FWIW, I didn't read your statement literally as in a nuclear war. This is what I was thinking and definitely agree. Sure there will be other traditional conflicts but cyberwar is going to be more and more prominent in the future.

If we are behind, we better get ramped up and quick.

There's a guy who lives behind me who is a gun dealer. He said that business was booming during Obama, but since the election it's been so dead he's not sure he can't even make money with it.

Thanks, Obama.

Thank you. I may lean a little left, but I definitely don't try to come off as a far left nutcase. I'm just as likely to vote Republican as I do Democrat as I mostly just want competence in my government officials. I truly believe that's what we all want, even with all our differences.

Honestly, Marco Rubio said it best when it comes to Russia's efforts to influence the elections and those that are willing to look the other way/don't want to acknowledge what's going on: https://www.usnews.com/news/politics...et-for-hackers




I'm not sure we're behind, but I'm not sure there's ever really a way to be ahead. If hackers want to get in, they'll find a way. IT Security is a Multi-Billion dollar industry at this point and that still tends to be the underlying slogan for it.

We already have the resources and manpower in place, we've used them in North Korea and a few other hotspots, but Russia is a different animal entirely. The best way to combat their tactics is to sanction, threaten, and show our capabilities in ways that hopefully slow down their efforts. Unfortunately, from what I can tell, based off intel reports and what most media sources are saying, all we are doing is preventative tactics which won't stop or even slow down what's going on.

I'd argue the more likely scenario is that you (the US) are actually far enough ahead that you aren't being caught so blatantly.

I was flabbergasted to see Trump say 'worry about due process later.' I've also noticed that family members who were quick to accuse Obama of having a secret plan to grab all the guns haven't uttered a peep about Trump's proposals of yesterday. So to the extent any of Trump's supporters are up-in-arms about the comments, they at least don't appear to be displaying that outrage in my little circle.

But it also wouldn't be the first time Trump has said "let's do this, we're gonna do this thing right here" and then nothing has ever come of it. So even without the "grab the guns first, worry about due process later," I'm skeptical that any of his other (frankly, more liberal than the GOP Congressional caucus would prefer) proposals from yesterday are ever going to see the light of day. Someone will get in his ear and tell him why it's a bad idea, and the whole "the last person he talks to is what he decides he believes" thing that we've seen documented over and over will come to the fore.

This also seems like a really easy walk-back for the White House.

"The President was expressing the frustration that all Americans share about criminals [read, black people] having easy access to fireams. He supports, as he always has, the fundamental Constitutional right for law-abiding Americans [read, white people] to keep and bear arms. He hopes that legislators in both parties will support him in his efforts to keep Americans safe and provide additional resources to law enforcement to help meet that goal."

We've never had an administration where the President says whatever he wants and then the staff determines whether or not they will support it or ignore it. I assume, but don't know, that Kelly and Pence have a hell of a lot of power right now, either directly or through staff that they nominally control.

And just like that, the Dow is down 500 points after Trump announces he'll slap 25% tariffs on steel and 10% tariffs on aluminum.

There were stories coming out around the convention that Trump's campaign offered Kasich the VP slot and that it would be "the most powerful VP in history."

Basically, as the rumors went, Trump didn't want to govern. He wanted the title, the prestige, and the attention.

Wouldn't shock me at all if Pence is the one calling the actionable shots while Trump gets the headlines.

Hah, you have more faith than I do. Sure the US probably has tremendous capabilities in some areas but I do think there are very likely a lot of gaps.

McMaster is rumored to be next.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/don...-month-n852371

Maybe it's not as bad as it looks, but things in the White House seem like they are disintegrating to a greater degree than they have previously.

White House Now Just Holding Continuous Going-Away Party For Departing Staffers https://t.co/nqnKVlmPSm pic.twitter.com/DRdEEIUzHr

— The Onion (@TheOnion) February 13, 2018

You know they're getting desperate when they decide to bring in the Bieguns.

Hope Hicks white lies
Jared's clearance compromised
Trump is taking all the guns
Sessions' time is almost done
Kush lands sweet loans
NRA standing alone
Maybe God lets Oprah run
Mueller watching all the fun

WE DIDN'T START THE FIRE

— Max Burns (@themaxburns) March 1, 2018

Just a word of caution here-I've seen at least three reports over the past 6-9 months that Gen Kelly was leaving, yet he is still here. So don't hold your breath on this one. My money is on Sessions leaving next-I'm certainly not a fan of his, but Trump thinks Sessions job is to protect him, and he's going to keep pushing him until he leaves and he finds someone who will try to do that.

