Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Trump Indictment/Trial thread-2023 (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=98941)

flere-imsaho 08-05-2023 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 3408615)
That is the irony in all this. his supporters claim he is being targeted when in reality he is getting special treatment literally no one else on the planet would receive.



Thomkal 08-05-2023 02:46 PM

So the judge wants a reply/meeting by Monday, what do you think Trump's lawyers do? Yep delay, want until the 10th to answer and have oral arguments.

Thomkal 08-05-2023 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3408636)
So the judge wants a reply/meeting by Monday, what do you think Trump's lawyers do? Yep delay, want until the 10th to answer and have oral arguments.



DOJ acts quickly to get the judge to not allow the delay and she agrees. Trump has now moved on to attack potential witness Mike Pence, who finally showed some balls in saying more about what Trump wanted him to do on Jan 6. And a potential Georgia indictment this week too. Summer is getting HOT!


EDIT: https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/s...61467507613701

RainMaker 08-05-2023 07:42 PM

Judge won't do shit. Maybe a lecture he will ignore. Different justice systems for different people.

Lathum 08-05-2023 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3408652)
Judge won't do shit. Maybe a lecture he will ignore. Different justice systems for different people.


Exactly. Trump has done more than enough to justify locking him up. He will never be held accountable.

CrimsonFox 08-05-2023 10:25 PM

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!

Atocep 08-07-2023 10:27 PM

Any attorneys here want to wade in on the Judge Cannon ruling today? I'm seeing analysis that's all over the place.

albionmoonlight 08-09-2023 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atocep (Post 3408765)
Any attorneys here want to wade in on the Judge Cannon ruling today? I'm seeing analysis that's all over the place.


Some caveats:

1. I think Trump is a horrible human being and a cancer on this country

2. I am a defense lawyer

Both of which color my perspective, but #2 more than #1.

Grand Juries are powerful things. They allow the government to collect evidence. They can subpoena testimony under oath. In a system that prides itself on open access to the justice system, they are an exception that is allowed to operate almost entirely in secret.

And we have decided that that secrecy is worth it for a few reasons. First, it lets the government build cases and investigate without interference. Second, if it turns out that someone was being investigated and turns out not to have done anything wrong, then the secrecy was good to protect their reputation; ideally, no one ever even knows they were a target. Third, if the grand jury does indict you, then you will get an open and public trial with lots and lots of procedural protections before you are found guilty, so that cures any problems caused by the grand jury secrecy.

Because grand juries are such a powerful tool, we do not allow prosecutors to continue to use them in a case once they issue an indictment. The indictment starts the public part of the case, and any investigation, evidence gathering, etc. needs to happen subject to the normal statutory and constitutional disclosure rules. In general, you need to finish with the grand jury and then indict. You don't indict and then keep using it.

There are exceptions to that rule, and I am honestly not completely sure what they are. And those exceptions are what is at play here.

Here, it looks like the United States started the investigation in DC with a DC grand jury. Then realized that the proper venue was Florida, so it got a grand jury down there. But it looks like it might have kept one or both grand juries going post-indictment, and that is what Judge Cannon is asking about.

It may be that due to the complexity of the case and alleged ongoing attempts to destroy evidence by the defense, the continued use of the grand jury(ies) was legitimate and falls into a well-established exception to the general rule (indeed, it would shock me if DOJ was not being super careful about crossing Ts and dotting Is here).

But on the surface, it raises questions. So the judge is asking those questions. She hasn't ruled on anything yet. She is asking for more information about something that (IMO rightly) raises questions and suspicions.

So, all that said, I say good for her. We WANT judges to hold the government's feet to the fire. We don't want the government taking shortcuts that end up violating rights. And judges are our first line of defense to make sure they don't.

Brian Swartz 08-09-2023 07:52 AM

Interesting, thanks for posting.

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight
1. I think Trump is a horrible human being and a cancer on this country


I'd say you'd get 98% or thereabouts support for that proposition. I would definitely be in favor of it.

Lathum 08-09-2023 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight (Post 3408819)
Some caveats:

1. I think Trump is a horrible human being and a cancer on this country

2. I am a defense lawyer

Both of which color my perspective, but #2 more than #1.

Grand Juries are powerful things. They allow the government to collect evidence. They can subpoena testimony under oath. In a system that prides itself on open access to the justice system, they are an exception that is allowed to operate almost entirely in secret.

