Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   FOFC Archive (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   Its' Here! NHL 2007-2008 Regular Season Thread (http://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=61204)

Suburban Rhythm 01-12-2008 09:34 PM

The Ty Conklin Undefeated World Tour comes to an end. Pens fall to ATL, 3-2 in a SO. Still 9-1-0 with a GAA at like 2.00 ain't bad.

And the bitter irony...Crosby, Letang, Malkin, Kovalchuk and Hossa can't score...by Mark Recchi kills his old team.

Dr. Sak 01-12-2008 10:38 PM

That was funny...I told my friend before the game that Recchi was going to score the game winner. He laughed at me.

Maple Leafs 01-13-2008 10:15 AM

The other interesting thing about the Bowman interview was that he wouldn't rule out taking the job if he was asked this week.

I say there's a 50/50 chance Bowman is running the Leafs by next weekend.

Honolulu_Blue 01-13-2008 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maple Leafs (Post 1634499)
The other interesting thing about the Bowman interview was that he wouldn't rule out taking the job if he was asked this week.

I say there's a 50/50 chance Bowman is running the Leafs by next weekend.


He certainly didn't. He did seem to hint at the fact that it may take a little more to pry him away from Detroit at this stage of the season than it would have before the season began.

I love the fact that there was some speculation that one of the reasons the board didn't offer Bowman that job was because they felt like they "knew" hockey, unlike the situation with the Raptors where, presumably, they didn't feel like they "knew" basketball well enough.

Maple Leafs 01-13-2008 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue (Post 1634505)
I love the fact that there was some speculation that one of the reasons the board didn't offer Bowman that job was because they felt like they "knew" hockey, unlike the situation with the Raptors where, presumably, they didn't feel like they "knew" basketball well enough.

It's a combination of two things:

a.) Like you said, they really think they're qualified to make decisions about NHL player personnel moves. That seems ridiculous on the outside, but Peddie at least really seems to believe it. This isn't all that shocking, actually -- if you spend any time around people who are very successful in the business/executive worlds, they tend to assume they know more than anyone else about just about everything. That's probably a benefit most of the time, but not here.

b.) They like being around the hockey organization. It's just fun. Makes them feel like big shots. They probably didn't get to hang out with the cool kids in high school, now they do. Tie Domi was the master at exploiting this sort of thought, which is why he had Tannenbaum in his back pocket for years.

It would be immature and disrespectful of me to call a group of well-respected businessmen "jock sniffers", but that doesn't mean I won't do it.

Dr. Sak 01-13-2008 10:57 AM

Wonder if the league will look into suspending Mats...


Maple Leafs 01-13-2008 11:17 AM

Apparently the shoving incident wasn't listed in the official's report, and Shick said it was no big deal and they weren't going to pursue it.

Draft Dodger 01-13-2008 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyshaka (Post 1633247)
Actually, what I believe you are thinking of, DD, is the situation the Oilers found themselves in to begin the 2nd period. Souray still had time left on his major penalty but there was nobody in the box to serve it. When time ran out on the penalty the only way the Oilers were allowed to get back to full strength was to wait for a whistle. So, still with only 4 guys on the ice but no longer being penalized, Reasoner iced the puck and icing was indeed called. Ferraro initially thought it was a botched call by the linesman but he'd be wrong. For instance, a team pulls their goalie and is playing with an extra man. If the other team, who is essentially shorthanded, ices the puck...it is still icing.

The Oilers have been playing well as of late but to be honest it just seems like the bounces have been going our way for a change.


that must be it. thanks for satisfying my curiosity.

the Avs finally won a freaking game, coming back to beat the Canes 5-4 last night. it's the most goals they've scored in a game since putting up 9 on the Blues on the 9 of December. since that game, their offense has been in hibernation.

Fidatelo 01-13-2008 12:58 PM

I'm guessing if Sundin was a rookie or his jersey was orange he'd be getting a suspension. He's getting away with that one because of who he is.

Maple Leafs 01-13-2008 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fidatelo (Post 1634615)
I'm guessing if Sundin was a rookie or his jersey was orange he'd be getting a suspension. He's getting away with that one because of who he is.

Maybe, but don't forget he was suspended for tossing a broken stick into the crowd, which seemed pretty innocent at the time. He didn't get any special treatment there.

A ten-game suspension (I think that's the standard "abuse of official" penaltyu) would actually be good news for the Leafs. It would help make sure we don't get a cheap win streak to fool us into thinking we're back in the race, and it would keep Mats healthy heading into the trade deadline.

bhlloy 01-13-2008 09:38 PM

Unreal end to the end of the Sharks-Ducks game tonight. Ducks pull Giguere with 1:30 left, Sharks nearly score into the empty net twice and then Weight just shoots it with 27 seconds left across the crease and it goes in off Semenov for the tying goal. Then with 2 seconds left Michalek walks right in and Giguere makes a huge save. 30 seconds into overtime Ducks win on a point blank shot from Beauchemin (who never seems to pinch in on the attack).

Definitely could be the turning point of the season for a very inconsistent Ducks team.

Chief Rum 01-13-2008 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhlloy (Post 1635332)
Unreal end to the end of the Sharks-Ducks game tonight. Ducks pull Giguere with 1:30 left, Sharks nearly score into the empty net twice and then Weight just shoots it with 27 seconds left across the crease and it goes in off Semenov for the tying goal. Then with 2 seconds left Michalek walks right in and Giguere makes a huge save. 30 seconds into overtime Ducks win on a point blank shot from Beauchemin (who never seems to pinch in on the attack).

Definitely could be the turning point of the season for a very inconsistent Ducks team.


Well, most of tonight's game was crap, but actually the Ducks season has been turned for a month now (since Niedermayer came back). They have been much closer to their Cup-winning selves in that time.

We pulled tonight outta our ass, though.

johnnyshaka 01-13-2008 10:49 PM

Great game by the Oilers tonight to get to .500...not to mention that we beat the Flamers!!! We're on a 4 game winning streak and the last three wins have come in regulation...something very rare for the Oilers this year!!!

Draft Dodger 01-14-2008 07:52 AM

Last year, the Avalanche had one guy doing all the fighting - Ian Laperriere (if I remember right, Jeff Finger had 2 fights and Mark Rycroft had 1...Scott Parker, Brad May and George Parros all had none in their short stints with the team last year).

