Oh

I

get

it

now

Any reason you didn't feel like sharing that with us Ardent?

Sorry that's going to be me being rude asking you a question you can't answer because you're not around for ages isn't it?

Hmmm.. I don't know. It doesn't fit perfectly but it's certainly a pretty clear tendency.

Not exactly lying but definitely starting to get in a grey zone there.

I'm weary

If people think I'm a wolf release Ardent and nobody put a bodyguard on me. I'm sure we know what the result will be. I've asked to be scanned a hundred times but, for some reason, no one has. I don't know what more I can do.

If there's still a game tomorrow I think you guys should be looking at anyone who has been conducting and winning lots of law suits recently. Looking at recent events I don't buy it being Autumn but Grammatica has some explaining to do. I think you should be looking to arrest Anxiety and rearrest Ardent/Path.

I doubt he'll do that. He's playing a game, not insulting you personally.

Vote Nightfall

[NAFL draft]

Again< I've scanned AE, not scanned path12. So,

Vote path

The wealthiest men in Rome are:

Ardentus Enthusiastus
Grammus Atticus

These men are extremely wealthy:

Abeus Anxietus
Autumnus Leaveus

These men are of moderate wealth:

Barkeepus Valerius Fortynineus
Ironus Headus
Mustangus Sallus
Narcizus Lispus

These remaining Senators are of ordinary wealth:

Chiefus Rumus
Passus Caglius
Pathus Twelveus
Tyrus Ithus

The following services are available in the Forum today:

Gallus Clarus, ex-legionnaire
Titus Ludius, ex-legionnaire
Durus Pimpus, dealer in sexual slaves
Animus Sentus, person rumored to be affiliated with the Priesthood
Furius Lucius, former warlord of Gaul, enslaved and now freed
Lexus Postus, owner of many horses
Blakus Fortunatus, owner of many horses
and of course,

Narcizus Lispus

Point one is good, there must be some reasoning that the poisoning stopped, and I hadn't noticed that coincidence on day 6. Since then AE and Anxietus have moved right up in the rankings and been grabbing the swordsman, perhaps to make up for the loss of the poisoner.

I agree also that Narcizo not dying has been suspicious. Since he's taken office I have two kills taking place: AE killing Coffeeus, and the sword guy killing Mr. W. So it may just be that the bad guys have lost a lot of their ability to kill, and have started targeting people unlikely to be protected. Also, specifically both previous lawyers were poisoned, so maybe the bad guys have to use poison on the public roles??

Narcizo being bad still seems a possibility, especially with this last execution vote being vetoed.

Are there any other executions where only Ardent gave us the results??

Newb question, what is a duke role? It means we can't kill him?

I sure would like to find a way to actually pin Anxietus too.

THis judicial system is irritating for sure. I don't think I want to leave the sword killing to Ardent's discretion though.

What's your case against Pathus, Chief? Basically what I've heard so far is that he was one of the people who could have hired the sword killer at the beginning of the game, so that's a good point. Does anyone have anything else? I'm leaning towards executing Ardent, unless I see more of a case against Pathus. Especially given how confusing this bidding system has been. I've been looking at those PDFs and it just doesn't make a lot of sense.

VOTE to execute Ardentus Enthusiastus

Something odd is going on with Anxietus so I feel good about going opposite of him. Also, AE says he wants to be executed, so it seems like a really good choice right now.

I can easily say the same thing about you. All your accusations are unjust, unfounded, and just retardedly wrong.

What are you talking about?

Are you insane??

See, that's the thing. I feel that he is. You can't tell me how I feel.

By the way, I think it would have been funny to hire Narcizco to defend me, but I didn't.

Cronin, can you clarify if I can give away my wealth, and if I can just plead guilty?

Crap. Just missed him I guess.

OK here are some of the unjust, unfounded and just retardly wrong accusations.

1, Anxiety cleared Ardent. Anxiety has just escaped execution by a duke role and excaped before with a double lawyer combo - despite have a clear majority against him. Both Anxiety and Ardent have shot up the wealth charts since the start of the game. If they're both wolves they'd be able to share information including how to accumulate wealth, they could thinktank it or, perhaps, it was in their role description.

2, Yesterday Anxiety claimed he bid and failed on a swordsman while Ardent claimed he didn't bid. They were the two wealthiest people in Rome. They can't be both telling the truth, and given point 1) it's likely that neither is.

3, I asked Ardent not to kill Coffee Warlord because I believed executing him would provide us with important information. Ardent went ahead and killed him anyway, blocking the chance to get any information.

4, People have been questioning why I'm still alive. The fact is that there's only been two sword kills recently. Ardent killed CW and someone killed Mr Wednesday (a safe kill if ever I saw one). Why is Ardent still alive? All other lawyers have been dropping off like flies when the kills where flying around but Ardent stays alive?

5, Ardent was only to happy to declare that I ruled when my theories fit his purposes. (to such an extent that he killed CW) As soon as they lead me to him I'm suddenly a wolf.

6, Ardent hasn't offered one constructive piece of information to help the village. All we've had has been post boosting (which I have a theory about - the writ system could be linked to number of posts in some way) and a desire to stay alive when the spotlight is on him. Interesting that the focus of his defence is entirely on me despite doubts coming from several people.

7, Ironhead pointed out that the poison killings lasted until the day Mr Neon died. We only have one person clearing Mr Neon that time. Ardent.

