Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   POTUS 2016 General Election Discussion Thread (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=91538)

albionmoonlight 10-07-2016 02:38 PM

FL, NC, and OH also have contested Senate races (though last I checked, FL and OH were pretty likely to go GOP). Seem like strange places to be withdrawing resources.

larrymcg421 10-07-2016 02:45 PM

So based on that site Quik linked, these are the winning scenarios if Trump loses any or all of those states...

Loses NC only - Clinton 404, Trump 101
Loses FL only - Clinton 469, Trump 39
Loses OH only - Clinton 413, Trump 90
Loses NC and OH - Clinton 230, Trump 23
Loses NC and FL - Clinton 251, Trump 4
Loses FL and OH - Clinton 252, Trump 2
Loses NC, FL, and OH - Clinton wins all scenarios

Easy Mac 10-07-2016 02:46 PM

He's going to have such a great debate he won't need to spend money in those states.

ISiddiqui 10-07-2016 02:51 PM

So 538's Poll-only projection has been moving steadily towards Clinton since the 1st debate. As of right now (well, more like as of 2:30pm):

Hillary Clinton has an 80.1% of winning the Electoral College vote on Nov 8, meaning Trump only has a 19.9% chance (if the election was held TODAY, Clinton would have an 86.7% chance of winning).

Now, of course things can change and 1/5th of a chance for Trump is still a chance, but Trump has got to turn this thing around and soon. Sunday's debate has to be a home run for him - and I don't think bringing up Bill Clinton's affairs is going do that.

Ben E Lou 10-07-2016 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ISiddiqui (Post 3122305)
Trump has got to turn this thing around and soon.

I think we've reached the point now where it's out of his hands. He needs a Clinton smoking gun at the level of an audio tape of her calling Obama the n-word or a major mass murder on American soil by an illegal immigrant of Muslim. I don't see how anything he can say at the remaining debates can undo the damage he's already done to his own candidacy.

NobodyHere 10-07-2016 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy Mac (Post 3122304)
He's going to have such a great debate he won't need to spend money in those states.


In fact the RNC has already called him the winner.

Logan 10-07-2016 04:02 PM

Donald Trump Says Central Park Five Are Guilty, Despite DNA Evidence - NBC News

Subby 10-07-2016 04:12 PM

Because this is in one of my historical blind spots (and it's 2016), I went straight to the Wikipedia entry about this. I was graduating high school/starting college around the time of the case and was basically completely oblivious to anything outside of a 10 foot radius of my body.

Anyway, after reading the entry I think that it's interesting to note that it's probably not as cut and dried as news outlets are going to make it in the coming days 24 hours. Even though the five were exonerated based on DNA evidence, there is still a pretty strong case for some type of accessory/collateral role in the assault (physical or sexual or both).

Again, this is about as surface an understanding as one can get and it isn't meant to let Trump off the hook for his racially charged bullshit back in '89 (or now). Still, it's a fascinating case.

SackAttack 10-07-2016 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ISiddiqui (Post 3122305)
So 538's Poll-only projection has been moving steadily towards Clinton since the 1st debate. As of right now (well, more like as of 2:30pm):

Hillary Clinton has an 80.1% of winning the Electoral College vote on Nov 8, meaning Trump only has a 19.9% chance (if the election was held TODAY, Clinton would have an 86.7% chance of winning).

Now, of course things can change and 1/5th of a chance for Trump is still a chance, but Trump has got to turn this thing around and soon. Sunday's debate has to be a home run for him - and I don't think bringing up Bill Clinton's affairs is going do that.


Honestly, I don't think even when the numbers started improving, that the Republican leadership was ever banking on a Trump win.

What they wanted was for Trump to be non-toxic enough for their Senate incumbents to be able to start banking votes as soon as early voting began. Make hay while the sun shines and all that.

I suspect their hope is that whatever does (or doesn't) happen in the final month of the campaign, that maybe Trump kept it together long enough to avoid the possibility of a washout in the Senate so that they can keep some leverage over the Scalia vacancy.

And I think that's been the plan even in recent weeks where Trump wasn't shooting himself in the dick Old Faithful style.

Subby 10-07-2016 04:29 PM



ISiddiqui 10-07-2016 04:49 PM

Another part of that tape:

Quote:

In that audio, Trump discusses a failed attempt to seduce a woman, whose full name is not given in the video.

