Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   The thread for images so cool that they belong in this thread (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=60049)

BYU 14 04-09-2013 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subby (Post 2808945)
Sorry. I went through revrew's gay therapy program and am now cured of gay.


Can you post male golfer pics then?

Subby 04-09-2013 03:17 PM

Stop causing problems.

Mizzou B-ball fan 04-09-2013 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subby (Post 2808952)
Stop causing problems.


Zip it. You're banned already.

Subby 04-09-2013 03:25 PM

Not anymore!

MacroGuru 04-09-2013 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noop (Post 1515553)


For posterity

Subby 04-09-2013 03:32 PM

Hmmm. Must. Stop. Prurient. Interest. PUMP. IT. PUMPY.

Mizzou B-ball fan 04-09-2013 03:34 PM








Suicane75 04-09-2013 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spleen1015 (Post 2808909)
MG, if you report the dog humping pic and say you are turned on by it, then they will remove it.


I'm not gonna lie, I'm totally turned on by it.

Mizzou B-ball fan 04-09-2013 03:39 PM






Mizzou B-ball fan 04-09-2013 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BYU 14 (Post 2808948)
Can you post male golfer pics then?


Sure you can. See?


Lathum 04-09-2013 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subby (Post 2808945)
Sorry. I went through revrew's gay therapy program and am now cured of gay.


Lol

Lathum 04-09-2013 03:44 PM

A couple of thoughts.

I'm not saying I agree or disagree with anyone's argument, but if you post a picture that is remotely risqué and get boxes that is your own fault. The precedent has been set for a while now.

My other thought is am I the only one here who hasn't ever moderated a message board?

finketr 04-09-2013 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum (Post 2808976)
A couple of thoughts.

I'm not saying I agree or disagree with anyone's argument, but if you post a picture that is remotely risqué and get boxes that is your own fault. The precedent has been set for a while now.

My other thought is am I the only one here who hasn't ever moderated a message board?


nope,.

sterlingice 04-09-2013 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben E Lou (Post 2808780)
If I perceive that the primary reason for posting the pic is "ZOMFG LOOK HOW HAWT SHE LOOKS," then it's gone. As I said pages and pages ago in this thread:

"Just don't post anything remotely prurient, and you won't have any problems."


Quote:

Originally Posted by Buccaneer (Post 2808804)
It is ironic that for quite a while, QS was enforcing the rule that the top of the page must contain a prurient photo, which i didn't go along with. I wonder if operation sports started clamping down?


Quote:

Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA (Post 2808891)
Merriam - Webster defines prurient as ": marked by or arousing an immoderate or unwholesome interest or desire; especially : marked by, arousing, or appealing to sexual desire "

By that definition & the admonition we got earlier, I'm guessing that bikini pics of Dr. Ruth, Kathy Griffin and Hillary Clinton are okay. And maybe Kathy Bates.

Beyond that, I guess it's poster beware.



Thanks, Jon. I'm actually serious that I would have to go look up what prurient meant :D

SI

finketr 04-09-2013 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA (Post 2808869)
Are there seriously that many people whose boss would be fine with them bullshitting on a video game forum on company time but would consider a stray bikini a major offense? Srsly?


If it's during your lunch time, then bullshitting on a forum would be allowed, but looking at pics of lovely women in a bikini could create the work environment that is impacting others. (stray female walking by, for example).

Suicane75 04-09-2013 03:50 PM

If you find a stray female, you should take her home.

Dutch 04-09-2013 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben E Lou (Post 2808763)
I am semi-back.

Any picture that I perceive to be an attempt to push the limits I have written in the sticky will be deleted, likely without further explanation. I have deleted several. It has already been explained and I, for one, am not willing to waste words saying the same thing over again. If you want action taken for pictures in this or another thread, just report the post and an evaluation will be made.

Bottom line: don't try to push the limit on "hawt chix" posts, and you won't get suspended. Push it, and you might. It's really that simple. And it's not up for discussion. In the time I have been away, some people have gotten away with some things that shouldn't have happened. So be it. But know that further complaining, sarcasm, whining, attempting to push the limits, or other jerk-ish behavior around this policy, either in this thread or elsewhere, will result in punitive measures.


You forgot "further joking around will not be tolerated".

Mizzou B-ball fan 04-09-2013 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suicane75 (Post 2808985)
If you find a stray female, you should take her home.


I was thinking the same thing. At least take the time to say 'Hi!'.

cuervo72 04-09-2013 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suicane75 (Post 2808985)
If you find a stray female, you should take her home.


Control the pet population.