In just the last 3 games, 6 different Avs have been involved in 6 different fights. They and the Panthers had 3 fights in the first period of last evening's game alone (something that's highly irregular for both teams). Even Brett Clark and Ollie Jokinen got caught up in the pugilistic euphoria.

Maple Leafs 01-14-2008 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger (Post 1635468)
In just the last 3 games, 6 different Avs have been involved in 6 different fights. They and the Panthers had 3 fights in the first period of last evening's game alone (something that's highly irregular for both teams). Even Brett Clark and Ollie Jokinen got caught up in the pugilistic euphoria.

I always enjoyed hockey more when each team had a few guys had who would go if they needed to. You'd see two heavyweights square off and wonder who might be up next. These days, the two heavyweights have their meaningless fight early on, then you never hear from them again and there's no bad blood the rest of the game.

Then again, as predicted the crackdown on fighting has done wonders for the game's profile in the US, so I guess it was worth it

Honolulu_Blue 01-14-2008 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maple Leafs (Post 1635491)
Then again, as predicted the crackdown on fighting has done wonders for the game's profile in the US, so I guess it was worth it


Totally. You can throw a stone around here without hitting some soccer mom who just loves hockey so much now that there aren't as many fights. She has her entire family involved in the game, kids playing youth hockey, family going to the games, watching it on TV. Hockey's never been hotter!

Fire on Ice!*


* That is the Wings' actual "official" slogan this year. Fire on Ice. It's incredibly original.

Dr. Sak 01-14-2008 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maple Leafs (Post 1635491)
These days, the two heavyweights have their meaningless fight early on, then you never hear from them again and there's no bad blood the rest of the game.


I hate that. I was at a Pens/Caps game and within the first 2 mins Larque and Brasher fought. What for? Who knows...there was no need for it. If the game got chippy or people took liberties, I am all for fighting. But I hate meaningless fights like that.

Draft Dodger 01-14-2008 09:23 AM

I also am not a big fan of the pre-planned fights.

speaking of them, they interviewed Steve Montador during the first intermission last night. He had fought with Lappy in the first period (and yes, it was one of those "hey, wanna go" fights off the faceoff.) Anyway, Montador was already sporting a pretty decent black eye, and the interviewer asked if he tried to protect that eye during the fight, and his response essentially boiled down to "oh, that? it's just a little scratch".

coming a few hours after seeing LT laugh it up on the sidelines on Sunday because of his bruised knee, it really showed how tough these fucking hockey players are.

Maple Leafs 01-14-2008 10:01 AM

Maybe I'm just getting old and looking at things through my nostalgia goggles, but it used to be that if Baumgartner and Churla went at it off the opening faceoff, you thought "Oh boy, here we go, setting the tone. This is going to be a good one tonight!" Now if Belak and Brashear go, you think "OK, I guess that's out of the way, it will be a no-hitter from here on out."

Fidatelo 01-14-2008 10:03 AM

While I do think that hockey players are freakin' tough, in fairness to LT a knee injury isn't something to treat lightly for a running back.

Also, if he felt it would prevent him from doing his awesome LT moves, and therefore deminish his effectiveness, then he is doing the right thing for his team. Look at how Terry Glenn almost cost his team an interception because he was trying to play when he probably shouldn't be and ended up falling down on a comeback route.

johnnyshaka 01-14-2008 10:08 AM

After Belak and Brashear go there isn't anybody left on the ice who would dare drop them...definitely not the case back in the day.

Times have changed and so has hockey. I get it. But, what I don't get is how UFC can be one of the fastest growing spectator sports going and yet we have to clean up fighting in hockey??

johnnyshaka 01-14-2008 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fidatelo (Post 1635558)
While I do think that hockey players are freakin' tough, in fairness to LT a knee injury isn't something to treat lightly for a running back.

Also, if he felt it would prevent him from doing his awesome LT moves, and therefore deminish his effectiveness, then he is doing the right thing for his team. Look at how Terry Glenn almost cost his team an interception because he was trying to play when he probably shouldn't be and ended up falling down on a comeback route.


If you can't play because of injury then you shouldn't be laughing and having a good time on the bench...especially when you are in tough against the defending Super Bowl Champs in their house. Hit the showers and let the guys playing the game stay focused. Same goes for Rivers and his retarded antics yelling at fans all game long...that's bush league garbage...even more so when you are riding the pine.

Fidatelo 01-14-2008 10:16 AM

Agree on Rivers thing with the fans, but just because you are injured you should sulk in the locker room? I disagree with that. Be out there, support you teammates, and hell, if someone cracks a joke, it shouldn't be wrong to smile just because you can't play.

johnnyshaka 01-14-2008 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fidatelo (Post 1635572)
Agree on Rivers thing with the fans, but just because you are injured you should sulk in the locker room? I disagree with that. Be out there, support you teammates, and hell, if someone cracks a joke, it shouldn't be wrong to smile just because you can't play.


I guess you and I will have to agree to disagree, then.

"If you are too hurt to play, then you are too hurt to stay."

bhlloy 01-14-2008 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maple Leafs (Post 1635553)
Maybe I'm just getting old and looking at things through my nostalgia goggles, but it used to be that if Baumgartner and Churla went at it off the opening faceoff, you thought "Oh boy, here we go, setting the tone. This is going to be a good one tonight!" Now if Belak and Brashear go, you think "OK, I guess that's out of the way, it will be a no-hitter from here on out."



Great post. Also a lot of the fights in the first few minutes of the game aren't necessarily staged - a lot of them are payback for things that happened a few games (or even a few months or seasons) ago.

I love the new wave of kids like Boll, Lucic, Voros, Clarkson coming in who can play and throw it down with the heavyweights if they need to. We seem to be going in the right direction if only we can get rid of that ridiculous instigator penalty.

Way to make me really nostalgic - I loved Shane Churla back in the day

Maple Leafs 01-14-2008 07:31 PM

Apparently, after all these years, the Leafs are finally ready to start listening to me. TSN is reporting that the team has done what I've suggested for months: asked Cliff Fletcher to come back to Toronto as interim GM until the end of the season (at which point they'd do a full search).

