Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Werewolf Games (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   Werewolf XXXVII: Middle-Earth - GAME ENDS. Who Won? Check it out! (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=53934)

Mr. Wednesday 11-09-2006 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrith (Post 1301841)
Even if thomkal is the seer he is much more useful to us alive than dead! If he dies we have three people we can trust and we can slaughter blade tomorrow. If he's bad we have a dead bad guy. If we let him live we know NOTHING because of the timing of the reveal. He didn't give us a role name, information about himself, or anything. We have to hold the lynch.


I think you're saying he's worth more dead than alive. The problem is, if we lynch him and he's right, one of the cleared people dies tonight. Don't waste the lynch on someone who's probably good, let the wolves take care of him tonight and take a shot at getting a real bad guy.

Thomkal 11-09-2006 09:51 PM

I'm posting as quickly as I can here guys, cut me some slack

Tyrith 11-09-2006 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1301845)
those are all reasons to kill him tyrith. if he's alive we have no idea if he would be telling the truth.


I know, that's waht I'm saying, he has to die! HE HAS TO DIE!

Thomkal 11-09-2006 09:51 PM

The people saying to hold the lynch obviously want to because they want the seer dead.

Mr. Wednesday 11-09-2006 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrith (Post 1301844)
If he's the real seer we need, need need need to know his scan list. Two of them will be alive tomorrow, we can use the information to actually get ourselves oriented in this game instead of running around.

We've already got the scan list. None of the cleared guys was up as an alternative, so what's your point here?

Tyrith 11-09-2006 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Wednesday (Post 1301847)
I think you're saying he's worth more dead than alive. The problem is, if we lynch him and he's right, one of the cleared people dies tonight. Don't waste the lynch on someone who's probably good, let the wolves take care of him tonight and take a shot at getting a real bad guy.


If he dies and he's good we know that two people are good tomorrow _and_ we can lynch blade. That's enough for me.

Mr. Wednesday 11-09-2006 09:52 PM

UNVOTE ntndeacon
VOTE Tyrith

Grammaticus 11-09-2006 09:52 PM

UNVOTE ThomKal

VOTE ntndeacon


I'm going with the reveal

DaddyTorgo 11-09-2006 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 1301850)
The people saying to hold the lynch obviously want to because they want the seer dead.


not at all. it's because the only way to actually verify what you're saying is for you to die. it's an unfortunate side-effect of being the seer i imagine. otherwise you could be a Dark agent trying to slip one of your fellow Dark agents into a CoT

Mr. Wednesday 11-09-2006 09:53 PM

Well, looks like a lot of folks are here... hope they've somewhat caught up...

Thomkal 11-09-2006 09:53 PM

Mr. Wednesday, Jonathan you know I'm telling the truth about you. You can save me.

Grammaticus 11-09-2006 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrith (Post 1301852)
If he dies and he's good we know that two people are good tomorrow _and_ we can lynch blade. That's enough for me.


Still does not mean Blade is bad, just wrong.

DaddyTorgo 11-09-2006 09:54 PM

people...don't let us end up with no lynch here. if we end up with no lynch we get NO information and NO certainty from this!

Tyrith 11-09-2006 09:54 PM

For what reason should we trust a seer reveal with 20 minutes left with no specific details on a role that was VERY heavy on specific details and a scan list that is possible the worst scan list I have ever seen? It's TOTAL CRAP. We get two good guys and a bad guy if he's good, and a bad guy if he's bad. Otherwise we go into tomorrow not knowing anything and a lynch behind.

Tyrith 11-09-2006 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grammaticus (Post 1301861)
Still does not mean Blade is bad, just wrong.


There's no way this was an accident if he's the seer. It's just too convenient. Lots of games they've had ways to scan for the seer.

LoneStarGirl 11-09-2006 09:55 PM

what is the vote count? we have five minutes and i think we have enough for the lynch

DaddyTorgo 11-09-2006 09:55 PM

if Thomkal is inded the seer (as i doubt) then there's someone else out there with information about people's roles. The odds of that...not so great I'd imagine. Whether that other person would be good or evil though I confess I have no idea.

