Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Obama versus McCain (versus the rest) (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=65622)

BrianD 09-04-2008 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186 (Post 1824358)
well I guess they couldve dropped the whole "private" charade and my brain would be able to put an equals sign after it...thats where Im having the discombobulation. You can't rewind the clock though so perhaps a pass is in order as youre right, all other families have been on stage too.


I would say that the line is crossed as soon as someone starts speaking. If any child of a candidate steps up to a microphone to say anything or gives a speech to a small gathering, that would change things from being private. Being visible doesn't make that change since the kids have no choice there.

JonInMiddleGA 09-04-2008 10:31 AM

I'll just go back to the original (far as I can tell) reference to "urban" areas to make an observation on that sub-topic.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grammaticus (Post 1824200)
Problem with this is, they consider places like Knoxville, TN as urban. Its not.


Perhaps the distinction you're making here is to some extent "urban" vs "urbane"? I believe that's definitely happening at least subconsciously elsewhere in the thread.

Meanwhile, trying to define "urban" gets into a real quaqmire since different definitions exist for various uses, not to mention all the various sub-categories such as "urbanized area", "metropolitan statistical area", not to mention lesser used terms like "conurbation" (which you could apply with regard to groupings such as MSA's fairly often).

Ultimately what I think you were really getting at was really more about mindset than a geographical or population density term.

Mizzou B-ball fan 09-04-2008 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrianD (Post 1824365)
I would say that the line is crossed as soon as someone starts speaking. If any child of a candidate steps up to a microphone to say anything or gives a speech to a small gathering, that would change things from being private. Being visible doesn't make that change since the kids have no choice there.


Well, the Obama kids held some microphones and talked on-stage. At least his youngest daughter knew the difference between Kansas City and St. Louis. :D

Flasch186 09-04-2008 10:53 AM

an article on fact checking from some of the speeches:

Attacks, praise stretch truth at GOP convention - Yahoo! News

Flasch186 09-04-2008 10:54 AM

Biden reiterates that critiques of the Palin family are off limits:

Quote:

Palin and her husband, Todd, announced this week that their 17-year-old unmarried daughter was pregnant and would be marrying her boyfriend, saying they were making a private matter public because of Internet rumors. Biden said the Democratic campaign was not criticizing Palin over her family.

"It is off limits to talk about her family," Biden said in an interview with "Fox and Friends" on Fox News Channel. "Every family has difficulty as they're raising their children. I think the way she's handled it has been absolutely exemplary."

McCain to give big speech on rebuilt stage - Yahoo! News

DaddyTorgo 09-04-2008 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186 (Post 1824384)
an article on fact checking from some of the speeches:

Attacks, praise stretch truth at GOP convention - Yahoo! News


that article is great. i particularly like the last two massive lies.

DaddyTorgo 09-04-2008 11:00 AM

kudos - classy move by biden there

Mizzou B-ball fan 09-04-2008 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1824390)
that article is great. i particularly like the last two massive lies.


I question the intelligence of the writer of that article for even including the Huckabee comment that you said was a 'massive lie'. It was a ridiculous overexaggeration that was meant to draw laughs and little more. It was never intended to be fully truthful, but rather to point out that Biden's presidential bid failed miserably. A writer who didn't detect the dripping sarcasm needs his sense of humor examined.

Mizzou B-ball fan 09-04-2008 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1824391)
kudos - classy move by biden there


He's washing his hands of the issue while allowing the media and blogsphere to do the dirty work for him. Must have been a tough move to make.

Flasch186 09-04-2008 11:06 AM

intelligence or humor, which one needs to be examined?

How can anyone, right or left control the internet or blogosphere?

DaddyTorgo 09-04-2008 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1824393)
He's washing his hands of the issue while allowing the media and blogsphere to do the dirty work for him. Must have been a tough move to make.


it was the right move to make. and for you to pretend that a republican in the same position wouldn't have done the same thing is ludicrous. in fact, any politician would have done the same thing. just saying it's classy of him (and obama) to come out and say that again.

it's more than mccain and the other republican candidates did during the whole "wright issue" IIRC.