It would be just about a perfect fit. Fletcher is popular in Toronto, he knows how to handle the pressure of the job, he's available, and he wouldn't expect a long-term commitment. And despite the fact that Damien Cox will use the term "draft schmaft" in every single article he writes about him if this happens, Fletcher has actually done pretty well at rebuilding type deals. His fault was always that he waited too long to make the deals, but Clark-for-Sundin worked out pretty well and he got three very good NHLers (Jason Smith, Steve Sullivan and Alyn McCauley) for a veteran Doug Gilmour.

So, great idea. Can't wait to see how the MLSE board screws this up.

miami_fan 01-14-2008 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyshaka (Post 1635585)
I guess you and I will have to agree to disagree, then.

"If you are too hurt to play, then you are too hurt to stay."


LT going back to the locker room and staying there instead of being on the sidelines supporting his teammates in any way possible? Yeah that would have went over really well amongst his teammates and in the media.:rolleyes:

EDIT: Sorry, didn't mean to interupt the hockey talk.

bbor 01-14-2008 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maple Leafs (Post 1636001)
Apparently, after all these years, the Leafs are finally ready to start listening to me. TSN is reporting that the team has done what I've suggested for months: asked Cliff Fletcher to come back to Toronto as interim GM until the end of the season (at which point they'd do a full search).

It would be just about a perfect fit. Fletcher is popular in Toronto, he knows how to handle the pressure of the job, he's available, and he wouldn't expect a long-term commitment. And despite the fact that Damien Cox will use the term "draft schmaft" in every single article he writes about him if this happens, Fletcher has actually done pretty well at rebuilding type deals. His fault was always that he waited too long to make the deals, but Clark-for-Sundin worked out pretty well and he got three very good NHLers (Jason Smith, Steve Sullivan and Alyn McCauley) for a veteran Doug Gilmour.

So, great idea. Can't wait to see how the MLSE board screws this up.



Has JFJ been sacked?

Maple Leafs 01-14-2008 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bbor (Post 1636080)
Has JFJ been sacked?

No, of course not. They're letting him twist in the breeze, while they work on replacing him and immediately leak every closed door discussion to the media.

Suburban Rhythm 01-15-2008 06:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maple Leafs (Post 1635553)
Maybe I'm just getting old and looking at things through my nostalgia goggles, but it used to be that if Baumgartner and Churla went at it off the opening faceoff, you thought "Oh boy, here we go, setting the tone. This is going to be a good one tonight!" Now if Belak and Brashear go, you think "OK, I guess that's out of the way, it will be a no-hitter from here on out."


Laraque and Orr went 7 seconds into last nights Pen-Rangers game. And that was about it for the game. Until the last 30 seconds, when Ruutu took a shot at Brandon Dubinksy, and Adam Hall and Marc Staal tangled along the boards.

Pens jumped out to a 3-0 in the 1st period. At one point they had 6 shots, 3 goals. End up winning 4-1.

Malkin's 2nd career HT...on Penguins toque night no less, so the ice was littered. Ty the Cok-eror now 10-0-1, GAA below 2, and a pair of SO's. Crosby ties Vinny for the scoring lead (63 pts) with a pair of assists, and the Pens tie NJ at the top of the Atlantic.

Edit to add - and Malkin STILL not good enough to get an All-Star invite. The league would rather have Marc Savard there.

Honolulu_Blue 01-15-2008 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maple Leafs (Post 1636001)
His fault was always that he waited too long to make the deals, but Clark-for-Sundin worked out pretty well and he got three very good NHLers (Jason Smith, Steve Sullivan and Alyn McCauley) for a veteran Doug Gilmour.


Was Fletcher still around when the Leafs decided to waive Steve Sullivan and ship Jason Smith to Edmonton for 2nd (Kris Vernarsky) and 4th round (Jonathan Zion) picks?

Fidatelo 01-15-2008 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suburban Rhythm (Post 1636227)
Edit to add - and Malkin STILL not good enough to get an All-Star invite. The league would rather have Marc Savard there.


I don't think that is so terrible, Savard is a terrific player, and doesn't have the luxury of playing with someone like Crosby to help his stats.

Maple Leafs 01-15-2008 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue (Post 1636247)
Was Fletcher still around when the Leafs decided to waive Steve Sullivan and ship Jason Smith to Edmonton for 2nd (Kris Vernarsky) and 4th round (Jonathan Zion) picks?

No, he was fired in 1997. Those were Dryden/Quinn moves.

johnnyshaka 01-15-2008 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fidatelo (Post 1636266)
I don't think that is so terrible, Savard is a terrific player, and doesn't have the luxury of playing with someone like Crosby to help his stats.



Agreed...I think Savard is a fine choice considering this is his first All Star appearance and he's been in the top 10 in league scoring the last two seasons...it's about time he got some recognition for his accomplishments. Besides, Malkin will have his opportunities for years to come.

Dr. Sak 01-15-2008 11:55 AM

If it wasn't bad enough for the Rangers, I just found out that Michael Nylander is out for the year.

Honolulu_Blue 01-15-2008 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bsak16 (Post 1636425)
If it wasn't bad enough for the Rangers, I just found out that Michael Nylander is out for the year.


Isn't Nylander on the Capitals?

Dr. Sak 01-15-2008 12:02 PM

Yeah I'm a moron....

Draft Dodger 01-15-2008 01:10 PM

somewhere, Kevin Lowe is smiling

johnnyshaka 01-15-2008 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger (Post 1636488)
somewhere, Kevin Lowe is smiling


You bet...Smyth and Nylander both out...and the Oilers playing .500 hockey...it could be much, much, worse.

Travis 01-15-2008 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyshaka (Post 1636497)
You bet...Smyth and Nylander both out...and the Oilers playing .500 hockey...it could be much, much, worse.


Now if they could just catch/pass the Ducks in the standings, Lowe's head might explode.

johnnyshaka 01-17-2008 12:07 PM

Just when the knife in the back started to feel less uncomfortable, Pronger, via Jim Rome, wiggled it around a little bit:

http://communities.canada.com/edmont...id-s-crib.aspx


I would think something like this would've made headlines around the city just like everything else hockey related but this is the first I've heard of this anywhere. In one sentence he says that he wished Oiler fans would move on and accept things as they are but in the next he rekindles the fire with these allegations.