Suicane75 04-09-2013 04:04 PM

Ya know, sure there are pictures in this thread that are all about "look at her boobs and look at her butt", but really, a majority of the pictures of females posted are genuinely beautiful. And I get that we're all probably popping boners to one degree or another but it's kind of sad that a community of adults can't just share and discuss pictures of women or that they're somehow viewed as more vulgar than any of the other types of pictures posted. I can go to TheHun and see tons of great pictures of nude women but there is a real level of quality to a lot of the pictures posted here that are A) Not Pornographic and B) Quite a remarkable level of female beauty.

I have a point, but I'm prone to rambling.

cuervo72 04-09-2013 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suicane75 (Post 2808994)
I can go to ________ and see tons of great pictures


Doing a bit of editing there to pose a question - do we really need a thread here to be a pic aggregator where posters go on repost sprees from "reallycoolfractals.com" or "totallyphotoshoppedlandscapes.net" or People of Walmart or "awfulalbumcovers.us" or "catsandcleavage.edu"? That's what most of this is, really, and while it was entertaining at first, I'm not sure it serves much of a purpose.

Mizzou B-ball fan 04-09-2013 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cuervo72 (Post 2808999)
Doing a bit of editing there to pose a question - do we really need a thread here to be a pic aggregator where posters go on repost sprees from "reallycoolfractals.com" or "totallyphotoshoppedlandscapes.net" or People of Walmart or "awfulalbumcovers.us" or "catsandcleavage.edu"? That's what most of this is, really, and while it was entertaining at first, I'm not sure it serves much of a purpose.


This post is a resource all by itself. Who knew there were such sites?

mckerney 04-09-2013 04:23 PM

Do we need to be the place to post about sports seasons or events, books, television shows, movies we've seen, video games, events in our personal lives, fantasy sports, strange news stories, current events, dead celebrities, child molesters, what beer we're drinking and music we're listening to? I can go elsewhere on the web and find all those things.

Suicane75 04-09-2013 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cuervo72 (Post 2808999)
Doing a bit of editing there to pose a question - do we really need a thread here to be a pic aggregator where posters go on repost sprees from "reallycoolfractals.com" or "totallyphotoshoppedlandscapes.net" or People of Walmart or "awfulalbumcovers.us" or "catsandcleavage.edu"? That's what most of this is, really, and while it was entertaining at first, I'm not sure it serves much of a purpose.


I think it's great. I don't scour the internet, there are two main sites I go to. The fact that I can come here and talk about sports, tv, music and politics AND see some cool pictures that I wouldn't have seen is really nice.

That being said, of course anyone posting pics should know by now what's going to happen and the complaining is very silly at this point.

Suicane75 04-09-2013 04:24 PM

Or what McKerney said

dawgfan 04-09-2013 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 2808966)

Justin Timberlake plays the saxophone? Man, is there anything he can't do?

fantom1979 04-09-2013 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mckerney (Post 2809003)
Do we need to be the place to post about sports seasons or events, books, television shows, movies we've seen, video games, events in our personal lives, fantasy sports, strange news stories, current events, dead celebrities, child molesters, what beer we're drinking and music we're listening to? I can go elsewhere on the web and find all those things.


+++

Suicane75 04-09-2013 04:52 PM

Bill Paxton on the left. Coolest band ever.

dawgfan 04-09-2013 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 2808970)

I don't think Jesus is enjoying their touch.

JonInMiddleGA 04-09-2013 05:11 PM

MBFF: re: Merrill Womach

Dude survived a horrific plane crash & fire. I think that has to get him a pass for his appearance under the circumstances.

He even had his 15 minutes of fame back in the 80s.
Brutally Burned in a Plane Crash, Merrill Womach Lives to Sing the Praises of the Lord : People.com

britrock88 04-09-2013 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA (Post 2808837)
Y'know the one deleted pic that stands out as making no sense to me whatsoever?

The one with the fairly hot chick (fully clothed) standing next to the wacky looking dude that's apparently some sort of high-roller or something. That seemed a lot more "hey, look what money will get ya" than prurient afaic.

(somebody will know the one I'm talking about and describe it better, I think it was shot at an NBA game or something like that)


Buck (?) Goldstein and some Danish model, I think it was.

Honolulu_Blue 04-09-2013 06:08 PM

As if last night wasn't enough...



Suicane75 04-09-2013 06:09 PM

Yeah, my point in posting that was entirely the funny juxtaposition, and I think the 2 cents I added made that entirely clear.

The reality is that any photo of woman with the slightest bit of skin showing above the knee, around the stomach or in the vicinity of her breasts, is going to be deleted, which is just lazy heavy handedness. But again, nothing that shouldn't be expected at this point.

Solecismic 04-09-2013 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue (Post 2809062)
As if last night wasn't enough...




I wish the guy well. Heck, he made some incredible plays over the last few seasons. I think he's a good person, too, and will work hard enough to become a success in the NFL as a slot or a specialist.