Yeah, that's what I suspect too. Personally I don't pay much attention to it anymore, I am just waiting for every election from now on to make sure I always vote and that my friends also do. Apart from my amusement at some of the fanatics finally having enough on reddit, there are definitely still a lot of people who are able to pull off Mary Lou Retton type shit in their brains and that works for them I guess. More power to them if they can't wake up and see that he doesn't serve anyone's interests but his own.. Or the person he just got done speaking with.

WSJ puts this into perspective nicely https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-...lly-1519950205

He really is a tool for big corporations easily able to convince him in meetings ...

Also, would only have a german link right now but the last time this was done (Bush 2002) this lead to more lost jobs in steel manufacturing firms than were even employed in steel production. (200k vs 185k)

OMG, we're in trouble.

When a country (USA) is losing many billions of dollars on trade with virtually every country it does business with, trade wars are good, and easy to win. Example, when we are down $100 billion with a certain country and they get cute, don’t trade anymore-we win big. It’s easy!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 2, 2018

Who knew a guy who bankrupts everything he touches would be bad at economic policy. Go figure.

He should go back to tweeting about the important things like Russia talking up new missiles...or Alec Baldwin on SNL. Baldwin hit back though. I may have to revise my "Who goes next" prediction-Gary Cohn tried to get the President to change his mind about the tariffs and lost in the end.

What I want to know is why his handlers are letting him tweet about international trade. Guns and immigration are two issues that play to his base on which no meaningful legislation will actually happen. Why aren't they having him talk about that?

He can actually cause some recession-level damage if investors start to think that he's going to try and implement some of his economic "ideas."

I'm thinking I made a pretty good decision getting out of the dairy business. Guess who is going to be the first to take the brunt of a trade war? The farmer. Yet, the Farm Bureau gave Trump a rousing ovation at their annual meeting because he put those damn NFL players in their place for kneeling during the national anthem. #priorities

Doesn't it play into the same base though?

It does. So why not have him keep that same base happy by talking about kneeling football players and MS13 instead of about stuff that might actually hurt the economy?

dola:

I'm not saying that they should have him come out in favor of free trade; I'm saying that they shouldn't have him talking or thinking about the issue at all.

You're assuming that the staff and the President discuss issues, plot a course of action, and formulate a messaging plan. It sure seems like the President just says whatever makes him feel good at the moment, especially when angered or buoyed by a Fox News segment.

edit: Steel companies apparently started running pro-tariff commercials on Fox hoping they would push the President towards that policy.

Because they're all busy writing their resignation letters.

As much as I would like to see his staff straight jacket him or otherwise contain him, I don't think that's realistic. What do you want them to do? I'm sure they are trying.

I guess so! Saw this this article a couple days ago:

As Milk Prices Decline, Worries About Dairy Farmer Suicides Rise : NPR

"YOU'RE FIRED!?"

On that note:



;)

Considering he has only been in office for 7 months, those reports from 9 months ago are jumping the gun a little. :D

So these reports have become so common I forget who they were talking about :) Besides Trump has already labelled it fake news, so nothing to see here I guess.

So, thsi is now being reported...

There were no prepared, approved remarks for Trump to give on trade and tariffs, NBC News reports.

There was no:
—Diplomatic strategy
—Legislative strategy
—Communications plan

No one at the following departments had been told about the policy:
—State
—Treasury
—Defense https://t.co/laJjkSNpJs

— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) March 2, 2018

Us farmers have a higher rate of suicide than veterans, I'm told. In fact just last week I noticed an alarming post on a Dairy forum I read. The guy didn't outright say he was suicidal but I ended up reaching out and talked to the guy on the phone where he admitted he had considered suicide. But he was in much better spirits after a nice long talk (mostly listening on my part).

I love how a guy that says trade wars are easy to win and was able to sum his economic strategy in 1 tweet was able to sell his base on being a genius businessman.

Ex-Trump adviser sold $31m in shares days before president announced steel tariffs | Business | The Guardian

Still following through on that promise to build the swamp!

I grew up in a farm town. I don't think many people understand how lonely the job can be, even if you have employees. There's really no peers for the owner at most family farms. If depression hits, I could see it being really hard to find a way out, and that's without adding in the tough it out culture of the midwest.