“I moved on her and I failed. I’ll admit it,” Trump is heard saying. It was unclear when the events he was describing took place. The tape was recorded several months after he married his third wife, Melania.

“Whoa,” another voice said.

“I did try and f--- her. She was married,” Trump says.

Trump continues: “And I moved on her very heavily. In fact, I took her out furniture shopping. She wanted to get some furniture. I said, ‘I’ll show you where they have some nice furniture.’”

“I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldn’t get there. And she was married,” Trump says. “Then all of a sudden I see her, she’s now got the big phony tits and everything. She’s totally changed her look.”

Man, and he's talking about speaking more about Bill's affairs?!

mckerney 10-07-2016 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ISiddiqui (Post 3122338)
Man, and he's talking about speaking more about Bill's affairs?!


His response is that Bill has said much worse things to him on the golf course, so yeah he probably will.

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-r...onald-j.-trump

Quote:

- OCTOBER 07, 2016 -

STATEMENT FROM DONALD J. TRUMP

“This was locker room banter, a private conversation that took place many years ago. Bill Clinton has said far worse to me on the golf course - not even close. I apologize if anyone was offended.”



tarcone 10-07-2016 04:55 PM

I dont really think this was bad lip reading


NobodyHere 10-07-2016 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subby (Post 3122329)



Maybe I'm jaded but I'm thinking this doesn't really change the election.

I mean is any Trump voter going to think, "I stood by Trump despite the other hundred racist/sexist/despicable things he has said, but this is going to far!"

cuervo72 10-07-2016 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mckerney (Post 3122340)
His response is that Bill has said much worse things to him on the golf course


Sadly I don't doubt this.

Ben E Lou 10-07-2016 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3122344)
Maybe I'm jaded but I'm thinking this doesn't really change the election.

I mean is any Trump voter going to think, "I stood by Trump despite the other hundred racist/sexist/despicable things he has said, but this is going to far!"

I think it could affect the nose-holders.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cuervo72 (Post 3122345)
Sadly I don't doubt this.

Maybe true. Maybe not. But yeah, it can't be disproven and it's completely believable. Probably his best shot to deflect.

mckerney 10-07-2016 05:12 PM




Trump is scheduled to campaign with Paul Ryan tomorrow, wonder if that will be called off.

ISiddiqui 10-07-2016 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mckerney (Post 3122340)
His response is that Bill has said much worse things to him on the golf course, so yeah he probably will.

Attention Required! | CloudFlare


Of course he has no proof of that... and that doesn't necessarily address the cheating part.

larrymcg421 10-07-2016 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NobodyHere (Post 3122344)
Maybe I'm jaded but I'm thinking this doesn't really change the election.

I mean is any Trump voter going to think, "I stood by Trump despite the other hundred racist/sexist/despicable things he has said, but this is going to far!"


The goal for him right now isn't to convince Trump voters, but to convince swing voters who aren't already on his side. I'm thinking about suburbanites in places like Philly, Cincy, and Tampa. I think definitely hurts him with them, or even in the best case scenarios, it prevents him from any attempts to gain with them for a few days.

ISiddiqui 10-07-2016 05:26 PM

It makes it far harder for him to claw back from his dwindling chances, but maybe Ben is right - that it is completely out of his hands and needs a near-miracle to win.

JonInMiddleGA 10-07-2016 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben E Lou (Post 3122307)
I don't see how anything he can say at the remaining debates can undo the damage he's already done to his own candidacy.


Well, he cost himself my vote with his own mouth, so on the one hand I get it.

On the other hand, I don't understand how any rational human being can vote for the subhuman filth running against him either.

A 1-1 tie (as they each vote for themselves) seems like the only sane outcome.

larrymcg421 10-07-2016 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA (Post 3122353)
Well, he cost himself my vote with his own mouth, so on the one hand I get it.

On the other hand, I don't understand how any rational human being can vote for the subhuman filth running against him either.

A 1-1 tie (as they each vote for themselves) seems like the only sane outcome.


Which would end up electing one of those third party candidates you love. :)

mckerney 10-07-2016 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ISiddiqui (Post 3122348)
Of course he has no proof of that... and that doesn't necessarily address the cheating part.


I don't think anyone is surprised by the cheating part, everyone knew that about Donald. I'd say it doesn't address the, "grab them by the pussy, you can do whatever you want if you're famous," part.