Flasch186 09-04-2008 11:12 AM

I dont think those two issues equate.

Her church and his church do and the statements of their respective preachers, do, but not church to children.

DaddyTorgo 09-04-2008 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186 (Post 1824396)
I dont think those two issues equate.

Her church and his church do and the statements of their respective preachers, do, but not church to children.


i could argue differently for hours -- that both are essentially "private matters" and that insofar as someone wants to argue that the statements of someone at the church he goes to demonstrate what kind of person he is or what kind of leader he would be, the conduct of, and parenting of one's own children offer an equally insightful (and honestly probably more meaningful) view of what kind of person they are, and in particular of what kind of leader they would be. Something along the lines of: being a leader of a country has far more in common with being a mother/father (note the distinct lack of gender-bias) of a family and raising your children than it does with sitting passively in a seat for an hour a week listening to somebody else you have literally no control over.

Greyroofoo 09-04-2008 11:20 AM



Good thing we never saw Hilary in this outfit.

Flasch186 09-04-2008 11:22 AM

if that's real....then at least she's even patriotic in her swimwear!


and now the thread just became NSFW

Alan T 09-04-2008 11:25 AM

What better?

Palin patriotic undies or Skydog patriotic undies?

DaddyTorgo 09-04-2008 11:25 AM

is that person behind her smoking drinking a beer? are they underage? sure looks to be a yes to both questions - i'd be curious

Mizzou B-ball fan 09-04-2008 11:27 AM

Wow, this didn't take long. Rasmussen poll already showing a backlash to the media's treatment of Palin and her family. I predicted earlier in this thread that it could be an issue for Democrats. Just didn't think the backlash would occur this quickly............

Poll: 51 percent say reporters are trying to hurt Palin - Yahoo! News

Also, a comment in regards to the picture of Palin a couple of posts above. I'm sure there will be tons of photoshopped photos like that in the coming weeks. If the left wing bloggers and internet supporters think that will help their candidate's cause, they're sorely mistaken. That kind of attack to paint her as a white-trash gun-toting beauty queen is going to fall flat on its face. Women will see it as an attack on them and degrading to their sex.

Flasch186 09-04-2008 11:31 AM

is that poll a rolling average?

JPhillips 09-04-2008 11:31 AM

MBBF: The voice of downtrodden women everywhere.

Greyroofoo 09-04-2008 11:32 AM

I know its fake(if snopes is anything to go by) but I think its funny anyways.

Alan T 09-04-2008 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1824397)
i could argue differently for hours -- that both are essentially "private matters" and that insofar as someone wants to argue that the statements of someone at the church he goes to demonstrate what kind of person he is or what kind of leader he would be, the conduct of, and parenting of one's own children offer an equally insightful (and honestly probably more meaningful) view of what kind of person they are, and in particular of what kind of leader they would be. Something along the lines of: being a leader of a country has far more in common with being a mother/father (note the distinct lack of gender-bias) of a family and raising your children than it does with sitting passively in a seat for an hour a week listening to somebody else you have literally no control over.



Politically speaking, I don't think that how good of a father someone is or is not has ever been a criteria for any of the previous presidential elections. It only becomes one now because Palin is female. Being a political moderate, I can only speak for myself, but how good or bad of a parent someone is , really is not one of my top concerns in choosing who I am going to vote for.

Discussing what groups or organizations that the candidate willingly chose to be involved with however leads to a discussion of actions displaying their ideology. This includes churches that they choose to attend as it is the candidate's choice to choose which church they go to, what that church's fundamental belief is and by attending that particular church it leads to an action displaying not only what that candidate also believes, but what might shape their future goals.

I think enough has been said about Obama's church in the past so won't really go into more details here on that. As far as Palin's church, it really is a non-issue with me as well. She goes to a very ultra-conservative religious right type of church. The things that have been reported as having been said by the pastor of that church is no different then what I hear many other of the far religious right having said. (The Kenneth Copeland types). It obviously is not mainstream, but it also should not be suprising or shocking.