So true. Luckily my dad was always open about his own depression that he successfully managed when we were growing up. When I came home to run the farm he warned me that it would more than likely be something I deal with. That came to pass a two years ago for me. Minus a bump or two in the road, I've learned how to manage it myself. You'd think selling the cows would throw me back down in the hole but I'm feeling my mental health get even better now.

Report: Donald Trump misled the public about freeing UCLA basketball players


Just another con.

And Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell still don't care.

Hey, Quik, Donny from Queens here, first time long time, anyhow, we are getting crushed in trade, we need to tax the eff out of, hey look at the legs on that one, and a real shame about those kids in Florida, I mean I would have run into that building, but next time, we'll give the football coach a rocket launcher and we'll blow the hell out of those madmen.

Credit to Ross for coming up with a diplomatic way to say “the hell if I know!”

Chuck Todd on Twitter: "Perhaps this should be a pinned tweet: Commerce Sec Ross after I asked if it’s possible POTUS could rescind his tariff proposal: “Whatever his final decision is, is what will happen. What he has said he has said; if he says something different, it’ll be something different�"

Looking forward to his perp walk. It'll be interesting to see how this plays out.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/05/polit...ler/index.html

All Mueller can threaten him with is jail.


Russian spy critically ill after being 'poisoned' by unknown substance in SalisburyÂ*

Nunberg is a prime example of why you should sober up from a long weekend of snorting coke prior to going on national TV to speak about an investigation that you are likely part of.

This could also be the way he has decided to flip. He's not going to "cooperate" with Mueller in public. But he's forcing Mueller to force him to comply.

bronconick's post-coke-bender theory is still probably the most plausible.

I think I've seen him on every network in the past week-so he's clearly got a story to tell-why not to Mueller?

He was just on Ari's show on MSNBC-he just seems totally off his rocker-said its not fair that Mueller's asking him to do all these things. He'll soon learn what's it like when Mueller stops asking.

He's a drunk.

Also only hiring "the best people".

Ari spent the first 30 mins of his show trying to talk him down from the ledge. Now he's on Erin's show on CNN. I just see no reason for why he's doing all this-what does he hope to gain in the end?

He is drunk. Erin even asked if he had been drinking because he smelled like booze.

I watched him on Erin. I don't think she should have ambushed him like that.

He's going to wake up tomorrow thinking "why did I do that and for what".

If you show up to an interview drunk, you abdicate the right to claim being ambushed.

Thad Cochran-Republican Senator from Mississippi, already looking like he's dying, resigns from Congress effective April 1 for health reasons. Both Senate seats from that state will now be up for a special election.

Cochran resigns effective April 1 - POLITICO

That and the WH apparently was pushing hard that he is a drunk.

To be fair, Erin saying he had alcohol in his breath does not discredit him. Early evening interview, so what if he had dinner with a drink(s)? ... if true.

As fair as I know, it was only her that said it. It was an ambush to embarrass and discredit him.

Like I said, the WH was saying he is a drunk. In addition, reports are his mother said he was not in a good place and several friends are worried about his drinking. Put all of it together, his behavior over the course of the day, all of the reports of his drinking, and smelling alcohol, and it's a fair question.

He can sober up in the slammer.

This dude seems to have a lot of demons, and I feel bad for him. I also think that, demons or not, you have to take responsibility for your actions, and mocking the judicial process cannot be tolerated. He should (and I expect will) be punished.

On a separate note, the television media isn't even pretending to be about anything other than cheap entertainment at this point. It's Real Housewives for people who want to pretend they are too good to watch Real Housewives.

Hope Hicks resigns. She is no more or less newsworthy than the many others who have resigned from this White House and got mentioned once on CNN. But Hope Hicks is conventionally attractive. She is skinny. She has clear skin and bright eyes. She has flowing long hair. So we had to spend 48 hours watching video of Hope Hicks walking. And Hope Hicks smiling. And Hope Hicks smiling while walking. All while the media could pretend that they were doing this because it was newsworthy. It would have been more direct to just have a Hope Hicks lookalike pornstar having sex in the background while they talked.

And yesterday, it became apparent early on that this guy was drunk and, after that first interview, not adding anything substantive to the conversation. The journalistic course would be to keep him off TV and discuss the meaning of that first interview. But these aren't journalists. They just kept putting on the drunk, hoping he'd say or do something else stupid live on air. They could have done the same thing with any drunk on the street, but because this guy has some slight connection to President Trump, it was "news."