Classy, Pronger, very classy.

Honolulu_Blue 01-17-2008 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyshaka (Post 1638076)
Just when the knife in the back started to feel less uncomfortable, Pronger, via Jim Rome, wiggled it around a little bit:

http://communities.canada.com/edmont...id-s-crib.aspx


I would think something like this would've made headlines around the city just like everything else hockey related but this is the first I've heard of this anywhere. In one sentence he says that he wished Oiler fans would move on and accept things as they are but in the next he rekindles the fire with these allegations.

Classy, Pronger, very classy.


I hate Chris Pronger.

Always have, always will.

Draft Dodger 01-17-2008 12:39 PM

pretty solid evidence there that Jim Rome is, in fact, an idiot.

johnnyshaka 01-17-2008 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue (Post 1638095)
I hate Chris Pronger.

Always have, always will.


Agreed...doesn't mean I wouldn't want him back on my team, though.

I'm over the whole ordeal and have been since the day it happened but when crap like this surfaces, whether it's true or not (and if it is true then that is a pretty tasteless "joke" or stunt), it just breeds negative press all over the place. Now every radio/TV station in Edmonton is obcessed with the accusations and I'm sure both the Sun and Journal will be littered with editorials about it over the following weeks. Not to mention how Pronger is going to be hounded about the comments over the next little while and the next time he comes to Edmonton. Serenity NOW!!!!

Seriously, I'd rather hear some more about when the Leafs are going to fire Fergie and how they are going to do it...and when...and all the reasons why...and who is going to get his parking space...and where he takes his suits to get dry-cleaned...and what kind of toothpaste he may or may not be using...please, TSN/Sportsnet, I need to know more!!!!!

RomaGoth 01-17-2008 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue (Post 1638095)
I hate Chris Pronger.

Always have, always will.


Same here. Maybe it is because of my Red Wings fondness, or maybe it is just because Pronger is a piece of garbage. He was always taking cheap shots at the Red Wing players when he played for St. Louis, and it was mostly because he could not keep up with the puck control game they played. What is Anaheim, his 4th team? HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa. Jerk.

RomaGoth 01-17-2008 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger (Post 1638108)
pretty solid evidence there that Jim Rome is, in fact, an idiot.


Why is Rome an idiot? Aside from his incident with "Chris" (Jim) Everett back in the 90's, he is a pretty smart guy. He has built a radio/tv empire on the premise of smack talk. Like him or not, that is good business sense. ;)

johnnyshaka 01-17-2008 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RomaGoth (Post 1638112)
Same here. Maybe it is because of my Red Wings fondness, or maybe it is just because Pronger is a piece of garbage. He was always taking cheap shots at the Red Wing players when he played for St. Louis, and it was mostly because he could not keep up with the puck control game they played. What is Anaheim, his 4th team? HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa. Jerk.


I have the same sentiments for one of your current blueliners...a certain senior citizen who I absolutely can't stand but would love have on my team.

RomaGoth 01-17-2008 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyshaka (Post 1638117)
I have the same sentiments for one of your current blueliners...a certain senior citizen who I absolutely can't stand but would love have on my team.


LOL. He is beyond the senior citizen status, he is playing hockey straight from the grave. For the record, I never really cared for Chelios until he came to the Wings in that trade. With that being said, I still don't really like the guy, it is more a matter of tolerance. :D

Draft Dodger 01-17-2008 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyshaka (Post 1638117)
I have the same sentiments for one of your current blueliners...a certain senior citizen who I absolutely can't stand but would love have on my team.


there's a lot of players that I hate that I'd love to have on my team. Pronger is one of them. Chelios is certainly not.

Chief Rum 01-17-2008 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RomaGoth (Post 1638119)
LOL. He is beyond the senior citizen status, he is playing hockey straight from the grave. For the record, I never really cared for Chelios until he came to the Wings in that trade. With that being said, I still don't really like the guy, it is more a matter of tolerance. :D


That bolded quote exemplifies my feeling on Pronger coming to the Ducks.

All that said, I entirely believe the crib story. Sorry, Pronger's a big time ass on the ice, but by and large he's quiet and introvertive off of it. He isn't a Moss or a TO where's going to make stuff up like this. I believe him, and I have seen indications from Oilers fans that they are capable of doing this, as they are a rabid fanbase (this is not necessarily a comment on the Oil fans here on this board, but everyone knows hockey is a passion for Canadians).

And this is completely outside of the fact that Kevin Lowe is in this franchise, and he is ironically the Lowest piece of shit in hockey.

RomaGoth 01-17-2008 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1638167)
That bolded quote exemplifies my feeling on Pronger coming to the Ducks.

All that said, I entirely believe the crib story. Sorry, Pronger's a big time ass on the ice, but by and large he's quiet and introvertive off of it. He isn't a Moss or a TO where's going to make stuff up like this. I believe him, and I have seen indications from Oilers fans that they are capable of doing this, as they are a rabid fanbase (this is not necessarily a comment on the Oil fans here on this board, but everyone knows hockey is a passion for Canadians).

And this is completely outside of the fact that Kevin Lowe is in this franchise, and he is ironically the Lowest piece of shit in hockey.


I keep praying that Chelly will retire already. For crying out loud, the guy is like 140 years old, stop playing already!!! Go run your restaurant into the ground or something and leave the Wings to the younger players. Crikee.

Honolulu_Blue 01-17-2008 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger (Post 1638157)
there's a lot of players that I hate that I'd love to have on my team. Pronger is one of them. Chelios is certainly not.


Poor Chris Chelios. :(

Honolulu_Blue 01-17-2008 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RomaGoth (Post 1638189)
I keep praying that Chelly will retire already. For crying out loud, the guy is like 140 years old, stop playing already!!! Go run your restaurant into the ground or something and leave the Wings to the younger players. Crikee.


Cheli's restaurants are doing quite well and are quite popular.

I like Chelios. He's pretty personable and has a pretty good sense of humor. He's solid enough in his own zone and has really cut back on bonehead plays. We used to "sponsor" our own "Chris Chelios Bad Pass Of The Game", but Andreas Lilja has taken over that title. Lilja is good for at least one complete inexplicable play per game that results in a fantastic scoring opportunity for the other team. It's like his brain simply ceases to function for like 2 seconds and he just throws the puck into the middle of the ice. It's terrifying.