But I laughed anyway.

Honolulu_Blue 04-09-2013 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Solecismic (Post 2809067)
I wish the guy well. Heck, he made some incredible plays over the last few seasons. I think he's a good person, too, and will work hard enough to become a success in the NFL as a slot or a specialist.

But I laughed anyway.


Me too. I am a huge fan. Sure, he had plenty of shortcomings as a QB, but he was such a joy to watch on Saturdays. Never been a player on Michigan quite like him.

Danny 04-09-2013 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue (Post 2809062)
As if last night wasn't enough...




Wow, his arm has improved while training for combine

kcchief19 04-09-2013 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vince, Pt. II (Post 2808855)
Is it a reading comprehension issue?

It's a comprehension issue, not a reading comprehension issue.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Vince, Pt. II (Post 2808855)
1. Risqué pictures can lead to some members being banned from visiting here by their employer.

FALSE: There are numerous other threads that contain risque pictures. For reasons that have not yet been fully explained, this thread is one in which this rule is enforced. It is very easy to find other threads which are advertised clearly as having risque photos that have not been censored. If members are banned from visiting here by their employer, it is more likely that the employer doesn't want their employees jacking around on a message board when they should be working.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Vince, Pt. II (Post 2808855)
2. Non-risqué pictures hosted on certain sites can lead to some members being banned from visiting here by their employer.

FALSE. If anyone bothered to notice, the domain for this site is Operation Sports | Madden NFL 13 | NCAA Football 13 | NBA 2K13 | MLB 13 The Show. Very few if any automated programs will prohibit access to a subfolder but allow access to the main folder. This site is judged by content across OperationSports.com. Unless this policy is enforced across all OS forums (which it clearly is not), then any images hosted on certain sites on any OS page would impact the viewing of FOFC.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Vince, Pt. II (Post 2808855)
3. Ben (and/or other mods) WILL remove anything that even approaches either of these two rules that he sees, in an effort to preserve every person's privilege to post/view here.

FALSE. If you can't find risque images in other threads, you're not looking hard enough.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Vince, Pt. II (Post 2808855)
4. The mods don't have nearly enough time to check every post ever made on this forum, therefore not every picture gets immediately deleted.

FALSE. Many threads are clearly advertised as having risque photos and have widespread moderation participation. Posters in this thread were at one time admonished by a well respected moderator for NOT posting a risque photo.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Vince, Pt. II (Post 2808855)
This seems neither draconian nor hard to understand. I think I must be missing something regarding the massive outrage here.

No one says it's draconian, it's just stupid and arbitrary. Here are the real truths:

1. If the moderators wish to increase transparency, create a stickied, closed thread in the Off-Topic forum that posts each reported post. Right now, most members assume the reportings are fictional or from misinformed members who don't understand how Internet filtering software works.

2. If you are blocked from FOFC or fear you may be blocked from FOFC, it is likely due to the fact that your employer wants you working and not jacking off on the Internet. I've worked for a company that blocked Facebook and other social networking sites. If your goal is to circumvent your employer's desire that you work while using their Internet, computer and other resources on your job, you're not exactly occupying a moral high ground.

3. If you are fearful your employer may see you viewing inappropriate content by view a thread, answer this: do you think your employer would approve of you viewing the text of this forum while working?

Anytime someone argues that a picture of a female golfer is going to lead to this forum being blocked by Internet filters has a fundamental lack of knowledge of how the Internet works.

DougW 04-09-2013 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buccaneer (Post 2808943)
It doesn't matter to me if the rule is to ban all pictures, animated gifs and videos. We can live without them here.

My issue is that the moderators are not part of this community and are lazy/detached in their duties and responsibilities. You earn trust not by your title but by your leadership. If the moderators would rather not spend any time here or feel the only have to come here to deservedly discipline a child, then that's not the definition of a forum moderator as others with experience have stated.


Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchief19 (Post 2809073)
It's a comprehension issue, not a reading comprehension issue.

FALSE: There are numerous other threads that contain risque pictures. For reasons that have not yet been fully explained, this thread is one in which this rule is enforced. It is very easy to find other threads which are advertised clearly as having risque photos that have not been censored. If members are banned from visiting her by their employer, is more likely than the employer doesn't want their employees jacking around on a message board when they should be working.

FALSE. If anyone bothered to notice, the domain for this site is Operation Sports | Madden NFL 13 | NCAA Football 13 | NBA 2K13 | MLB 13 The Show. Very few if any automated programs will prohibit access to a subfolder but allow access to the main folder. This site is judged by content across OperationSports.com. Unless this policy is enforced across all OS forums (which it clearly is not), then any images hosted on certain sites on any OS page would impact the viewing of FOFC.

