So the day's barely started and we already have 5 people with votes on them. This should be interesting.

the game flavr or the jalapeno flavr ;)

just checking in at this point...need to fully read the rule set before i wade in too deeply. but then again...dont need to reflect that much in order to do this...

vote dubb

Why are you picking on my puppy? :(

hes like that....

saldana -- 1 dubb93 (244)
PurdueBrad -- 1 EagleFan (251)
Abe Sargent -- 1 Poli (252)
Passacaglia -- 1 lerriuqs (253)
Dubb -- 1 Saldana (304)
lerriuqs -- 1 Passacaglia (284)

Vote count so far

Well, I don't have any longlasting rivalry so I don't get to throw out a meaningless vote. I'm cetainly not going to add another person to that list. But I'm not interested in picking which person to start picking on.

My tendency (unless something shows itself today) is to vote on someone who doesn't show up or contribute, without prior warning. Or, if the contenders shrink a little, to keep things close for a more useful voting record.

It looks like so far MartinD and NtNdeacon are the only to not have checked in yet. I worry that they won't be reaping the rewards of our therapy today.

The fact that there are players with independent win conditions is the only piece of information I've mined so far. It's not particularly helpful at this point though.

Too bad you didn't get Spring to show up.

Anyway, my tendency seems pretty much the same as yours, and I'll be looking to consolidate as well at some point.

Autumn, are you referring to this line of the rules, or something else? If it's just he needies, that's interesting. Does that mean that if the needies get their 1:1 ratio, they don't all win -- that one of them has to do something else as well? That might be good for us, if it causes dissention in their ranks.

this was mined from where?

It was a joke from last game where (and I've been guilty of this in a previous game and trying not to let it carry over) people were throwing around the "I'm going to vote you day 1 from now on" threat and RendeR had made a comment about the puppy taking up some of his play time so I made the obvious connection that I needed to vote his puppy on day 1 every game.

Hrm. Let's see if we get everyone checked in by midday, I'm not seeing a rush for my vote.

I'm referring to The Jackal last night revealing that he had independent win conditions, and that Barkeep might as well.

Quoted here.

Since Danny said it, I will say it. My win conditions are the same as the Group's. My power just doesn't help either side.

same could be said about me and Poli. Interesting yu would try and draw attention like that to PB.

MartinD is in another country and NTN is typicaly very quiet

oh, ok :)

I guess i need to reread last night....

I don't know if the same could be said about you. You put your vote on Poli as retaliation, but you didn't know that Poli was going to unvote you.

wait, wait, wait, wait.... PB says vote for hoops? must follow PB... not the voices in my head.... "NO!!!! I WON'T VOTE FOR MYSELF!!!!!"


unvote PB

vote hoops

Your actions seemed entirely to do with out of game stuff. It didn't register for me that it could possibly having to do with the game at all.

its tough knowing who to vote for with no heinze :(

Vote Abe

nothing personal, but we need some consolidation and he could probably use a break after just running what I am sure is a challenging game to run.

:lol: The only thing I would make you do is root for my Penguins tonight!

Going to be in and out of meetings today, so not a lot of time to drill through the posts. However, I'm willing to throw a vote back on EF.
1.) He roots for the Eagles, so it always feels kind of good to vote for him.
2.) He had said in past games that he would want to get rid of me as quickly as possible as a wolf. And he has now voted for me.

VOTE EAGLEFAN

VOTE PB

HOLY UNFATHOMABLE SITUATIONS BATMAN, EF and Hoops voting for each other, which way do I go, which way do I go?

My head may explode.

Can they tie? If so, please don't make me cast the tie-breaking vote.

Yes, I'm still pissed. Therapy might not actually be a bad idea, I think Hartnell's been getting into my head.

If it helps calm you at all, I went back and re-read the Battlestar Galactica game. First time I've re-read a game I played in, good times.

VOTE LERRIUQS

I haven't yet played with Lerriuqs (as far as I know), so this seems fun.

Yeah that really wants to make me vote for you less. ;)

vote packernerd

Leriqus has said he wont be around alot today, and i need a reason to vote for someone :)

3.) We need a vote on a SEVENTH player, apparently.

:p

Vote count:

That second vote on Lerriuqs was from me, not PB.

Jesus Pass, for a second there you made me think I really am crazy. No, I didn't vote for lerriuqs, that was PF, not PB.

UNVOTE LERRIUQS
VOTE HOOPSGUY


I'll change it if/when you put a vote on a real contender, or if the person you're voting for becomes a real contender (which I define right now as having a vote on them by someone other than you).

oops:

Okay, Pass and EF are going Hoops. I'll then:

vote Eaglefan

Doh, forgot my own vote change:

Start narrowing things down. And I get to turn the tables and put a day 1 on EF.

Damn, well my conditions for changing my vote off hoops were met pretty quickly.

[b]
UNVOTE HOOPSGUY

Vote count:

I hate to throw someone else into the mix, but um, we still have a couple of no shows right? If so I plan on casting my vote that way at lunch.

So we're out to 9 people with votes. Think that's enough yet?