Back to Chelios, he still plays with a bit of an edge, he's still a great competitor, and if the choice was between Chelios, Meech, Quincey, or Lilja in the line-up (which it currently would be), I'm going with Chelios every time. He also doesn't count much against the cap. There's very little downside to having him on the roster.

RomaGoth 01-17-2008 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue (Post 1638194)
Cheli's restaurants are doing quite well and are quite popular.

I like Chelios. He's pretty personable and has a pretty good sense of humor. He's solid enough in his own zone and has really cut back on bonehead plays. We used to "sponsor" our own "Chris Chelios Bad Pass Of The Game", but Andreas Lilja has taken over that title. Lilja is good for at least one complete inexplicable play per game that results in a fantastic scoring opportunity for the other team. It's like his brain simply ceases to function for like 2 seconds and he just throws the puck into the middle of the ice. It's terrifying.

Back to Chelios, he still plays with a bit of an edge, he's still a great competitor, and if the choice was between Chelios, Meech, Quincey, or Lilja in the line-up (which it currently would be), I'm going with Chelios every time. He also doesn't count much against the cap. There's very little downside to having him on the roster.


Well said.

Fidatelo 01-17-2008 01:56 PM

Chelios can't retire until one of his coaches allows him to play an entire 60 minute game without a break.

As for Pronger, I like him, but a lot of that is simply because he's from Dryden. I'd love to have him on my team though... if I had a team.

johnnyshaka 01-17-2008 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1638167)
All that said, I entirely believe the crib story. Sorry, Pronger's a big time ass on the ice, but by and large he's quiet and introvertive off of it. He isn't a Moss or a TO where's going to make stuff up like this. I believe him, and I have seen indications from Oilers fans that they are capable of doing this, as they are a rabid fanbase (this is not necessarily a comment on the Oil fans here on this board, but everyone knows hockey is a passion for Canadians).


To a point, I agree with you...we do have a very emotional fanbase here in Edmonton...for both the Oilers and the Eskimos. Good or bad, that's the way it is and it won't change anytime soon. So, when I first heard about this story yesterday I immediately tried to recall any "promos" done by one particular radio station, The Bear, who do have a rep for going above and beyond "tasteless" when it comes to publicity stunts. I couldn't remember a single incident in the city regarding Pronger's furniture nor could anybody else that I've spoken to since yesterday afternoon. So, either Pronger "heard stories" from a terribly inaccurate source or he flat out made it up because if a city as passionate about their teams can't recall something this crazy happening...then it never happened.

Chief Rum 01-17-2008 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyshaka (Post 1638212)
To a point, I agree with you...we do have a very emotional fanbase here in Edmonton...for both the Oilers and the Eskimos. Good or bad, that's the way it is and it won't change anytime soon. So, when I first heard about this story yesterday I immediately tried to recall any "promos" done by one particular radio station, The Bear, who do have a rep for going above and beyond "tasteless" when it comes to publicity stunts. I couldn't remember a single incident in the city regarding Pronger's furniture nor could anybody else that I've spoken to since yesterday afternoon. So, either Pronger "heard stories" from a terribly inaccurate source or he flat out made it up because if a city as passionate about their teams can't recall something this crazy happening...then it never happened.


I can udnerstand if the stories he heard were overblown, but how can a burnt crib be a "story"? He will have seen that, don't you think?

johnnyshaka 01-17-2008 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1638228)
I can udnerstand if the stories he heard were overblown, but how can a burnt crib be a "story"? He will have seen that, don't you think?


According to his quote from the interview...he said he heard stories about it. After announcing he wanted out of town...via his agent...he reportedly was already sunning on the beach in Mexico or something and never set foot back in Edmonton until the following year...wearing a Ducks' jersey. So, if this indeed happened, he wasn't here to witness it unless he dropped by his old pad on game day last year.

Chief Rum 01-17-2008 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyshaka (Post 1638238)
According to his quote from the interview...he said he heard stories about it. After announcing he wanted out of town...via his agent...he reportedly was already sunning on the beach in Mexico or something and never set foot back in Edmonton until the following year...wearing a Ducks' jersey. So, if this indeed happened, he wasn't here to witness it unless he dropped by his old pad on game day last year.


Wouldn't someone in the Pronger family, though, have been there? I mean, if there was a crib there, his family was there, right? Even if Pronger doesn't see it himself, someone in the "Pronger camp" will have seen this, I would think.

Dr. Sak 01-17-2008 02:32 PM

So Canadians burn cribs and people in West Virginia burn couches...

johnnyshaka 01-17-2008 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1638239)
Wouldn't someone in the Pronger family, though, have been there? I mean, if there was a crib there, his family was there, right? Even if Pronger doesn't see it himself, someone in the "Pronger camp" will have seen this, I would think.


Well, let's say that's the case, somebody from the Pronger family was still living in the house when all of this supposedly went down...wouldn't you think something like this would make the local news...national news...and even international news? Of course it would...and yet nobody has ever heard of such a thing happening until now...after Pronger says he "heard stories" about it.

Now, it's common practice for players to rent a house/apartment and all the fixings for the first little while and that's exactly what the Prongers were doing, AFAIK. So, my guess, is that once the trade was done the Prongers had no intentions of coming back here and just had their belongings packed up, if they already weren't, and sent on to where ever their permanent home is...probably St. Louis. So, there would be no reason for anybody in the Pronger Camp to be in Edmonton following his trade to Anaheim.

Chief Rum 01-17-2008 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyshaka (Post 1638252)
Well, let's say that's the case, somebody from the Pronger family was still living in the house when all of this supposedly went down...wouldn't you think something like this would make the local news...national news...and even international news? Of course it would...and yet nobody has ever heard of such a thing happening until now...after Pronger says he "heard stories" about it.

Now, it's common practice for players to rent a house/apartment and all the fixings for the first little while and that's exactly what the Prongers were doing, AFAIK. So, my guess, is that once the trade was done the Prongers had no intentions of coming back here and just had their belongings packed up, if they already weren't, and sent on to where ever their permanent home is...probably St. Louis. So, there would be no reason for anybody in the Pronger Camp to be in Edmonton following his trade to Anaheim.


