Arbitrary Aardvark |
07-01-2003 09:14 AM |
Quote:
Originally posted by SkyDog
Goes back to my general feeling about those unwillling to do what is right regardless of the consequences... They sound gutless to me. If they wanted to uphold the law, then uphold and deal with the backlash from the liberals and the likely US SC overturning of the case. If they wanted to strike it down, then strike it down and deal with the backlash from the pissed-off homophobes. It is bad enough when we have wimps in elected positions...
|
A lot of times unconstitutional laws are enforced, and appeals are made against the initial overturn by appelate courts, for political reasons. In a lot of states, you can get re-elected by being firmly anti-abortion, and it is better for one's political career to spend $20 million of the state's money appealing the overturn of a blatently unconstitutional law than it is to appear "soft" by not fighting the overturn. Fourty years ago you could replace "anti-abortion" by "pro-segregation".
|