Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   FOFC Archive (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   2008-2009 College Basketball Thread...... (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=68303)

Swaggs 02-04-2009 10:07 PM

How did ESPN manage to show a Duke game without Dickie V. calling it?

Radii 02-04-2009 10:23 PM

Texas/Missouri has definitely been the game of the night. Mizzou by 1 with 4:30 to go.

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-04-2009 11:02 PM

M-I-Z Z-O-U!!!!!!!!!

HUGE win for the Tigers in Austin tonight!!! The league is basically a three horse race now with OU, KU, and MU 1 1/2 games clear of the rest of the league.

MU plays on the road against ISU this Saturday while KU hosts OSU. Assuming both teams win, it sets up a monster game at Mizzou Arena on Big Monday with both teams likely being ranked!

LET'S GO TIGERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

sterlingice 02-04-2009 11:12 PM

Business to attend to with Okie State and Iowa State this weekend.

Then it's time to take our young and inconsistent but talented show on the road for a nice Big Monday showdown.

SI

Butter 02-05-2009 06:42 AM

Wow, how did Clemson get away with having Duke and UNC only once each this year? If Purnell can avoid the problems he's had in the past with road games (typically, Clemson is good for a couple of dropped road games to far inferior teams per season), Clemson could be set up nicely for a top-3 conference finish, with 6 of their last 9 games against the bottom 6 in the conference.

That was one of the most satisfying college basketball games I have ever watched. Coach K just sat most of the 2nd half and watched his team get dismantled.

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-05-2009 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Butter_of_69 (Post 1938091)
That was one of the most satisfying college basketball games I have ever watched. Coach K just sat most of the 2nd half and watched his team get dismantled.


I'm glad I'm sitting in a cubicle today instead of a Duke practice. Coack K is going to throw his back out just from the force of his yelling. I see a lot of sprints in their future.

JonInMiddleGA 02-05-2009 07:52 AM

I really liked Coach K trying to make sure the players got the point.

CLEMSON, S.C. (AP) -Duke coach Mike Krzyzewski called a timeout in the final minute, gathered his beaten Blue Devils around him and let them listen as the Littlejohn Coliseum crowd celebrated a Clemson win like few others.

Prolonging the agony as a teaching tool, I like it, especially if (as a Clemson player said afterwards) Duke quit at the end.

MizzouRah 02-05-2009 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1938012)
M-I-Z Z-O-U!!!!!!!!!

HUGE win for the Tigers in Austin tonight!!! The league is basically a three horse race now with OU, KU, and MU 1 1/2 games clear of the rest of the league.

MU plays on the road against ISU this Saturday while KU hosts OSU. Assuming both teams win, it sets up a monster game at Mizzou Arena on Big Monday with both teams likely being ranked!

LET'S GO TIGERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


YES!!!!!!!!!!!! What a game!!!!!!!!!

sooner333 02-05-2009 05:21 PM

It will be pretty awesome game on Big Monday...of course, you always have to watch out for Hilton Magic, especially in a look-ahead game on Saturday.

I feel better about OU beating KU at home rather than Mizzou on the road for sure. Mizzou is a good team and Coach Anderson has them playing hard and you have to respect that. They also bring legitimacy to the Big 12 North (and thus makes the conference look better in general). Of course, the conference is so down this year we can use legitimacy wherever we can.

JonInMiddleGA 02-05-2009 07:28 PM

As Pat Summitt goes again tonight for win number 1,000, the injury bug for the Lady Vols is getting ridiculous. Already this season they lost Cait McMahan to a series of knee injuries that proved to be career ending. Then last week it's a second torn ACL in two years for sophomore Vicki Baugh, season ending at best.

20 seconds into tonight freshman Alicia Manning goes down & out for the night with some sort of thigh injury. And now in the opening minutes of the second half they have to carry Shekina Stricklen off with what looked at first to be a knee but while I'm typing this we hear an eavesdrop from the bench with Pat telling the team that it's a groin injury & she'll be okay.

And none of that gets into the ridiculous run of concussions they went through during practice at the start of the season. Of the original 12 player roster, only 4 of the 12 players have not missed at least one game this season.

I know it's a sidebar to the main focus for the men's game here & everything but watching this really makes me think that there's something to the feature I saw CNN run over the weekend about how the physiology of young women was so different from that of young men and the role that plays in increased injuries, specifically knee injuries. Something to the effect that lateral movement was more natural for growing boys while growing girls tended to be more vertically oriented & that explosive lateral movement wasn't something they were designed for. I'm sure that rankles some folks but I didn't make it up, the core of of the story was a female researcher who wasn't saying anything needed to be done differently or suggesting any restrictions but just dealing with the reality of the physical differences.

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-06-2009 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sooner333 (Post 1938570)
It will be pretty awesome game on Big Monday...of course, you always have to watch out for Hilton Magic, especially in a look-ahead game on Saturday.

I feel better about OU beating KU at home rather than Mizzou on the road for sure. Mizzou is a good team and Coach Anderson has them playing hard and you have to respect that. They also bring legitimacy to the Big 12 North (and thus makes the conference look better in general). Of course, the conference is so down this year we can use legitimacy wherever we can.


Honestly, the Big 12 North has a real argument for being the better division. 2 of the top 3 and 4 of the top 6 teams are in the North. The North has a winning record in the head-to-head matchups against the South. Baylor and Texas have to be considered the biggest disappointments in the league thus far. KSU and NU have been relative surprises considering nothing was expected of either team, yet their right in the middle of the pack.

Radii 02-07-2009 03:00 PM

Duke survives against Miami after shooting 19% in the first half and trailing by as many as 16 early in the 2nd half. Jack McClinton carried Miami and forced an overtime, but Miami went completely cold in the OT. 78-75 Duke in OT in Durham.

That drops miami to 4-6 in the ACC. 3 of their final 6 games are on the road and 1 of the home games is vs UNC next Saturday. They are definitely on the bubble and need to make something pretty big happen in their final 6 games or in the ACC Tourney to get in I would think.