Alan T 11-09-2006 09:56 PM

Just caught up. Whats the current vote count? I think its crazy to lynch the seer to prove his trust list. I think Tyrith should be hung for just saying it, but its too late at this point.

The chances of lynching the seer instead of making the bad guys waste a move to do it seems just mind boffling to me. Worst case scenerio, he is a bad guy and he survives another day.

I would rather lynch no one than accidentally lynch the seer just to clear 3 good people. that is insane.

Tyrith 11-09-2006 09:56 PM

We only have 8 on Thomkal, we need someone

Mr. Wednesday 11-09-2006 09:56 PM

Considering he went on the block an hour before deadline, what in the heck were you expecting?

DaddyTorgo 11-09-2006 09:56 PM

I AGREE WITH TYRITH!!! HOLD STRONG PEOPLE!

BrianD 11-09-2006 09:57 PM

Quick shift to Tyrith?

Mr. Wednesday 11-09-2006 09:57 PM

UNVOTE Tyrith
VOTE ntndeacon

I think we should look very hard at Tyrith tomorrow, but right now my vote is better placed where it might get someone who's not a seer and not cleared.

Tyrith 11-09-2006 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T (Post 1301869)
Just caught up. Whats the current vote count? I think its crazy to lynch the seer to prove his trust list. I think Tyrith should be hung for just saying it, but its too late at this point.

The chances of lynching the seer instead of making the bad guys waste a move to do it seems just mind boffling to me. Worst case scenerio, he is a bad guy and he survives another day.

I would rather lynch no one than accidentally lynch the seer just to clear 3 good people. that is insane.


If he is the seer they can just let him live tonight, give us another bogus name, and we kill him tomorrow and we're just as bad off!

DaddyTorgo 11-09-2006 09:57 PM

Alan...I have VERY GOOD reason to believe he is not the seer. Or at worst there are multiple people with role information. Because someone else has role information on me.

Alan T 11-09-2006 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrith (Post 1301863)
For what reason should we trust a seer reveal with 20 minutes left with no specific details on a role that was VERY heavy on specific details and a scan list that is possible the worst scan list I have ever seen? It's TOTAL CRAP. We get two good guys and a bad guy if he's good, and a bad guy if he's bad. Otherwise we go into tomorrow not knowing anything and a lynch behind.


How can you blame the 20 min thing on him? Its not like he anticipated 8 votes being moved to him 3 hours ago. If you are the seer would you reveal your role with your neck not on the line?

Now I have no idea if Thomkal is good or bad.. but the risk of lynching the seer just to prove a point sounds crazy.

Mr. Wednesday 11-09-2006 09:57 PM

Brian, if you want to do it, I'm game, just don't think we can round up nine votes in two minutes.

LoneStarGirl 11-09-2006 09:57 PM

A seer would never reveal 20 minutes before deadline. It is a BS move to save his butt. No real seer would scan those three people. He had BS reasons for scanning them too. Gram, you changed your vote, if Thomkal dies and is bad, you aren't going to look good.

Grammaticus 11-09-2006 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1301867)
if Thomkal is inded the seer (as i doubt) then there's someone else out there with information about people's roles. The odds of that...not so great I'd imagine. Whether that other person would be good or evil though I confess I have no idea.


I think you are onto something here.

Mr. Wednesday 11-09-2006 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1301876)
Alan...I have VERY GOOD reason to believe he is not the seer. Or at worst there are multiple people with role information. Because someone else has role information on me.

More details, please. As many as you can give without compromising that person.

DaddyTorgo 11-09-2006 09:59 PM

change back then gram! someone else gave me SPECIFIC role information about me. that they wouldn't just "guess" at.

Grammaticus 11-09-2006 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T (Post 1301877)
How can you blame the 20 min thing on him? Its not like he anticipated 8 votes being moved to him 3 hours ago. If you are the seer would you reveal your role with your neck not on the line?

Now I have no idea if Thomkal is good or bad.. but the risk of lynching the seer just to prove a point sounds crazy.


