Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   The Trump Presidency – 2016 (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=92014)

stevew 11-29-2017 08:42 PM

One week you're mopping floors next week it's the fries

RainMaker 11-29-2017 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3186319)
I bet this tax bill lays the groundwork for repealing the ACA. With the mandate already gone the CBO score on a repeal bill will look much better in comparison to the previous bills. All the moderates will say, “Mission Accomplished!” and presto, ACA repeal.


It sounds like they're going after Medicare and SS next. Kind of have to with how much debt this tax plan adds on.

AlexB 11-30-2017 01:47 AM

You know when someone keeps banging on about the same thing despite being in a minority view, despite inconveniences like facts proving them to be wrong? People stop trying to argue and just ignore them.

For me, that is what is happening to the US in global terms - Trump spouting his garbage means I’m now getting tired of any American global politics.

So when Nikki Haley pops up asking for global assistance in isolating N.Korea, I’m thinking, even though in this case she probably has a point, why the hell should we listen to you?

I honestly think it will be the US that gets isolated because of Trump (I’m sure Jon will quite like this idea), and it will simply allow China and Russia to become the world’s largest powers, if they aren’t already (which Jon won’t like)

If there’s any planning involved, it’s incredibly short sighted by Trump to act the way he does, and will end up setting the US back for generations.

mckerney 11-30-2017 01:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexB (Post 3186355)
You know when someone keeps banging on about the same thing despite being in a minority view, despite inconveniences like facts proving them to be wrong? People stop trying to argue and just ignore them.

For me, that is what is happening to the US in global terms - Trump spouting his garbage means I’m now getting tired of any American global politics.

So when Nikki Haley pops up asking for global assistance in isolating N.Korea, I’m thinking, even though in this case she probably has a point, why the hell should we listen to you?

I honestly think it will be the US that gets isolated because of Trump (I’m sure Jon will quite like this idea), and it will simply allow China and Russia to become the world’s largest powers, if they aren’t already (which Jon won’t like)

If there’s any planning involved, it’s incredibly short sighted by Trump to act the way he does, and will end up setting the US back for generations.


That can't be right, Trump said the rest of the world is just now starting to respect the US.


Groundhog 11-30-2017 05:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexB (Post 3186355)
I honestly think it will be the US that gets isolated because of Trump (I’m sure Jon will quite like this idea), and it will simply allow China and Russia to become the world’s largest powers, if they aren’t already (which Jon won’t like)


It's already happened IMO. The rest of the West (and in some cases the West and Asia) are working together in lieu of the US. The US is the world's largest military power still, but the case could be made that China and Russia, maybe in that order, are the most powerful powers right now.

Edward64 11-30-2017 12:06 PM

Looks more likely that Trump will get a win here.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/30/politi...lan/index.html
Quote:

Sen. John McCain said Thursday he will support Senate Republicans' tax plan, a major sign of progress for GOP leaders as the party barrels toward a vote on their overhaul of the US tax system by the end of the week.

McCain, who had remained a wild card and had kept his position on the tax bill unclear even from leadership, said that he came to support the legislation because he believed it had gone through committee and would improve the economic outcome of Americans.

"After careful thought and consideration, I have decided to support the Senate tax reform bill. I believe this legislation, though far from perfect, would enhance American competitiveness, boost the economy, and provide long overdue tax relief for middle class families," McCain said in a released statement Thursday morning. "For months, I have called for a return to regular order, and I am pleased that this important bill was considered through the normal legislative processes, with several hearings and a thorough mark-up in the Senate Finance Committee during which more than 350 amendments were filed and 69 received a vote."

Republicans have 52 members in the Senate, and could only afford to lose two votes and still pass their legislation.

JPhillips 11-30-2017 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3186389)
Looks more likely that Trump will get a win here.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/30/politi...lan/index.html


The text of the Senate bill still isn't public, John.

NobodyHere 11-30-2017 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3186397)
The text of the Senate bill still isn't public, John.


That just proves his maverickness.

