Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   The 2024 Presidential Nomination Thread (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=98938)

RainMaker 07-31-2023 06:57 PM

They don't really have anything else to run on. "Hey, we are cutting taxes for billionaires again" isn't riling up the base.

It's been a dying party on a national level for decades now. Barring a huge shift, I don't see that changing.

RainMaker 07-31-2023 07:02 PM

DeSantis campaign seemed really into making 4chan memes. Weirdest campaign I can ever remember.

‘This belongs in the Smithsonian’: Inside the meme video operation that swallowed Ron DeSantis’ campaign | Semafor

RainMaker 07-31-2023 07:04 PM

Meanwhile the king still has it.

Attention Required! | Cloudflare

BYU 14 07-31-2023 09:30 PM

And this, I swear this guy has asperger's


albionmoonlight 08-02-2023 08:18 AM

Tim Scott, disappointingly, reacts to the Trump J6 indictment with a whataboutHunterBiden

He's the one GOP candidate that was seeming to offer something other than the same old story. But if he's just gonna be another Trump-but-not-actually-Trump candidate, then what's the point?

Ksyrup 08-02-2023 08:47 AM

He's young enough to still want a career in politics as a conservative, so of course that's the route he takes. The ones who speak out are old, retiring, or looking for different jobs that don't require them to bow down to Trump or his followers. That's really the only test I see for who falls into which category.

RainMaker 08-02-2023 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight (Post 3408323)
Tim Scott, disappointingly, reacts to the Trump J6 indictment with a whataboutHunterBiden

He's the one GOP candidate that was seeming to offer something other than the same old story. But if he's just gonna be another Trump-but-not-actually-Trump candidate, then what's the point?


He is angling to be Trump's VP.

thesloppy 08-02-2023 02:53 PM

I hadn't really considered that with Trump's known aversion to reading/working, let alone these hundreds of charges and his advanced age, that VP role is probably as attractive as it will ever get. It's probably true that these folks have more & better paths to the presidency via kissing ass and hoping to get appointed VP than attempting to beat him in the primary.

JPhillips 08-02-2023 08:22 PM

Ramaswamy is a 9/11 truther.

Great party they got.

Ryche 08-02-2023 09:10 PM

All that sucking up to be vp and he will probably end up choosing RFK Jr

Edward64 08-03-2023 06:08 AM

This should be entertaining.

Gives both a stage that they can/hope to build on; gives Hannity a chance to come back at Fox (?) or at least thumb his nose at them one more time.

Ron DeSantis agrees to debate Gavin Newsom on Fox News - POLITICO
Quote:

Ron DeSantis agrees to debate Gavin Newsom on Fox News

The California governor has been trying to get his Florida Republican counterpart to engage. On Wednesday, he got it.
Quote:

Newsom’s office had sent a formal request offer to Fox News last week with proposed debate dates of Nov. 8 or Nov. 10. That request called for Hannity to serve as the sole moderator for a 90-minute forum on Fox News that would not include an in-studio audience and would air live.

“Desantis should put up or shut up. Anything else is just games,” the aide said.

A debate would — to put it mildly — be an unpredicted event in modern presidential politics even in an age of seemingly endless cable news town halls. For DeSantis, it would provide a new venue and opponent to contrast his record in Florida after spending weeks bogged down in process stories about layoffs; tightened campaign budgets, and nervous GOP donors.

Newsom, should a debate happen, would feel the weight of his political party on his shoulders under a national spotlight brighter than he’s experienced before. Like he did opposite Hannity in a recent sitdown interview, he would be forced to defend attacks about the progressive policies in his own state as well as President Joe Biden’s record.

albionmoonlight 08-03-2023 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3408404)
This should be entertaining.

Gives both a stage that they can/hope to build on; gives Hannity a chance to come back at Fox (?) or at least thumb his nose at them one more time.

Ron DeSantis agrees to debate Gavin Newsom on Fox News - POLITICO


Seems bad for Biden either way.

If Newsom bombs, then Dems look bad generally.

If Newsom does awesome, then the story becomes why can't we have him running instead of Biden.

Edward64 08-03-2023 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3408388)
Ramaswamy is a 9/11 truther.

Great party they got.


Rest of the story.

Ramaswamy: I ‘don’t believe’ the 9/11 Commission report - POLITICO
Quote:

In an interview Tuesday night on the conservative Blaze TV, host Alex Stein asked the Republican presidential candidate if he believes 9/11 was an “inside job” or “exactly like the government tells us.”

