Lathum |
05-19-2009 12:51 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by saldana
(Post 2027091)
again...you posted links to all the posts i made about you, but what is missing is the time stamps from them...with one exception, they are all from the hour long window otherwise known as my lunch break.
why are you continuing to exaggerate the truth?
1 hour hardly equals "all day" or "kept coming at me"...hoops asked me if i had any theories or analysis, and i gave it to him....your over the top defensiveness is actually more suspicious to me than my own theory was
i doubt i will get any backing with this, but i for one have had my fill of lathum jumping all over people with his "how dare you suspect me" attitude, and his unconfirmed triggered mechanic....i feel like i am playing with blade again. :D
vote lathum
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoopsguy
(Post 2027096)
Saldana, the thing I worry about with Lathum is that we are playing with Fouts back in the day with his "my role will come in soon and it will blow your minds" = wolf.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Jackal
(Post 2027108)
I agree with sal that he's been hyper-defensive, likely because of what he can and can't say. Not sure he's the best target at this point, I think the chance of him being a wolf is less than some of the others.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by saldana
(Post 2027118)
wasnt it the survivor game where blade kept making up ridiculous powers the whole game that basically scared everyone away from lynching him?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by saldana
(Post 2027122)
but is it really what he can or cant say, or is it what he wants us to believe he can or cant say?
no one else's private role to this point has has required public action that they werent allowed to talk about.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Jackal
(Post 2027155)
I've thought it more likely he was a villager than wolf most of the game, but the longer he stays alive the higher he shoots up the suspicion charts.
That's very true. It seems possible Danny only included one role like that, but yes, he could be lying.
I just think at this point there's a higher probability we hit a wolf on someone else - if Lathum is alive as we near the end of the game and he hasn't used any sort of ability, I'm sure he'll get lynched.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by saldana
(Post 2025655)
thanks for thinking i am not as stupid as i seem Hoops :D
i actually do have a thought....not saying i firmly believe it, but it is a thought worth throwing out there.
there was a lot of disbelief on day 2 regarding EF because he was criticized on N1...people didnt think that the wolves would waste their criticism on one of there own...EF of course turned up wolf.
now it is N3, and they have another shot to criticize someone. seeing how many people didnt think they would do it the first time, would it not be an interesting ploy to criticize one of their own again as a means of buying trust?
half of us didnt think they would waste it once...how many of us wont think they will waste it twice?
again, not saying i am even sold on my own idea, but it is food for thought.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lathum
(Post 2025713)
so what you are saying is I make a crazy over the top play on day 2 that would likely earn me a seer scan, just to try to get myself into a COT because if I stay alive to long people are just going to assume i am a wolf?
So the best way for me to gain trust is to make a play calling attention to myself, in a game where I can't say why I made that play or what benefit the play gives us, on the second day.
Right, makes perfect sense.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by saldana
(Post 2025721)
also, look at the payoff if it worked...PB would be dead, EF would be semi-trusted because he had been criticized, and Lathum would have been able to plead some cock'n bull story about having to vote that way because of his role, which would have been completely impossible to confirm. (which is actually what he is doing right now)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by saldana
(Post 2025726)
there is a cunning wolf in this game, isnt there?
you know damn well your mere existence invites a seer scan! (look, and exclamation point:p )
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lathum
(Post 2025733)
ummm, are you on crack? Lets say I am a wolf.
PB does get lynched, then everyone looks at me as the catalyst, lynches me the next day, then comes to the conclusion that I was protecting EF and lynch him.
Right, would have worked out awesome!
I can't help but think of the people who are trying to get me lynched today their is at least one wolf who is trying to get me killed out of reputation and for fear of the mechanic that was triggered for my role.
If you are so convinced then vote me, but there is zero chance I am lynched today.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lathum
(Post 2025739)
well then you kind of prove the point that I don't need to pull crazy shenanigens to get scanned.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by saldana
(Post 2025743)
and you had been preparing your defense for PB's death the entire day...you could easily have gotten out of it, and dont pretend you dont think you couldnt...you have gotten out of way worse.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lathum
(Post 2025747)
but again, why?
You and hoops have both said I would be scanned early based on reputation, there were others on the chopping block so why make that play?
If you are so convinced then please, vote me.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by saldana
(Post 2025748)
but getting scanned by the seer doesnt do you any good against the lynch unless the seer comes to your defense!
a public display that gets you on the trust lists is 10 times better than a seer scan because it is just that. Public.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lathum
(Post 2025760)
do you really think I though my play day 2 would get me on any trust list?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by saldana
(Post 2025767)
has anyone voted for you on day 3 or 4 (yet)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lathum
(Post 2025777)
no, but that has zero to do with my play and everything to do with the fact there are people with far worse voting records, people like you I might add, whose voting record is piss poor.
You are forcing this way to much.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by saldana
(Post 2025858)
i hardly think i am forcing anything...go back and look at my first post on this topic...i said i am not even sure i buy my own theory...the fact that you are getting so bent about it when i havent even voted for you (in fact i have said i will probably not be voting for you) is doing nothing but drawing attention to yourself, and making me wonder if i might have stumbled onto something.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lathum
(Post 2025902)
you have harped all day on it. You mentioned you think a smart wolf is pulling some strings, you certainly fall under that catergory as well.
Not really sure how I am getting bent, I am merely responding to your claims, but if you feel the need to vote me please by all means do, your voting record stinks already, why stop now?
|
So these are all mine and Saldana's posts from yesterday. I hardly think I has hyper defensive and I certainly didn't act out of character at all. I responded to his inquires in the best manner I could and interjected my own opinions.
Remove the name Lathum from my posts and tell me if you think I did anything over the top.
|