Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Trump Indictment/Trial thread-2023 (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=98941)

Edward64 08-01-2023 06:23 PM

I'm thinking he'll find a way to delay the trial/verdicts after election. Rallying cry for his troops.

I think it's 99% that he'll try a blanket pardon for himself if he gets elected. Then the fun really begins.

Ksyrup 08-01-2023 06:24 PM

That would require him to be elected, and if that happens, him pardoning himself is the least of our worries...

PilotMan 08-01-2023 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Galaril (Post 3408274)
So what is the likelihood he stalks all these trials and /or gets convicted in a few then gets elected and pardons himself. I am starting to think he cosnsiders a way to get votes on the right. The first NY Times poll came out today and Biden Trump were each at 43 % with 14 % saying they will either vote 3rd party or still not decided. Geez our the Democrats going to screw this up ?



Have you met the Bernie Bros? And don't get me started on the far left, conspiracy minded, health focused, q-adjacent dems.

Brian Swartz 08-01-2023 06:50 PM

I'd actually be quite interested in getting you started on them. It would be a nice diversion from the usual topics :).

Quote:

Originally Posted by KSyrup
That would require him to be elected, and if that happens, him pardoning himself is the least of our worries...


Yup. The American people have been on record for decades as not thinking being guilty of felonies should prevent somebody from being President. But if they elect Trump after everything he's said and done, it'll just be a worse version of the T-shirt that went around after he was elected the first time: 'Donald Trump is President. Who gives a $@*&'. I know it definitely changed my perspective on what is possible in the United States, and not in a good way.

RainMaker 08-01-2023 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PilotMan (Post 3408277)
Have you met the Bernie Bros? And don't get me started on the far left, conspiracy minded, health focused, q-adjacent dems.


Can't figure out why people aren't excited to vote for the dementia riddled 80 year old who has been on the wrong side of every major issue over the past 4 decades.

Blame everyone but the people who wanted Biden.

JPhillips 08-01-2023 08:50 PM

Dementia riddled is such horseshit. He's old, but there's no indication that he isn't mentally sharp.

RainMaker 08-01-2023 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3408289)
Dementia riddled is such horseshit. He's old, but there's no indication that he isn't mentally sharp.


The fact they're terrified to have him interviewed or give press conferences is a pretty good indication. He's 80 years old. No one is mentally sharp at that age. Especially someone who was never known for his mental sharpness when he was young.

I just think these excuses are lame. The party chose to strap their hopes and dreams to him. Don't blame others if he hasn't inspired enough people to vote for him in 2024. Only so many times you can run on "well the other guy is worse".

The party should have had some younger candidates lined up in 2024. Especially if their plan was to have Biden do nothing for 4 years.

PilotMan 08-01-2023 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3408287)
Can't figure out why people aren't excited to vote for the dementia riddled 80 year old who has been on the wrong side of every major issue over the past 4 decades.

Blame everyone but the people who wanted Biden.



We wouldn't be in this situation if the Bernie Bros could have pulled their collective heads out of their asses long enough to realize that 2016 was all about the Supreme Court and not Hillary. But they weren't smart enough to see that.

RainMaker 08-01-2023 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PilotMan (Post 3408297)
We wouldn't be in this situation if the Bernie Bros could have pulled their collective heads out of their asses long enough to realize that 2016 was all about the Supreme Court and not Hillary. But they weren't smart enough to see that.


Hillary lost because she is one of the most unlikable politicians in the country that ran one of the dumbest campaigns in history. Again, blaming everyone but the shitty politicians these parties desperately wanted as their candidate.

PilotMan 08-01-2023 09:58 PM

Had nothing to do with that 20+ year attack from the right on her. Nothing at all. I didn't like her, don't like Biden, but you look at the end game, and if you're clutching your pearls because you are making a political point, in spite of yourself, you're losing and you're whining about the party, when the voters made the choices.