Yep, that was a quick move out of the blue. That is one big reason why I moved my vote. He didn't get much more time to do a reveal.

Alan T 11-09-2006 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1301876)
Alan...I have VERY GOOD reason to believe he is not the seer. Or at worst there are multiple people with role information. Because someone else has role information on me.


I read what you are referring to. I have a theory about that, and its based alot on just my gut belief. I could be wrong, but in alot of ways this game is somewhat similar to my tombstone game I ran. Different people can find out different information about people. Thomkal states he only finds out someone's allegiance. This other person you refer to, did they know your allegiance or your role only?

This is a very similar mechanism to what I used in Tombstone also.

LoneStarGirl 11-09-2006 09:59 PM

Gram, mr wed, change back
you are doing the village wrong. yuo haev one minute! c'mon guys!

DaddyTorgo 11-09-2006 09:59 PM

they mentioned multiple times what my character's occupation was

Jonathan Ezarik 11-09-2006 09:59 PM

Holy crap. I go away for a few hours and everything falls apart. I don't know about Mr. W or whomever else got scanned, but I can say that I'm good. Believe me or not, I'M GOOD.

Grammaticus 11-09-2006 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1301883)
change back then gram! someone else gave me SPECIFIC role information about me. that they wouldn't just "guess" at.


Is it enough to make you move your vote?? You don't have much time.

Mr. Wednesday 11-09-2006 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoneStarGirl (Post 1301879)
A seer would never reveal 20 minutes before deadline. It is a BS move to save his butt.

Um, no. A seer will reveal as late as possible when his butt is on the line.

Quote:

No real seer would scan those three people. He had BS reasons for scanning them too.
:confused:

Please elaborate. They looked pretty reasonable to me.

Mr. Wednesday 11-09-2006 10:00 PM

MY VOTE IS NOT GOING BACK TO THOMKAL.

Abe Sargent 11-09-2006 10:00 PM

Time

Abe Sargent 11-09-2006 10:00 PM

Let's see what the vote says, hold on

Alan T 11-09-2006 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoneStarGirl (Post 1301879)
A seer would never reveal 20 minutes before deadline. It is a BS move to save his butt. No real seer would scan those three people. He had BS reasons for scanning them too. Gram, you changed your vote, if Thomkal dies and is bad, you aren't going to look good.


If you were the seer, when would you have revealed? 5 hours ago when no one voted for you?

Tyrith 11-09-2006 10:01 PM

You all belived a guy that didnt' give us his name or occupation in a game where everyone has a name and an occupation! When we didn't lose much by just killing him now! And you're going to kill me tomorrow just for trying to be reasonable! CONGRATULATIONS BAD GUYS, YOU'VE WON THE GAME. I don't know what to say, but this was alarmingly dumb on our part.

DaddyTorgo 11-09-2006 10:01 PM

well that's a lovely pile of dung we got ourselves into as a village there

alan...do the rules of WW allow you to elaborate on what that other type of tombstone role was?

Mr. Wednesday 11-09-2006 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1301887)
they mentioned multiple times what my character's occupation was

That's a little different from a seer. To the extent that it does not compromise you or the person, why is knowledge of your character's occupation significant?

Thomkal 11-09-2006 10:02 PM

Whew, thanks to those who switched off me

Tyrith 11-09-2006 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T (Post 1301894)
If you were the seer, when would you have revealed? 5 hours ago when no one voted for you?


If I was the seer I would have at least given my name and occupation when I revealed when those are the only pieces of information we know about people.

Alan T 11-09-2006 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1301887)
they mentioned multiple times what my character's occupation was


Right, so you have one person stating he knows your occupation, and another stating he knows your allegiance but not your occupation.. Put 2 and 2 together.

LoneStarGirl 11-09-2006 10:02 PM

Alant, if you were the seer, would you look at jonathan, schmidty, and mr w?

Thomkal 11-09-2006 10:03 PM

Again I tell you all I get is which side they are on. If there are other roles out there that get more information then good for you, but that is all I get.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.