BishopMVP 10-07-2016 06:34 PM

Like Subby said, it's pretty clear they were exonerated of raping her, but guilty of heinous acts and were accessories to her rape (and thought they'd killed her). Screw them, screw de Blasio for settling, and screw Hillary for trying to make this a campaign issue.

sabotai 10-07-2016 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subby (Post 3122325)
Again, this is about as surface an understanding as one can get and it isn't meant to let Trump off the hook for his racially charged bullshit back in '89 (or now). Still, it's a fascinating case.


Ken Burns did a documentary on it. It's on YouTube on PBS's YouTube channel.

larrymcg421 10-07-2016 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BishopMVP (Post 3122362)
Like Subby said, it's pretty clear they were exonerated of raping her, but guilty of heinous acts and were accessories to her rape (and thought they'd killed her). Screw them, screw de Blasio for settling, and screw Hillary for trying to make this a campaign issue.


It's not pretty clear at all to me. I know the three person panel sponsored by the police commissioner concluded that they were likely involved in some way, but I don't find them any more convincing than DA Morgenthau's conclusions, especially when we have hours and hours of interrogation that was not recorded.

JPhillips 10-07-2016 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by larrymcg421 (Post 3122350)
The goal for him right now isn't to convince Trump voters, but to convince swing voters who aren't already on his side. I'm thinking about suburbanites in places like Philly, Cincy, and Tampa. I think definitely hurts him with them, or even in the best case scenarios, it prevents him from any attempts to gain with them for a few days.


In particular he needs to win back a fair portion of college educated white women that have abandoned the GOP this cycle. This won't help.

chinaski 10-07-2016 08:02 PM

If this is locker room talk, its coming from the mouth of the one guy no one wants to be friends with. He's straight up bragging about how his self perceived status allows him to get away with sexual assault. What a disgusting piece of trash and an embarrassment to America.

bronconick 10-07-2016 08:11 PM

How did none of the other R nominees not find any of this? Are they that freaking incompetent?

SackAttack 10-07-2016 08:27 PM

They lost to him, didn't they? I think that answers the question.

(I'm not sure any of this would have sunk Trump in the primary.)

Thomkal 10-07-2016 08:44 PM

So how do evangelicals support Trump after this?

SackAttack 10-07-2016 08:50 PM

Cognitive dissonance.

It's a requirement to be a Republican these days.

rjolley 10-07-2016 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3122375)
So how do evangelicals support Trump after this?


Here's one way:

Bill Mitchell on Twitter: "Look at the Bible. An imperfect soul like Trump is EXACTLY the type of person God always uses to lead his people. The pious are the enemy."

Thomkal 10-07-2016 08:59 PM


wow I think Trump is way beyond imperfect.

BishopMVP 10-07-2016 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by larrymcg421 (Post 3122365)
It's not pretty clear at all to me. I know the three person panel sponsored by the police commissioner concluded that they were likely involved in some way, but I don't find them any more convincing than DA Morgenthau's conclusions, especially when we have hours and hours of interrogation that was not recorded.

Are you also arguing they were innocent of all the other unprovoked assaults committed that evening? Because even Burns admits that they brought a pipe to the park that was used in the attack on one of the other joggers, and multiple defendants admitted to involvement in other crimes that night. And I think 7 years in jail sounds about right for teenagers who violently assault and rob multiple people but only probably were accomplices in a brutal rape. You don't have to pull the trigger to be charged with murder, and I don't think you should need to be the one penetrating the victim to be charged with rape.

But hey, Donald Trump said some sexist and offensive things, and the guy on his 3rd trophy wife probably wasn't faithful to her. That clearly deserves to be the bigger outrage in many people's minds.

mckerney 10-07-2016 09:53 PM

And there's more.



JPhillips 10-07-2016 10:01 PM

What are the odds Trump ends the debate with, "Fuck her right in the pussy"?

SirFozzie 10-07-2016 10:14 PM

I'm now convinced that the entire GOP Presidental primaries are a giant improv group dedicated to amplifying the worst fears of the Conservatives:
2008- Political Neophyte in Barack Obama? Meet Sarah Palin.

2012- Running against Obamacare? Meet the other person to sign mandatory health insurance, Mitt Romney.