Karlifornia 02-07-2009 03:02 PM

Meanwhile, Nebraska is up 4 on Texas with less than a minute left. Go Huskers!

JonInMiddleGA 02-07-2009 03:10 PM

Tennessee loses to Auburn on the road, slips to 14-8 overall. Just an incredibly disappointing season this year for a team that was supposed to be at least Sweet 16 caliber.

Chief Rum 02-07-2009 03:47 PM

UCLA crushes Notre Dame on national TV. Good win, even though Notre Dame has really fallen off in its losing streak. I am thinking a lot of people saw UCLA for the first time today, and it will be interesting to see what sort of jump they make in the polls.

Karlifornia 02-07-2009 06:25 PM

Michigan is hanging tough in Storrs...I wonder if Thabeet could be the #1 overall pick. He seems to still have loads of untapped potential.

RedKingGold 02-07-2009 06:27 PM

Nova's win against Syracuse has to put them into "lock" category.

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-08-2009 09:33 AM

The table is set for the biggest Border War match-up in several years. 19-4 Kansas at 20-4 Mizzou. The hatred in me boils without control.

OU, Kansas and Mizzou are all but locks in the Big 12 at this point. It looks like this will be a 5 bid league, meaning that KSU, NU, and Texas will be fighting for the last two spots. If Texas doesn't turn things around in a hurry, we could easily see 4 of the 5 Big 12 bids go to the North Division. The South has really disappointed this year.

CU Tiger 02-08-2009 09:36 AM

And in historical Clemson fashion a huge win is followed up by a disappointing loss. The program was and os progressing nicely under Purnell, I just hate this atypical performance.

sterlingice 02-08-2009 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1939704)
The table is set for the biggest Border War match-up in several years. 19-4 Kansas at 20-4 Mizzou. The hatred in me boils without control.

OU, Kansas and Mizzou are all but locks in the Big 12 at this point. It looks like this will be a 5 bid league, meaning that KSU, NU, and Texas will be fighting for the last two spots. If Texas doesn't turn things around in a hurry, we could easily see 4 of the 5 Big 12 bids go to the North Division. The South has really disappointed this year.


Neither KSU nor NU have any guaranteed shots. Neither did anything in the non-conference so even 10-6 would require a decent Big XII tourney showing. Texas has a nice non-conference to fall back on but they will need to close strong to get a spot.

SI

Karlifornia 02-08-2009 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CU Tiger (Post 1939705)
And in historical Clemson fashion a huge win is followed up by a disappointing loss. The program was and os progressing nicely under Purnell, I just hate this atypical performance.


I don't know, man. FSU looks to be a tournament team this year. Disappointing to lose at home I'm sure, but I wouldn't be too broken up about it.

Groundhog 02-08-2009 04:25 PM

St. Mary's are looking WOEFUL without Pat Mills. 1-2 since he went down, with 18 point losses to both Santa Clara and Portland. They play like a completely different team.

Wolfpack 02-08-2009 10:01 PM

Proving once again there are always new and unique ways to lose a game, State blows an 18-point second half lead at Virginia Tech and loses in OT, 91-87. The intentional foul call that basically flipped the entire game around was complete and utter BS and resulted in a five-point possession for the Hokies, but there was plenty of time and lead to regain their footing after that, which they naturally didn't do.

Such a good time to be a State fan. Really. :(

Butter 02-09-2009 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CU Tiger (Post 1939705)
And in historical Clemson fashion a huge win is followed up by a disappointing loss. The program was and os progressing nicely under Purnell, I just hate this atypical performance.


Classic hangover game, I wouldn't worry too much.

The thing that makes it the most galling is that Clemson had a 16 point lead with under 8 minutes left. Blowing that type of lead almost takes effort.

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-09-2009 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sterlingice (Post 1939725)
Neither KSU nor NU have any guaranteed shots. Neither did anything in the non-conference so even 10-6 would require a decent Big XII tourney showing. Texas has a nice non-conference to fall back on but they will need to close strong to get a spot.

SI


Sure, but you could say that about a lot of the middle of the pack teams in a BCS conference. Someone's going to emerge out of those three, while another will likely limp in thanks to a 9-7 record and a good run in the conference tourney. Similar stories will occur in the other big conferences.

Swaggs 02-09-2009 10:39 AM

WVU travels to Pittsburgh tonight. WVU has a really high RPI, based mostly on very good losses (neutral sites against Kentucky and Davidson and BE games against 'Cuse, UConn, Pitt, Louisville, and Marquette), rather than very good wins. We have beaten Ohio State on the road and Georgetown on the road (although that doesn't look too special nowadays), but we really need to knock off one of the big dogs we have remaining (@ Pitt or at home vs Louisville or Villanova) to get a protected seed.

I'm not too confident going against Pitt and DaJuan Blair, but if we could somehow get his giant butt in foul trouble and shoot well, we could steal one here.

MizzouRah 02-09-2009 10:54 AM

Allright SI and KU... should be a good one tonight!!!

GO TIGERS MIZ-ZOU!

MJ4H 02-09-2009 11:02 AM

i hate basketball

DataKing 02-09-2009 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MizzouRah (Post 1940284)
Allright SI and KU... should be a good one tonight!!!

GO TIGERS MIZ-ZOU!


Just gotta chime in here with a "ROCK CHALK! JAYHAWK! KU!" :D

gstelmack 02-09-2009 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolfpack (Post 1940039)
Proving once again there are always new and unique ways to lose a game, State blows an 18-point second half lead at Virginia Tech and loses in OT, 91-87. The intentional foul call that basically flipped the entire game around was complete and utter BS and resulted in a five-point possession for the Hokies, but there was plenty of time and lead to regain their footing after that, which they naturally didn't do.