Ok, fine on the other bits, but you're not seriously offering THIS up as "evidence, " are you?

Media has been heading down this path for a long time, and the best fodder is anything attached to the Clown the White House. Why would you expect anything more knowing it is about viewers, clicks and ratings?

No, just that by the time of the Burnett interview this was part of the story. After all the interviews before Burnett and all the quotes about Nunberg, somebody needed to ask if he was drunk.

As to the entertainment aspect, of course. In a field where ratings determine whether you have a job or not, you have to expect hosts and producers are going to gravitate towards things that get ratings.

Dude comes into a room with a bomb strapped to himself and starts waving the detonator around wildly and you think others are trying to ambush him. Interesting perspective.

She was probably encoraged by her producer. I seriously doubt that she did something like that without talking to her producer or someone else about the ramifications. I could be wrong, but it seems that stuff like this is much more controlled than it looks.

I don't think its been shown/proven he was drunk other than for his seemingly stupid actions. I've actually not read that others identified him as being drunk earlier in the day. And if they did, then what worth was there to put him on the air other than being exploitative.

Maybe he was off his meds, or depressed and not being treated for it. Its just blatantly unfair for Erin to put him on that spot.

Either way, I do not think Erin comes out looking like an objective reporter (I know, those days are long past).

I do feel sorry for him. With that said, he was stupid and should be accountable for the consequences.

Office of Special Counsel: Conway violated Hatch Act

I hope the forthcoming slap on the wrist doesn't hurt too hard.

I categorically reject any criticism of Erin Burnett.

She could kill a guy with a spoon live on the air and I'd still be on her side. Her eyes are dreamy.

Can't argue with that.

I prefer Katie Tur.

Goodbye Globalist Gary.

Took a quick look, futures down only -13 right now.

Is there anyone left in the administration?

Kelly and Trump are just going to Thelma & Louise this shit.

Cohn put in his year so that his stock sale remained tax free.

Who gets this job now, Kushner or Mulvaney?

Woohoo! What do I win? And this happens right after Trump said there was no chaos in the WH.

Last I heard down over 300.

Down 386 now at https://www.marketwatch.com/

NBC News‏Verified account @NBCNews 17m17 minutes ago




BREAKING: Stormy Daniels sues Donald Trump, says "hush agreement" invalid because he never signed.


Biggest waste of $130k ever.

Puzder is supposedly the favorite. He was the guy who didn't take the Labor job because he beat his wife in the 80's and hired illegals.

So for those in the law field here, does Stormy Daniels have a case here?

Everything's a con.

Honestly I don't get the merits of this lawsuit. How can you get sued over a contract that you didn't sign? Shouldn't she be suing the lawyer or something?

She's seeking a declaratory judgment from the court, which essentially means you go to the court and say, "hey, we have a dispute, please just tell me I'm right." In this case she wants to be able to tell her story without fear of repercussion from Trump trying to enforce the confidentiality terms.

Someone like albion may be able to provide more insight, but courts are usually predisposed not to grant declaratory relief (they want to be there to decide real causes of action, not for everyone to run in to "have their disputes settled here").

On the merits themselves, it's hard to know, but I'd think the biggest thing going against Stormy is that she accepted the payment--so the argument on the other side is that there had to be some agreement here since she cashed a $130k check.

In the end, the suit seems like a publicity stunt that lets her further her narrative without technically violating their agreement.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/06/u...?smid=tw-share

Mueller's getting closer to finding out what happened at the Sychelles meeting.

"Follow the money" as they always say

Trump tweeted that China is going to work to reduce the trade deficit by 1 billion dollars.

Or .3%

Everything's a con.

Just quoting this because its awesome. Well done sir

Why thank you! It's the first thing that came to mind after hearing the latest resignation :D.

If only we had a huge economic event from almost 100 years ago to tell us if tariffs are good or bad.

Maybe we can have Mueller go after Wall Street and the drug cartels next.

I actually read your post the first time as Kellyanne and Trump, which may be even better.

I think that guy is ready to move somewhere warm and retire once he is done with this shitshow of an apointment/job.

lol Everything's a con.

And now it will be "based on how deep up my ass they are willing to crawl " ... Wait, my bad: "flexible" is the word he used.