It doesn't have to be someone living in the house right then and there. Moving was already in the process. Someone could have come on the scene after said damage and seen it, someone in the Pronger camp.

I'm not an NHLer, so I can't say much about the logistics of moves like these, but I would think at one point someone with the Prongers would be on hand to supervise a move and to make sure stuff isn't damaged, stolen, etc. So the damage could have been done when no one was there, but surely someone related to the Prongers would have been along at some point.

Really, it gets back to that I don't see Pronger making this stuff up. Heck, it's sorta out there, enough that I think it has to be abit true, don't you think? I mean, who thinks "let's burn furniture" to get back at someone?

johnnyshaka 01-17-2008 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1638265)
Really, it gets back to that I don't see Pronger making this stuff up. Heck, it's sorta out there, enough that I think it has to be abit true, don't you think? I mean, who thinks "let's burn furniture" to get back at someone?


You are missing the point, regardless of whether he's making it up or not or whether he or somebody he knows witnessed it, it would have made the news one way or another especially in Edmonton and especially because of the circumstances surrounding who it involves and his situation in relation to the city of Edmonton at the time. That's why I find very hard to believe.

With that said....there are "over the top" fanatics in every walk of life and I wouldn't put it past a couple of fans who have a little extra cash to burn...pun intended...to do something this stupid. But, again, something like this would have definitely made the news.

Here's my guess as to what may have happened...maybe just prior to his return to Edmonton Pronger was talking to, I don't know...former teammates...local media guys that he may have had a decent rapport with...and they heard rumours of a local radio station buying some of his furniture (either through auction if the Prongers did indeed own the stuff or from the rental company...who knows) and were planning on burning it the day he made his return to Edmonton for the first time. The radio station who planned to do the burning may have backed off on the stunt without Pronger actually knowing it didn't go down but for all he knows, he thinks it did.

Chief Rum 01-17-2008 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyshaka (Post 1638280)
You are missing the point, regardless of whether he's making it up or not or whether he or somebody he knows witnessed it, it would have made the news one way or another especially in Edmonton and especially because of the circumstances surrounding who it involves and his situation in relation to the city of Edmonton at the time. That's why I find very hard to believe.

With that said....there are "over the top" fanatics in every walk of life and I wouldn't put it past a couple of fans who have a little extra cash to burn...pun intended...to do something this stupid. But, again, something like this would have definitely made the news.

Here's my guess as to what may have happened...maybe just prior to his return to Edmonton Pronger was talking to, I don't know...former teammates...local media guys that he may have had a decent rapport with...and they heard rumours of a local radio station buying some of his furniture (either through auction if the Prongers did indeed own the stuff or from the rental company...who knows) and were planning on burning it the day he made his return to Edmonton for the first time. The radio station who planned to do the burning may have backed off on the stunt without Pronger actually knowing it didn't go down but for all he knows, he thinks it did.


No, I get the point on the news angle. What I think you're missing is that Pronger wouldn't alert the media about this (he was already under seige as it was, and wanted to move on), and the perpetrators didn't want to be arrested. So who else knows?

I can see what you suggest happen as a possibility except Pronger mentions a crib. Rather specific for rumors from local reporters on a story that, as you say, didn't get reported, don't you think? That tells me he didn't get this from innuendo. He got it from someone much closer to the action, someone who actually saw the damage done (and someone he trusts more than local media guys).

Honolulu_Blue 01-17-2008 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1638265)
It doesn't have to be someone living in the house right then and there. Moving was already in the process. Someone could have come on the scene after said damage and seen it, someone in the Pronger camp.

I'm not an NHLer, so I can't say much about the logistics of moves like these, but I would think at one point someone with the Prongers would be on hand to supervise a move and to make sure stuff isn't damaged, stolen, etc. So the damage could have been done when no one was there, but surely someone related to the Prongers would have been along at some point.

Really, it gets back to that I don't see Pronger making this stuff up. Heck, it's sorta out there, enough that I think it has to be abit true, don't you think? I mean, who thinks "let's burn furniture" to get back at someone?


A friend of mine is a cop in Edmonton. I am trying to see what he knows about any of this...

scooter 01-17-2008 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1638283)
I can see what you suggest happen as a possibility except Pronger mentions a crib. Rather specific for rumors from local reporters on a story that, as you say, didn't get reported, don't you think? That tells me he didn't get this from innuendo. He got it from someone much closer to the action, someone who actually saw the damage done (and someone he trusts more than local media guys).


I'm a neutral in all of this, but I do know that Chris Pronger is a bit of an ass. If you were Chris (an ass) and you knew what kind of furniture you had in your rental home in Edmonton, and you were telling the story to Jim Rome, would you pick out something average, like say a sofa, or would you pick out something a little more inflammitory, like a crib? Like I said, I'm a neutral, but I do know what he is capable of.

johnnyshaka 01-17-2008 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1638283)
No, I get the point on the news angle. What I think you're missing is that Pronger wouldn't alert the media about this (he was already under seige as it was, and wanted to move on), and the perpetrators didn't want to be arrested. So who else knows?


I'm confused now. What do you think happened then?

Do you think somebody busted into the Pronger's home and burnt a bunch of furniture in their house? Did they break in, pile a bunch of furniture in the yard and burn it there? Do you think somebody hijacked the moving truck on the way out of town and burned the furniture on the side of the highway? Did they somehow get their hands on the furniture, bring to Rexall Place and burn it in front of a screaming mob of fans? If so, Pronger wouldn't have a choice about keeping something like that quiet.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1638283)
I can see what you suggest happen as a possibility except Pronger mentions a crib. Rather specific for rumors from local reporters on a story that, as you say, didn't get reported, don't you think? That tells me he didn't get this from innuendo. He got it from someone much closer to the action, someone who actually saw the damage done (and someone he trusts more than local media guys).


Fair enough...so, a guy somehow gets a hold of Pronger's crib...burns it where nobody will be suspicious like outside of town on a farm or something...and only invites a close friend of Pronger to watch and swears him to secrecy...he can only tell Pronger about it...that's it. Could happen, I guess.

johnnyshaka 01-17-2008 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue (Post 1638285)
A friend of mine is a cop in Edmonton. I am trying to see what he knows about any of this...


Cool...keep us posted.