2016-Trust and Honesty issues, with a side of "Bad towards Women?" (Bill). Heeeeere's Donald Trump!

at this point, if Clinton wins the election and runs for re-election in 2020.. I don't know what they're going to do, except maybe put a T-1000 Terminator built from email servers from the Consulate at Benghazi.

(Ok, some of this may be the cold medicine. Not all of it though)

Flasch186 10-07-2016 10:36 PM

Now the election is over. This hot mic can be dragged out for another 7-10 days and itll essentially be too late for Trump to turn it around. I'd suspect over the next week a bunch of GOP'ers turn their back on Trump when they view it a lost cause to win the Gen election.

Subby 10-07-2016 10:40 PM

It's late on a Friday so everyone has probably already seen this stuff, but I think the Billy Bush tapes are what ultimately put the final nail in Trump's coffin. He's already been disinvited from Ryan's event tomorrow. Huntsman came out strong against him. The governor of Utah has now said he's not voting for him. Some never Trumps like Romney and Flake are just hammering him.

And then there's the Master of Shitty Timing, Ted Cruz. Maybe should have waited just a little longer to flush his dignity down the toilet with that endorsement.

Galaxy 10-07-2016 10:46 PM

Blah, I retract my prediction. This is the one nail in the coffin, and possibly the end of Trump's business brand.

Does the GOP get behind Johnson/Weld?

Julio Riddols 10-07-2016 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Galaxy (Post 3122391)
Blah, I retract my prediction. This is the one nail in the coffin, and possibly the end of Trump's business brand.

Does the GOP get behind Johnson/Weld?


I hope so. A third party winning the election would be incredible.

bronconick 10-07-2016 10:56 PM

They'd probably like McMulllen better since he was brought in by some NeverTrumps, but beggers can't be choosers

mckerney 10-07-2016 10:56 PM




At least one Republican has found a way to justify continuing to endorse him.



mckerney 10-07-2016 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albionmoonlight (Post 3122149)
Went ahead and put a little money on Trump not participating in all 3 debates at 11c/share.

I think that the hurricane might get him to at least hint about not going so that he can help provide disaster relief and/or "it is not appropriate for us to have this debate while so many people have just lost their homes"

As longshots go, I'll take that at 10 to 1.

He may or may not do it, but one stray remark would be enough to make that market move, I think.


PredictIt has this up to 20¢/share currently.

larrymcg421 10-07-2016 11:10 PM

Congratulations to anyone who bought Hillary shares before the first debate.

Subby 10-07-2016 11:13 PM

Chaffetz just pulled his endorsement.

mckerney 10-07-2016 11:14 PM

Trump: ‘I Know That Was Pretty Bad, But Let’s Just Say You’re Going To Want To Save Your Energy’ - The Onion - America's Finest News Source

larrymcg421 10-07-2016 11:15 PM

Gary Herbert also pulled his endorsement.

Ryche 10-07-2016 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mckerney (Post 3122384)
And there's more.




Those one has been out there for quit awhile, her subsequent actions after the alleged assaults really weaken her credibility.

SirFozzie 10-07-2016 11:23 PM

And the Times moved forward a story they were going to run in the Sunday paper. Holy shit.

Log In - The New York Times

edit: fuck, beaten :)

Thomkal 10-07-2016 11:24 PM

Well that didn't take long:

Clinton unveils video on Trump's crude comments about women - POLITICO

I almost wonder if she should not debate him again.

stevew 10-07-2016 11:37 PM

Like do people really expect this to hurt trump? He's survived so many gaffes already that this too will pass. The election is still very much a toss up.

Flasch186 10-07-2016 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 3122407)
Like do people really expect this to hurt trump? He's survived so many gaffes already that this too will pass. The election is still very much a toss up.


Yup, I do. This will kill any chance he had of getting any female undecideds. He had to get them to come his way to win and that is toast. He's even losing some of the hold your nose and vote Trump republicans. Its ovah. Toast.

larrymcg421 10-07-2016 11:43 PM

Not only will it hurt Trump with hold your nose voters, but I think it could actually create hold your nose voters for Hillary. Some female Stein voters may now be convinced to try and defeat Trump at all costs.

Thomkal 10-07-2016 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 3122407)
Like do people really expect this to hurt trump? He's survived so many gaffes already that this too will pass. The election is still very much a toss up.


Of course it will hurt him. How could it not.

