I found this. Unsure how a vote would go to rejoin, needing 2/3 to get there.

The US is Out of the Open Skies Treaty. What’s Next? - Air Force Magazine

Well, at least we have a clear explanation!

Military Efficiency!

I do think there are Republicans that would be for returning to the treaty, but even if not:
Pifer also suggested the U.S. could pursue an executive agreement to rejoin the treaty that could earn the votes of simple majorities in the House and Senate, and the approval of the other 33 Open Skies signatories.

I would prefer the media tell me who the President is not going to pardon. I suspect the list will be shorter.

Seriously.

Trump loses again in PA, this time with the US Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit who rules against him 3-0 with a Trump appointee writing the decision:

Court Rejects Trump Attempt To Overturn Pennsylvania Result

If you really want to get conspiracy theory/tin foil hat... What if they are purposely puting through the weakest of lawsuits all the whilr making huge fraud claims in public forums to purposely further destroy the creditability of the courts in their cult members eye? Trump already has destroyed congress as a check in power, next up has to be the judicial system right? He tried to stack the courts, but has still run into those pesky judges that want to do their jobs.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

The crazy thing is, in many of these lawsuits they aren't even alleging fraud! The appeal of the PA lawsuit that just got denied had no fraud allegations. I mean, if you just get that piece of information in front of his people, what is the explanation for that?

Assume Israel did this with tacit approval/support from the US.

I guess this may delay their nuclear ambitions by 1-2 years (if that long) and/or this was to pick a fight to give Trump and Netanyahu an excuse.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/27/middl...ntl/index.html

The assassination of Mohsen Fakhrizadeh (peace be upon him) is an unfortunate setback to Iran's nuclear weapons program, but I have confidence that the incoming administration can get them back on track, and perhaps offer more financial aid to their efforts.

Iranian nuclear program head Mohsen Fakhrizadeh assassinated

Hold him close, that Tiny Desker
Count the tantrums and the deuces
Lay him down to take his nap now
He's had a busy day today
#diaperdon

Operation scorched Earth seems to be going much better than the law suits and is hardly even making waves. Cleverly done.

Biden will be busy doing nothing but putting out fires and rolling back shit. Doing it just on environmental stuff would be a fulltime job in itself ...

I wonder which staffer(s) made the call on the smaller desk.

I read somewhere it was normal to do a smaller desk when there was a bunch of people crowding around a seated Trump but even then I can't believe a small desk like that was used. Regardless, some one messed up.

or knew exactly what they were doing

I seriously bet Trump and friends had something to do with it

Judging by the rest of the comment I'm going to assume VV is ok with that.

I've never quite understood the conservative stance on that particular 'scandal'. Trump withdrew from that treaty, didn't enact any other restrictions AND let Iran keep every single bit of their money, but Obama was the bad guy?

I don't. Not even sure Netanyahu called it, and not 100% sure it's the Israeli's & not some other agenda, but whoever did it definitely knew that this was a perfect time where they could pursue their agenda & will get almost no blowback (or coverage past Monday).

A little convenient that it happened shortly after Pompeo met with Bibi and MBS.

and they know that with trump, they'll get the tacit approval, where they won't with Biden. It's about playing to their strengths here.

that's an interesting take too and I would indeed believfe that as a possibility. EIther is possible. I mean the reps have been trying to force a war with iran for awhile and babydesk ordering some loyalists to make a kill is certainly something he would do. But sure doesn't mean he did.

More details from the DailyMail. If true, quite a hit job.

Assassination of Iran's top nuclear scientist 'involved 62 people including 12 gunmen' | Daily Mail Online

The Daily Mail is not what I consider a reliable source. They may be spot on, but until I see it elsewhere, I’d err on the side of scepticism

So I know I am “preaching to the choir”except for the right wingers oh and “libertarians” here but this assassination is so risky. Now Iran will absolutely retaliate and that could depending on how tied they are of these hit jobs could cause a war with Iran and Israel which would pull us ultimately into it. We eventually get into a shooting war someday with Iran and do not see that ending in a victory for us. Just another unstable Iraq mess at best and Jerusalem being wiped off the earth along with Tehran.SMH.