JPhillips 11-30-2017 07:06 PM

From Sen. Hatch:

Quote:

But let me tell you something. We're going to do CHIP, there's no question about it in my mind. It has to be done the right way. But we—the reason CHIP is having trouble is because we don't have money anymore. We just add more and more spending and more and more spending, and you can look at the rest of the bill for the more and more spending.

Now excuse me, I need to vote for trillions in revenue cuts.

mckerney 11-30-2017 11:33 PM



Ben E Lou 12-01-2017 08:31 AM

Flynn is pleading guilty to making false statements to the FBI. More indication that he is fingering bigger fish?

Logan 12-01-2017 08:32 AM




Guilty plea coming.

PilotMan 12-01-2017 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben E Lou (Post 3186486)
Flynn is pleading guilty to making false statements to the FBI. More indication that he is fingering bigger fish?


Without question.

One count.

This is a deal of some kind.

mckerney 12-01-2017 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Logan (Post 3186487)



Guilty plea coming.



Thomkal 12-01-2017 09:49 AM

So "nothing to see" about Russia now Donald?

Ben E Lou 12-01-2017 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3186502)
So "nothing to see" about Russia now Donald?



corbes 12-01-2017 10:26 AM

Here is the criminal information: See the Charges: U.S. v. Michael T. Flynn - The New York Times

Benjamin Wittes on Twitter: "A criminal information, as opposed to an indictment, is almost always a prelude to a negotiated plea agreement."

Benjamin Wittes on Twitter: "Look for the release later today, or very soon, of a stipulation of fact document that will contain much more information."

mckerney 12-01-2017 10:32 AM



Warhammer 12-01-2017 10:38 AM

There is smoke in both camps, I would like to see both campaigns investigated.

stevew 12-01-2017 10:50 AM

Nothing is ever going to come of this. I dunno why we're wasting time and resources on it. He will not be impeached or arrested and will win reelection.

digamma 12-01-2017 10:53 AM

Two people have plead guilty and a third is facing conspiracy charges. That, in and of itself, is not nothing.

digamma 12-01-2017 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warhammer (Post 3186519)
There is smoke in both camps, I would like to see both campaigns investigated.


Yes, yes, many fine people on both sides.

Flasch186 12-01-2017 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by digamma (Post 3186525)
Yes, yes, many fine people on both sides.


Bwahahahahahahah President Clinton should be ashamed of herself!!

JPhillips 12-01-2017 11:27 AM

From the President's lawyer:

Quote:

Today, Michael Flynn, a former National Security Advisor at the White House for 25 days during the Trump Administration, and a former Obama administration official, entered a guilty plea to a single count of making a false statement to the FBI.

lol

stevew 12-01-2017 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by digamma (Post 3186524)
Two people have plead guilty and a third is facing conspiracy charges. That, in and of itself, is not nothing.


What's the end game though? Not going to be impeachment/indictment or a resignation. What's the victory? Donald Jr. In cuffs basically?

JPhillips 12-01-2017 11:37 AM

At this point I wouldn't be surprised if the pee tapes are real.

stevew 12-01-2017 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3186535)
At this point I wouldn't be surprised if the pee tapes are real.


Oh I'm sure all of it is real. Piss tapes. 14 year old hookers. Etc etc.

Make America great again and hang traitors

RedKingGold 12-01-2017 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 3186533)
What's the end game though? Not going to be impeachment/indictment or a resignation. What's the victory? Donald Jr. In cuffs basically?


I'm pretty sure a deterrent effect on any future election is a worthy goal.

jeff061 12-01-2017 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 3186536)
Oh I'm sure all of it is real. Piss tapes. 14 year old hookers. Etc etc.

Make America great again and hang traitors


I thought they were a little too far fetched. Then Trump recently started trying to say the Billy Bush tapes were faked. And I read an article on Russia targeting him in the 80s (and any other high profile Americans with potential political aspirations), goals to gather information, turn if possible and and gather compromising information.

stevew 12-01-2017 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeff061 (Post 3186542)
I thought they were a little too far fetched. Then Trump recently started trying to say the Billy Bush tapes were faked. And I read an article on Russia targeting him in the 80s (and any other high profile Americans with potential political aspirations), goals to gather information, turn if possible and and gather compromising information.