CrimsonFox 08-01-2023 10:00 PM

I've lost track. How many idictments is that

Edward64 08-01-2023 10:05 PM

Trifecta aka 3

RainMaker 08-01-2023 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PilotMan (Post 3408300)
Had nothing to do with that 20+ year attack from the right on her. Nothing at all. I didn't like her, don't like Biden, but you look at the end game, and if you're clutching your pearls because you are making a political point, in spite of yourself, you're losing and you're whining about the party, when the voters made the choices.


If the election is so important as you and others say, why run someone who is such a liability? Why run someone who has a 20+ year record of negative attacks against her? Why spend the past few decades fighting harder against progressives in your own party than Republicans (and expecting those progressives to vote for you)?

It's the same shit with Biden in 2024. We're going to hear about how this election is for the future of our democracy but the party just couldn't be bothered to run a better candidate for this supposedly important race.

If the party doesn't give a shit, why should voters?

RainMaker 08-01-2023 10:38 PM

Reading that indictment, I have to assume co-conspirator 4 is going to be arrested. Has anyone broke down which person is which co-conspirator?

CrimsonFox 08-01-2023 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3408303)
Trifecta aka 3


I thought three was a turkey

PilotMan 08-01-2023 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3408308)
Reading that indictment, I have to assume co-conspirator 4 is going to be arrested. Has anyone broke down which person is which co-conspirator?


https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Trum...y?id=101919066

RainMaker 08-02-2023 12:25 AM

So this trial is in DC with a judge not appointed by Trump. In fact, a judge who has been quite harsh on the J6 defendants and gone above prosecution sentencing requests. DC juries have also convicted every single person that took it to trial. I have to admit that I think there is a possibility this man goes to prison (or more likely house arrest).

In fact, Biden's best campaign strategy might be that voting him in again means you get to see Trump go to prison. I know people will complain about delays, but that might be the motivation to surpass even turnout in 2020.

Brian Swartz 08-02-2023 12:53 AM

I don't think there are that many people who care. Last poll I saw (July 6, Politico) has only a third of independents who think Trump should be indicted if he is convicted. That may have changed some with additional charges since then, but a similar number said a conviction would have no impact on their decision of whether to support his candidacy, and amusingly similar numbers of Republicans and Democrats said the same - presumably because they've already decided and wouldn't be moved by anything.

Still, I don't think this an issue that a massive amount of people care about. Enough to make a difference in the election? Sure, and I definitely hope so. But not a 'I wasn't going to vote, but I will to see him rot in jail' surge.

Edward64 08-02-2023 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3408313)
Last poll I saw (July 6, Politico) has only a third of independents who think Trump should be indicted if he is convicted.


What does this mean? Isn't it normally someone gets indicted first, then trial, and then convicted?

albionmoonlight 08-02-2023 07:58 AM

I assume he meant imprisoned

Edward64 08-02-2023 08:00 AM

Ah. Thanks.

Qwikshot 08-02-2023 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3408304)
If the election is so important as you and others say, why run someone who is such a liability? Why run someone who has a 20+ year record of negative attacks against her? Why spend the past few decades fighting harder against progressives in your own party than Republicans (and expecting those progressives to vote for you)?

It's the same shit with Biden in 2024. We're going to hear about how this election is for the future of our democracy but the party just couldn't be bothered to run a better candidate for this supposedly important race.

If the party doesn't give a shit, why should voters?


The problem I see, is that it's all culture war. Both sides have determined spotlighting wedge issues works better than actually governing, it keeps them in power and the donation money flowing. Actually governing/legislating leads to divisiveness and openings for losing ones job.

Link below, shows how many are very wealthy and thus drive all issues towards the rich while blockading anything that would support the common or poor person.

https://rollcall.com/2018/03/02/ever...-in-one-chart/

Average age of members of congress is 58, it's an old man's game because power is held by the old and rich.

Age of Members of 118th Congress (& Averages) | FiscalNote.

New blood is never going to rise to the top, only the divisive who spout shit everyday get the spotlight. The quiet ones who actually govern/legislate will quickly be dropped for the hot take of the minute assholes.

Now the Republicans want to disrupt/destroy local politics and then their stranglehold will be complete.

