the word, I gotta find the word or I'm going to look like an idiot -- crap, now I'm worried about it AND IT ISN'T HELPING")

JPhillips 02-09-2024 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 3425971)
On predict it Trump is at .47 and Biden .40. Biden is down .03. Newsome is up to .10


Newsome's got a friendly donor throwing money at this for publicity. There's no way a white guy liberal from California somehow sneaks into the nomination without winning any primaries.

There's a very narrow path for someone other than Biden or Harris, but it doesn't include Newsome.

Lathum 02-09-2024 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cuervo72 (Post 3425975)
I swear, am I the only one who ever has words escape him? I was at the doctor's Wednesday and I totally forgot the word "hernia." Just couldn't find it, and once you know you can't find a word it just makes it worse ("shit, I can't find the word, I gotta find the word or I'm going to look like an idiot -- crap, now I'm worried about it AND IT ISN'T HELPING")


Of course not but you also don't have the nuclear codes.

His cognitive decline isn't nearly as bad as the right wing media makes it out to be, but it is undeniable there is decline and that isn't something that's going to improve.

Kodos 02-09-2024 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cuervo72 (Post 3425975)
I swear, am I the only one who ever has words escape him? I was at the doctor's Wednesday and I totally forgot the word "hernia." Just couldn't find it, and once you know you can't find a word it just makes it worse ("shit, I can't find the word, I gotta find the word or I'm going to look like an idiot -- crap, now I'm worried about it AND IT ISN'T HELPING")


Happens to me a lot too.

GrantDawg 02-09-2024 10:48 AM

I can't remember names at all. To a point I fear I might be showing signs of early onset dementia.

Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk

Edward64 02-09-2024 10:50 AM

I really hope they do some ancestry stuff, there's got to be a common ancestor.

US Senator Chris Coons finds doppelganger in German Chancellor Olaf Scholz
Quote:

What do a US Senator from Delaware and the Chancellor of Germany have in common? It turns out, quite a lot.

Chris Coons and Olaf Scholz met in Washington DC on Thursday. Afterward, they took a selfie together and posted it online teasing the same question.
"Wer ist wer?", Sen Coons joked - German for "who is who".

Between their nearly identical greying hair, middle-aged baldness and infectious smiles, at first glance it was hard to tell.


cuervo72 02-09-2024 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kodos (Post 3425987)
Happens to me a lot too.


I mean, it happens at the weirdest times on the most basic of things. Like..."what't that bird, you know the one that's blue and green, has the feathers with the eye things..." "Oh, you mean a peacock?" That one has escaped me MORE THAN ONCE.

Or, watching Jeopardy!. Really famous actor/actress? Know exactly who is being talked about...vape on the name. Obscure fact about the 17th century? INSTAGET. So it's not nearly everything, or even most things. Just every now and then, "yeah, sorry we have a bad pointer to this byte/sector, give us a minute, we'll get there...eventually."

Kodos 02-09-2024 02:23 PM

Yeah, I'm bad with names. And sometimes on Jeopardy they'll show someone famous who I know well and it's just "oh, for god's sake, I know this!"

cuervo72 02-09-2024 03:20 PM

Also re: nuclear codes -- I mean it's not like you have to memorize the codes, right?

Lathum 02-09-2024 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cuervo72 (Post 3426011)
Also re: nuclear codes -- I mean it's not like you have to memorize the codes, right?


True but what if he means to say nuke Russia and instead says nuke Romania!

Brian Swartz 02-09-2024 04:15 PM

I think you're joking, but they have a lot of safeguards in place for that. Nobody gets nuked without being absolutely sure it's what you want to do.

Lathum 02-09-2024 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3426022)
I think you're joking, but they have a lot of safeguards in place for that. Nobody gets nuked without being absolutely sure it's what you want to do.


:banghead:

NobodyHere 02-09-2024 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3426022)
I think you're joking, but they have a lot of safeguards in place for that. Nobody gets nuked without being absolutely sure it's what you want to do.


I suddenly have the urge to watch Dr. Strangelove

RainMaker 02-09-2024 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3425964)
Horseshit. Watch his presser from yesterday and it's clear he's very informed and mentally alert.

I wish the Dem nominee was younger, but the choice is Biden or Trump and there's no measure where Trump isn't worse.


He had an impromptu press conference to tell us his memory was good and proceeded to mix up Egypt and Mexico. This after a week of mixing up leaders in major European countries.

Like I get if you'd prefer him over Trump at all costs. But you've got to face reality that his mind is shot and there is no way he's finishing out that second term.

JonInMiddleGA 02-09-2024 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3426030)
But you've got to face reality that his mind is shot and there is no way he's finishing out that second term.


I don't believe for a second he was ever intended to finish out the first term, much less a second one.

Then they realized Plan B was even more out of it .. why they haven't found a different VP candidate for this round (which, hey, it ain't too late I guess) is a mystery

JPhillips 02-09-2024 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3426030)
He had an impromptu press conference to tell us his memory was good and proceeded to mix up Egypt and Mexico. This after a week of mixing up leaders in major European countries.

