SackAttack |
02-06-2004 03:33 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramzavail
No - In every draft there are going snubs - I don't think anybody that Sack mentioned were so obviously that we were boneheads not too choose.
I think if we would have chosen the guys Sack mentioned - he would have said at the end of the draft - how could somebody not pick anything from the game Pong!!!!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? That game has been around for 4 decades - blah blah blah. IE: A no-win situation.
|
No, not really. I'm more a literalist than anything else, and when I see the name of the thread - Video game character draft, the first thing that pops into my mind isn't the 'player one paddle' or 'the arrow from Asteroids.' I think those are cop-out picks, to be frank with you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramzavail
IF I-Ninja was chosen - I would have laughed - that game is pathetic.
|
To each his own. I'm not suggesting that he, specifically, should have been chosen, but merely grabbing an example based on one of the more recent games I've played, at 2 in the morning. I don't think it's a 'pathetic' game, but at the same time, just as with the player one paddle, I'm sure there are better choices still out there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramzavail
Parappa the Rapper would have been a good pick - Parappa 1 was classic, Parappa 2 stunk - but I wouldn't say "goddamn how could we forget about him?"
|
Sure. All I'm saying is that clearly there are plenty of recognizable characters who didn't get drafted because somebody thought a straight line was a good pick.
And to that end, I'll let my assertion stand on its own legs from here on out. I just wanted to make it clear that I'm not disagreeing for the sake of being arbitrary, as you were so quick to imply.
|