Oh yeah, that was a great article. Read that too.

mckerney 12-01-2017 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3186531)
From the President's lawyer:



lol


So all they've got so far is one of Obama's generals and a coffee boy.

Edward64 12-01-2017 01:02 PM

Yup, seems that Flynn has flipped.

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/01/us-s...he-agenda.html
Quote:

Michael Flynn (L), former national security advisor to President Donald Trump, arrives for his plea hearing at the Prettyman Federal Courthouse December 1, 2017 in Washington, DC. Markets fall on ABC News report that Flynn is prepared to testify on Trump and Russia

Stocks fell Friday on a report that Michael Flynn was directed by President Trump to talk to Russians.

ABC News reported that Flynn, the former national security adviser, would testify that he was directed to make contact with Russians during the presidential campaign in 2016. Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his postelection contacts with Russia's ambassador to the U.S.

Marc Vaughan 12-01-2017 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedKingGold (Post 3186539)
I'm pretty sure a deterrent effect on any future election is a worthy goal.


Yeah that is the intent of this investigation - let future candidates know there are consequences no matter if they're President or not ..

CrescentMoonie 12-01-2017 01:19 PM

Kushner Is Said to Have Ordered Flynn to Contact Russia - Bloomberg

CrescentMoonie 12-01-2017 01:58 PM

That's some next level trolling.

Comey Makes His Instagram Debut With a Bible Verse on ‘Justice’ - Bloomberg

jeff061 12-01-2017 02:09 PM

Comey is a moronic prima donna.

JPhillips 12-01-2017 02:43 PM

The Senate is pretending to have debate and amendments on the tax bill, but the plan is to have the last amendment offered by a complete substitution of the bill language with what has been agreed to previously by the GOP.

I'm so old I remember when the GOP promised to have three days between making a bill public and voting.

RainMaker 12-01-2017 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3186585)
The Senate is pretending to have debate and amendments on the tax bill, but the plan is to have the last amendment offered by a complete substitution of the bill language with what has been agreed to previously by the GOP.

I'm so old I remember when the GOP promised to have three days between making a bill public and voting.


Remember when they cared about the deficit?

Edward64 12-01-2017 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrescentMoonie (Post 3186564)


I'm sure he knows he gets an automatic and free get-out-of-jail card.

To be fair, I can see where Kushner did not understand the consequences of his actions/direction back then.

Edward64 12-01-2017 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeff061 (Post 3186583)
Comey is a moronic prima donna.


No problem here, someone that treats me like dirt and fires me like that, sure I'll get back at them.

RainMaker 12-01-2017 03:03 PM

So the guy who screamed "lock her up" at the Republican Convention just happened to have committed some light treason.

mckerney 12-01-2017 07:54 PM



RainMaker 12-01-2017 08:46 PM

So college endowments get taxed unless they have ties to DeVos. LOL

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/01/demo...e-college.html

I mean I guess if you're going to pass an unpopular tax bill that fucks over people, might as well really go all-in and appease all your donors and buddies.

CrescentMoonie 12-01-2017 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3186629)
So college endowments get taxed unless they have ties to DeVos. LOL

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/01/demo...e-college.html

I mean I guess if you're going to pass an unpopular tax bill that fucks over people, might as well really go all-in and appease all your donors and buddies.


DeVos went to Calvin, not Hillsdale. Her chief of staff, however...

cuervo72 12-01-2017 09:09 PM

Notable alumni: Erik Prince, Navy SEAL and founder of Blackwater.

(aka Betsy DeVos's brother)

RainMaker 12-01-2017 09:17 PM

Why don't we make it easier and just let them decide what companies and people don't have to pay any taxes? Like just make a list of friends that are exempt. It appears that's where we are at.

RainMaker 12-01-2017 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrescentMoonie (Post 3186632)
DeVos went to Calvin, not Hillsdale. Her chief of staff, however...


She's a huge donor to the school.

JPhillips 12-01-2017 09:40 PM

Quote:

GOP Senator Ron Johnson -

"You really don't read this kind of legislation."

I actually agree with this, but after all the shit about reading the ACA I hope all the GOP gets killed over statements like this.