Like I get if you'd prefer him over Trump at all costs. But you've got to face reality that his mind is shot and there is no way he's finishing out that second term.


He didn't mix up two countries he said the word name. You can't watch his presser and think his mind is shot.

As for dumping Harris, how exactly do you do that and retain the black vote?

Lathum 02-09-2024 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA (Post 3426034)
I don't believe for a second he was ever intended to finish out the first term, much less a second one.

Then they realized Plan B was even more out of it .. why they haven't found a different VP candidate for this round (which, hey, it ain't too late I guess) is a mystery


because if you kick a black woman off the ticket you lose a shit ton of votes

JonInMiddleGA 02-09-2024 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 3426042)
because if you kick a black woman off the ticket you lose a shit ton of votes


Not if you replace her with another (or some other double minority, whatever they have on the bench)

JPhillips 02-09-2024 09:13 PM

You have very little understanding of Dem coalitions if you think you can just replace one woman of color with another and have the voters all step into line.

And that's even before the woman replaced starts talking about what really happened behind closed doors.

RainMaker 02-09-2024 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3426044)
You have very little understanding of Dem coalitions if you think you can just replace one woman of color with another and have the voters all step into line.

And that's even before the woman replaced starts talking about what really happened behind closed doors.


No one gives a shit about Kamala Harris.

RainMaker 02-09-2024 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA (Post 3426034)
I don't believe for a second he was ever intended to finish out the first term, much less a second one.

Then they realized Plan B was even more out of it .. why they haven't found a different VP candidate for this round (which, hey, it ain't too late I guess) is a mystery


He insinuated during the last campaign that he'd only serve one term and be a "bridge" President.

Democrats have had 4 years to prop up other candidates and didn't. Part of me wonders if they'd be happier losing and in the minority. A lot less pressure and fundraising off Trump is probably easier. Or they could just be incredibly dumb and bad at politics which is sort of their thing.

RainMaker 02-09-2024 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3426041)
He didn't mix up two countries he said the word name. You can't watch his presser and think his mind is shot.

As for dumping Harris, how exactly do you do that and retain the black vote?


Yes I can. I can also watch the other pressers where he's mumbling and stumbling all over himself. Or the reports of him mixing up the names of leaders. Or the report that said he doesn't remember when he was Vice President or when his son died.

I think some of the dementia stuff early in his term was overblown, but he's shown some considerable cognitive declines of late. Just watch videos of him from 4-5 years ago and compare it to today. It's staggering. And imagine another 4 years of cognitive decline.

And I don't know how you dump Kamala Harris. Probably shouldn't have put an incredibly unpopular person with negative charisma as your running mate the first time around. The chickens are coming home to roost. They're likely fucked this election. I guess they can just blame Russia again or something.

Edward64 02-10-2024 06:17 AM

The "test".

Joe should take it in secret. If good, publicize it. If bad, keep on denying it. My guess is he may pass but it won't be "good".

Would YOU pass the gold-standard dementia tests that experts want Biden to take? Try it and tell us how you get on... | Daily Mail Online


Quote:

1. ALTERNATING TRAIL MAKING

TEST: The patient is told to pair up five numbers and letters (1-5, A-E) in ascending order (pairing 1 with A, 2 with B, etc) while drawing connect-the-dots lines.

2. VISUOCONSTRUCTIONAL SKILLS (CUBE)

TEST: Draw your own version of the cube in the space next to it.

It must be exactly the same as the one printed on the page.

3. VISUOCONSTRUCTIONAL SKILLS (CLOCK)

TEST: Draw a clock, putting in all the numbers and set the time to 10 minutes past 11 o'clock.

4. NAMING

TEST: Name each animal.

5. MEMORY

TEST:

The doctor tells the patient that they are going to read a list of words that the patient must remember. At the end the patient has to tell them as many as they remember; it doesn't matter what order.

The doctor then reads five words, one per second:

FACE, VELVET, CHURCH, DAISY, RED

6. ATTENTION

TEST (NUMBERS):

Recall numbers: The doctor reads a list of five numbers at a rate of one number per second; the patient recalls them exactly as they were said:

2 1 8 5 4

Recall numbers backwards: The doctor reads three numbers at a rate of one number per second; the patient recalls them backwards:

7 4 2

TEST (LETTERS): The doctor reads a list of letters at a rate of one per second. Every time they say the letter 'A', the patient has to tap their hand:

F B A C M N A A J K L B A F A K D E A A A J A M O F A A B


TEST (MATH): The patient starts at 100, then must count down by subtracting seven every time, until the examiner tells them to stop:

93
86
79
72
65

7. SENTENCE REPETITION

TEST:

Step one: The examiner reads this sentence, and the patient has to repeat it exactly: 'I only know that John is the one to help today'.

Step two: The examiner then reads another sentence, with the same instruction: 'The cat always hid under the couch when dogs were in the room'.

8. VERBAL FLUENCY

TEST: The doctor reads out a letter (F), and the patient has to think of words that starts with that letter. The aim is to reach 11 words or more in 60 seconds.