I don't see how it's inherently more risky than the other available options. There are no non-risky options with Iran.


For entering the deal in the first place. Conservatives generally wanted no-restrictions inspections with a proven bad actor like Iran, or else no deal.

I think that would be a valid complaint if there were any kind of inspections taking place either before that deal was made or after it was broken.

I remember reading about the blockade but didn't realize it was still on. The US has a base and has been selling weapons to Qatar. Seems like we are playing both sides here (surprise).

And now, we know the rest of the story ...

https://www.newsweek.com/rudy-giulia...t-back-1551034

Finally, I can sleep at night.

Not necessarily. I can think of two off the top of my head, Nikki Haley and Dr. Condoleezza Rice. Maybe not enthusiastically, but they would certainly vote for them against the Democrat nominee.

Haley might win the primary, but I can't see Rice winning.

You could be right. Her past comments could come back to haunt her, calling Joe Biden "a true patriot" and praising Obama's selection of Hillary Clinton to be Secretary of State. I, for one, think Dr. Rice would be an outstanding candidate for president, but it will probably never come to fruition.

Could see Kristin Noem getting a lot of support as well

I don't see it. She's a slightly more refined version of Sarah Palin, and although she would appeal to some of the lunatic fringe, I don't think she could win enough republican support to get the nomination.

I doubt they'd get through the nomination, but who knows

SI

Do past comments even matter with Republicans anymore? Trump was a Democrat up till Obama took office. The guy was posting about Kristen Stewart and Vanity Fair a few years before he ran for President. He had joked about his daughter having an abortion, cheated on his wife who was home nursing a newborn, and a slew of other things that would normally be disqualifying.

I think the winner will be whoever Trump endorses. Could be anyone from Haley to Barron, who knows? I think he'll enjoy playing Kingmaker and having the Republican establishment fawn over him for 4 more years.

I think Haley and Graham sold their soul for the endorsement, and the only name he is going to endorse is Trump.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Agreed. Again, this is all a family business to him. Trump Org and now politics. What does he care about Haley, Graham, or anyone else? What can they do to benefit him? Family, though...

Curious time for him to resign. Maybe he thinks this would be best chance to rehabilitate his reputation (e.g. I'm resigning because I never really agreed with Trump's policies etc.) vs waiting till the very end.

No big loss.

He will double down and cash in. There are millions of Trumpsters to fleece.

Krebs seems like the kind of guy who doesn't take shit and it sounds like he is going to go after people making comments like this. I hope they throw this guy in jail and at the very least disbar him.

Trump campaign lawyer says former cybersecurity chief should be 'shot' - POLITICO

I have met Krebs a few times at various Cyber security leadership events and have a few close friends who also are close to him and no he definitely is not going to take that shit lying down from what I know about him.

good to hear, need more like him. Guy is a god damn hero in my opinion.

I didn't know who Christopher Krebs was but the first time I saw his name, I confused him with Brian Krebs who has a cybersecurity blog "Krebs on Security" that I've read quite a few times

Trump Fires Security Chief Christopher Krebs — Krebs on Security


SI

Bill Barr admits to the AP that the Justice Dept has not found any instances of widespread voter fraud that could have changed the outcome of the election. Guess Trump will fire him now...

So do you agree with everything else he's done and then agree that he's a truth-teller bent on fundamental ethics OR do you disagree with everything before and now disagree with his being a truth-teller now?

Can't wait to see the evangelists twist themselves into a pretzel on this one...

Perhaps they don't know, since they're now on Parler.

it's because barr works for the deep state of course

Someone had the perfect tweet about Barr - he was comfortable covering up other people's crimes but not comfortable committing his own.

Barr also appointed John Duram as a special prosecuter for the Russian investigation. People are saying Trump is furious that it means they will not be releasing the Durham report before he leaves office, but it is really a big middle-finger to the Biden administration. Now, either Biden fires him and makes it look like Biden is covering up something, or he has this rouge free agent constantly trying to dig up dirt. Barr is a much better political operative than most people give him credit for.