“I don’t believe the government has told us the truth,” Ramaswamy said. “I’m driven by evidence and data. What I’ve seen in the last several years is we have to be skeptical of what the government does tell us.

“I haven’t seen evidence to the contrary, but do I believe everything the government told us about it? Absolutely not. Do I believe the 9/11 Commission? Absolutely not.”

The 37-year-old Ohio-based biotech entrepreneur did not suggest the United States was complicit in or responsible for the attacks, the underlying argument at the heart of the “9/11 Truther” movement. And after a clip of the encounter was shared online by Blaze TV, Ramaswamy moved swiftly to insist he was referring to the Saudi Arabia government’s explanation of the attack.

“Al-Qaeda clearly planned and executed the attacks, but we have never fully addressed who knew what in the Saudi government about it,” Ramaswamy wrote. “We *can* handle the TRUTH.”


I don't think its unreasonable to question SA involvement. Very easy to believe we covered up "some/tangential" Princeling/senior officials involvement because we're beholden to their oil. The 911 findings below.

Quote:

The 9/11 Commission's final report, the 9/11 Commission Report, published in July 2004 at the request of Bush administration and the U.S Congress, concluded that there was "no evidence" linking Saudi Arabian government or its senior officials to the September 11 attacks.

Ksyrup 08-03-2023 08:37 AM

This is the game these kinds of people play knowing how many people get information only from their specific silos. To a true conspiracy theorist, he said just enough on freaking Blaze TV to appeal to them. Do many of those same people care about other news sources where he cleans this up for the rest of us? Probably not. So he's effectively given 2 different answers that can co-exist to appease 2 totally different types of people. I have a hard time not believing that isn't done purposefully. It's like an art form these days.

Lathum 08-03-2023 08:49 AM

I don't get why Newsome would do this unless he is testing the waters for a presidential run. Everyone on the right will say he was destroyed by DeSantis. Everyone on the left, if they watch, will say he killed it. Not one person will be swayed either way. DeSantis isn't going to win the nomination. I honestly think even if Trump bows out he may not win. So if Newsomes goal is just to make him malfunction in front of his supporters, cool I guess, but otherwise it seems odd.

GrantDawg 08-03-2023 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 3408413)
I don't get why Newsome would do this unless he is testing the waters for a presidential run. Everyone on the right will say he was destroyed by DeSantis. Everyone on the left, if they watch, will say he killed it. Not one person will be swayed either way. DeSantis isn't going to win the nomination. I honestly think even if Trump bows out he may not win. So if Newsomes goal is just to make him malfunction in front of his supporters, cool I guess, but otherwise it seems odd.

I think he might be trying to be "forced" to run. Get enough exposure and popularity that he can pretend he was drafted by the overwhelming support of the people.

Ksyrup 08-03-2023 09:17 AM

And if he objectively does well, maybe the donors/DNC make a push to force Biden aside if they feel like he's a viable candidate.

GrantDawg 08-03-2023 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ksyrup (Post 3408417)
And if he objectively does well, maybe the donors/DNC make a push to force Biden aside if they feel like he's a viable candidate.

I wouldn't cry about it, but he would not be my first choice.

PilotMan 08-04-2023 09:29 AM

Speaking of how the "next" ejecting is always the most important in the history of the world. Far right personalities are now equating the j6 indictments as "assassination" and are suggesting that perhaps in kind action is the only action that will win the 2024 election

NobodyHere 08-04-2023 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PilotMan (Post 3408521)
Speaking of how the "next" ejecting is always the most important in the history of the world. Far right personalities are now equating the j6 indictments as "assassination" and are suggesting that perhaps in kind action is the only action that will win the 2024 election


I imagine the next ejecting would be the most important one for any pilot.

Ksyrup 08-04-2023 09:42 AM

Leave the man alone. He may have been trying to land a plane when he was typing that!

PilotMan 08-04-2023 09:57 AM

No comment

Ksyrup 08-04-2023 10:02 AM

I imagine other planes pulling up next to you, seeing you glancing down to your phone and typing, giving the "tsk tsk" shake of the head, and flying off.

albionmoonlight 08-04-2023 10:47 AM

"Ladies and Gentlemen, this is your pilot speaking. We are about to encounter some turbulence, so I've put the fasten seat belt sign back on. More importantly, my Instagram is blowing up this afternoon thanks to some pics I have up from the Taylor Swift concert. So things are pretty freaking sweet right now."

flere-imsaho 08-04-2023 11:40 AM

"Ladies, we were about to take off, but I need to pause for a moment because someone is very wrong on the internet."

