![]() |
Quote:
Mustang, do you think Narcizo's a Tarq? He won't believe my innocence. :cool: |
Hey. It's hoops. Jump in whenever you like. :)
|
Quote:
What Day 3 service? The only one I have matched up there so far is Anxiety on Pimpus. |
Great, now that I'm caught up on the night developments I'm the only one in the thread.
I like Rum's thoughts on who got the killer on Day 1. As an add-on, I would suggest that once they bought the killer that day it would have been a priority for them on Day 3 when they once again successfully won the bid. So a look at the top of the wealth chain from that day makes sense as well. Day 3 Wealthiest Bulletus Spongeus (Dead, confirmed good) Dodgus Erchickus Imus Thecrewus (Dead, confirmed good) The following Senators are known to be extremely wealthy (no change): Coffeus Yakus Warlordus Ironsus Headus Lonestarus Girlus (in jail already) Marcus Vaughnus (inactive) Schmidtyus Schmidtyus (Dead, confirmed good) I'm not convinced we drop down to the third level as Rum did on Day 1. I really think this would have been a priority service for the Tarqs so this is where I'm going to focus my conversation unless some other detail (attorney scans) emerges. Dodgerchick Day 1: attorney Day 2: sex slaves Day 3: ??? Warlord Day 1: attorney Day 2: jailed, no services Day 3: ??? Ironhead Day 1: priest Day 2: killer Day 3: ??? I know that I advocated earlier that I would rather make a mistake with a poor Roman than a wealthy Roman. But that was also when we were operating with less information. At this point in the game we have content to digest; we beleive we understand how many of the rules operate. I'm certainly willing to listen to feedback from others, but right now my plan would be to arrest one of these people. With that in mind, I'll try to advertise my final selection early enough so someone with an attorney can use their "scan" on one of the people who will be spending the day in jail. That should allow us to make an informed release/kill decision - something we have not yet been able to do this game. |
Quote:
Haven't read anything after this, but -- did anyone even die after Day 1? In other words, I didn't put in a kill order. |
Also, I realize I'm giving Passacaglia a walk on the Day 3 analysis. If people think that Marc Vaughn was not posting but sent in an order then please voice that opinion as well.
|
Quote:
I hired Animus Sentus on Day 3. |
Dodgerchick, why did you choose to scan Autumn with your attorney yesterday? Was he someone high on your distrust list?
|
Quote:
Just had a thought on my way to work -- even if no one died after Day 1, I think someone was poisoned after Day 2, so we can't discount the fact that a kill order was made on Day 1. I didn't order one, though. |
Quote:
Thanks..I think. I think the most likely scenario is that MV wasn't doing anything -- otherwise why replace him? If that's too much of a meta-game thing, then I take it back. |
I can't recall, did we get consul vote results yesterday?
|
Also, as I said before, I was told that "I" didn't purchase any services while I was Marc Vaughan, so "I" wasn't doing anything on that front. As for kills, I wasn't told that I made any -- probably since it's assumed that loyal Senators don't kill people! :)
|
Nice late night analysis, Chief Rum. I tend to agree with you that there is a Tarq from this group: Antmeister, Autumn, Barkeep, Path12 and Peregrine.
I have a pretty good vibe about Autumn. He's had some good insights and seems to be a good guy. I think he's on the up-and-up. I'm not confident enough in that to claim him to be trusted or anything like that, but I feel that it is unlikely for him to be a Tarq. I have neutral feelings about Path, BK, and Peregrine. Could be good - could be bad. But Antmeister? I get bad vibes from him. Primarily because of how hard he came after me after the arrest snafu the other night. It seemed that he started to casually try to cast suspicion my way, and when no one took the bait, he became more and more accusatory. I know it's human nature to get defensive when someone comes after you, and maybe that's part of what I'm feeling, but I just feel like he was trying to make me look bad for a reason - I'm very active, was a Consul at the time, have a lot of wealth, and seem to be able to get more wealth pretty much at will. He seemed to want to take advantage of the arrest issue to try to take me down and that gives me a bad feeling about him. So for right now, I would arrest Antmeister. |
Personally, I would arrest path12, and after kwhit's thought process of antmeister, I might arrest antmeister as well.
I sent the horses to someone suggesting I would select barkeep, but I'd relent given his response that he doesn't fake real life obstacles. |
Ardent Enthusiast sues Anxiety for being rich.