Just as with Obama's pastor having said things that might be shocking to "white america", I would only happen to guess that it is something that is fairly often said in ultra-radical left leaning groups as well. Unless you are a part of that life, you probably don't hear it often so it becomes shocking when it suddenly gets alot of spotlight.

Like it or not, but it is very obvious that Palin is the VP choice of the far-right, her political leanings, her social leanings and her religious leanings all echo that. None of what her pastor says should be a shock for anyone. If they are suprised by it, then they just haven't read up enough on the radical-right leaning religious groups.

Somewhere in between these two radical groups is the other 65% of the american population that unfortunately has to choose between radical right and radical left. :)

ace1914 09-04-2008 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greyroofoo (Post 1824399)


Good thing we never saw Hilary in this outfit.



Could you please stop posting sexist pictures of our (R) VP nominee please. You need to post pictures of Biden by the pool to be fair.

DaddyTorgo 09-04-2008 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1824406)
Wow, this didn't take long. Rasmussen poll already showing a backlash to the media's treatment of Palin and her family. I predicted earlier in this thread that it could be an issue for Democrats. Just didn't think the backlash would occur this quickly............

Poll: 51 percent say reporters are trying to hurt Palin - Yahoo! News




Some key points you left out


Over half of U.S. voters (51%) think reporters are trying to hurt Sarah Palin with their news coverage, and 24% say those stories make them more likely to vote for Republican presidential candidate John McCain in November.

In the new survey, while 24% are more likely to vote for Palin due to recent news coverage, 19% say the opposite and 54% say the stories have no impact on their votes.

35% believe reporters are providing unbiased coverage.

Among unaffiliated voters, 49% say reporters are trying to hurt Palin, while 32% say their coverage is unbiased. Only five percent (5%) say reporters are trying to help her.

larrymcg421 09-04-2008 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ace1914 (Post 1824413)
Could you please stop posting sexist pictures of our (R) VP nominee please. You need to post pictures of Biden by the pool to be fair.


I think we can all come together, across party lines, and agree that no such pictures should be posted anywhere ever.

Logan 09-04-2008 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronnie Dobbs2 (Post 1824411)
That picture is a photoshop if any is actually taking it seriously.


Damn, who did I just rub one out to then?

DaddyTorgo 09-04-2008 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Logan (Post 1824416)
Damn, who did I just rub one out to then?


I heard it was your mom.

Galaxy 09-04-2008 11:44 AM

Alaska looks pretty warm and lush in that picture. :)

Subby 09-04-2008 12:12 PM



elizabeth - american flag bikini rifle on Flickr - Photo Sharing!

KWhit 09-04-2008 12:16 PM

That was a pretty good Photoshop, though.

JediKooter 09-04-2008 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greyroofoo (Post 1824399)


Good thing we never saw Hilary in this outfit.


The real tragedy of this picture is, the dude looks like he's drinking Schlitz...

Deattribution 09-04-2008 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ace1914 (Post 1824413)
Could you please stop posting sexist pictures of our (R) VP nominee please. You need to post pictures of Biden by the pool to be fair.


In the interest of being fair...





(and yes, I suck at photoshop but it was quick work)

Kodos 09-04-2008 01:44 PM

Obama drinks Schlitz? That does it. I am throwing my vote away on a third-party candidate.

Mizzou B-ball fan 09-04-2008 01:45 PM

Article about fundraising today in the Wall Street Journal. While the majority of the article details a new fundraising campaign by McCain, there are a couple of interesting notes regarding the Obama war chest.

1. It appears that 2/3rds of Obama's original $150M in funds has already been spent. Cash on hand in the Obama campaign is now less than what McCain has.

2. The Obama campaign is spending more money than they are taking in at this point.

McCain Top Fund-Raisers Set New Target - WSJ.com

ISiddiqui 09-04-2008 02:14 PM

Wow... that is interesting. It seems Obama's greatest asset in the campaign may not be what it was assumed to be.