FALSE. If you can't find risque images in other threads, you're not looking hard enough.

FALSE. Many threads are clearly advertised as having risque photos and have widespread moderation participation. Posters in this thread were at one time admonished by a well respected moderator for NOT posting a risque photo.

No one says it's draconian, it's just stupid and arbitrary. Here are the real truths:

1. If the moderators wish to increase transparency, create a stickied, closed thread in the Off-Topic forum that posts each reported post. Right now, most members assume the reportings are fictional or from misinformed members who don't understand how Internet filtering software works.

2. If you are blocked from FOFC or fear you may be blocked from FOFC, it is likely due to the fact that you're employer wants you working and not jacking off on the Internet. I've worked for a company that blocked Facebook and other social networking sites. If you're goal is circumvent your employer's desire that your work while using their Internet, computer and other resources on your job, you're not exactly occupying a moral high ground.

3. If you are fearful your employer may see you viewing inappropriate content by view a thread, answer this: do you think your employer would approve of you viewing the text of this forum while working?

Anytime someone argues that a picture of a female golfer is going to lead to this forum being blocked by Internet filters has a fundamental lack of knowledge of how the Internet works.


I like both of these posts.

JonInMiddleGA 04-09-2013 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by britrock88 (Post 2809059)
Buck (?) Goldstein and some Danish model, I think it was.


Close enough. Turns out that it's James (or Jim).

The pic in question, btw, is featured in the article on him that appears at noted trashy site Yahoo.com, and is also the first image associated with his name on Google (with SafeSearch on)

M GO BLUE!!! 04-09-2013 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue (Post 2809062)
As if last night wasn't enough...




Quote:

Originally Posted by Danny (Post 2809071)
Wow, his arm has improved while training for combine


:lol:

digamma 04-09-2013 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buccaneer (Post 2808943)
It doesn't matter to me if the rule is to ban all pictures, animated gifs and videos. We can live without them here.

My issue is that the moderators are not part of this community and are lazy/detached in their duties and responsibilities. You earn trust not by your title but by your leadership. If the moderators would rather not spend any time here or feel the only have to come here to deservedly discipline a child, then that's not the definition of a forum moderator as others with experience have stated.


Bucc, I don't think that is the case. I think the time spent may vary by mod, but I think most hours of the day you'll find one or more here. (Granted, the last week is an exception for Ben given his new arrival.)

What I think is true is that none of us read every single thread, and I think that accounts for some inconsistencies. At some point you have to rely on the community for things like post reports. And, I think the community does a pretty good job of that. For the most part, things work well and but for people's complaints about this thread (or differences between this thread and others) the board is modded pretty consistently. I will say there is likely one exception and that is that posters who have "earned their stripes" may get a longer leash than newer posters. In part, that's human nature. In part, though it is because there are other ways to reach those posters.

I will use Subby as an example. I communicate with Subby in variety of ways off the board. On more than one occasion, I've sent him an e-mail or a note somewhere else to tell him to cool his jets. He has always done so. People may not like that or think it shows favoritism or whatever, but that's just the nature of the beast.

People seem to doubt what I wrote yesterday about the number of posts reported or think that there is some hiding of the ball there. There really isn't. I will try to post (while protecting anonymity) a summary of reported posts on a regular basis if that is something people would like. I think you will be underwhelmed.

Buccaneer 04-09-2013 07:36 PM

digamma, thank you for the clarification. Perhaps there could be some regulars here that could be added to the moderator's pool to replace those that do not frequent the boards much anymore?

MacroGuru 04-09-2013 07:40 PM


kcchief19 04-09-2013 07:42 PM

For the record, I can't fix the quoted text, but I'm ashamed at the misuse of "you're" in my post above. I know better ... I write for a freakin' living, that's a huge pet peeve. I don't know what type of phasia caused that.

BlackJack 04-09-2013 07:52 PM

Hey guys, anyone in the Cleveland area that wants to grab a coffee, PM me-

Desnudo 04-09-2013 07:57 PM

Which version of guitar hero do you have?

BlackJack 04-09-2013 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Desnudo (Post 2809122)
Which version of guitar hero do you have?


yessir

Bobble 04-09-2013 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackJack (Post 2809120)
Hey guys, anyone in the Cleveland area that wants to grab a coffee, PM me-


"Sure, I could buy pants and whatever, but then I wouldn't have as many guns and guitars."

You know, the REALLY disturbing thing is that there had to be someone else there to take the picture. Then, of course, it puts the picture and the lotion in the bucket. {shivers}

Autumn 04-09-2013 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 2808966)
x


Oh my god, lol, this is a local band that my friend and I joke about all the time. Their MySpace is priceless.

korme 04-09-2013 11:37 PM

Wow


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.