Ghost Econ 08-04-2023 11:43 AM

He meant to type "'next' erection is always the most important in the history of the world..." but a boy came into the cockpit and he go distracted by gladiator talk.

Ksyrup 08-04-2023 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghost Econ (Post 3408537)
He meant to type "'next' erection is always the most important in the history of the world..." but a boy came into the cockpit and he go distracted by gladiator talk.



Edward64 08-05-2023 06:13 AM

Nice first step. Wonder if he'll repeat this out loud in his future rallies vs just reporters. I'm sure they'll be asked "the" 2020 election question in GOP debates.

DeSantis: Trump's 2020 election fraud theories were 'unsubstantiated' | CNN Politics
Quote:

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said Friday that the “theories” put out by former President Donald Trump and his associates following the 2020 election were “unsubstantiated” and “did not prove to be true.”

“I’ve said many times, the election is what it is. All those theories that were put out, did not prove to be true,” DeSantis, a Republican presidential candidate, told reporters traveling on his Never Back Down bus tour in Iowa. “What I’ve also said is the way you conduct a good election that people have confidence in, you don’t change the rules in the middle of the game.”

“It was not an election that was conducted the way I think we want to, but that’s different than saying, like, ‘Maduro stolen votes’ or something like that,” he added, in reference to Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. “I think those theories, you know, proved to be unsubstantiated.”


Qwikshot 08-05-2023 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3408602)
Nice first step. Wonder if he'll repeat this out loud in his future rallies vs just reporters. I'm sure they'll be asked "the" 2020 election question in GOP debates.

DeSantis: Trump's 2020 election fraud theories were 'unsubstantiated' | CNN Politics


This is probably why he pivoted. He's still a shitbag.

DeSantis’s biggest donor cuts off funds, demands moderate shift | The Hill

DeSantis’s biggest donor cuts off funds, demands moderate shift

GrantDawg 08-05-2023 11:05 AM

He still trying to ride the surf board. "It wasn't the way I want an election to run, but it was by the rules." It is an excuse for more voter suppression laws targeting minorities and major populated areas. If you can't win over the majority, then disenfranchise the majority.

Edward64 08-07-2023 06:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3408602)
Nice first step. Wonder if he'll repeat this out loud in his future rallies vs just reporters. I'm sure they'll be asked "the" 2020 election question in GOP debates.


Looks like his committed to (re)stating this. He does need to do something to shake it up some.

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/08/07/ron-...on-claims.html
Quote:

DeSantis continued to discuss all the ways he believed the previous presidential election was not perfect. But pressed further, he clearly stated that Trump lost.

“But respectfully, you did not clearly answer that question,” Burns said. “And if you can’t give a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ on whether or not he lost —”

“No, of course he lost,” DeSantis said, adding, “Joe Biden’s the president.
:
And at a campaign stop in Iowa on Friday, DeSantis also strongly dismissed theories that the election was stolen, saying they “did not prove to be true.””

Smart of him to add below. He'll lose the true believers but maybe he'll get the more "moderate" Republicans.

Quote:

Still, DeSantis made sure to point out in Sunday’s interview that he saw a number of problems with the 2020 election, including Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s grants for election administration, the widespread availability of mail-in ballots, state laws that allow third parties to collect and return voters’ ballots, and how social media outlets de-emphasized a story about the laptop of President Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden.

“I think what people in the media and elsewhere, they want to act like somehow this was just like the perfect election. ... I don’t think it was a good-run election,” DeSantis said. “But I also think Republicans didn’t fight back. You’ve got to fight back when that is happening.”


HerRealName 08-07-2023 07:06 AM

Supporting or voting for an extremist like DeSantis means that you aren't a moderate.

Galaril 08-07-2023 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HerRealName (Post 3408703)
Supporting or voting for an extremist like DeSantis means that you aren't a moderate.


Agree. In fact I am not sure his stuff isn’t more extreme then Trumps shit.

Edward64 08-08-2023 08:03 AM

Pence has qualified for the GOP debates.

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/08/08/mike...-desantis.html
Quote:

Pence joins other qualifiers including Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley, South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott and former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie.
Good move for Trump to avoid the debates (or at least the first/early one). He doesn't need the debate, if I was him I would plan an event/rally during the first debate.

Quote:

But Trump has repeatedly signaled he is leaning against it. “Why would you let somebody that’s at zero, or one or two or three [in the polls] be popping you with questions?” Trump said in a recent interview.