PilotMan 10-07-2016 11:50 PM

Fuck Trump and fuck anyone who has a daughter who votes for him after this. Clinton needs to tie Trump with that kid from Stanford and Cosby.

larrymcg421 10-08-2016 12:10 AM

Oh my god. He used his apology video as a free campaign commercial.

Dutch 10-08-2016 12:11 AM

It's a shame we didn't get this video when it could've helped rule him out of the GOP running. Why are we just learning about this now? Dirty politics. Shady AF.

mckerney 10-08-2016 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dutch (Post 3122413)
It's a shame we didn't get this video when it could've helped rule him out of the GOP running. Why are we just learning about this now? Dirty politics. Shady AF.


Billy really let Jeb down.

Quote:

Originally Posted by larrymcg421 (Post 3122412)
Oh my god. He used his apology video as a free campaign commercial.


"This is a meaningless distraction. Now, let's talk about Bill Clinton..."

PilotMan 10-08-2016 12:15 AM

I think Dutch just channeled Ted Cruz's thoughts.


Quote:

It's a shame we didn't get this video when it could've helped rule him out of the GOP running. Why are we just learning about this now? Dirty politics. Shady AF.

cuervo72 10-08-2016 12:25 AM

"I'm the one who said 'Just grab them in the pussy'"

-- Trumpty Trump



(of course someone has already made a Trumpty Dance parody song)

PilotMan 10-08-2016 12:38 AM

Lol, a commentator just said that Trump used the "Pee Wee Herman Defense", "I know you are but what am I."

LMFAO!

mckerney 10-08-2016 01:10 AM



mckerney 10-08-2016 01:26 AM



stevew 10-08-2016 02:22 AM

I mean this is the thing that finally makes him poisonous for women? As if the 60+ female voter is cool with the fact that he traded her model in for a younger one. Twice. He's a sleazeball but it's just guy talk. I'm sure he probably wasn't actually (literally) serious.

Every cycle there's all these undecideds who are probably the same people that order light sauce on their entree or everything on the side or well done but not burnt. Like concentrate on getting your team out and less about someone who is unable to commit to the amount of sugar they want in their coffee.

He's said like 10 things dumber than this in the cycle. Pounding him on this issue might actually cause a withdrawal and "President Mike Pence" is almost as equally scary as "President Donald Trump"
(god forbid both of them)

bhlloy 10-08-2016 03:34 AM

I don't think this is THE thing, but on top of the comments about the beauty queen being disgusting for putting on a bit of weight and maybe being in a sex tape (and then there being concrete proof that he was a creepy dude in a soft porn himself) and all the other shit he's said, I can well believe this is the final straw for some people.

He had the couple of weeks where he was quiet and near presidential, and Clinton said the stupid stuff and the race was close. Since then he's lost a debate and just had a brutal couple of news cycles. I think unless the Russians or Assange actually have something meaty on Hillary, or he wipes the floor with her at a couple of the remaining debates, this is all but over. FWIW 538 now has Clinton ahead in every state up to Georgia, which I don't think will happen but is an absolute ass-kicking.

Shkspr 10-08-2016 03:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 3122423)
I mean this is the thing that finally makes him poisonous for women?


I suspect evangelicals are the most likely groups to actually flee. The thing that strikes me, though, is that the anonymous, behind-the-scenes quotes from Trump advisers and insiders seem much more pessimistic this time around. The attack dogs that show up on media outlets are still publicly spinning this as just mirroring Bill's attitude towards women, but privately, it seems like this may be something that makes lots of volunteers and campaigners go "why bother?" Trump's GOTV operation is already much smaller than Clinton's. If they're less motivated to perform wholeheartedly as well, then this may be the strike that hits.

But to win, Trump has to grab another 5% or so among white women than he's been polling, and this won't help.

stevew 10-08-2016 04:22 AM

I'll have to see if this finally changed my mom's vote. I doubt it, but who knows.

stevew 10-08-2016 05:21 AM

We're calling this Pussygate, right?

Butter 10-08-2016 08:48 AM

PING: tarcone

CraigSca 10-08-2016 09:10 AM

I think some of you are forgetting that a lot of Trump voters consider a vote for Hillary as a vote for the antichrist.

larrymcg421 10-08-2016 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CraigSca (Post 3122436)
I think some of you are forgetting that a lot of Trump voters consider a vote for Hillary as a vote for the antichrist.