The problem with that call (aside from the fact that they looked at it on the replay and still missed State getting a piece of the ball...) was not so much that it took State out of it but that it got Tech and the fans back into it. And it's yet one more reminder why I watch so little basketball these days...

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-09-2009 11:33 AM

I think it's important to note just how despicable a breed these Jayhawkers really are................

Quote:

There are some KU fans that believe the Jayhawk is nothing more than a “cute little bird”, and do not realize the Jayhawk moniker can be directly traced to the jayhawkers that were part of the violence and warfare along the Missouri-Kansas border during the Kansas territorial period and later during the Civil War (collectively known as the Border War). Among the KU fans that recognize the historical basis of the moniker, a sizeable portion believe the term “jayhawkers” refers to noble and honorable men that fought to keep Kansas from becoming a slave state, and that then fought for the freedom of all men during the Civil War. That sounds good, but the historical reality isn’t that pretty.

The reality of the Border War was obscured to a significant degree by two waves of propaganda. The first was the propaganda campaign waged during the territorial period, when the northern press gave the public (and to an extent also gave posterity) a politicized and highly biased version of the nature of the conflict that accompanied Kansas statehood. For example, many associate the territorial period with “Bleeding Kansas”, a term coined by Horace Greeley of the Ney York Times to inflame the passions of the times, and a term that contributed to a distortion of the reality that persists to this day. A careful review of violence during the Kansas territorial period (1854 to 1860) indicates there were 56 deaths that can be attributed to the fight over slavery. Compared to the 1,200 that died in the frontier violence in San Francisco in the period 1850 to 1853, Bleeding Kansas was not very bloody. The second wave of propaganda came after the Civil War, when the history was being written by the victors, and the actions of those associated with the Union cause were glorified (or white-washed), and those of the defeated vilified.

What was the historical reality of the jayhawkers? To understand the truth, one must understand the time and place the term came into use. The term "jayhawking" first appeared in the Kansas press in November 1958. This was AFTER the battle for Kansas statehood was essentially over (e.g., the pro-slavery Lecompton Constitution went down to its third defeat in mid-1958).

The place that the term “jayhawker” and Kansan first began to be associated was in southeast Kansas (Linn and Bourbon counties). The vast majority of the political bloodshed in Kansas was over by the end of 1856, but violence in southeast Kansas flared up later, and extended more or less into the Civil War. Why? It is important to understand that most emigrants that settled Kansas Territory did not come to make any statement about slavery, but to acquire land. When southeast Kansas was initially settled, it was primarily by pro-slavery settlers, and they claimed the best lands (those with water and timber). When John Brown unleashed political bloodshed in southeast Kansas with the massacre at Pottawattamie Creek, some pro-slavery settlers drove free-state settlers off their claims. The pro-slavery movement in Kansas Territory was basically defeated by the flood of emigrants from what is now the Midwest (Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, etc) and their embrace of the superiority of a free labor system over slavery. This wave of emigrants that embraced the fee-state cause overwhelmed any advantage that was initially held by the pro-slavery forces. That tide of emigration reached southeast Kansas in 1958, and as pro-slavery settlers became a minority, they were driven off their land claims by militants aligned with the free-state cause. “Jayhawkers” was the term used to describe these militants. Additionally, as with any frontier, there were banditti about, and they used the free-state movement as en excuse for horse theft and plundering. These banditti also went by the name of jayhawkers. In the words of an early Kansas historian, “Confederated at first for defense against pro-slavery outrages, but ultimately falling more or less completely into the vocation of robbers and assassins, they have received the name --- whatever its origin may be -- of jayhawkers”.

Pro-slavery settlers in Kansas Territory were not the only victims of the jayhawkers. The moderate free-state settlers that believed pro-slavery settlers should be allowed to remain on their legally valid claims were also targets of the jayhawkers’ campaign of violence and intimidation. As the jayhawkers consolidated their control of southeast Kansas, they also began to launch raids into Missouri. The objectives of these raids varied. For John Brown, the raids were a chance to experiment in guerilla warfare, and to practice and hone the techniques he would later employ at Harpers Ferry. For others, the raids, while ostensibly for the purpose of freeing slaves, were primarily an opportunity to plunder.

When the Civil War broke out, the “jayhawking” term came to encompass the mode of total war unleashed on the civilian population of western Missouri in the first year of the war. Men who had been leaders or champions of the jayhawkers during the territorial period, men like Jim Lane and Doc Jennison, became leaders of the Union forces raised by Kansas. They and their troops descended on western Missouri in a campaign of theft, arson, torture, and murder. Between September 1861 and the end of January 1862, a whole string of Missouri towns were plundered and burned. Among the population centers reduced to ashes were Morristown, Osceola (about the same size as Lawrence, Kansas), Papinsville, Butler, Dayton, and Columbus. Additionally, hundreds of families were burned out of their homes in the country side around Pleasant Hill, Rose Hill, Kingsville, and Lexington. In their predations, the jayhawkers made little effort to distinguish between Union and Secessionist among the Missouri residents.

The Union military belatedly moved to bring the jayhawkers into control and to stop their predations. The U.S. military declared martial law in an "anti-jayhawking" proclamation in early 1862, helped to maneuver Lane out of his military command, and banished Jennison's Seventh Volunteer Kansas Cavalry (also known as Jennison’s Jayhawkers) from the region. With the Seventh to be moved out of striking distance of Missouri, Jennison and his sidekick Hoyt quit the 7th Kansas, encouraged their fellow brigands in the regiment to desert, and started a new jayhawking organization that came to be called the redlegs. Predations on the citizens of western Missouri continued, leading to Quantrill’s retaliatory raid, and culminating in Order No. 11, the forced depopulation of several Missouri counties in an effort to put down the guerilla warfare fomented by the predations of the jayhawkers and redlegs.