The words cannot be proper nouns, like Bob or Boston
The words cannot be the same sounding word but with different suffixes (like love, lover, loving)

9. ABSTRACTION

TEST: The patient has to describe what the relationship is between certain words (i.e. an orange and a banana; a train and a bicycle; a ruler and a watch).

There is one practice trial (ORANGE AND BANANA) before two scored pairs (TRAIN AND BICYCLE; WATCH AND RULER).

10. DELAYED RECALL

TEST: The patient has to recall all the words they heard earlier (FACE, VELVET, CHURCH, DAISY, RED).

11. ORIENTATION

TEST: Say the exact date, and the name of the place they are in, including the city.



flere-imsaho 02-10-2024 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3426030)
He had an impromptu press conference to tell us his memory was good and proceeded to mix up Egypt and Mexico. This after a week of mixing up leaders in major European countries.


World Leader Or My Friends Dad 🤔 - Hasan Minhaj #shorts - YouTube

Quote:

Like I get if you'd prefer him over Trump at all costs. But you've got to face reality that his mind is shot and there is no way he's finishing out that second term.

Again, you insinuate that there's another option. There's not. The choice is Trump or Biden.

RainMaker 02-10-2024 03:13 PM

They had 4 years to find someone else and didn't. So now you're stuck pretending this is normal behavior as everyone with functioning eyes and ears roll their eyes.

I don't even blame Biden. The 80s are not kind to most people. But this was expected.

Qwikshot 02-10-2024 03:13 PM

I'll vote for Biden dead corpse over any Republican. He'll do a better job regardless if he's breathing or not.

flere-imsaho 02-10-2024 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3426069)
They had 4 years to find someone else and didn't.


Name me the last time a party did this. You're asking dozens of Democratic politicians to not only subvert their own ambitions, but do so in the pursuit of undermining their newly-elected POTUS. You're not being realistic, as usual.

Quote:

So now you're stuck pretending this is normal behavior as everyone with functioning eyes and ears roll their eyes.

There's literally more precedent for a party allowing a POTUS in skeptical health to run for his second term (Reagan & FDR, at least) than there is for what you're suggesting.

Again, you insinuate there was another option. There was not.

At least be honest, RM, you want the Democrats to get annhiliated at this election so you can say "I told you so" and tell us all how electing Bernie would have been better.

RainMaker 02-10-2024 04:41 PM

I genuinely don't care who wins. Both options are pretty bad for the country.

GrantDawg 02-10-2024 05:31 PM

Bernie could never win a general election. Heck, he can't even get half of Democrats to vote for him. Talk about an unmitigated disaster of a candidate.

Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk

JPhillips 02-10-2024 05:54 PM

Meanwhile Trump said that he's going to nationalize the guard and send red state guards into blue cities on day one to start deportations.

And if that's not enough, he said he wouldn't fight for NATO allies and would instead encourage Russia to do whatever the hell they wanted.

Edward64 02-10-2024 05:55 PM

Michelle will save the Dems!

JPhillips 02-10-2024 06:13 PM

Anyone who seriously believes that is an idiot. Ill bet whatever you like that Michelle won't be the nominee.

RainMaker 02-10-2024 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3426076)
Meanwhile Trump said that he's going to nationalize the guard and send red state guards into blue cities on day one to start deportations.

And if that's not enough, he said he wouldn't fight for NATO allies and would instead encourage Russia to do whatever the hell they wanted.


Don't care about Russia or what they do. Has no impact in my life or yours. The current strategy of lighting money on fire in Ukraine hasn't done anything but put us deeper in debt.

Biden is also pushing an incredibly far right immigration bill that mirrors what Trump wants to do. Going to have to pick a different policy to differentiate the two.

JPhillips 02-10-2024 06:31 PM

Just go full Trump, man. It's obvious this is where you're heading.

Ksyrup 02-10-2024 06:49 PM

Looks like Biden has had a helluva 10+ days since I've been out of the country. Yeesh.

RainMaker 02-10-2024 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3426080)
Just go full Trump, man. It's obvious this is where you're heading.


Politics isn't binary and I can't help that I don't support the primary positions of both options. You don't have to "pick a team" and support them to the ends of the earth.

I guess if Trump wins, we'll be on the same side politically since it'll be someone with an R next to the name doing the stuff.

Brian Swartz 02-10-2024 07:31 PM

The choice of whether to have Biden be the nominee again if he wanted to be was made when he was nominated in 2020, practically speaking. You don't just decide to pick someone else when you have an incumbent president of your party. We might all wish politics worked differently in various ways, but you have to deal with and make decisions based off the way it actually functions.

flere-imsaho 02-10-2024 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3426073)
I genuinely don't care who wins. Both options are pretty bad for the country.


That's a nice, comfy, naive, privileged place to be. Congrats.

bronconick 02-10-2024 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3426078)
Anyone who seriously believes that is an idiot. Ill bet whatever you like that Michelle won't be the nominee.


Michelle tried to talk Barack out of running for President. Not a chance in hell she'll ever get into running for a political office.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.