No one is arguing that Trump will lose every single voter. But this will hurt him by:

1) sending weak Trump voters away.
2) preventing him from acquiring new undecided voters (which he desperately needs to do at this point).
3) strengthening Hillary's support.

bronconick 10-08-2016 09:28 AM

Some of this hurting more than the 167 other things Trump has said is because we just entered the last month to Election night and we're in between debates. Non-Political Americans (80-90% of them) are now paying attention and he's shooting himself in the foot. Repeatedly.

Ben E Lou 10-08-2016 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CraigSca (Post 3122436)
I think some of you are forgetting that a lot of Trump voters consider a vote for Hillary as a vote for the antichrist.

Sure. But turnout. I've already seen two people I grew up with who now live in Ohio who say they have moved off of nose-holding in the last 12 hours. She says she is going to leave POTUS blank and her hubby says he will vote third party. Trump can't afford for the nose-holders not to show up.

Ben E Lou 10-08-2016 09:33 AM

Dola: not to mention the #NeverHillary younger voters that he might possibly offend enough that they flip to #StillHateHillaryButGottaStopTrump

JPhillips 10-08-2016 09:49 AM

People also react more to the audio/visual than they would to a transcript. This wouldn't hurt him as much if there wasn't video.

Jas_lov 10-08-2016 09:52 AM

Someone above said it's still a toss up election but it wasn't even before this recent Trump fiasco. He was already trending downward and I don't see how this will help.

RCP's electoral map now has Hillary up 247-165 with 126 in the toss up category. They currently have MN, CO and NH as toss ups and Hillary is up by 4.3, 4.3 and 5.0 in the polling averages for those states. Those 3 states would put her at 280 and she's taken a slight lead in FL, NV and NC.

jeff061 10-08-2016 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomkal (Post 3122410)
Of course it will hurt him. How could it not.


For the same reasons he's still a viable candidate. None of this is new or adds any additional insight into who his is, it's more of the same with him. He pretty much says these things in debates. Not to mention, it's 2016, people won't be talking about this anymore in 2 days. Hilllary needs to keep finding new material right up to the debate and I'm not sure rehashing the same stuff will work.

I'm surprised people think this is going to sink him. Desperatly hope I'm wrong.

panerd 10-08-2016 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3122441)
People also react more to the audio/visual than they would to a transcript. This wouldn't hurt him as much if there wasn't video.


Yep the Ray Rice effect. Written report he beat up his wife on an elevator... "Shrug... just NFL players doing what they do". Video released... "OMG!!!! Fire everyone, ban him for life!"

At this point Trump supporters get exactly what they deserve (outside of nuclear war) if they vote for this asshole. Get believe anyone considers him a viable candidate for president regardless of their views on Clinton.

Flasch186 10-08-2016 10:00 AM

Ovah

Easy Mac 10-08-2016 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 3122429)
We're calling this Pussygate, right?


I'm going with vaginazi

QuikSand 10-08-2016 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevew (Post 3122423)
I mean this is the thing that finally makes him poisonous for women?


I seriously think this is a learning opportunity. Call him misogynist... quote him calling specific women "pigs"... point out his statements about female candidates and journalists... all those things basically failed to make the debate "tip" enough to change the entire campaign. (Isolating what did and did not happen in this campaign is going to prove completely impossible, just given the sheer number of "incidents" he has triggered)

Get him ON TAPE saying a very very memorable and objectionable phrase, and maybe it finally does "tip" here.

Maybe it's the political equivalent of the Ray Rice footage.

QuikSand 10-08-2016 11:41 AM

...and following on that... how much less impact would all this have had he used the word "crotch" in the most-quoted sentence of this decade-old tape? We'll never know, but don't we think that specific word is playing a major part in all this? Just the fact that he was boorish and rapey and awful might not be enough... but the exact phrasing seems to be a big part of it, I think.

Thomkal 10-08-2016 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeff061 (Post 3122443)
For the same reasons he's still a viable candidate. None of this is new or adds any additional insight into who his is, it's more of the same with him. He pretty much says these things in debates. Not to mention, it's 2016, people won't be talking about this anymore in 2 days. Hilllary needs to keep finding new material right up to the debate and I'm not sure rehashing the same stuff will work.

I'm surprised people think this is going to sink him. Desperatly hope I'm wrong.