Young Drachma 09-04-2008 02:15 PM

Politics and Power Blog: vanityfair.com

Young Drachma 09-04-2008 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1824472)
Article about fundraising today in the Wall Street Journal. While the majority of the article details a new fundraising campaign by McCain, there are a couple of interesting notes regarding the Obama war chest.

1. It appears that 2/3rds of Obama's original $150M in funds has already been spent. Cash on hand in the Obama campaign is now less than what McCain has.

2. The Obama campaign is spending more money than they are taking in at this point.

McCain Top Fund-Raisers Set New Target - WSJ.com


They'll get their ATM machine fired up again for the last stretch of the race. No way the people they've stoked up are gonna quit now. The last 45 days of this race are gonna be nothing like we've seen before.

larrymcg421 09-04-2008 02:29 PM

I think it is telling that the Dems are targeting $220 million, while the GOP is looking to get $100 million.

gstelmack 09-04-2008 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark Cloud (Post 1824485)


Boy there are a lot of assumptions in that thar article...

JPhillips 09-04-2008 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1824472)
Article about fundraising today in the Wall Street Journal. While the majority of the article details a new fundraising campaign by McCain, there are a couple of interesting notes regarding the Obama war chest.

1. It appears that 2/3rds of Obama's original $150M in funds has already been spent. Cash on hand in the Obama campaign is now less than what McCain has.

2. The Obama campaign is spending more money than they are taking in at this point.

McCain Top Fund-Raisers Set New Target - WSJ.com


1) Funds for the primary had to be spent before the end of the convention. It's not a surprise that he spent that much in July.

2) Remember those numbers are as of July. They had to get to zero in primary funds as of the end of August and I'd bet they pre-paid a lot of organizing costs to cover the whole election so that general election funds could be better targeted.

Obama/DNC won't have a huge advantage on McCain/RNC in funding, but any story on spending has to mention the legal restrictions on primary vs. general election money.

JPhillips 09-04-2008 03:02 PM

dola. Without comment.

Quote:

Georgia Republican Rep. Lynn Westmoreland used the racially-tinged term "uppity" to describe Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama Thursday.

Westmoreland was discussing vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin's speech with reporters outside the House chamber and was asked to compare her with Michelle Obama.

"Just from what little I’ve seen of her and Mr. Obama, Sen. Obama, they're a member of an elitist-class individual that thinks that they're uppity," Westmoreland said.

Asked to clarify that he used the word “uppity,” Westmoreland said, “Uppity, yeah.”

Galaxy 09-04-2008 03:04 PM

Does every penny have to be spent by election day for candidates? What happens if they have left over money?

Logan 09-04-2008 03:05 PM

Quote:

racially-tinged term "uppity"

My head just exploded.

DaddyTorgo 09-04-2008 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Logan (Post 1824510)
My head just exploded.


in shock that he said that, or because you think it's much-ado about nothing? please clarify

BrianD 09-04-2008 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186 (Post 1824387)
Biden reiterates that critiques of the Palin family are off limits:]


I applaud him for this. The family...especially the under-age members of the family should be off limits. Hopefully more people answer questions in this way so the reporters stop asking the questions.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1824393)
He's washing his hands of the issue while allowing the media and blogsphere to do the dirty work for him. Must have been a tough move to make.


This equivocation sucks. He said the right and proper thing. Anything anyone else is going to do is on them and belongs in a separate criticism.

Logan 09-04-2008 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1824512)
in shock that he said that, or because you think it's much-ado about nothing? please clarify


I had no idea that had a negative black connotation (my complete ignorance thought if anything, it's something said about rich white folks). But I did find it as like the fourth listing on dictionary.com, so apparently it is something that's bad to say.

DaddyTorgo 09-04-2008 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Logan (Post 1824516)
I had no idea that had a negative black connotation (my complete ignorance thought if anything, it's something said about rich white folks). But I did find it as like the fourth listing on dictionary.com, so apparently it is something that's bad to say.


in common usage it pretty much goes hand-in-hand with the n-word. as in "uppity n*(#$#"

Alan T 09-04-2008 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Logan (Post 1824516)
I had no idea that had a negative black connotation (my complete ignorance thought if anything, it's something said about rich white folks). But I did find it as like the fourth listing on dictionary.com, so apparently it is something that's bad to say.