And we have decided that that secrecy is worth it for a few reasons. First, it lets the government build cases and investigate without interference. Second, if it turns out that someone was being investigated and turns out not to have done anything wrong, then the secrecy was good to protect their reputation; ideally, no one ever even knows they were a target. Third, if the grand jury does indict you, then you will get an open and public trial with lots and lots of procedural protections before you are found guilty, so that cures any problems caused by the grand jury secrecy.

Because grand juries are such a powerful tool, we do not allow prosecutors to continue to use them in a case once they issue an indictment. The indictment starts the public part of the case, and any investigation, evidence gathering, etc. needs to happen subject to the normal statutory and constitutional disclosure rules. In general, you need to finish with the grand jury and then indict. You don't indict and then keep using it.

There are exceptions to that rule, and I am honestly not completely sure what they are. And those exceptions are what is at play here.

Here, it looks like the United States started the investigation in DC with a DC grand jury. Then realized that the proper venue was Florida, so it got a grand jury down there. But it looks like it might have kept one or both grand juries going post-indictment, and that is what Judge Cannon is asking about.

It may be that due to the complexity of the case and alleged ongoing attempts to destroy evidence by the defense, the continued use of the grand jury(ies) was legitimate and falls into a well-established exception to the general rule (indeed, it would shock me if DOJ was not being super careful about crossing Ts and dotting Is here).

But on the surface, it raises questions. So the judge is asking those questions. She hasn't ruled on anything yet. She is asking for more information about something that (IMO rightly) raises questions and suspicions.

So, all that said, I say good for her. We WANT judges to hold the government's feet to the fire. We don't want the government taking shortcuts that end up violating rights. And judges are our first line of defense to make sure they don't.



Thanks for the clarification. I was also confused. Right wing twitter of course has already called for his disbarment and prosecution over this. Have to keep the outrage machine fed.

Thomkal 08-09-2023 12:25 PM

So the Special Counsel had a warrant to aceess Trump's Twitter account since Jan, with the stipulation that they could not tell Trump about it. Twitter resisted got fined and eventually gave in:


https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/stat...13590149263360

bronconick 08-09-2023 08:57 PM

..Trump wants a SCIF room built for him in Mar-a-Lago. I can't even.

JPhillips 08-09-2023 09:07 PM

The game is to get the judge to approve more and more until the government feels like it has no choice but to drop the case. And with this judge it just might work.

bronconick 08-09-2023 11:13 PM

Except the counter move is to walk over to the 11th circuit and watch her get smacked down again so.

Galaril 08-10-2023 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3408833)
So the Special Counsel had a warrant to aceess Trump's Twitter account since Jan, with the stipulation that they could not tell Trump about it. Twitter resisted got fined and eventually gave in:


https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/stat...13590149263360


CNN is reporting that they also tipped Trump off before turning the data over so he probably had time to delete some things.

Edward64 08-12-2023 10:19 PM

I agree with pursuing this, get it out in the open, get it in the books. Doubt it's going to impact Trump much politically (what's one more indictment) but it'd be good if some of his non-Teflon accomplices are caught in the dragnet and paid a price.

Geoff Duncan: Former Georgia lieutenant governor to testify before Fulton County grand jury in 2020 election probe Tuesday | CNN Politics
Quote:

An Atlanta-area prosecutor has notified at least two witnesses to appear before a grand jury early next week, the most significant indication of her intention to seek indictments in the investigation of how Donald Trump and others tried to overturn the 2020 election in Georgia.

Edward64 08-13-2023 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3408990)
... but it'd be good if some of his non-Teflon accomplices are caught in the dragnet and paid a price.


Really don't know how guilty they are but ... congratulations Misty & Cathy, you win the prize for being the low persons on the non-teflon totem pole that no one will care much about.

Wonder if they've cut a deal or stubbornly continue to believe they did the right thing.

Exclusive: Georgia prosecutors have messages showing Trump's team is behind voting system breach | CNN Politics
Quote:

Days later, (Misty) Hampton shared the written invitation to access the county’s election office with a Trump lawyer, text messages obtained by CNN show. She and another location elections official, Cathy Latham, allegedly helped Trump operatives gain access to the county’s voting systems, according to documents, testimony and surveillance video produced as part of a long-running civil lawsuit focused on election security in Georgia.

Latham, who also served as a fake elector from Georgia after the 2020 election, has come under scrutiny for her role in the Coffee County breach after surveillance video showed she allowed unauthorized outsiders to spend hours examining voting systems there.