Is there anything that the GOP has complained about that applies to them as well? Literally, any single thing?

Izulde 12-02-2017 01:10 AM

RIP America.

PilotMan 12-02-2017 07:03 AM

I'm just happy that they got those tax breaks for plane owners in there. I mean, that along really simplifies the tax code and helps our country win.

I also can't wait until I hear all the amazing things that are in this thing. All the last minute adjustments that I know will benefit all of us! It's like a special Christmas present where it's all a secret, then BOOM nothing but WINNING!

miked 12-02-2017 07:43 AM

I sure hope they fix the grad school tuition waiver issue. My PhD students take classes, work about 70 hours a week in the lab, and TA for 2 classes during their stay...all for 30k a year. If you tax them on 60-70k of income because the PI or university is paying the tuition, nobody will want to go to grad school. Talk about an innovation killer.

But hey, maybe they can all band together and buy a G4 to get that tax break.

PilotMan 12-02-2017 09:05 AM

More food for thought:

If it's the biggest tax cut in the history of the US, and my taxes go up, what is that saying exactly?

PilotMan 12-02-2017 09:16 AM

dola

If every person in the top 1% doesn't incorporate in some way they are idiots. The top tax bracket being 30-whatever percent is all for show. Pass through's will now be at 25% and as a corporation you can take an income of $1 and everything else will be your business expense. Really what you're seeing is a massive gain for anyone who is in a position to benefit from it.

Marc Vaughan 12-02-2017 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PilotMan (Post 3186670)
If every person in the top 1% doesn't incorporate in some way they are idiots. The top tax bracket being 30-whatever percent is all for show. Pass through's will now be at 25% and as a corporation you can take an income of $1 and everything else will be your business expense. Really what you're seeing is a massive gain for anyone who is in a position to benefit from it.

The top 1% aren't salaried already - I totally agree the top tax bracket is just there for 'show', its the other changes which make a difference.

Jas_lov 12-02-2017 10:45 AM

Yeah, looks like my taxes will go down by a whole $200. Yipee! I had $11K itemized deductions plus the $4K personal exemption and about $800 student loan interest deduction last year and now I'll just have the $12K standard deduction. And the tax brackets in the Senate bill aren't nearly as generous as the house version to make up for the lost deductions.

mckerney 12-02-2017 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miked (Post 3186660)
I sure hope they fix the grad school tuition waiver issue. My PhD students take classes, work about 70 hours a week in the lab, and TA for 2 classes during their stay...all for 30k a year. If you tax them on 60-70k of income because the PI or university is paying the tuition, nobody will want to go to grad school. Talk about an innovation killer.

But hey, maybe they can all band together and buy a G4 to get that tax break.


You could probably skip buying the plane and just get by on the tax break for your luxury car.



mckerney 12-02-2017 11:37 AM





cuervo72 12-02-2017 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miked (Post 3186660)
I sure hope they fix the grad school tuition waiver issue. My PhD students take classes, work about 70 hours a week in the lab, and TA for 2 classes during their stay...all for 30k a year. If you tax them on 60-70k of income because the PI or university is paying the tuition, nobody will want to go to grad school. Talk about an innovation killer.


That's the fix. Punish (liberal-leaning) universities, punish students who have the gall to be not-rich. Limit their opportunities so they can be taken advantage of by the corporate sector.

GrantDawg 12-02-2017 12:30 PM

There is a clear message here about what is going on with this bill. They are going to institute everything they possibly can into law, knowing that if they lose control of either side of congress, it is going to be near impossible to roll everything back.

Flasch186 12-02-2017 12:36 PM

Looks like the news is up in arms that he just admitted to OoJ via twitter...

RainMaker 12-02-2017 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mckerney (Post 3186680)





This is why lawyers tell clients to not talk.

RainMaker 12-02-2017 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miked (Post 3186660)
If you tax them on 60-70k of income because the PI or university is paying the tuition, nobody will want to go to grad school.


I think that's the point.

mckerney 12-02-2017 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3186694)
This is why lawyers tell clients to not talk.


Lawyers also don't release statements in Comic Sans, yet here we are.