I'm in the same boat as you and I grew up in the south (that is if you consider the metro-Atlanta area "south" which many wouldn't.) I had always viewed the word "uppity" more along the lines of hmmm.. how Hugh Grant acts in every one of his boring movies.

I guess I would view calling someone "uppity" as an insult and something to be offended at being called.. just never viewed it as racial at all.

Alan T 09-04-2008 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1824518)
in common usage it pretty much goes hand-in-hand with the n-word. as in "uppity n*(#$#"


Is that from movies or music, or where exactly does this usage usually get used out of curiosity? It obviously is from something that I Have very little exposure to.

Young Drachma 09-04-2008 03:19 PM

uppity negro

Quote:

Main Entry: up·pi·ty ne·gro
Pronunciation: 'up + -ity 'nE-(")grO
Function: proper noun
: a fearless black person who by social definition is "not in their place”
:a Black person who is committed to reversing the crimes of self-refusal, self-denial, and self-hatred that are endemic to the Black community and detrimental to the Black psyche
: UNAPOLOGETIC. VAINGLORIOUS. MULTIFARIOUS. JUST AUDACIOUS.

DaddyTorgo 09-04-2008 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T (Post 1824524)
Is that from movies or music, or where exactly does this usage usually get used out of curiosity? It obviously is from something that I Have very little exposure to.


history

Young Drachma 09-04-2008 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T (Post 1824524)
Is that from movies or music, or where exactly does this usage usually get used out of curiosity? It obviously is from something that I Have very little exposure to.


No.

It's from actual people, who used the term in reference to black folks who weren't in their proper place. Who thought they were better than white folks and in some cases, black folks using it to other black folks who think they're better than "ordinary" black people.

It's not as say, a common term now as it was. But that's due to the verbal judo that occurs in modern lexicon. But the term still has applicable and usage among some sectors, depending on where you go...

bulletsponge 09-04-2008 03:25 PM

Quote:
Main Entry: up·pi·ty ne·gro
Pronunciation: 'up + -ity 'nE-(")grO
Function: proper noun
: a fearless black person who by social definition is "not in their place”
:a Black person who is committed to reversing the crimes of self-refusal, self-denial, and self-hatred that are endemic to the Black community and detrimental to the Black psyche
: UNAPOLOGETIC. VAINGLORIOUS. MULTIFARIOUS. JUST AUDACIOUS.


how is that a bad term then?

Alan T 09-04-2008 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1824527)
history


Thanks for being helpful here :confused: Some people are trying to do a bit more than just push agendas around in this thread here. :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark Cloud (Post 1824528)
No.

It's from actual people, who used the term in reference to black folks who weren't in their proper place. Who thought they were better than white folks and in some cases, black folks using it to other black folks who think they're better than "ordinary" black people.

It's not as say, a common term now as it was. But that's due to the verbal judo that occurs in modern lexicon. But the term still has applicable and usage among some sectors, depending on where you go...


Fair enough. I've heard and read where people were called "Uncle Toms" or such, so it sounds like from this usage, it is just a less familiar method of calling someone the same. I don't think I would find many reasons to call someone "uppity" myself, but I guess I would perceive it as an insult either way (racial meaning or not)

larrymcg421 09-04-2008 03:28 PM

I think it was definitely used in a racial context, but he'll be able to dodge any serious scandal because of plausable deniability and representing a district that probably doesn't much care.

larrymcg421 09-04-2008 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bulletsponge (Post 1824531)
Quote:
Main Entry: up·pi·ty ne·gro
Pronunciation: 'up + -ity 'nE-(")grO
Function: proper noun
: a fearless black person who by social definition is "not in their place”
:a Black person who is committed to reversing the crimes of self-refusal, self-denial, and self-hatred that are endemic to the Black community and detrimental to the Black psyche
: UNAPOLOGETIC. VAINGLORIOUS. MULTIFARIOUS. JUST AUDACIOUS.


how is that a bad term then?