Good times for everyone!

Edward64 08-02-2023 08:41 AM

Yup, it'll be a cluster if Trump gets re-elected.

Could Donald Trump serve as president if convicted? | CNN Politics
Quote:

Donald Trump has been indicted on federal charges related to 2020 election subversion, a stunning third time this year that the former president has faced criminal charges.

But could the former president, who remains the front-runner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, assume the Oval Office again if convicted of the alleged crimes? In short, yes.

University of California, Los Angeles law professor Richard L. Hasen – one of the country’s leading experts on election law – said Trump still has a path to serving as president should he win reelection in 2024.

“The Constitution has very few requirements to serve as President, such as being at least 35 years of age. It does not bar anyone indicted, or convicted, or even serving jail time, from running as president and winning the presidency,” he said in an email to CNN.

Could a president serve from prison? That’s less clear.

“How someone would serve as president from prison is a happily untested question,” Hasen said.
Quote:

If Trump were to be convicted before the 2024 election and win the contest, he could try to grant himself a pardon, according to Hasen.

“Whether he can do so is untested. The Supreme Court may have to weigh in,
” Hasen said, adding that Trump could potentially appeal a conviction to the conservative Supreme Court.

Galaril 08-02-2023 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3408324)
Yup, it'll be a cluster if Trump gets re-elected.

Could Donald Trump serve as president if convicted? | CNN Politics


Yes , which is why I see the SC totally allowing him or another Republican president to pardon him in the end. Best case is under Trump we have an Autocracy like Turkey/ Hungary and worse case the beginning of the Fourth Reich.

I agree the D party needs to get younger and we need to have more parties that are actually relevant. I think 4 parties and two can join to create a coalition type governing model. But, if we have people voting 3rd party or staying home because they aren’t getting what they want that is a bad decision. I am a white hetero former US veteran male corporate VP they aren’t coming for me the day Trump declares himself King. I am amazed at the people who have every reason to stop another Trump presidency yet are not on board to vote against him.

Republican friends always say and they are right that the Rs can always count on the Dems breaking up and fighting against each other. They do join under the one nominee it seems better than us. Make no mistake the 2016 election never ended.

Sweed 08-02-2023 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3408324)
Yup, it'll be a cluster if Trump gets re-elected.

Could Donald Trump serve as president if convicted? | CNN Politics


Well, they could impeach him and remove him from office....

Wait a second.. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :banghead:

Atocep 08-02-2023 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 3408312)
So this trial is in DC with a judge not appointed by Trump. In fact, a judge who has been quite harsh on the J6 defendants and gone above prosecution sentencing requests. DC juries have also convicted every single person that took it to trial. I have to admit that I think there is a possibility this man goes to prison (or more likely house arrest).

In fact, Biden's best campaign strategy might be that voting him in again means you get to see Trump go to prison. I know people will complain about delays, but that might be the motivation to surpass even turnout in 2020.


Jack Smith landed the perfect judge for this. She wasn't appointed by Trump, she's been very tough on J6 defendents, but hasn't directed any attacks at Trump during sentencing.

This is also the judge that ruled against Trump when the House was trying to access his white house records as part of the J6 hearings by basically saying "a president is not king and you are no longer president."

GrantDawg 08-02-2023 02:40 PM

Pence is not having it:

albionmoonlight 08-02-2023 02:43 PM

I did not have Mike Pence as the Republican who was going to grow balls on this issue.

Edward64 08-02-2023 02:51 PM

That's a beautiful quote "gaggle of crackpot lawyers".

Ksyrup 08-02-2023 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight (Post 3408358)
I did not have Mike Pence as the Republican who was going to grow balls on this issue.


I just read the other day that he is in danger of not even making the debate stage. He may be in "ah well, fuck it" territory like Chris Christie.

Galaril 08-02-2023 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3408324)
Yup, it'll be a cluster if Trump gets re-elected.