Political strategists have said it makes little sense for Trump to expose himself to all manner of attacks from his challengers on his policy record, his myriad controversies and his numerous pending criminal matters.

The absence of Trump, a media magnet and ratings booster, could also undermine other candidates’ efforts to make an impact on the Republican primary electorate.

Lathum 08-08-2023 08:19 AM

Of course the same people agreeing Trump shouldn't debate are the ones yelling because Biden won't debate RFK. The hypocrisy never ends.

Edward64 08-08-2023 12:08 PM

Looks like Ron is going to change things up. I do wonder if former campaign manager is just a convenient scapegoat

Quote:

Ron DeSantis has replaced his campaign manager Generra Peck, in what is the third major reshuffling of his operations, a campaign spokesperson and a person familiar with the move confirmed to POLITICO.

Peck will be shifted to a role of chief strategist as part of the new order. Taking her place atop the campaign will be James Uthmeier, who has served as chief of staff in DeSantis’ governor’s office. In a text message, Uthmeier said the change was happening “ASAP.”

Atocep 08-08-2023 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward64 (Post 3408782)
Looks like Ron is going to change things up. I do wonder if former campaign manager is just a convenient scapegoat


So far he's tried fighting culture wars, tried taking trump on indirectly by creating ads that his campaign would "leak" online to desantis supporters with large twitter followings, and refused to shift in any meaningful way as donations have dried up.

Then you have the motorcade accident that showed he was using state resources (the car and florida police) to campaign out of state.

Atocep 08-09-2023 03:40 PM

DeSantis held a weird press conference today where he announced the suspension of another elected state attorney. Two sheriffs from counties that don't overlap in any way with her district spoke at the press conference to bash her and shared one shared a weird printed meme.

Spoiler alert: the state attorney is a black democrat

DeSantis suspends another elected prosecutor in move derided as ‘politically motivated’ - POLITICO

JPhillips 08-13-2023 12:02 PM

Trump refusing to sign a pledge saying he'd support the nominee while the other candidates pledge to support Trump is just a perfect representation of the whole GOP primary.

JPhillips 08-13-2023 03:41 PM

dola

Ramaswamy's rise as he's gotten progressively crazier is a bad sign for the future GOP.

Lathum 08-13-2023 04:17 PM

I saw a thing the other day where someone was calling him the GOP version of Obama and almost puked.

RainMaker 08-14-2023 06:06 PM

Ron DeSantis Says He Has “Moved On” And Disney Should Drop Lawsuit – Deadline

Ksyrup 08-14-2023 07:14 PM

If that's not code for "I'm gonna lose so I'm gonna play it off like I don't want to keep fighting" I don't know what does. Maybe Elon making excuses about needing surgery instead of fighting Zuckerberg. Two peas in a pod.

Lathum 08-18-2023 09:22 AM

What a shitshow of a disaster this guy is.

Ron DeSantis campaign suffers another blow after debate memos published | Ron DeSantis | The Guardian

JPhillips 08-18-2023 10:11 AM

I can't believe they are running the 2016 strategy of hoping to be the one that gets all of Trump's supporters when he drops out.

The sooner DeSantis drops out the more likely his chances of retaining some sort of national political future. He's going to be the target for everyone at each debate until he's humiliated enough to shrink into nothingness.

NobodyHere 08-18-2023 10:22 AM

If Trump can run for President then he's getting the nomination. Really the best any other Republican candidate can hope for is that Trump is unable/unwilling to run and then try to scoop up Trump's base.

JPhillips 08-18-2023 10:34 AM

Taxes are too low if rich people are willing to throw away a billion dollars on the chance that their guy might still be standing when Trump drops out.

Lathum 08-18-2023 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3409252)
If Trump can run for President then he's getting the nomination. Really the best any other Republican candidate can hope for is that Trump is unable/unwilling to run and then try to scoop up Trump's base.


They are all hoping he isn't eligible and they get the nomination. Even if that happened I don't think DeSantis would get it. My money is on Vivek.

Lathum 08-18-2023 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3409251)
I can't believe they are running the 2016 strategy of hoping to be the one that gets all of Trump's supporters when he drops out.

The sooner DeSantis drops out the more likely his chances of retaining some sort of national political future. He's going to be the target for everyone at each debate until he's humiliated enough to shrink into nothingness.


I suspect Christie will bury him next week.

JPhillips 08-18-2023 10:40 AM

Christie does have a history of throat-punching FL lightweights.