Many KU fans will dismiss the above portrayal of the jayhawkers and redlegs as “revisionst history”. Well, don’t take the word of an MU fan on this topic, let’s see what Charles Robinson had to say about it. Robinson was the leader of the abolitionists that founded Lawrence, and served as first governor of the new state of Kansas. Following are excerpts from his book The Kansas Conflict, in the chapter on the Civil War subtitled “Lane's Brigade and Jay-Hawking.” Describing his feelings about the jayhawking at the time his term as Governor expired in 1863, Robison states that “Enough had been seen and experienced of the management of the war in the West, permitting the most brutal and inhuman outrages, all to gratify personal greed, malice, or ambition, to disgust any person not entirely given over to subsisting upon human misery.” In describing the consequences of the “war of rapine…under Lane and his red-leg thieves”, Robinson concludes that "Order No. 11 would have never been needed, and Quantrell's raid at Lawrence would never have occurred.”

So next time you hear the lines about the jayhawk being about a “cute little bird” or its heritage going back to the honorable men that fought to make Kansas a free state, don’t buy it. The KU athletic teams are named after an unsavory assortment of rogues, thugs, and outright criminals that hastened and steepened the descent of the Missouri-Kansas border region into the horrors of total war. They were a scourge to innocent civilians of both Missouri and Kansas, even if that fact failed to register with many Kansans of that era and continues to be glossed over by the KU fans of today.

sterlingice 02-09-2009 12:16 PM

Both sides had the proverbial (and literal, in this case) raping and pillaging. Missouri was the slave state, Kansas was the free state. Scoreboard. Take your little propaganda elsewhere ;)

SI

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-09-2009 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sterlingice (Post 1940330)
Both sides had the proverbial (and literal, in this case) raping and pillaging. Missouri was the slave state, Kansas was the free state. Scoreboard. Take your little propaganda elsewhere ;)

SI


Does your wife know that the MU/KU game is tonight?

sterlingice 02-09-2009 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1940353)
Does your wife know that the MU/KU game is tonight?


Yeah, tho she's at a conference in Albuquerque

SI

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-09-2009 01:30 PM

Rankings are out. MU was the big mover in both polls. Mizzou jumped from unrated to #17 in the AP poll and #19 in the Coaches poll.

NCAA College Basketball Polls, College Basketball Rankings, NCAA Basketball Polls - ESPN

nole4sho 02-09-2009 04:58 PM

It's most certainly nice too see Florida State ranked at 25, hopefully we can break through and make the tournament.

Karlifornia 02-09-2009 05:06 PM

Yeah, sorry....Kansas wins that battle.

As an aside, I just came into $13,500, and I was thinking of putting it all on Missouri tonight. Thoughts?

sterlingice 02-09-2009 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karlifornia (Post 1940591)
Yeah, sorry....Kansas wins that battle.

As an aside, I just came into $13,500, and I was thinking of putting it all on Missouri tonight. Thoughts?


I'd give Mizzou about a 60% chance to win. According to Yahoo, it's bid 200 to win 100 with Mizzou or bid 100 to win 160 with Kansas so I'm not too far off from Vegas. The Tigers are at home and, frankly, we've been inconsistent, like any young team (yeah, I know, most teams would kill to be as "inconsistent" as we are this year).

Frankly, I think Mizzou's D will frustrate us and they will build a lead in the first half. We'll see if KU can come back.

SI

MizzouRah 02-09-2009 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DataKing (Post 1940297)
Just gotta chime in here with a "ROCK CHALK! JAYHAWK! KU!" :D


Damn you! ;)

sterlingice 02-09-2009 08:08 PM

Game on

SI

Radii 02-09-2009 08:59 PM

What a terrible half of basketball in Missouri, heh. Kansas D deserves a little credit for sure but Missouri is just playing awful. And really Kansas hasn't looked great but when Missouri is shooting under 25% it doesn't take much!

Izulde 02-09-2009 09:01 PM

I bet Karl's breaking something if he put all that dough on Mizzou. :D

RainMaker 02-09-2009 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA (Post 1938625)
I know it's a sidebar to the main focus for the men's game here & everything but watching this really makes me think that there's something to the feature I saw CNN run over the weekend about how the physiology of young women was so different from that of young men and the role that plays in increased injuries, specifically knee injuries. Something to the effect that lateral movement was more natural for growing boys while growing girls tended to be more vertically oriented & that explosive lateral movement wasn't something they were designed for. I'm sure that rankles some folks but I didn't make it up, the core of of the story was a female researcher who wasn't saying anything needed to be done differently or suggesting any restrictions but just dealing with the reality of the physical differences.


Here's a good article on it. I remember this being a somewhat big topic years ago.

Knee Injuries are More Common for Female Basketball Players

Radii 02-09-2009 10:12 PM

as bad as the first half was, I'm glad I stuck with it, Mizzou/Kansas tied with 1:15 to go.

sterlingice 02-09-2009 10:17 PM

And tied again with 0:23 to go

SI

Radii 02-09-2009 10:19 PM

congrats mizzou fans!

sterlingice 02-09-2009 10:19 PM

Well, that played out almost the exact opposite as I said it would.

Fun second half, tho a lot more fun for Mizzou fans :(

SI

sterlingice 02-09-2009 10:20 PM

Man, that was a pretty shot

SI

cartman 02-09-2009 10:23 PM

The Big 12 is gonna be lucky to have any teams make it to the Sweet 16 this year.

Chief Rum 02-09-2009 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1940391)
Rankings are out. MU was the big mover in both polls. Mizzou jumped from unrated to #17 in the AP poll and #19 in the Coaches poll.

NCAA College Basketball Polls, College Basketball Rankings, NCAA Basketball Polls - ESPN


Hmm, apparently UCLA's thrashing of a number of opponents of late has drawn attention, jumping six spots in the AP, and I am not sure how many in the ESPN poll, but they're #6 now, and I am certain they weren't in the Top 10 before.

Radii 02-09-2009 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cartman (Post 1940859)
The Big 12 is gonna be lucky to have any teams make it to the Sweet 16 this year.