Sorry Jeff. but I think you are here. We have him, a man running for President of the US, leader of the free world, speaking on tape, not just words about a women's private parts and trying to force himself on a married woman-how can he be viable after that. Clinton sure won't let him be-she and her surrogates will be talking this up all through Election Day. It's not going to just go away in a couple of days. There have already been other stories coming out where women have said how they were treated by him, and as far as I know the Nancy mentioned in the tape (I assume Nancy O'Dell, co-host of Access Hollywood at the time) has not come forward yet to talk about it.

I'm sure Trump supporters want this to blow away like a lot of stuff has, but this close to the election, don't see how that is possible.

HerRealName 10-08-2016 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ryche (Post 3122401)
Those one has been out there for quit awhile, her subsequent actions after the alleged assaults really weaken her credibility.


This reads like a modern remake of the beginning of Le Morte d'Arthur only Trump keeps trying to get laid instead of starting a war.

JonInMiddleGA 10-08-2016 01:15 PM

I'd anticipate this having more of a public comment impact than an actual ballot casting impact.

Trump could be on film raping kittens & he'd still be a better human being than his opponent and a better (though probably not "good") President.

I can't imagine this changing (or removing) more than 1-2 percent of actual votes. Thing is, that may be just the size margin he can't absorb.

bhlloy 10-08-2016 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA (Post 3122459)

I can't imagine this changing (or removing) more than 1-2 percent of actual votes. Thing is, that may be just the size margin he can't absorb.


QFT - think this is probably a solid take. I also think as somebody mentioned above it probably moves the needle a little in getting some of the BernieBros on the #NeverTrump bandwagon.

But overall even if it's "just" a 1-2 percent swing, that's the last thing Trump needs right now.

Ben E Lou 10-08-2016 01:42 PM

If nothing else, this particular incident might at least put an end to the inane blathering about "Trump doesn't want to be President." He could easily drop out now, blame Crooked Hillary, the liberal Media, the NeverTrump RINOs, and, I'm sure, a few others that I'm leaving out, and (at least in his world) save face.



mckerney 10-08-2016 03:55 PM


Ben E Lou 10-08-2016 04:11 PM

Ryan uninvited Trump to a campaign event in Wisconsin. It has started. It sounds interesting.




mckerney 10-08-2016 04:25 PM

CNN breaking news headline on their front page: Trump: OK to call Ivanka a piece of ass

No the media's just digging for whatever old statements they can find, wonder what we'll see in the next few days.

Ben E Lou 10-08-2016 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mckerney (Post 3122486)
No the media's just digging for whatever old statements they can find.

But of course...
Quote:

Donald Trump engaged in crude and demeaning conversations about women over a 17-year-period with radio shock-jock Howard Stern, according to a review by CNN's KFile of hours of newly uncovered audio.
And really, you can't blame them. It's a good time to get clicks for that stuff.

SirFozzie 10-08-2016 04:46 PM

RNC halts Victory project work for Trump - POLITICO

Stop working on Trump Victory projects, and basically let the other side destroy your hopes (and True Trump-ites may stay home in disillusionment).

Or keep working, and watch you get tarred with the Trump Tar and risk the hand-to-nosers say "I can't support this party even against Hillary".)

It's the Ogre's Choice. Die Fast or Die Slow.

flere-imsaho 10-08-2016 06:02 PM

If Pence wants to have a hope in 2020, he needs to start thinking seriously if he stays on the ticket.

Ben E Lou 10-08-2016 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flere-imsaho (Post 3122502)
If Pence wants to have a hope in 2020, he needs to start thinking seriously if he stays on the ticket.

All Pence campaign events have been removed from the Trump web site. Lots of buzz on Twitter about that one of course.

PilotMan 10-08-2016 06:43 PM

Trump doesn't need a running mate. His kids will totally take over after he dies. We don't need to worry about a thing. He and his kids are gonna to make 'merica great again. You'll see.

AlexB 10-08-2016 06:43 PM

"I'd never withdraw. I've never withdrawn in my life"

Probably not the best phrasology given the circumstances

Ben E Lou 10-08-2016 06:49 PM

Trump is retweeting Juanita Broddrick now. This "debate" tomorrow night.

CraigSca 10-08-2016 07:22 PM

One has to wonder, how does Trump start his next speech at his next event? Address it, ignore it, what? Crazy.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.