Draft Dodger 01-17-2008 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scooter (Post 1638308)
I'm a neutral in all of this, but I do know that Chris Pronger is a bit of an ass. If you were Chris (an ass) and you knew what kind of furniture you had in your rental home in Edmonton, and you were telling the story to Jim Rome, would you pick out something average, like say a sofa, or would you pick out something a little more inflammitory, like a crib? Like I said, I'm a neutral, but I do know what he is capable of.


the way I see this, he heard talk that people had burned his furniture, which hurt his feelings. then he realized that he had a crib in the house, and that mental image must have really hit him hard. Honestly, I can't really blame him for being upset if he thought it was true, even though chances are rather slim that this really happened.

The problem is that he really has no idea if it's true or not and so really has no business mentioning that story to anyone in the media. If anyone should know better than to toss careless rumors around, shouldn't it be Pronger? Good God, didn't that reporter he was boning in Edmonton teach him ANYTHING?

Honolulu_Blue 01-17-2008 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger (Post 1638331)
the way I see this, he heard talk that people had burned his furniture, which hurt his feelings. then he realized that he had a crib in the house, and that mental image must have really hit him hard. Honestly, I can't really blame him for being upset if he thought it was true, even though chances are rather slim that this really happened.


That's how I see this whole thing having been played out. He heard talk about the "Burn Chris Pronger Furniture Day", that hurt his feelings, he started thinking about it and the crib image came up.

I can just see the image of a saddened Chris Pronger walking aimlessly through the charred wreckage of his beloved furniture, eyes glazed over in disbelief muttering, "How? How could this have happened? Who... Who would have done such a... No," he spots the charred remains of something that looks like a crib.

He wanders closer, stepping over the charred remains of one of his baby's beloved teddy bears and half-melted photo from his wedding. "No..." Yes. There it is, the charred remains of his baby's crib. Pronger falls to his knees, grasping for the burnt and shattered remains of the very bed his babe once slept so peacefully on.

"Noooooooooo!!!!" He belows into the brutally cold, uncaringly clear Edmonton night sky...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger (Post 1638331)
The problem is that he really has no idea if it's true or not and so really has no business mentioning that story to anyone in the media. If anyone should know better than to toss careless rumors around, shouldn't it be Pronger? Good God, didn't that reporter he was boning in Edmonton teach him ANYTHING?


Heh!

Draft Dodger 01-17-2008 06:36 PM

for fuck's sake...

Paul Stastny is out for 2 to 3 weeks after having his appendix out.

Dr. Sak 01-17-2008 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger (Post 1638362)
for fuck's sake...

Paul Stastny is out for 2 to 3 weeks after having his appendix out.


Fuck...he's on my fantasy team.

Draft Dodger 01-17-2008 08:17 PM

fuck you, he's on my REAL team!

:)

Travis 01-17-2008 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger (Post 1638417)
fuck you, he's on my REAL team!

:)


I'd feel for you, but well a)I'm an Edmonton fan and b) Pitkanen is hurt again :(

johnnyshaka 01-17-2008 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Travis (Post 1638427)
I'd feel for you, but well a)I'm an Edmonton fan and b) Pitkanen is hurt again :(


Heard them say that Pitkanen was hurt...what happened?

Travis 01-17-2008 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyshaka (Post 1638430)
Heard them say that Pitkanen was hurt...what happened?


He was gone by the time I got home from work, but they said groin, so I'm assuming nothing really major happened in the game, hopefully just a tweak. They also said Greene had been sent down on a conditioning stint so hopefully that means Tarnstrom gets dealt as soon as Greene is ready to get back in the lineup, then can send Grebeshkov to the press box as soon as Pitkanen is good (though hopefully he only misses a game or two).

Dr. Sak 01-17-2008 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Travis (Post 1638427)
I'd feel for you, but well a)I'm an Edmonton fan and b) Pitkanen is hurt again :(


I'd get use to that if I were you...

Travis 01-17-2008 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bsak16 (Post 1638442)
I'd get use to that if I were you...


I know you're referring to Pitkanen in particular, but as an Oilers fan, we're getting pretty used to injuries period at this point.

johnnyshaka 01-17-2008 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Travis (Post 1638439)
He was gone by the time I got home from work, but they said groin, so I'm assuming nothing really major happened in the game, hopefully just a tweak. They also said Greene had been sent down on a conditioning stint so hopefully that means Tarnstrom gets dealt as soon as Greene is ready to get back in the lineup, then can send Grebeshkov to the press box as soon as Pitkanen is good (though hopefully he only misses a game or two).


Saw that note about Greene earlier today...very good news, indeed.

About this game against the Caps...I've only seen the 3rd period...very entertaining game...a lot of end to end action.

OH MY...nice save by Rolly in OT on the breakaway!!

johnnyshaka 01-17-2008 08:44 PM

And Kolzig is up to the task as well...stops Stoll on a breakway!

Great game!!

Travis 01-17-2008 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyshaka (Post 1638449)
Saw that note about Greene earlier today...very good news, indeed.

About this game against the Caps...I've only seen the 3rd period...very entertaining game...a lot of end to end action.

OH MY...nice save by Rolly in OT on the breakaway!!


First save over a difficulty of 6 he's made all night. Gave up one of his trademark goal line shots that caught him cheating off the post during a 4 goal second period by the Caps.

Great save for sure, but the Caps never should have seen OT.

johnnyshaka 01-17-2008 08:48 PM

That has to be the best OT period I've ever seen...wow!!! End to end action for five minutes highlighted by a couple of breakaways...Hemsky undressing two D-men with 10 seconds to go only to get stoned by Kolzig and Ovechkin get a shot from in tight with literally tenths of a second left. WOW.

johnnyshaka 01-17-2008 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Travis (Post 1638453)
First save over a difficulty of 6 he's made all night. Gave up one of his trademark goal line shots that caught him cheating off the post during a 4 goal second period by the Caps.

Great save for sure, but the Caps never should have seen OT.


Well, considering the way they've played in regulation I'm not surprised we let this game get away. But, good on them for battling back to pick up at least a point.

Travis 01-17-2008 08:51 PM

Nice to see Gagner stare at the pad before he slides it right along the ice.

johnnyshaka 01-17-2008 08:53 PM

I can't imagine there is any net to see behind Kolzig...that guy is friggin' HUGE!!