Brian Swartz 08-18-2023 12:26 PM

Agree on DeSantis. I was completely wrong about his chances.

dubb93 08-18-2023 12:35 PM

DeSantis is playing to a base that will never support anyone besides Trump IMO.

Ghost Econ 08-18-2023 12:38 PM

DeSantis seems like that guy you see at a backyard BBQ who's trying to hold court but ends up in solo conversations by sneaking up on people by grabbing their shoulder and saying something stupid loudly.

GrantDawg 08-18-2023 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 3409254)
They are all hoping he isn't eligible and they get the nomination. Even if that happened I don't think DeSantis would get it. My money is on Vivek.

He can't lose eligibility. If where convicted on every account, he would still be eligible. The Constitutional requirements is silent on legal convictions. The craziest thing in the world would be him winning the election in Fulton county jail, which is not likely but not impossible.

Lathum 08-18-2023 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 3409271)
He can't lose eligibility. If where convicted on every account, he would still be eligible. The Constitutional requirements is silent on legal convictions. The craziest thing in the world would be him winning the election in Fulton county jail, which is not likely but not impossible.


There is a movement out there, believe it or no started by 2 guys from the federalist society, that he violated clause 3 of the 14th amendment and is ineligible to run.

Lathum 08-18-2023 01:41 PM

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...al-presidency/

NobodyHere 08-18-2023 02:01 PM

Ultimately conviction or no the question of eligibility will be sent to the Supreme Court.

GrantDawg 08-18-2023 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 3409273)

I think the chance of him being in the Fulton county jail as he wins the election is higher than that working.

GrantDawg 08-18-2023 03:33 PM

Btw, hours after he said that Disney filed additional lawsuits against the state of Florida for breach of contract. I don't think they are moving on.

RainMaker 08-18-2023 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 3409294)
Btw, hours after he said that Disney filed additional lawsuits against the state of Florida for breach of contract. I don't think they are moving on.


I don't know how it plays out, but it was a clear violation of the 1st Amendment. Guessing he wants to move on before they get to go through communication and get some of his employees into a deposition.

Lathum 08-18-2023 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 3409281)
I think the chance of him being in the Fulton county jail as he wins the election is higher than that working.


Maybe but this isn’t some fringe crackpot coming up with this. It’s ivy league scholars and members of the federalist society. You have to at least give it some credence.

bronconick 08-18-2023 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 3409294)
Btw, hours after he said that Disney filed additional lawsuits against the state of Florida for breach of contract. I don't think they are moving on.


Disney threatens small time bakeries who make Disney themed cakes. But I'm sure they'd "move on" for Ron.

CrimsonFox 08-18-2023 11:10 PM

I peeled off a raisin off the bottom of my shoe. I think it would make a GREAT republican candidate!

Edward64 08-18-2023 11:14 PM

Scheduling is not confirmed yet but ...

Smart move for Trump. Smart move for Tucker. And for the first debate, I like it for the rest of the field. Gives them the ability to differentiate from one another vs. attacking/reacting to Trump.

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/08/18/trum...r-carlson.html
Quote:

Former President Donald Trump has made up his mind not to attend the first GOP debate next week, according to two sources familiar with his thinking, and is seeking a sit-down interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson as a means of counter-programming the event.

A source close to Carlson says the host is currently en route to Europe, where he has interviews and events lined up all next week. The source said Carlson is “always in discussions” with all the candidates, and nothing is firmly set with Trump and Carlson.

GrantDawg 08-19-2023 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 3409306)
Maybe but this isn’t some fringe crackpot coming up with this. It’s ivy league scholars and members of the federalist society. You have to at least give it some credence.

It was Ivy league guys from the Federalist society who said that state legislatures can just throw out the votes of the people and decide who gets their state electors after a election. I don't trust Federalist society lawyers to come in out of the rain.

Lathum 08-19-2023 07:34 AM

Unless I’m mistaken the federalist guys came up with it but the Yale lawyers looking at it aren’t part of them.

Brian Swartz 08-19-2023 07:35 AM

Apparently it's an increasingly minority opinion, but I still think it's a lot more important whether or not people are still going to support Trump than it is whether he is ruled ineligible to run. Him being ruled ineligible and people declaring victory over Trumpism doesn't fill me with happy thoughts; I'm not sure it does more than just kick the can down the road if that's all that happens.