Atocep 12-02-2017 03:54 PM

Cobb is fighting for his job. Bannon has been pushing Trump to fire him and Cobb had told Trump the investigation should be wrapped up around Thanksgiving. Continuing to sell Trump in the light at the end of the tunnel is vital to his employment.

Flasch186 12-02-2017 04:11 PM

KT's emails are coming out implicating everyone... huzzah!

JPhillips 12-02-2017 04:39 PM



PilotMan 12-02-2017 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mckerney (Post 3186680)





Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3186694)
This is why lawyers tell clients to not talk.


The Post is now reporting that the tweet was authored by Trump's personal lawyer, John Dowd, according to two people familiar with the situation. The fact that Dowd authored the tweet could limit its salience to the investigation, but the White House still hasn't publicly corrected anything.

WTF?

BBT 12-02-2017 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3186713)



Oh my
:popcorn:

Flasch186 12-03-2017 07:28 AM

Trump tweeted today that he never asked Comey to back off and basically called him a liar.

The real issue is congress under GOP control would never impeach him/put country before party.

We've got so far to go to get the country back from the special interests and gang mentality in DC.

JPhillips 12-03-2017 11:51 AM

71% of likely GOP voters no not believe the allegations against Moore

Moore has a 6 point lead in the same poll

McConnell now is saying that the voters of AL will decide who is in the Senate

cuervo72 12-03-2017 12:21 PM

He's beginning to realize it's like Trump said - he (and probably other Republicans) could shoot somebody in the middle of the street in broad daylight and followers wouldn't care. They don't care if their side lies, they don't care if they beat up reporters, they don't care if they harass or molest women/girls.

RainMaker 12-03-2017 03:29 PM

Remember Democrats are elitists.

https://iowastartingline.com/2017/12...=socialnetwork

PilotMan 12-03-2017 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cuervo72 (Post 3186837)
He's beginning to realize it's like Trump said - he (and probably other Republicans) could shoot somebody in the middle of the street in broad daylight and followers wouldn't care. They don't care if their side lies, they don't care if they beat up reporters, they don't care if they harass or molest women/girls.


Molesting girls and killing kids is accepted in the US to protect freedoms for everyone.

mckerney 12-03-2017 10:49 PM



Ben E Lou 12-04-2017 04:56 AM

Having grown up and gone to school less than 10 minutes from Alabama, it's not surprising that my social media contacts contain a fair number of people who live there. In the last couple of weeks, I've endeavored to engage (mostly privately) with old friends who are current Alabamians. There's not a consensus among conservatives that I know there. They range from holding their noses and voting Jones to voting Moore enthusiastically, and everything in between. That said, one common theme definitely has emerged among the ones who say they intend to vote for Moore despite thinking that there's at least *something* to the charges. This sentiment was best expressed in two sentences in an email that I received overnight from a friend who is the father of two teenage daughters.

"It's quite possible that he's a child molester, and there's no way I want him anywhere near {daughters' names}, but we're not hiring a babysitter. We're hiring someone to wage political war against our enemies on the left, and there's no question that he's the best candidate for that job."

This is where we are.

Ben E Lou 12-04-2017 05:16 AM

Hmmmm...when the President's lawyer is saying that the President cannot obstruct justice, I'm guessing that's an admission that if it were anyone else, it'd be obstructing justice.

Exclusive: Trump lawyer claims the "President cannot obstruct justice" - Axios

bob 12-04-2017 06:55 AM

https://www.forbes.com/sites/michael.../#3a16282832ba

I find this argument to be laughable as household actually do pay down their debt by making mortgage and other loan payments, but this does bring up another question - when does the federal debit become a problem?

corbes 12-04-2017 08:27 AM

Another way of putting it: Nixon's only error was admitting defeat.

PilotMan 12-04-2017 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob (Post 3186928)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/michael.../#3a16282832ba

I find this argument to be laughable as household actually do pay down their debt by making mortgage and other loan payments, but this does bring up another question - when does the federal debit become a problem?


For current policy makers, it doesn't. Not as long as GDP keeps growing and even if it doesn't as long as there's some other way to rationalize it, they'll just keep letting it ride. Hey, they'll be dead long before any of this really matters to them.