It's bad from the perspective of the person calling someone that term, but the definition given here is a way of turning that term around and making it a compliment. I think most African-Americans would probably consider it a good thing to be called this, but would not like the person that said it.

BrianD 09-04-2008 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1824518)
in common usage it pretty much goes hand-in-hand with the n-word. as in "uppity n*(#$#"


Once again, my soul weeps.

Young Drachma 09-04-2008 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by larrymcg421 (Post 1824538)
. I think most African-Americans would probably consider it a good thing to be called this, but would not like the person that said it.


No, they wouldn't. You don't have to understand why. Just trust me. It's not a complement.

larrymcg421 09-04-2008 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark Cloud (Post 1824540)
No, they wouldn't. You don't have to understand why. Just trust me. It's not a complement.


It's not about a lack of understanding. I completely understand why it wouldn't, but I can also understand why someone could turn it around and take it the other way. Maybe "most" was not the right word to use, though.

I'm certainly not defending Westmoreland here. I think he's a racist fuck.

cuervo72 09-04-2008 03:40 PM

:facepalm:

cartman 09-04-2008 03:40 PM

There was a thread about "uppity" a while back, brought about by the former Rep. McKinney's camp, where they called the blacks in her district that did not support her 'uppity'.

bulletsponge 09-04-2008 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cartman (Post 1824547)
There was a thread about "uppity" a while back, brought about by the former Rep. McKinney's camp, where they called the blacks in her district that did not support her 'uppity'.


sounds like a compliment then :)

Galaril 09-04-2008 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan (Post 1824381)
Well, the Obama kids held some microphones and talked on-stage. At least his youngest daughter knew the difference between Kansas City and St. Louis. :D


Is there a difference?:lol:

JonInMiddleGA 09-04-2008 03:57 PM

I had to read Westmoreland's quote about three times to figure out what he was trying to say (almost looked like it was putting Palin & Obama in the same category the first couple of times I read it).

As written, it seems to me he was searching for something that meant "they think they're big shots"; i.e. "they think they're better than everyone else" or in some other regions maybe the colloquialism would be "they think they're hot shit" or "they think their shit don't stink".

As I've run across the word over time, I believe it can be used with more of a class distinction than a racial one although the most common usage is historical & racially connected.

Lynn isn't, in my estimation, isn't exactly the most refined guy in the world (although he tries to appear that way at times) and I suspect he was trying to avoid using some variation of the colorful phrases I mentioned and boil it down to a single word. Unfortunately for him, it wasn't exactly the best choice he could have made. I think he was largely trying to make the same criticism that Jesse Jackson made at one point but being a white guy, picked the wrong word to do it with, and should have stuck with "elitist" instead.

As for the impact of it all, well let's see. His district is 57% white but he pulled 75% of the general election vote last time. I'd be surprised if this changed those margins significantly this November.

Galaril 09-04-2008 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo (Post 1824527)
history


lol

I am guessing if you are african american you know exactly what it means.

Young Drachma 09-04-2008 05:30 PM

Barack Obama: Portrait of a pragmatist -- chicagotribune.com

Vegas Vic 09-04-2008 06:22 PM

ST. PAUL -- The McCain campaign must be giddy with this news, just out from Nielsen: Sarah Palin's speech generated 37.2 million viewers, just 1.1 million viewers fewer than watched Barak Obama's Invesco Field acceptance speech. As Nielsen notes, only six networks carried Palin's speech compared with ten for Obama's.

Calis 09-04-2008 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TIME

According to Nicole Wallace of the McCain campaign, the American people don't care whether Sarah Palin can answer specific questions about foreign and domestic policy. According to Wallace -- in an appearance I did with her this morning on Joe Scarborough's show -- the American people will learn all they need to know (and all they deserve to know) from Palin's scripted speeches and choreographed appearances on the campaign trail and in campaign ads.