Atocep 08-14-2023 10:45 AM

You'd think there would be consequences for going online and telling a person that is scheduled to testify against you to not testify, but here we are. Wlwere watching a former President make baseless accusations against judges and trying to influence people testifying, but not suffering consequences.

JPhillips 08-14-2023 11:45 AM

According to a worker's comp attorney in GA it's a common strategy to say worker's comp covers all workplace injuries so there is o additional liability.

GrantDawg 08-14-2023 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3409037)
According to a worker's comp attorney in GA it's a common strategy to say worker's comp covers all workplace injuries so there is o additional liability.

Wrong thread I believe, but that is absolutely the case. Employers can be super negligent, and Worker's Comp caps out what employee's can get. OSHA can nail them with a fine, but the employee just has to take what the WC table will allow.

Thomkal 08-14-2023 03:36 PM

Heads up:


The indictments might come down in GA today-they are moving thru the last Grand Jury witnesses, and the Head Judge has said they will go past the usual closing time of 5pm if the DA signals she wants to. Tomorrow if not today then.

Toddzilla 08-14-2023 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronconick (Post 3408869)
..Trump wants a SCIF room built for him in Mar-a-Lago. I can't even.

good luck with that - those things are *expensive*

flere-imsaho 08-14-2023 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toddzilla (Post 3409054)
good luck with that - those things are *expensive*


The good news is that he's an especially generous billionaire who is only intereseted in the truth.

flere-imsaho 08-14-2023 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atocep (Post 3409033)
You'd think there would be consequences for going online and telling a person that is scheduled to testify against you to not testify, but here we are. Wlwere watching a former President make baseless accusations against judges and trying to influence people testifying, but not suffering consequences.


We're way past the point of wondering whether Trump is worse than Nixon and I'm now trying to determine if there's anyone in the modern era who has committed as many crimes as Trump with so little consequences. I can come up with names, but they're mostly dictators, which probably says something.

Thomkal 08-14-2023 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flere-imsaho (Post 3409055)
The good news is that he's an especially generous billionaire who is only intereseted in the truth.



But I'm sure his followers would love to pay for it

GrantDawg 08-14-2023 07:11 PM

I think the Fulton indictment might come any minute.

Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk

Thomkal 08-14-2023 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 3409061)
I think the Fulton indictment might come any minute.

Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk



They are voting right now

Thomkal 08-14-2023 07:44 PM

And in a pre-arranged interview winning the "Best Timing" award, Rachel Maddow is about to interview Hilary Clinton at 9 pm

GrantDawg 08-14-2023 08:04 PM

10 indictments. RICO likely the big one.

Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk

GrantDawg 08-14-2023 08:21 PM

It might be another three hours before we see the indictments. No indication of the number of defendants. We really don't know if Trump is a defendant on all ten charges.

Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk

Lathum 08-14-2023 08:26 PM

Ho Hum

Nothing will happen and Trump will rake in millions in small dollar donations and see a spike in the polls.

Like it or not, at some point, one we have likely passed, non maga people are going to start believing this is Biden trying to jail his opponent.

Galaril 08-14-2023 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 3409071)
Ho Hum

Nothing will happen and Trump will rake in millions in small dollar donations and see a spike in the polls.

Like it or not, at some point, one we have likely passed, non maga people are going to start believing this is Biden trying to jail his opponent.



Yes I see democrat free media ( Trump calls them main stream media) news anchors like Maddox and CNN doing victory laps and I have PTSD from 2016. I am really concerned we wake on the day after the election in November 2024 and Trump has won Arizona, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and he is president again. Then God help us all.

Ksyrup 08-14-2023 08:47 PM

Someone tweeted that Trump is now under indictment in every NL East city except Philly.

RainMaker 08-14-2023 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 3409071)
Ho Hum

Nothing will happen and Trump will rake in millions in small dollar donations and see a spike in the polls.

Like it or not, at some point, one we have likely passed, non maga people are going to start believing this is Biden trying to jail his opponent.


He is getting preferential treatment but that DC indictment seems like trouble any way you look at it.

RainMaker 08-14-2023 09:05 PM

I think Georgia requires a mugshot so we might actually get one.

Lathum 08-14-2023 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3409074)
He is getting preferential treatment but that DC indictment seems like trouble any way you look at it.


The jury pool there will easily be the most problematic, but doubtful it goes to trial prior to the election.

SirFozzie 08-14-2023 09:34 PM

Happy indictment day! It's kinda like Groundhog day, but with less Groundhogs, and more Orange Man Indictments.