Oklahoma seems fairly likely ;)

cartman 02-09-2009 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radii (Post 1940866)
Oklahoma seems fairly likely ;)


They have a Pomeroy rating of 18, and a Pythagorean SOS of 70, so they are by no means a lock.

sooner333 02-09-2009 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cartman (Post 1940874)
They have a Pomeroy rating of 18, and a Pythagorean SOS of 70, so they are by no means a lock.


Yeah, OU could stand to be a better defensive team. I also think they play down to their level of competition a lot (which also means they are more likely to get upset and you be right). But, they provide match-up problems inside and it seems that at least one of Johnson, Warren, and Crocker are hitting from the outside and having good overall games offensively. Patillo has provided fresh legs and energy so far since shedding the redshirt and has been a defensive force (7 blocks the past two games off the bench). Depth isn't nearly as much of an issue as before, going pretty much four deep off the pine.

cartman 02-09-2009 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sooner333 (Post 1940883)
Yeah, OU could stand to be a better defensive team. I also think they play down to their level of competition a lot (which also means they are more likely to get upset and you be right). But, they provide match-up problems inside and it seems that at least one of Johnson, Warren, and Crocker are hitting from the outside and having good overall games offensively. Patillo has provided fresh legs and energy so far since shedding the redshirt and has been a defensive force (7 blocks the past two games off the bench). Depth isn't nearly as much of an issue as before, going pretty much four deep off the pine.


But if Blake Griffin gets in early foul trouble...

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-10-2009 07:31 AM





WOOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOOOO!

It's unfortunate that Mizzou came out with nerves in the first half, but the defense was good throughout and that's what saved MU in the end.

sooner333 02-10-2009 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cartman (Post 1940885)
But if Blake Griffin gets in early foul trouble...


Yeah, it's happened before. It's not as good, but I do think people believe this team is Blake Griffin and the four dwarfs. That isn't really true. Sure, he's the best player on the team and there's nobody going to question that, lest they be an idiot. But, Willie Warren can step up on offense too. Other guys have been able to as well. Also, I think he's made an effort to stay in games by not fouling (which has led to some of the defensive problems...but probably a good trade-off to keep him in).

Also, another thing that benefits the conference as a whole is the new emphasis on calling games closer in the Big 12, or so it seems. I watched the 2000 Oklahoma-Oklahoma State game the other day and remembered just how much the refs used to let them play. It really hurt all of the teams, I believe, in the tournament when other conference officials would call fouls.

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-10-2009 11:14 AM

Sounds like there was an altercation at the end of the MU/KU game. Sheron Collins loitered on the court a bit too long and was unable to get through the crowd of students to get to the locker room. Sheron somehow managed to mistake MU Asst. Coach TJ Cleeland for a student (don't know how that happens when he's in a suit) and shoved him out of the way as they were heading for the locker room. KU AD Lew Perkins shot off a comment to nearby MU AD Mike Alden that students would never be allowed to rush the court at KU. Alden basically told him to go screw himself.

I'm guessing these two will not be meeting for dinner when the Tigers head to Lawrence on March 1st for the rematch.

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-10-2009 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sooner333 (Post 1941079)
Also, another thing that benefits the conference as a whole is the new emphasis on calling games closer in the Big 12, or so it seems. I watched the 2000 Oklahoma-Oklahoma State game the other day and remembered just how much the refs used to let them play. It really hurt all of the teams, I believe, in the tournament when other conference officials would call fouls.


Boy, you wouldn't have known that watching the MU/KU game last night. People were getting hammered with no call on both sides of the ball. FWIW, that generally benefits MU just because they like to pressure and try to steal the ball. The pressure defense goes down the tubes when the refs call it tight.

sooner333 02-10-2009 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1941090)
Boy, you wouldn't have known that watching the MU/KU game last night. People were getting hammered with no call on both sides of the ball. FWIW, that generally benefits MU just because they like to pressure and try to steal the ball. The pressure defense goes down the tubes when the refs call it tight.


Mizzou still had a lot of free throw attempts. Off the ball it's still somewhat the same, but it seems they are doing a lot more shooting foul stuff and continuations (or saying they were shooting and they get two shots). I know the game I watched was particularly rough and tumble, but just having been watching Big 12 basketball since 98-99, it seems like it's gotten significantly cleaned up.

Karlifornia 02-10-2009 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sooner333 (Post 1941079)

Also, another thing that benefits the conference as a whole is the new emphasis on calling games closer in the Big 12, or so it seems. I watched the 2000 Oklahoma-Oklahoma State game the other day and remembered just how much the refs used to let them play. It really hurt all of the teams, I believe, in the tournament when other conference officials would call fouls.



That's funny. A lot of PAC-10 fans feel the exact opposite.

sooner333 02-10-2009 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karlifornia (Post 1941164)
That's funny. A lot of PAC-10 fans feel the exact opposite.


I guess it's just the nature of the fact that the refs aren't standardized (and in fact, independent contracts) across the country. Any time things aren't going the way you're used to it's tough. I always thought ACC and Pac 10 refs were tighter and we'd get fouls called we weren't used to. I guess you guys out west thought that they were getting beat up. Maybe it's good and more refs are calling tighter these days leading to more standardization come tournament time.

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-10-2009 01:53 PM

I've always had the impression that some of these referees have some pretty big egos. I saw these comments from last night's MU/KU game from a college recruiting scout that attends a lot of games that did little to change that feeling........

Quote:

*I’ve seen a few basketball games, kids. I’ve seen parents come out of the stands, I’ve seen pepper spray used in AAU gyms, and I’ve seen grown adults throw trash cans at each other over the outcome of a game. But I’ve never, EVER seen a referee with the rabbit-ears that Big XII Referee Rick Hartzell displayed tonight. I was fortunate to have exceptional seats (thank you, RM!!!), and upon an MU fan simply saying “he’s over the back again, Rick!” after one of the many times Cole Aldrich was exactly that, he literally turned to the crowd near the court, made as much eye contact as he could, and shook his head no, all while saying “no he wasn’t”.