Could Donald Trump serve as president if convicted? | CNN Politics


Yes , which is why I see the SC totally allowing him or another Republican president to pardon him in the end. Best case is under Trump we have an Autocracy like Turkey/ Hungary. Worse case the beginning of the fourth Reich.

RainMaker 08-02-2023 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight (Post 3408358)
I did not have Mike Pence as the Republican who was going to grow balls on this issue.


Would have been nice if he did that on January 6th. Instead he supported the guy for years until it became socially acceptable for him to not.

Thomkal 08-03-2023 03:56 PM

Finally he is being held accountable for his actions on Jan 6

Lathum 08-03-2023 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3408476)
Finally he is being held accountable for his actions on Jan 6


yeah. Not really.

If anything this will help him and his rubes are footing the bill.

Accountability will only come in the form of an actual conviction and jail time.

Thomkal 08-03-2023 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 3408479)
yeah. Not really.

If anything this will help him and his rubes are footing the bill.

Accountability will only come in the form of an actual conviction and jail time.



Correct me I'm wrong though Lathum-you did not think that even this day would happen right? We are now in the process to that accountability which we could not say until today

Lathum 08-03-2023 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3408482)
Correct me I'm wrong though Lathum-you did not think that even this day would happen right? We are now in the process to that accountability which we could not say until today


Not sure I ever said he won't be indicted, but I definitely said he will never see a jail cell and I stand by this. He is already receiving insanely preferential treatment. Anyone else, literally anyone, who possessed even ONE of the documents he had, let alone 100s, would be locked up in a cell pending trial as a national security risk.

Atocep 08-03-2023 04:44 PM

I was telling my wife yesterday that its absolutely insane that a former President was just indicted for a plot to overturn an election and it doesn't feel like it's a big deal.

Where we are in politics vs pre Trump is crazy and happened so fast.

GrantDawg 08-03-2023 08:06 PM

Indictment number 4 officially coming next week:
The main street in front of Fulton County courthouse to shut down next week – WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta

Galaril 08-03-2023 09:40 PM

Trumps lawyer just admitted on Fox tv to his client committing the crime he is being charged with.

Brian Swartz 08-04-2023 04:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64
What does this mean? Isn't it normally someone gets indicted first, then trial, and then convicted?


You're absolutely right, and so is albionmoonlight's explanation. Wow was that an impressive mis-statement on my part :lol:

RainMaker 08-04-2023 03:54 PM

I had to try and overthrow the government because they're offering a tax rebate on which type of stove I buy.



albionmoonlight 08-04-2023 04:18 PM

There's a weird disconnect. If he were to have said this in a private meeting that was secretly recorded, it would be a scandal.

But because he's proud of it, we treat it as a normal mainstream political position.

Ksyrup 08-04-2023 04:52 PM

There's this odd convergence of the old conservative academic thought process that has merged with fantastical/religious "end of times" fringe political cosplay that is now threatening to become a legitimate mainstream position that it's time to reclaim the country or tear it all down. Scary shit.

PilotMan 08-04-2023 04:55 PM

Threatens? Eastman has gone from looney bin to rising star on the right.

RainMaker 08-04-2023 04:59 PM

I can't tell if their brains are just mush now and they're buying into whatever shit Grandmas are screaming about on Facebook. Or if they are just fascists who are using some culture war issues as an excuse to implement authoritarian rule.

CrimsonFox 08-04-2023 05:06 PM

who else here wants to be indicted

Thomkal 08-05-2023 10:04 AM

We knew he wouldn't shut up:


https://twitter.com/MacFarlaneNews/s...44636175593474


Special Counsel already on it

Qwikshot 08-05-2023 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3408608)
We knew he wouldn't shut up:


https://twitter.com/MacFarlaneNews/s...44636175593474


Special Counsel already on it


He should be behind bars.

Lathum 08-05-2023 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qwikshot (Post 3408611)
He should be behind bars.


That is the irony in all this. his supporters claim he is being targeted when in reality he is getting special treatment literally no one else on the planet would receive.

CrimsonFox 08-05-2023 10:46 AM

he's all out crying like tantrum crying


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.