Edward64 08-19-2023 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3409321)
Apparently it's an increasingly minority opinion, but I still think it's a lot more important whether or not people are still going to support Trump than it is whether he is ruled ineligible to run. Him being ruled ineligible and people declaring victory over Trumpism doesn't fill me with happy thoughts; I'm not sure it does more than just kick the can down the road if that's all that happens.


re: ineligibility. What I've been reading says the only hope is the 14th amendment (insurrection). It'll be tested if he is convicted of that but suspect there's enough "gray" area stuff where he'll still sit in office if elected. And if it does get expedited to SCOTUS, fair chance he'll come out a winner.

So in other words, Dems need to forget their "hopism" and face reality that his name will be on the ballot. They better get their act together in supporting Joe and getting out the vote.

Lathum 08-19-2023 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3409321)
Apparently it's an increasingly minority opinion, but I still think it's a lot more important whether or not people are still going to support Trump than it is whether he is ruled ineligible to run. Him being ruled ineligible and people declaring victory over Trumpism doesn't fill me with happy thoughts; I'm not sure it does more than just kick the can down the road if that's all that happens.


Thats a pipe dream. Trumpism is a cult and anyone who hasn't abandoned him at this point never will.

Best thing for our nation, at least in the relative short term is Trump is ruled ineligible, his base is disenfranchised and stays home, and this wretched current version of the GOP completes its death spiral and never holds power again.

bronconick 08-19-2023 03:56 PM

The Supreme Court isn't going to rule Trump ineligible. All this is is an exercise for some bored Ivy leaguers.

Brian Swartz 08-19-2023 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum
Thats a pipe dream. Trumpism is a cult and anyone who hasn't abandoned him at this point never will.


If so, then Trump being ineligible doesn't gain us much. It doesn't address the underlying problem.

Lathum 08-19-2023 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3409367)
If so, then Trump being ineligible doesn't gain us much. It doesn't address the underlying problem.


Of course it does. It ensures, at least for a time, that maniacs won't be running our government.

These people have always been here, Trump just let them crawl out from under their rocks and normalize this shit. Cut off the head of the snake and all those people will crawl back to where they came from.

Brian Swartz 08-20-2023 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum
These people have always been here, Trump just let them crawl out from under their rocks and normalize this shit. Cut off the head of the snake and all those people will crawl back to where they came from.


We'll see, but I don't think this is the case. I don't think it's an accident that Trump emerged when he did and that a number of other nations saw a rise in similar forms of extremism to varying degrees at about the same time. We're not going to back to, for example, country-club Republicanism a la Romney and the Bushes no matter what happens to Trump. Modern democratic societies, especially but not soley the US, are more broken than that.

Lathum 08-20-2023 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Swartz (Post 3409389)
We'll see, but I don't think this is the case. I don't think it's an accident that Trump emerged when he did and that a number of other nations saw a rise in similar forms of extremism to varying degrees at about the same time. We're not going to back to, for example, country-club Republicanism a la Romney and the Bushes no matter what happens to Trump. Modern democratic societies, especially but not soley the US, are more broken than that.


Do you honestly think there isn't a rather significant number of Trump supporters that will just stay home once he becomes irrelevant or dies?

For a lot of those people it isn't about politics or the GOP. They literally see him as a god like figure. They aren't turning out for anyone else.

It is why I think he has completely destroyed the party for the foreseeable future and good riddance I say. They likely can't win with him and certainly can't win without him.

JPhillips 08-20-2023 10:59 AM

It's a cult.


Thomkal 08-20-2023 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3409398)
It's a cult.



Yeah just kinda mindboggling to me, Trump has never once personally shown that he has evidence that the election was stolen. He could have released it any time and thrown the country into chaos more than it already is if it were true. After the election they lost over 60 lawsuits and won just one. But yet they keep still believing he has the evidence of Democrats cheating, even though no journalist from the right, left or independent has any evidence of it at all. People have gone to jail for years and years because they truly believed Trump's words over every one when there is nothing to back it up.



I hope the trials over Jan 6 are televised and they are finally forced to hear the evidence and Trump's lack of.



thesloppy 08-20-2023 12:49 PM

Yeah there's obviously some weird flavor of delusion going on in that world. I think if you pressed those exact same people about Trump's constant lying they would insist they know he exaggerates everything, and it's smart for him to him to cheat on his taxes, it's just good business to go bankrupt and defraud charities, it's manly for him to cheat on his wives, but in matters of politics he always tells the absolute truth...as long as you are wise enough to interpret it.