Travis 01-17-2008 08:53 PM

Somebody has to go high glove. First one to do it wins.

johnnyshaka 01-17-2008 08:54 PM

Holy stick side, BATMAN!!! Change it up, boys!!!

Travis 01-17-2008 08:56 PM

LOL

Classic Stoll deke (stick broke).

Travis 01-17-2008 08:58 PM

Can we each have 1.5 points?

johnnyshaka 01-17-2008 08:59 PM

Two posts...JEBUS!!!!!

Travis 01-17-2008 09:00 PM

Sucks not having Pitkanen around at this point, he'd be a nice option as the 12th shooter.

johnnyshaka 01-17-2008 09:01 PM

LOL!!! Friggin' Souray...what a buffoon.

johnnyshaka 01-17-2008 09:02 PM

Regardless...still one of the best 3rd periods, overtimes, and shootouts I've seen.

Travis 01-17-2008 09:02 PM

For such a great game and OT and to go to 12 shooters for both teams, I'm really surprised there weren't more quality chances in the shootout. A lot of fanned shots, missed nets, broken stick, falling over, etc. Even Moreau's off the post only looked half speed. Where's Malik when you need him.

bbor 01-17-2008 10:22 PM

2 in a row...BREAK UP THE LEAFS.

Peddy is phoning Cliff in Mexico and telling him to stay on vacation.

TurnerONU22 01-17-2008 10:37 PM

If you get a chance, check out Rick Nash's goal tonight against PHX. Phoenix scored on a 6 on 4 (on a penalty against Nash, no less) with 1:30 left in the 3rd to tie up the game. With about 30 seconds left in the game, Nash goes 1 on 2, undresses Morris, and beats Tellqvist to give the Jackets a 4-3 game.

This might be (because of the situation) one of the most amazing AND clutch goals all rolled into one that I've ever seen.

Chief Rum 01-18-2008 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyshaka (Post 1638316)
I'm confused now. What do you think happened then?

Do you think somebody busted into the Pronger's home and burnt a bunch of furniture in their house? Did they break in, pile a bunch of furniture in the yard and burn it there? Do you think somebody hijacked the moving truck on the way out of town and burned the furniture on the side of the highway? Did they somehow get their hands on the furniture, bring to Rexall Place and burn it in front of a screaming mob of fans? If so, Pronger wouldn't have a choice about keeping something like that quiet.



Fair enough...so, a guy somehow gets a hold of Pronger's crib...burns it where nobody will be suspicious like outside of town on a farm or something...and only invites a close friend of Pronger to watch and swears him to secrecy...he can only tell Pronger about it...that's it. Could happen, I guess.


Well, curious, then, how do you figure it would have happened? I have been figuring all along someone knew where Pronger lived and broke in to burn stuff. How on Earth would they have gotten to the furniture? Obviously, anyone out there burning cribs and shit isn't right in the head anyway (on top of being a rabid Oilers fan), so trying to assess their actions rationally is kinda silly, don't you think?

Chief Rum 01-18-2008 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Dodger (Post 1638331)
the way I see this, he heard talk that people had burned his furniture, which hurt his feelings. then he realized that he had a crib in the house, and that mental image must have really hit him hard. Honestly, I can't really blame him for being upset if he thought it was true, even though chances are rather slim that this really happened.

The problem is that he really has no idea if it's true or not and so really has no business mentioning that story to anyone in the media. If anyone should know better than to toss careless rumors around, shouldn't it be Pronger? Good God, didn't that reporter he was boning in Edmonton teach him ANYTHING?


So you go from figuring it's likely to have happened the way you say to assuming it is and ripping into him for it? Got it.

Chief Rum 01-18-2008 12:38 AM

Naw, you know what? I ain't fighting this fight. I think you guys are ripping on a victim here (in this specific instance), like blaming the rape victim for wearing a tight dress.

But Pronger is indubitably an ass, and even as a Ducks fan, I know that. So screw it. No one's gonna think differently about him anytime soon (nor do I think he will deserve to be thought of differently).

But I stand by that you guys are too willing to claim he's lying, when there could be some seriously messed up Oiler fans at the heart of this (not representative of Oiler fans as a whole, of course).

johnnyshaka 01-18-2008 03:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1638622)
Naw, you know what? I ain't fighting this fight. I think you guys are ripping on a victim here (in this specific instance), like blaming the rape victim for wearing a tight dress.


Chief Rum, as soon as somebody finds some kind of proof of somebody burning his kid's crib I'll gladly eat crow.

Now, comparing him to a rape victim is certainly an interesting way to look at things...but I think I can see where you're coming from.
The Oilers bought him the most expensive tight dress they could find. They wined and dined him at the fanciest restaurant in town. And, they introduced him to all of their friends. He looks like he's having a great time and even tells several people that in fact our observations are, indeed, correct. But, even before the appetizers come he gets up to go to the washroom to freshen up and doesn't come back. Instead a waiter hands a note scribbled on a napkin to whoever is buying that says:

"Thanks for the dress, cya!!"

A year goes by without seeing the dress they spent so much money on when suddenly the owner of that dress files rape charges stating that after supper that night he was raped by the Oilers and their friends. Huh? Nobody remembers seeing the dress after dinner what the hell is going on?
Is this what you meant? :rolleyes:

I know...a little over the top...but, c'mon, a rape victim??

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum (Post 1638622)
But I stand by that you guys are too willing to claim he's lying, when there could be some seriously messed up Oiler fans at the heart of this (not representative of Oiler fans as a whole, of course).


Well, let's go over his brief history as an Oiler. Gets traded to the Oilers and promptly signs a big, fat, long-term contract. Shows up with a big grin on his face and tells everybody how excited he is to be playing in Canada in front of a packed house every night. Leads the Oilers to the Cup Finals with a big grin from ear to ear. The week after the Cup Finals, while the Prongers were laying on some beach, the Oilers are the last ones to know that they aren't coming back. Sites family as his reason for pulling the Oilers' collective pants down and having his way with them...prison-style.

In the end, Pronger did what he thought was best for his family. I respect that. But, the lack of character he demonstrated during his finally days in Edmonton should speak volumes to you about what kind of person he is. So, is lying or exagerrating really that far fetched? Personally, I don't think so.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.