So does this mean know interviews or press conferences the entire campaign from Palin?

That's pretty disheartening if so. I understand she's being hounded by the media, but an act like this doesn't really instill my confidence in someone's ability to be VP of our country.

Flasch186 09-04-2008 06:35 PM

unfortunately i wont be watching anything tonight that doesnt involve a pigskin.

Raiders Army 09-04-2008 06:45 PM

I could've posted this in the NCAA thread. I told my wife I Baracked Kansas State today. She asked me what did that mean. I told her that it meant that I beat them around like an old white woman.

TazFTW 09-04-2008 06:55 PM

CBS Poll: McCain, Obama Tied, McCain Closes Eight-Point Gap From Poll Taken Last Weekend - CBS News

Young Drachma 09-04-2008 07:17 PM

Palin's children should take priority over being Vice President » Brazen Careerist by Penelope Trunk

Penelope Trunk saying what barely anyone else would ever bother to say.

Quote:

Okay. Look. I wasn't going to tell you what I think of Sarah Palin, but so many people are asking, so fine. Here it is. She is nuts. And the Republicans are nuts for putting her on a ticket. She has a five-month-old kid with Down's Syndrome.

Why is no one writing about this? I have a special needs kid. I have two. Here's what happens when you have a special needs kid. You are in shock. You love the kid. I loved my first one so much that even though there was something like an 80% chance of having another kid with autism, I had a second kid.

And guess what? The second kid had a different disability than the first. Amazing. Statistically phenomenal, really. But my point here is that I'm very qualified to tell you what it's like to be a breadwinner mom of a five-month-old special needs kid. And, it's not just from my perspective. I am a magnet for breadwinner moms. They constantly write to me. And when I write about this topic—being the breadwinner and having a special needs kid—women come out of the woodwork. They all say exactly what I'm telling you now: it's insane. It's insanely hard.

Here's what's insanely hard. You go through a mourning period. Don't tell me about love and how everyone is different. Because everyone is the same about their kids: They love their kids no matter what, and they didn't plan on having a special needs kid, no matter what. So you need adjusting time.

And here's more I know from both statistics and first-hand experience: It's nearly impossible to keep a marriage together with a special needs kid. And it's nearly impossible to keep a marriage together when the husband quits his job to take care of the kids (which Palin's husband just did). And Sarah needs her marriage to stay together pretty badly right now.

And who will take care of the newest member of the family? Certainly not the 17-year-old daughter who is pregnant with the newest kid. So the dad now has three teens at home and soon two kids under one year old at home and one has special needs. This is not a reasonable job. For anyone.

I know that I'm going to be reminded me that I have a nanny, a house manager, and a cleaning woman (who actually shows up every day). But I also have a job that allows me to leave at 2:30. It's a compromise for me. Because every parent in the world has had to compromise, and it's fair to judge public figures on the choices they make.

It's really hard to know where to compromise. Here's what I was doing when my kid was five months old: I was at home. Hating it. Telling myself that I was not cut out to be at home. I was sort of a columnist and sort of a mom and sort of a psychopath. Because having a five-month-old with special needs is very very hard. Not just learning to take care of the baby, but mentally coping.

Why is no one talking about this? The Republicans should dump Palin. She's got too much responsibility at home.

Don't tell me that this is not fair to women. Because you know what? People should have railed against John Edwards running for President when he had two young kids at home and a wife fighting cancer. Fine if she wants him to run for office while she fights the cancer. I get it. But I don't get how the President of the United States was going to have time to console two school age kids about their mom's death while leading the country. It's irresponsible.

I know it's not cool to tell people how to parent. I know it's not cool because every day someone asks me how I run my company when I have two young kids and what they are really saying is "you suck as a parent." It's hard to hear every day, so I have empathy for the idea that everyone should shut up about how other people parent.

But it's absurd how extreme these presidential-wanna-be cases are. I don't want someone in the White House who has kids at home who desperately need them. I don't want to watch that scenario unfold on national TV. So at some point, it must be okay to speak up. At some point we have to say that we have standards for parenting and we want the community to uphold them.