Thomkal 08-20-2023 03:12 PM

Speaking of cults...


https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/s...41330997416075

molson 08-20-2023 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3409401)
Yeah just kinda mindboggling to me, Trump has never once personally shown that he has evidence that the election was stolen. He could have released it any time and thrown the country into chaos more than it already is if it were true. After the election they lost over 60 lawsuits and won just one. But yet they keep still believing he has the evidence of Democrats cheating, even though no journalist from the right, left or independent has any evidence of it at all. People have gone to jail for years and years because they truly believed Trump's words over every one when there is nothing to back it up.

I hope the trials over Jan 6 are televised and they are finally forced to hear the evidence and Trump's lack of.


I overhear some people at work or around town, I think a lot of people don't care/don't really follow any of this, they vote Republican because they think maybe their gas will be a little cheaper, or they just don't like Democrats. I think we underestimate the number of people who don't follow any of this, who might not know anything about the charges or even know that they exist.

Or, that's a me using a defense mechanism...

Atocep 08-20-2023 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by molson (Post 3409408)
I overhear some people at work or around town, I think a lot of people don't care/don't really follow any of this, they vote Republican because they think maybe their gas will be a little cheaper, or they just don't like Democrats. I think we underestimate the number of people who don't follow any of this, who might not know anything about the charges or even know that they exist.

Or, that's a me using a defense mechanism...


My mom falls into this group. She doesn't know much of anything about Trump but has voted republican her whole life and continues to do so. She doesn't even know what the wedge issues between Dems/GOP tend to be. She lives in WV and gets the vast majority of her news from facebook, though, so she knows she likes Trump.

JPhillips 08-20-2023 04:21 PM

I think this is right, but it requires a lot of moderate GOPers to vote D and that's tough to make actually happen.


Atocep 08-20-2023 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3409411)
I think this is right, but it requires a lot of moderate GOPers to vote D and that's tough to make actually happen.




They haven't won anything since 2016 and they're still on the Trump train because it drives turnout.

It's amazing, really. They allowed Trump to take such a hold on the GOP because he's driven away a significant portion of swing voters, turned away suburban moms and other groups, but he's brought in enough people that generally don't follow politics to keep elections competitive. Since that base is all that's keeping the GOP competitive right now they're trying to ride out the Trump wave. Losing isn't bothering them because accepting these MAGA voters is the only way they can win an election right now and the party refuses to look at the big picture in the long term.

The GOP has had countless opportunities to take an exit away from Trump yet here we are. I think it's naive at this point to think further losing is going to do anything more than embolden them to act on the belief that the only reason they're losing is because dems are stealing elections.

We're going to see MAGA splinter groups for the foreseeable future. Whether it's moms for liberty or whatever comes along next. These groups are really good at finding weaknesses in local leadership, taking over, and creating movements into national politics.

bronconick 08-20-2023 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3409411)
I think this is right, but it requires a lot of moderate GOPers to vote D and that's tough to make actually happen.



There aren't enough moderate Republicans left because they all electorally die in the primary. Liz Cheney went from 74% to 29% in 2 years because she voted to impeach their deity. She had voted with Trump 93% of the time previously.

JPhillips 08-20-2023 06:52 PM

The GOP hasn't lost enough. They need an LBJ or Reagan style ass whipping. They need a beating harsh enough so that they can't see a way to power without modifying their politics.

That won't take a huge amount of voters. If the GOP lost ten percent of their voters they would be wiped out nationally.

Lathum 08-20-2023 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3409427)
The GOP hasn't lost enough. They need an LBJ or Reagan style ass whipping. They need a beating harsh enough so that they can't see a way to power without modifying their politics.

That won't take a huge amount of voters. If the GOP lost ten percent of their voters they would be wiped out nationally.


Once Trumo isnt the nominee they will.

dubb93 08-20-2023 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atocep (Post 3409409)
My mom falls into this group. She doesn't know much of anything about Trump but has voted republican her whole life and continues to do so. She doesn't even know what the wedge issues between Dems/GOP tend to be. She lives in WV and gets the vast majority of her news from facebook, though, so she knows she likes Trump.


My mom and stepdad fall into this as well. I try to tell them the awful shit that is being spewed by the right, but the church they go to gets political and alters their view of the candidates.

They are good people and they don't even had cable or local TV(they can only watch movies.) They live so far off the road they can't even get internet or a landline phone, let alone cell signal so most of the information they get....best I can call it....invented. It all comes from someone else and gets put through a strange leanse that I don't understand considering how good of people they are and how many people they help. My step-dad literally went to Guatemala as a missionary and used his skills as an electrical lineman to run electric to entire towns while he was there for no compensation. Alot of these people just don't understand how far these political parties have shifted.

