|
vote bullet
random day one vote OOC:I have an ASU basketball game tonight so I won't be on much more tonight |
Quote:
No, I'm not making things up, but I don't want to have this fight again, honey. You characterized me as being at least somewhat suspicious. I said "huh?" You pointed to an instance of me thinking out loud, trying to generate some conversation. You know, the stuff I do every game, and end up on the hot seat every game. For what it's worth, I don't think you, or any of the other active players like Barkeep, hoops, etc., are particularly suspicious yet. And I'm going to move out of my defensive mode now. I'm also going to keep my thoughts to myself for a while now. |
Interesting bandwagon voting there. I consider all 4 of you suspicious.
|
Quote:
If you believe that EVERY GOOD ROLE gets information on night 0, then you should vote for me. Your assumption will be proven wrong. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I call day 3! :D |
I have information about Izulde telling me he is not who we want to lynch.
The 4 votes on Izulde have been notified. Do what you will. |
Quote:
Oh, if only the four of us could be wolves together. That would be fun. Based on your other post: unvote Izulde vote ntndeacon |
dola correction
unvote Izulde vote ntndeacon |
Quote:
I'm not saying all 4 are wolves, but good chance 1 of you are. |
Quote:
cronin, I didn't find you suspicious for making your thought process public, I found you suspicious because I saw some discrepancies with what I know to be true. I did say that it was just slightly better than a random reason, but I'm not on any big push to get you lynched. I just needed you to clarify your thoughts. That said, I'm not going to switch just for the sake of switching. I don't really have a better reason to go on right now, but I would most likely switch if there was a swing your way that looked like it would get to 1/3. |
UNVOTE IZULDE
VOTE BARKEEP Back to where i was |
Quote:
Fair enough. Like I said, I'm playing hunches and trying to minimalize damage of being wrong on day 1. Unvote Izulde Vote Jonathan E. I'll go option #2 for me then. He and Schmidty both have been as quiet as Izulde, and JE is newer. JE has made 2 posts this game: "In" and "Checking In." He was a bit more involved in the discussion last game and impressed me a good bit as a new player last game. |
I'll hitch my horse to the Alan T train, for good or ill -
unvote ntndeacon vote Jonathan Ezrarik |
Quote:
If you put our exchange in context, you were objecting to someone saying that night 0 gave certain roles a jump on everyone else. My observation is that there's no reason "average joe" (or, in this case, "average John" ;)) shouldn't be one of those "certain roles" that gets a jump. |
my head hurts so many changes. i for one did nothing last night and have no information to add to this witch hunt
|
We need 1/3, so im prob. going to follow Alan onto JE, though JE is here now
|
Quote:
I haven't been around all afternoon, true. I had some work I had to get done before I could get back online. In the last game I had some idea who was good (you) so it was a bit easier to get into the flow of things. This game I have no idea. I know I'm good, but that's it. I'm still trying to figure out who to lynch tonight, but I think we have to lynch someone. My original instinct was to go after Barkeep, but I would like to keep him around. Part of me wants to go after ntndeacon because of last game (:) ) and part of me wants to lynch st.cronin because he keeps jumping all over the place. I'm going to wait and think this over dinner before I vote. |
Following players have not voted yet, afaict:
DaddyTorgo Schmidty saldana Lathum Jonathon BrianD LoneStarGirl RaidersArmy Izulde |
Deadline in 50 minutes. Bunch of people need to get a vote in.
|
Yeah, Fouts, okay, we'll see how it goes. I'll vote for another quiet person that's taking some votes.
UNVOTE IZULDE VOTE NTN |
unvote Fouts
vote BrianD i will vote for someone whom hasnt posted yet. its as good as any |
Quote:
For the record, Brian was here earlier today. |
two things:
i am relatively certain hoopsguy is a townsperson i have nothing definitive as far as information, but i am very suspicious of alan t vote alan t |
I believe the votes are:
Code:
Jonathan 2 st.cronin, AlanT3 way tie right now. How many are needed for lynch? 8? |
Code:
Jonathan 2 st.cronin, AlanT |
Gonna be tough to get 8 tonight with that spread.
|
Well, that was a long read...At this point I don't know who to suspect. I was leaning towards Barkeep initially, but I like to keep games separate in my mind and it's pretty easy since I haven't played a game in a while.
Now, I would normally vote for a quiet person but there are two problems with that: 1. I would be a hypocrite (although I did say I would be out most of the day and I got caught in some bad traffic when I gave one of my contractors a ride home :mad:). 2. It wouldn't make a difference in the lynch vote. Because of reason #2, I'm going to cast a vote for Barkeep. This is primarily because of the suspicion previously and because (more so) I feel bad about going after Blade in a previous game. :) VOTE BARKEEP |
I'll be bold and break the 3 way tie:
Vote Jonathan Ezrarik If anyone can give me a good reason to not vote for him, I'll change my vote. As far as people sighting me as being inactive today, I'll respond by saying - When am I not inactive in the first few days? |
Have to vote for someone.
Vote ntndeacon |
Oops.
Vote Jonathan Ezrarik |
Hey, if you're going to vote for me, at least spell my name right. :)
|
vote barkeep
seems hoops may be onto something. if nothing else it will give us some info down the road |
Yes 8.
|
Umm when you say hoops is on to something what do you mean Lathum? Hoops voted for Swaggs even after I voted for him.
|
Schmidty,
I wish I could give you a good reason not to vote for me. Unfortunately, I don't have anything information to save myself. You'll just have to take my word that I'm good. Or as good as can be in this world. I know my word isn't worth anything, but that's all I've got. |
A lot of action in the past few minutes...after thinking about it for a sec, I'm changing my vote to see what happens now:
UNVOTE BARKEEP VOTE JONATHAN EZARIK |
I certainly do not understand in the least why we would vote off a player of Barkeep's ability day 1 without any real reason besides the typical day 1 hunch. We wouldn't do that to hoops or Blade. Well, OK, maybe Blade.... ;-)
He will not be getting my vote. |
looks like it'll be a wild finish
Code:
Barkeep 3 Blade, Mr. W, Raiders |
So 20 minutes til deadline and it seems we're headed towards a no-lynch. I hate that.
unvote path12 Vote Jonathan E. |
BrianD, DaddyTorgo, Izulde, and LSG haven't voted.
For the record, DaddyTorgo had some work stuff and LSG said she didn't have internet access at home. |
well, we need 1/3 so...
UNVOTE BARKEEP VOTE JONATHAN E. By the way, thanks raiders :) And boooo path ;) Both of your comments garnered comments back lol |
Quote:
We have 6 on JE, need 2 more |
Quote:
And yet people gladly took their votes off Izulde just because Fouts said so. Interesting. It looks like I'm the one to go, and that's cool. I'm all for a lynch tonight, and while I hoped it wouldn't be me, so be it. I hope you guys learn something from this because you're about to lose one good guy. |
At this point, let's get it on. I'm sorry if JE's a good guy but sometimes you have to break some eggs to make an omlette.
|
Quote:
Are you a special role? It sure doesnt sound like it, but now would be a good time to speak up. If your not, dont lie..it will only hurt the team in the long run |
well, we all know what i think of 'no lynch situations'
unvote alan vote Jonathan E note: i still dont like alan, but i like days with no lynches even less |
Izulde was last on at 1:26, so I'm not sure if that means anything.
|
I understand, RA. I just find it odd that people are so quick to believe Fouts for no reason.
On that note: UNVOTE ntndeacon VOTE Izulde |
Ummmm...3:26 PM EST, 1:26 my time.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.