Later, he asked that another courtside fan be removed. Now, I don’t know if any profanity was used, and I’m certainly not condoning boorish behavior. But I can tell you that NO ONE near us said anything even remotely offensive, and this man took it upon himself, during one timeout, to utter sarcastically to fellow ref Tom O’Neill, at a decibel level high enough for everyone nearby to hear, “well, I guess we better make ONE call right”. I don’t think he heard me, but I did utter back, “that would be a good start”….though he did briefly look my way, then shortly after ask that someone near us be removed. And to reiterate, I heard NO profanity; in fact, I heard nothing that could be reasonably construed as offensive.

Dr. Sak 02-10-2009 02:04 PM

I would never never never want to be a basketball official.

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-10-2009 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Sak (Post 1941196)
I would never never never want to be a basketball official.


It's that much more difficult of a job if you have rabbit ears. I was an official for 10 years. If you're listening to the crowd, you're going to have some problems.

SackAttack 02-10-2009 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1941185)
I've always had the impression that some of these referees have some pretty big egos. I saw these comments from last night's MU/KU game from a college recruiting scout that attends a lot of games that did little to change that feeling........


Most of the referees I've seen behave like that have probably been insecure about their positions.

There was a guy calling women's basketball games at the JC back home in CA, he was inserting himself into the play from the half-court line, making foul calls on players around the hoop. And he displayed exactly that sort of behavior when the fans started calling him out.

Dr. Sak 02-10-2009 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1941214)
It's that much more difficult of a job if you have rabbit ears. I was an official for 10 years. If you're listening to the crowd, you're going to have some problems.


Yep and with the way people are today, I don't trust fans coming out of the stands. Hell I had an old man throw his cane at me from outside the fence at a JV Football game.

Wolfpack 02-10-2009 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sooner333 (Post 1941180)
I guess it's just the nature of the fact that the refs aren't standardized (and in fact, independent contracts) across the country. Any time things aren't going the way you're used to it's tough. I always thought ACC and Pac 10 refs were tighter and we'd get fouls called we weren't used to. I guess you guys out west thought that they were getting beat up. Maybe it's good and more refs are calling tighter these days leading to more standardization come tournament time.


[bitter Wolfpack fan]ACC refs only call it tight when the jersey color isn't blue.[/bitter Wolfpack fan]

Seriously, it probably is something endemic to all leagues that come NCAA time, nobody's going to believe the stuff that gets called/not called on them because they were getting away/not getting away with it for three months during conference play. I know one of the things ACC fans like to harp on is the fact that Duke and Carolina struggle a bit during the tournament because they suddenly aren't getting the calls anymore.

Radii 02-10-2009 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolfpack (Post 1941531)
the fact that Duke and Carolina struggle a bit during the tournament


*looks at all the final fours and championship banners from the last 27ish years or so*

I'd hate to see what it would have looked like if they didn't struggle so much in the tournament :)

RedKingGold 02-10-2009 10:21 PM

I was at the Nova-Marquette game tonight, and I was really impressed with Marquette's speed.

Still, Villanova is going to be a tough out in the tournament this year. If they play out the rest of their schedule well, they're all set up for a #3 seed (or better).

Wolfpack 02-10-2009 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radii (Post 1941547)
*looks at all the final fours and championship banners from the last 27ish years or so*

I'd hate to see what it would have looked like if they didn't struggle so much in the tournament :)


I didn't say that they didn't win, just that they struggled. ;)

Even so, Duke seems particularly susceptible to this sort of thing as they've not really been an NCAA tournament threat much of this decade but are a dominant ACC team at times.

cartman 02-10-2009 10:27 PM

Texas dismantled Oklahoma State 99-74 to stop their three game slide. Considering that the three losses were by a total of 11 points, with one of the losses in OT and the other two decided on shots with less than 10 seconds left, the rumors of Texas' demise were greatly exaggerated.

This looked like the Longhorn team that beat Villanova, UCLA and Wisconsin earlier this season.

Chief Rum 02-10-2009 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cartman (Post 1941555)
Texas dismantled Oklahoma State 99-74 to stop their three game slide. Considering that the three losses were by a total of 11 points, with one of the losses in OT and the other two decided on shots with less than 10 seconds left, the rumors of Texas' demise were greatly exaggerated.

This looked like the Longhorn team that beat Villanova, UCLA and Wisconsin earlier this season.


Good. UCLA needs Texas to play better to reflect better on themselves.

Swaggs 02-10-2009 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedKingGold (Post 1941549)
I was at the Nova-Marquette game tonight, and I was really impressed with Marquette's speed.

Still, Villanova is going to be a tough out in the tournament this year. If they play out the rest of their schedule well, they're all set up for a #3 seed (or better).



'Nova has really stepped it up in the last month or so.

Depending on how they all finish, it is quite possible that five Big East teams land top 3 seeds in the tourney.

Groundhog 02-10-2009 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolfpack (Post 1941550)
Even so, Duke seems particularly susceptible to this sort of thing as they've not really been an NCAA tournament threat much of this decade but are a dominant ACC team at times.


Duke have pretty much looked shakey as hell each NCAA tournament game I can recall watching them in over the past half-decade or so.

CU Tiger 02-10-2009 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolfpack (Post 1941531)
[bitter Wolfpack fan]ACC refs only call it tight when the jersey color isn't blue.[/bitter Wolfpack fan]

Seriously, it probably is something endemic to all leagues that come NCAA time, nobody's going to believe the stuff that gets called/not called on them because they were getting away/not getting away with it for three months during conference play. I know one of the things ACC fans like to harp on is the fact that Duke and Carolina struggle a bit during the tournament because they suddenly aren't getting the calls anymore.


just find "the infamous ACC index card" The number of fouls called on any team goes up 11% in the last 15 years when they play Duke and UNC, and the their opponent fouls go down, 15%... That said, I am still confused how Clemson is ranked #9 destroys #3 Duke 9abyone who saw the game knows it was bad) then loses on a last second to FSU (unranked) and the polls vault FSU to #25 slide Duke back to 6 and drops Clemson to #12 and #11....admitedly Im new to this caring about college basketball thing but doesnt seem quite right

Groundhog 02-10-2009 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CU Tiger (Post 1941600)
just find "the infamous ACC index card" The number of fouls called on any team goes up 11% in the last 15 years when they play Duke and UNC, and the their opponent fouls go down, 15%...