Shkspr 12-04-2017 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben E Lou (Post 3186926)
Hmmmm...when the President's lawyer is saying that the President cannot obstruct justice, I'm guessing that's an admission that if it were anyone else, it'd be obstructing justice.

Exclusive: Trump lawyer claims the "President cannot obstruct justice" - Axios


The problem with this view, of course, is that the President can ABSOLUTELY obstruct justice, because the concept of Presidential infallibility implies a form of Divine Right that is not inherent in the American political tradition. The man isn't a King; he's simply the guy we hired to see to it that the REAL infallible part of American democracy, the Constitution, is followed. The President can only be incapable of obstructing Justice when his actions are in service to the document. If he is obfuscating the attempt to determine whether his administration's actions undermine the Constitution, then you can't consider that anything BUT obstruction.

mckerney 12-04-2017 02:04 PM

Senate GOP Accidentally Killed All Corporate Tax Deductions

Quote:

This screwup — like most of the tax plan’s oddest features — was born of a math problem. Due to arcane Senate rules, the Trump tax cuts can only add $1.5 trillion to the deficit over the next decade. Last Thursday, the Senate tax bill already cost about that sum, and then McConnell started making expensive promises to his few holdouts. Susan Collins wanted a $10,000 property tax deduction for Americans in high-tax states; Ron Johnson wanted a 23 percent business-income deduction for the company that his family owns. This left the Senate Majority Leader searching under the tax code’s couch cushions for new sources of revenue.

Eventually, he came upon the corporate alternative minimum tax (AMT). At present, most corporations face a 35 percent (statutory) rate on their income. But by availing themselves of various tax credits and deductions, most companies can get their actual rates down far below that figure. To put a limit on just how far, the corporate AMT prevents companies from paying any less than 20 percent on their profits (or, more precisely, on the profits that they fail to hide overseas).

The GOP had originally intended to abolish the AMT. But on Friday, with the clock running out — and money running short — Senate Republicans put the AMT back into their bill. Unfortunately for McConnell, they forgot to lower the AMT after doing so.

This is a big problem. The Senate bill brings the normal corporate rate down to 20 percent — while leaving the alternative minimum rate at … 20 percent. The legislation would still allow corporations to claim a wide variety of tax credits and deductions — it just renders all them completely worthless. Companies can either take no deductions, and pay a 20 percent rate — or take lots of deductions … and pay a 20 percent rate.

With this blunder, Senate Republicans have achieved the unthinkable: They’ve written a giant corporate tax cut that many of their corporate donors do not like.
Quote:

McConnell’s mistake has two big implications. First and foremost, it means the Senate will almost certainly have to vote on a tax bill again before one goes into law. Previously, it looked as though Paul Ryan had enough votes in the House to pass the Senate bill as is. This took pressure off the party’s conference committee (the House and Senate leaders tasked with reconciling each chamber’s bills). Worst-case scenario, the House could just rubber-stamp the Senate’s work. Now, that option is deeply undesirable. It remains overwhelmingly likely that Republicans will pass a giant tax cut. But their task is now a bit more difficult.

The second implication is that McConnell is going to need new revenue. In all probability, Republicans are going to drop the alternative-minimum tax rate well below 20 percent. That will put the bill’s price tag over $1.5 trillion. Right now, some of the House’s most heinous revenue raisers — including the infamous tax on graduate student tuition — are not in the Senate bill. Chances are now somewhat higher that these odious provisions will make it into the final legislation, as Republicans will once again be desperate for pay-fors. That said, it’s also possible that the GOP will simply revise their bill’s corporate rate up to 22 percent, now that President Trump has given the party permission to do so.

RainMaker 12-04-2017 05:09 PM

It would appear KT McFarland committed perjury.

McFarland Contradicted Herself on Russia Contacts, Congressional Testimony Shows - The New York Times

NobodyHere 12-04-2017 05:17 PM

Manafort worked on op-ed with Russian while out on bail, prosecutors say

Thomkal 12-05-2017 08:46 PM

Trump to recognize Jerusalem as Israeli capital | TheHill

Because we want, you know, more unrest in the Middle-East than there already was.