GrantDawg 08-21-2023 06:09 AM


GrantDawg 08-21-2023 06:12 AM

Somehow it was predictable that the more he gets indicted the more his support grows.

Lathum 08-21-2023 08:58 AM

I suspect that support comes from people in the GOP who were undecided but at the end of the day would have fallen in line with him as the nominee.

If independents or dems are buying in to the political persecution theory I would be very surprised but if they are we are fucked and we would get what we deserved.

JPhillips 08-21-2023 10:30 AM

Ramaswamy with another I'm not really a 9-11 truther comment.

Quote:

Vivek Ramaswamy: "I think it is legitimate to say how many police, how many federal agents, were on the planes that hit the Twin Towers. Maybe the answer is zero. It probably is zero for all I know, right?"

GrantDawg 08-21-2023 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3409458)
Ramaswamy with another I'm not really a 9-11 truther comment.

What the hell is the suggestion there? The same as what was spread around the time that new Jewish people were at work in the towers on 911? They knew?

JPhillips 08-21-2023 12:26 PM

He went on to ask how many federal agents were involved in 1/6, but you can get to that without going through 9/11 conspiracies. He's either a truther or he sees some sort of value in communicating to believers that he's on their side.

albionmoonlight 08-22-2023 09:45 AM

Stolen from elsewhere:

First question at the GOP debate--raise your hand if you think Mike Pence should have been hanged on 1/6.

And every candidate eagerly raises their hand, including Mike Pence.

Edward64 08-22-2023 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 3409461)
What the hell is the suggestion there? The same as what was spread around the time that new Jewish people were at work in the towers on 911? They knew?


re: 9/11. I think too early to judge, he's saying he was misquoted. Per his request, no idea on when he asked for it, but you'd think the reporter can provide the recording (did the reporter really refuse?).

Access to this page has been denied
Quote:

“What I said is on Jan. 6, I do believe that there were many federal agents in the field and we deserve to know who they are,” Ramaswamy said on CNN’s “The Source.” “On 9/11, what I’ve said is that the government lied and this is incontrovertible evidence, Kaitlan, the government lied about Saudi Arabia’s involvement.”

“Again, I asked that reporter to send a recording because it was on the record. He refused to do it, but we had a free flowing conversation,” he told Collins when she pressed him further on the quotes. “The truth is there are lies the government has told about 9/11, but it’s not the ones that somebody put in my mouth. It’s the one that I articulated, which is that Saudi Arabia, absolutely their intelligence was involved in 9/11.”


re: Jan 6. This one is more interesting. Unsure what he is getting at ... so what if there were federal agents a the Capitol? Is he saying they contributed to the rush into the Capitol?

Access to this page has been denied
Quote:

“Vivek was referring to Jan. 6, not 9/11, as we have clarified with the Atlantic. It was a very free-flowing conversation, so we are not blaming the reporter, but the real question Vivek has is about undercover federal agents on Jan. 6, 2021, not 9/11,” his campaign spokesperson told The Hill.

Vivek, next time you sit down with a reporter, just do your own recording.

JPhillips 08-22-2023 11:35 AM

He did eventually get to 1/6, but he was clearly using 9/11 as a way to get to his point about 1/6. It doesn't make any logical sense to say he was really just talking about 1/6.

Edward64 08-22-2023 11:39 AM

He asked for the recording which I think is fair (and the reporter shouldn't have an issue providing to him) so it's put up or shut up for him. Right now it's in the reporter's court.

JPhillips 08-22-2023 11:46 AM

I believe the Atlantic reporter has publically released the audio.

Edward64 08-22-2023 11:54 AM

Thanks, saw it. Behind a paywall so I'll wait for the pundits to analyze who is right/wrong here.

GrantDawg 08-22-2023 12:50 PM

Just basic conspiracy theory mumbo-jumbo then. Open with something you know is true, like "were there uncover Federal Agents in the crowd at 1/6?" (of course there were. The question is what they were doing not if they were there) or "the government has not told us everything about 9/11" (of course they haven't. There are intelligence gathering that will probably never be declassified because it would be dangerous if it were made public).

Swaggs 08-22-2023 01:00 PM

Trump's PAC trolling the upcoming debate by calling it the Vice Presidential Debate: Vice Presidential Debate 2024

And pretty sure they have the fly on Pence's head. The fact that so many of them are so spineless and cannot believe that he will burn it all down before letting anyone else run is hard to fathom.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.