To be fair, for the most part of 15 years both schools have been top-flight teams. What are the statistics for schools when playing top-10 or top-25 teams in general? I'd expect an increase in fouls for and a decrease in fouls against in general.

sooner333 02-11-2009 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cartman (Post 1941555)
the rumors of Texas' demise were greatly exaggerated.


I think it's also a sign that the Big 12 North is a lot better than anyone thought. Teams like Baylor are not living up to expectations for whatever reason (*cough* Scott Drew). Texas Tech is terrible. Oklahoma State isn't far behind the Red Raiders. Texas A&M has talent but something is wrong there.

Nebraska is doing it on heart and solid play despite nobody is above 6-6 in the starting lineup. Kansas State is putting it together. Missouri is a top 15 team it's looking like. KU is solid. Iowa State and Colorado are the only bad teams up North but CU is actually putting together a string of close losses (which is good for them...I like the Princeton system for the Buffs).

SackAttack 02-11-2009 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cartman (Post 1941555)
This looked like the Longhorn team that beat Villanova


Cool.

Quote:

UCLA

Cool!


Quote:

and Wisconsin.

Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaahaha.

Would this be the same Wisconsin that lost six straight, capping the streak with a loss to NORTHWESTERN, until they beat Illinois (in Madison)?

I know I'm supposed to support them, adopted state and all, but they're 5-6 in the Big Ten and 9-3 outside it, with only UConn (L), Marquette (L) and Texas (L) and possibly Virginia Tech (W) worth a damn in that non-conference schedule. Yeah. The three teams worth a damn they played, they lost to by an average of 9 points. I wouldn't hold them up as a quality win for Texas, even though Texas is a fine team themselves.

BishopMVP 02-11-2009 02:17 AM

Maybe not quite the right thread, but interesting story up here about a girl who just broke the girls state scoring record held by Rebecca Lobo. She's headed to U Memphis in the fall. What notable about this? She's a devout Muslim who plays wearing the hijab and full coverings Covered in glory - The Boston Globe
Quote:

Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA (Post 1938625)
I know it's a sidebar to the main focus for the men's game here & everything but watching this really makes me think that there's something to the feature I saw CNN run over the weekend about how the physiology of young women was so different from that of young men and the role that plays in increased injuries, specifically knee injuries. Something to the effect that lateral movement was more natural for growing boys while growing girls tended to be more vertically oriented & that explosive lateral movement wasn't something they were designed for. I'm sure that rankles some folks but I didn't make it up, the core of of the story was a female researcher who wasn't saying anything needed to be done differently or suggesting any restrictions but just dealing with the reality of the physical differences.

I thought it had something to do with girls naturally walking/jumping off their heels while boys did it on their toes and that strengthens the calf/knee muscles accordingly. Not sure why anyone would get mad - it's pretty undeniable that ACL injuries are much more common among girls who play basketball than guys.


Also, I don't know who saw the end of Florida-UK, but damn. Jodie Meeks 3 to win it was ridiculous.

Radii 02-11-2009 02:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CU Tiger (Post 1941600)
just find "the infamous ACC index card" The number of fouls called on any team goes up 11% in the last 15 years when they play Duke and UNC, and the their opponent fouls go down, 15%...


You mean that teams commit more fouls when they play against teams filled with more athletic, more talented players? Shocking! :)

Samdari 02-11-2009 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolfpack (Post 1941531)
Duke and Carolina struggle a bit during the tournament because they suddenly aren't getting the calls anymore.


Umm Duke and Carolina do very well in the tournament.

In part because they get very generous calls.

cartman 02-11-2009 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SackAttack (Post 1941650)
Would this be the same Wisconsin that lost six straight, capping the streak with a loss to NORTHWESTERN, until they beat Illinois (in Madison)?

I know I'm supposed to support them, adopted state and all, but they're 5-6 in the Big Ten and 9-3 outside it, with only UConn (L), Marquette (L) and Texas (L) and possibly Virginia Tech (W) worth a damn in that non-conference schedule. Yeah. The three teams worth a damn they played, they lost to by an average of 9 points. I wouldn't hold them up as a quality win for Texas, even though Texas is a fine team themselves.


I had Wisconsin listed, because they were something ridiculous like 92-8 at home under Bo Ryan up to that point. They've subsequently lost several more home games since then, but at the time it was considered incredibly tough for a visiting team to leave Madison with a W.

Butter 02-11-2009 08:56 AM

Xavier/Dayton tonight on ESPN Classic. A classic small-school rivalry... if you get bored waiting for Duke/UNC, or don't feel like watching the US-Mexico soccer game on ESPN2, flip by. It is usually a very intense game, and especially closely fought when it is in Dayton.

DataKing 02-11-2009 10:32 AM

Regarding all of the discussion earlier about referees, so long as the refs' calls are consistent over the course of a game, I'm happy. Good teams adjust to the type of game the referees are calling. More banging and tough interior play of the refs are calling it loose, and more dribble-drive offense when they're calling it tight. But what angers me to no end is when the calls change in the middle of a game. You can't expect kids to shift their play style in the middle of a game, when what was being permitted in the first half is suddenly being called in the second.