I don't even have to read this post to know just about anything you've said about me is wrong.

Wait.

This

is

me

acting

like

Narcizo.

3. That's true. I got tired of hearing CW cry that I was bad. I'm still convinced HE was.

As for offering information, I have given all I have to give. I haven't made up stuff like you have.

Hey, CR. How are you? Kind of weird to have all three of us online at the same time.

AND Autumn. Dang.

I don't think I tried to. :confused:

I've just assumed it was Ardent's routine to write a billion posts ... but your theory makes sense Narcizo. That would explain why the people who win suits changes as the game goes on.

I'm going to wait a little bit still to see if anyone has a case to make against Path. If not I'll vote to execute Ardentus, and nightfall, in case we can move on.

As for arrests, I've yet to see any reason to move away from Anxietus and Ardentus. We may not be able to pull of executing Anxiety, but at least we can keep him in jail. Tyrus Ithus, who are you thinking of targeting with your arrest today?

And just in case we can't pull off an execution or arrest somehow ...

I SUE ARDENTUS ENTHUSIASTUS
I SUE ABEUS ANXIETUS
I SUE GRAMUS ATTICUS

[quote=Narcizo;1447458]OK here are some of the unjust, unfounded and just retardly wrong accusations.

1, Anxiety cleared Ardent. Anxiety has just escaped execution by a duke role and excaped before with a double lawyer combo - despite have a clear majority against him. Both Anxiety and Ardent have shot up the wealth charts since the start of the game. If they're both wolves they'd be able to share information including how to accumulate wealth, they could thinktank it or, perhaps, it was in their role description.

Lots of accusations, big IF there as well.

2, Yesterday Anxiety claimed he bid and failed on a swordsman while Ardent claimed he didn't bid. They were the two wealthiest people in Rome. They can't be both telling the truth, and given point 1) it's likely that neither is.

I have never lied. I did not place a bid that day. I did not have the time. You can look at my time sheet for MY JOB and then confirm I was at the Fenton City Park with primelord and WSUCougar through the night. The fact you keep pushing for me makes me believe you are trying to hide yourself as a wolf.

3, I asked Ardent not to kill Coffee Warlord because I believed executing him would provide us with important information. Ardent went ahead and killed him anyway, blocking the chance to get any information.

At that time, I was tired of CW's accusations, just as I'm tired of yours. This might be the first true thing you've said so far, but I don't recall you actually telling me not to do it. Granted, I wouldn't have listened anyway.

4, People have been questioning why I'm still alive. The fact is that there's only been two sword kills recently. Ardent killed CW and someone killed Mr Wednesday (a safe kill if ever I saw one). Why is Ardent still alive? All other lawyers have been dropping off like flies when the kills where flying around but Ardent stays alive?

Maybe it's just that I skim over the posts after I get off work, but I can't recall anyone questioning why you're still alive. But in truth, I don't see this as an accusation. Why I'm still alive, I have no idea.

5, Ardent was only to happy to declare that I ruled when my theories fit his purposes. (to such an extent that he killed CW) As soon as they lead me to him I'm suddenly a wolf.

What are you talking about specifically? I can't remember that time. You might be right. You're not suddenly a wolf, but I do now suspect you. The only thing I do know is you're 100% wrong about me.

6, Ardent hasn't offered one constructive piece of information to help the village. All we've had has been post boosting (which I have a theory about - the writ system could be linked to number of posts in some way) and a desire to stay alive when the spotlight is on him. Interesting that the focus of his defence is entirely on me despite doubts coming from several people.

A lie. I have been 100% upfront about every single thing I've done. Every bit of information passed to me has gone out to everyone else.

7, Ironhead pointed out that the poison killings lasted until the day Mr Neon died. We only have one person clearing Mr Neon that time. Ardent.

How is this a point? Neon was good. Do you not realize how foolish that would be of me to lie about? Let's just say Neon was bad, and so was I...only because I'm the "lawyer" I can't poison people for one reason or another. Wouldn't it be plain as day obvious after a few days of people not getting poisoned? Come on. Get off your high horse. And you owe me an apology after the game.

Actually, I was planning on sending my wealth to you, Autumn. Besides Chief Rum, you're the only person I trust.

A lot of what Narcizo has up there, ardent, is conjecture, but that's mostly what we have been having to go on in this game anyway. He also does make some evidentiary points. Once again, much of it is based on information we can't really confirm, but it's the best we got. So I wouldn't say he made it up.

In fact, putting that much work into an analysis post this late is impressive, and IMO, makes it more likely he's not a wolf from a sem- metagaming perpsective. I usually have as much enthusiasm for analysis and long posts as anyone in a WW game (I mean, I bring out spreadsheets and stuff), and yet I am tired of doing analysis at this point in a long game. That he still has the energy to come up with something like that speaks well for his goodness. Keep in mind, I'm not saying that means he's right that you're a wolf--just that it suggests he is what he says he is.

As for "wisely" from my post before, let's just say there's a certain someone still in the game who should have been tossed from the rock twice now. I think it's past time to remove him.

You say your convinced he was but WE can't be 100% sure because you assassainated him, instead of letting him go to trial and being executed when there were two lawyers to corroborate it.

And what have I made up? I've given reasons for everything I've done.

My point is this: You can't tell me if I feel insulted.

And I just refuted your claims.

Well, this is the only one I have a comment on. Apparently it wouldn't be plain as day since i don't remember anybody noticing or thinking about it until today.