Shkspr 12-05-2017 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3187245)
Trump to recognize Jerusalem as Israeli capital | TheHill

Because we want, you know, more unrest in the Middle-East than there already was.


On the bright side, the knowledge that Trump is calling Jerusalem the capital of Israel should be enough to unify the rest of the world in the belief that it isn't.

JPhillips 12-06-2017 07:42 AM

This attack on Romney by Steve Bannon is really ugly:

Quote:

“You hid behind your religion. You went to France to be a missionary while guys were dying in rice paddies in Vietnam. Do not talk to me about honor and integrity,”

miami_fan 12-06-2017 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3187262)
This attack on Romney by Steve Bannon is really ugly:


But his former boss... deferments...okay.

Kodos 12-06-2017 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miami_fan (Post 3187264)
But his former boss... deferments...okay.


Those heel spurs are nothing to mess around with. Trunp is lucky that he can still golf 5 days a week.

Edward64 12-06-2017 11:13 AM

Not sure what to think about recognizing Jerusalem. Its not as if anything is happening right now anyway but is definitely dangerous ... this may change the calculus, spur more talks (after the initial intifada-like reactions) or blow things up long-term.

The so-called ISIL caliphate has been cowed, we are much less beholden to ME oil, and some Arab countries are probably more concerned about the SA-Iran power struggle. All makes for a very interesting dynamic.

whomario 12-06-2017 03:04 PM

The issue isn't really recognizing it as the capital, the issue is that there is zero chance he is doing it for the right reasons and not as some sort of demented powerplay (towards other countries), political statement against the arab world and as a showboating move.

Logan 12-06-2017 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3187295)
Not sure what to think about recognizing Jerusalem. Its not as if anything is happening right now anyway but is definitely dangerous ... this may change the calculus, spur more talks (after the initial intifada-like reactions) or blow things up long-term.


Don't forget about blowing things (and people) up short term.

Ryche 12-06-2017 06:01 PM

Funny how we demand something from countries for everything else but we're giving this to Israel for nothing. America first...after Israel.

Groundhog 12-06-2017 06:57 PM

Israel have a whole lot of leverage, being located where they are.

Thomkal 12-06-2017 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ryche (Post 3187349)
Funny how we demand something from countries for everything else but we're giving this to Israel for nothing. America first...after Israel.


so much for being a great deal maker.

JPhillips 12-06-2017 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ryche (Post 3187349)
Funny how we demand something from countries for everything else but we're giving this to Israel for nothing. America first...after Israel.


To be fair, we also don't demand anything from Russia.

mckerney 12-07-2017 01:24 AM



BBT 12-07-2017 09:39 AM

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.73b3cca2ba8f

Quote:

As President Trump delivered his inaugural address on the steps of the U.S. Capitol in January , his new national security adviser, Michael Flynn, sent a text to a former business associate telling him that a plan to build nuclear power plants in the Middle East in partnership with Russian interests was “good to go,” according to a witness who spoke with congressional investigators.

Flynn had assured his former associate that U.S. sanctions against Russia would immediately be “ripped up” by the Trump administration, a move that would help facilitate the deal, the associate told the witness.

Drain the swamp?

Logan 12-07-2017 10:14 AM

What a deal for Russia. Either they get everything they wanted from Trump or they end up having us look like complete idiots to the rest of the world while not-so-slowly destroying us from within.

Marc Vaughan 12-07-2017 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBT (Post 3187399)
Drain the swamp?


You appear to be misunderstanding what that term means ... it was first thought to mean 'remove money from politics' or 'remove corporate interests from politics' ...

But what it means to the right is 'removing any left wing influence from politics' - as far as I can see most right wing people on Fox don't care about Russian influence, Corporate influence or billionaires milking the system ... so long as anything associated with the Democrats is destroyed.

Fidatelo 12-07-2017 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Logan (Post 3187409)
What a deal for Russia. Either they get everything they wanted from Trump or they end up having us look like complete idiots to the rest of the world while not-so-slowly destroying us from within.


In the end it might be both.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.