Ardent Enthusiast sues Dodger Chick for not paying me. Ardent Enthusiast sues Kwhit because the third time's the charm (though I don't recall suing him two times before, just once). |
Quote:
|
Interesting...
|
Quote:
This is correct. I made a data entry error, and Pass's bid was entered in the wrong place. I didn't discover this until after pms had gone out, and at that time decided to leave it as is. Whenever I have to make a decision like this, I consider whether it is fair to all parties, and in this case I think it was. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
To explain why I've got a bad feeling about Ardent - I keep coming back to the kill on Swaggs on day two before the real importance of lawyers was (widely?) known. At the time my thoughts were that the pimps or the priest would be providing seer-like services, certainly not the lawyers. It now turns out that lawyers are very important/crucial in the game (a seer-role who can also read allegiance when someone dies). If Ardent were bad might he not presume that the top lawyer in Rome is always going to supercede him and, potentially, expose him. Or that Ardent potentially was given more information about his role then Swaggs got. There's also his, well, post-boosting, for want of a better word. He's posted an awful lot but has he actually said anything of note? With regards to bullet I don't see it as a huge mark in his favour. He might also be aware that lawyers get info about the killed person and suspect that the replacement lawyer would also get the info. I think it would be pretty risky for him to say that bullet was a bad guy. So basically that's why I'm not very trusting of Ardent at the moment. On the other hand I think we can remove the question of his continued survival having any meaning beyond this point. It's likely that the bad guys will let him live from now on to increase suspicion of him. So me pointing that out might cost him his life. Sorry if that's the case. |
Quote:
Why would you arrest path? And I'm afraid I don't really understand what you're saying about the horses. Probably just me being stupid though. |
Not really, Narc. I actually just assumed when bullet died that he had somehow hired me...that I was looking after his will or something. I did not, in fact, expect to have someone come in and authenticate my announcement.
|
Quote:
Thanks for getting my back. Anyway, my vote for who to arrest would be Neon Chaos. I don't see why we shouldn't scan both lawyers, to make sure they're on the up-and up, especially the one that doesn't want to be scanned. |
Narc, as for why path: Here's better than just a 38 post guy. At least, my memory tells me he is. I can't recall reading anything he's posted, honestly. I could see path setting up the game as it has gone so far...I could see a number of players doing so, honestly. But Path has been quiet and I'd like to hear more from him.
The horse guy is who I bid on, and won, yesterday...meaning I can communicate with one person today. It's not entirely useful, but I'm sure the person reading the message understands it. |
I am also suspicious of Ardent and Neon and would have no problems if one of them were arrested as well.
|
Quote:
Day 3 was Furius, I bid on Schmidty last night, and we all know how that went. |
Note for the Consuls: You may not issue arrest warrants for a Consul or Tribune. The Consuls are Hoopus Guyus and Narcizus Lispus. The Tribune is Antus Meisterus.
|
Can lawyers do their job while in jail?
|
Quote:
There is one way to find out. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Can I volunteer for jail?
|
Quote:
|
I know hoops is a consul, who got the other spot?
|
Dude, look at the post you just quoted.
|
Doh. :) Wasn't thinking about the consuls when I quoted, actually breezed right by it. I went to the name antmeister...and realized that we couldn't jail him.
Narc, by all means, jail me. Let's roll those dice. |
:D
|
Seriously, let's have at it.
|
Quote:
Same question here. I'm loyal to the Senate, but when it comes to blows, I'm looking to stay alive. |
I don't want to jail you Ardent. I want the lawyers out there doing some good. If I was going to jail a lawyer it would be Neon who isn't going to provide anything today anyway.
|
I'm really struggling with why Tyrith would lie about sending me a message. Really struggling.
|
Actually, Neon, I meant in court. Can I defend myself in court. Not sure if that's how it came across.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Watch out, Narc. When AE gets his masochism going, he'll hound you for your entire term as Consul, until you throw him in jail. ;) |
Quote:
I'm not sure how me going to jail proves that I'm guilty or innocent, but if it's what the masses want, it's what the masses get. |
Quote:
It's possible. It wouldn't be the only time it happened that night. |
Quote:
Where did I miss this information? What was the result of the scan (post # possibly) |
Ardentus Enthusiastus has decided to sue everyone...in hopes that me being the lawyer that I am that perhaps I can get more information from the suing of people.
Coffeeus Yakus Warlordus Ironus Headus Passus Caglius Pathus Twelvus Peregrineus Barbarus Barkeepus Valerius Fortynineus Autumnus Leavus Antus Meisterus Chiefus Rumus Narcizus Lispus Lonestarus Girlus Daddyus Torgous Grammus Atticus Hoopus Guyus Mustangus Sallus Neonus Chaosus Tyrus Ithus |
Quote:
Did you ever post this? |
Note: of the suits I've filed so far, I haven't had any information. Just trying this out for size.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.