SirFozzie 08-14-2023 09:43 PM

https://twitter.com/bluestein/status...19740847411201

Quote:

“As Republicans we need to take our medicine and realize the election wasn’t rigged, Donald Trump was the worst candidate ever, in the history of our party … and now we are going to have to pivot from there.”


Georgia's Lt Governor.

God DAMN.

that bit that was elipsis'd out? "Even worse than Herschel Walker"

SirFozzie 08-14-2023 10:09 PM

Dola:

19 people indicted, Trump is facing 13 Felony Charges including RICO (hey, maybe they can seize Mar-a-Lago under RICO? Kidding!)



The Indictment starts with:

INTRODUCTION

Defendant Donald John Trump lost the United States presidential election held on November 3, 2020. One oft he states he lost was Georgia. Trump and the other Defendants charged in this Indictment refused to accept that Trump lost, and they knowingly and willfully joined a conspiracy to unlawfully change the outcome of the election in favor of Trump. That conspiracy contained a common plan and purpose to commit two or more acts of racketeering activity in Fulton County, Georgia, elsewhere in the State of Georgia, and in other states.

JPhillips 08-14-2023 10:12 PM

Gonna be tough when he endorses Trump for the general.

SirFozzie 08-14-2023 10:27 PM

Ken White (Popehat) with the Chumbawumba reference:

He gets a New York charge, he gets a Florida charge
He gets a DC charge, he gets a Georgia charge
He enters the pleas that remind him of the good times
He enters the pleas that remind him of the better times


and for once, he has to say "Yes, it's RICO"

https://youtu.be/aiVkyD1yzJg

Edward64 08-14-2023 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3409003)
Really don't know how guilty they are but ... congratulations Misty & Cathy, you win the prize for being the low persons on the non-teflon totem pole that no one will care much about.

Wonder if they've cut a deal or stubbornly continue to believe they did the right thing.


Misty and Cathy are listed. They were #17 and #19.

Is it in order of severity of charges? Sidney Powell is #16 and I'd thought she would be up there with Guiliani.

Oh well, I'm sure someone will translate it into layman terms tomorrow.

SirFozzie 08-15-2023 12:01 AM

Giuliani and Trump each have the most felony count charges (13)

CrimsonFox 08-15-2023 01:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SirFozzie (Post 3409081)
Ken White (Popehat) with the Chumbawumba reference:

He gets a New York charge, he gets a Florida charge
He gets a DC charge, he gets a Georgia charge
He enters the pleas that remind him of the good times
He enters the pleas that remind him of the better times


and for once, he has to say "Yes, it's RICO"

ADMISSION OF RICO - YouTube


AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Thank you

miami_fan 08-15-2023 05:34 AM

This needs to be highlighted.

Rudy Giuliani, Who Pioneered Use of RICO, Indicted on RICO Charges

Life comes at you fast.

GrantDawg 08-15-2023 06:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3409080)
Gonna be tough when he endorses Trump for the general.

Geoff Duncan won't. He isn't that guy. He said after the 2020 election that he was glad Trump lost. He also refused to vote for Hershel Walker. His whole mission is to clean out Trump completely from the GOP.

Kodos 08-15-2023 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miami_fan (Post 3409089)
This needs to be highlighted.

Rudy Giuliani, Who Pioneered Use of RICO, Indicted on RICO Charges

Life comes at you fast.




Irony can be pretty ironic sometimes.

GrantDawg 08-15-2023 07:10 AM

Why the Georgia case is different than any of the others is that he can't get a pardon in Georgia. Georgia pardons can only come 5 years after any sentence is served, and is decided by a board not the governor. Trump really needs to move this case to the Federal level, and it might be he will have more success doing that in this case than the NY case.

Bobble 08-15-2023 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SirFozzie (Post 3409081)
Ken White (Popehat) with the Chumbawumba reference:

He gets a New York charge, he gets a Florida charge
He gets a DC charge, he gets a Georgia charge
He enters the pleas that remind him of the good times
He enters the pleas that remind him of the better times


and for once, he has to say "Yes, it's RICO"

https://youtu.be/aiVkyD1yzJg


RICO Suave

albionmoonlight 08-15-2023 07:24 AM

I get that it was not in his nature to do this, but if he had just conceded the election and not stolen a bunch of classified documents, he'd currently be living the life of luxury and adoration as an ex-president that he's spent his whole life chasing.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.