And props to Mizzou for a job well done Monday night. They recovered from an absolutely horrid first half and their pressure defense finally started to pay off late (and just in the nick of time, too). We'll see you again in 3 weeks, and ye best pay heed. :D

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-11-2009 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DataKing (Post 1941819)
Regarding all of the discussion earlier about referees, so long as the refs' calls are consistent over the course of a game, I'm happy. Good teams adjust to the type of game the referees are calling. More banging and tough interior play of the refs are calling it loose, and more dribble-drive offense when they're calling it tight. But what angers me to no end is when the calls change in the middle of a game. You can't expect kids to shift their play style in the middle of a game, when what was being permitted in the first half is suddenly being called in the second.


I know that Mizzou players are taught to pressure heavily early in the game to 'test' how tight the referees will call the game. They'll initiate a lot of body contact and will reach in and slap the arm to see if the ref will call it.

DataKing 02-11-2009 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1941828)
I know that Mizzou players are taught to pressure heavily early in the game to 'test' how tight the referees will call the game. They'll initiate a lot of body contact and will reach in and slap the arm to see if the ref will call it.


I was a fan of Mike Anderson and his "forty minutes of hell" defense when he was at UAB. I was actually rather upset when I learned that Mizzou had hired him. I don't want to hate him...but...well...he's the Mizzou coach now, so I guess I must. :D

Wolfpack 02-11-2009 09:03 PM

Yeay! We beat Wake, but for the love of Mike, enough with blowing 20-point leads already! From what I gather (since the game wasn't televised), Wake jumped on State a bit early, but then State used junk defenses to lock Wake and particularly Jeff Teague down, building a 20-point lead with 13 minutes to go. State then started collapsing just like they did against Virginia Tech and Wake managed to cut it to 78-76 with under a minute to go before State managed to ice it at the line.

BishopMVP 02-11-2009 09:31 PM

Am I the only one not getting UNC-Duke in HD? UNC-Duke is on Channel 49 (ESPN) but 849 (ESPNHD) is showing a Kansas State-Texas Tech blowout with ESPNU banners on the sides.

Radii 02-11-2009 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BishopMVP (Post 1942479)
Am I the only one not getting UNC-Duke in HD? UNC-Duke is on Channel 49 (ESPN) but 849 (ESPNHD) is showing a Kansas State-Texas Tech blowout with ESPNU banners on the sides.


Make sure you don't have it on a local channel... that doesn't sound right though. I have no idea if Raycom's ACC contract rights extend up to MA now that Boston College is in the ACC, down here ESPN is blacked out and we are getting the local Raycom broadcast on CBS (no Vitale, hooray!)

BishopMVP 02-11-2009 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radii (Post 1942502)
Make sure you don't have it on a local channel... that doesn't sound right though. I have no idea if Raycom's ACC contract rights extend up to MA now that Boston College is in the ACC, down here ESPN is blacked out and we are getting the local Raycom broadcast on CBS (no Vitale, hooray!)

I am watching it in Cambridge near BC's campus. Comcast claims that due to contracts somehow Texas Tech-KSU has "precedence". I would care more, but UNC was on an 11-0 run while I was on the phone and it's up to a 14-pt game, so I don't care.

Noop 02-11-2009 09:54 PM

Lawson is amazing, I am surprised Duke hasn't learned to get a decent post game by now.

Radii 02-11-2009 10:16 PM

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.


Lawson is indeed amazing. Watching him burn Paulus over and over was easily the highlight of the evening.

Tigercat 02-11-2009 10:38 PM

LSU is the most underrated basketball team in the country, and I don't think it is even close. Is the SEC pretty poor this year? Sure. But to lead any major conference by two full games at this time of the year and not be ranked in the top 25 is a bit off.

It seems like all the college basketball "Experts" give too much credit to winning/losing on the road out of conference (when teams aren't fully "gelled" and there isn't conference pride on the line) and too little credit to winning on the road in conference. Unless that conference is the Big East or ACC of course.

Ah well, with LSU's experience level and Trent Johnson coaching his ass off, I expect LSU to make some noise in the tournament this year, under the radar or not.

sterlingice 02-12-2009 07:22 AM

I think some people are starting to take notice. I can't remember who it was, but some national basketball guy was talking on Kansas City sports talk about LSU this past week as a real dark horse and someone to watch come tourney time.

SI

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-12-2009 02:29 PM

New Bubble Watch is up. Glad to see Mizzou in as a lock.

College Basketball Bubble Watch - NCAA Men's Basketball - ESPN

RainMaker 02-12-2009 10:06 PM

Big Illinois-Northwestern game. NU had a shot at potentially getting back in the tourney talk with a win. The blew around a 10 point lead with 2 minutes left. Was up big throughout most of the game. Team literally turned into a high school team the last 2 minutes. Couldn't get the ball past half court, two travels, bad passes, and a jump ball.

sterlingice 02-13-2009 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RainMaker (Post 1943521)
Big Illinois-Northwestern game. NU had a shot at potentially getting back in the tourney talk with a win. The blew around a 10 point lead with 2 minutes left. Was up big throughout most of the game. Team literally turned into a high school team the last 2 minutes. Couldn't get the ball past half court, two travels, bad passes, and a jump ball.


I don't think they literally turned into a high school team unless there was some sort of time travel involved ;)

SI

Mizzou B-ball fan 02-13-2009 12:46 PM

Looks like Cole Aldrich's phone number got posted on a KSU message board.

College Basketball: Cole Aldrich Does Not Appreciate Your Prank Calls (With Update)

I remember when the Antlers held up Ryan Robertson's phone number on a sign during a KU/MU game several years ago. He had to get his phone number changed.

cartman 02-14-2009 03:38 PM

Texas finally won a close game again. They had a chance to put away Colorado with a couple of minutes left, but they allowed the Buffs to come back and take the game into OT, after Damion James missed two free throws with less than 2 seconds left. But the Longhorns dominated in OT and came away with the road win, 85-76.

Arles 02-14-2009 06:16 PM

Arizona has won 7 in a row (including wins over UCLA and Washington) to go from "dead" to bubble team. Still a bit of a stretch, but who knows...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.