Logan 09-04-2008 07:35 PM

Obviously Palin's family has some unusual stuff going on which will make "being a family" pretty hard.

But I don't see what the difference is between what Palin would be doing and what Obama would be doing. Do you think his two daughters would have a normal life? Get to spend the time with their parents that me, you and millions of others had? Will Barack and Michelle be as intimately involved in their lives while running the country? Of course not.

Sure, these kids don't have any special issues, but they still need their parents. I don't see how anyone could attack Palin for leaving her family and not attack Obama in the same way.

DanGarion 09-04-2008 07:38 PM

This is my impression of Sarah Palin. She appears to be a nagging, annoying bitch. My god her speech yesterday was teeth grinding. Wife agrees as well. I'm not really sure who is more annoying. Palin, Sanchez, H. Clinton, Fienstein, or Boxer. GAH.

Deattribution 09-04-2008 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Logan (Post 1824650)

I don't see how anyone could attack Palin for leaving her family and not attack Obama in the same way.


Or the other 43 presidents and their VPs.

If she wasn't a woman this wouldn't even be a talking point. Edwards' wife had cancer (which to me is worse, not to minimize down syndrome but I'd hate to spend the potential last months of my wife's life away from her constantly), and nobody was crying about him being VP.

Young Drachma 09-04-2008 07:43 PM

Obama is on O'Reilly. Initial thoughts, he's certainly not rolling over for Bill. O'Reilly is trying to press him to say something they can soundbite.

Young Drachma 09-04-2008 07:47 PM

At first I thought he was bloviating. O'Reilly broke the whole thing up into three more episodes. Cute. Nothing crazy and not likely to turn heads on either side.

sterlingice 09-04-2008 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T (Post 1824522)
I'm in the same boat as you and I grew up in the south (that is if you consider the metro-Atlanta area "south" which many wouldn't.) I had always viewed the word "uppity" more along the lines of hmmm.. how Hugh Grant acts in every one of his boring movies.

I guess I would view calling someone "uppity" as an insult and something to be offended at being called.. just never viewed it as racial at all.


What he said.

In fact, I looked at my posting history and I have used it 4 times on this board. It was to describe Falcons fans, Canadians, women, and Steve Francis. I guess I missed the "it's supposed to the racist" memo.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark Cloud (Post 1824525)
uppity negro


Yeah, see- you have to add that second part for it to be racist.

SI

Raiders Army 09-04-2008 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark Cloud (Post 1824645)
Palin's children should take priority over being Vice President » Brazen Careerist by Penelope Trunk

Penelope Trunk saying what barely anyone else would ever bother to say.


Yeah, she's right. Just like Gore should be taking care of his kids instead of screwing around with alarmist global warming BS. Andy Reid should also stop worrying about cheese steaks and concentrate on his kids as well.

BrianD 09-04-2008 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark Cloud (Post 1824645)
Palin's children should take priority over being Vice President » Brazen Careerist by Penelope Trunk

Penelope Trunk saying what barely anyone else would ever bother to say.


Who is Penelope Trunk and why do we care what she has to say?

sterlingice 09-04-2008 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Galaril (Post 1824556)
Is there a difference?:lol:


Hey! I refuse to have the good people of KC lumped in with those awful Cardinals fans! :rant:

SI

sterlingice 09-04-2008 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flere-imsaho (Post 1824350)
The Daily Show last night was on top form. First they juxtaposed GOP talking heads from a year ago (attacking Hillary Clinton on being a woman) and defending Palin during the last week (from attacks on her because she's a woman). A typical example was people a year ago saying Clinton was "whining" when she complained about the "boys" ganging up on her in the Democratic debates, and then the same people saying how disgraceful it was that anyone was attacking Palin now, and that they were doing so just because she was a woman.

Also good was comparing Bill O'Reilly's response to Jamie Spears' pregnancy to Bristol Palin's. Pretty much a word-for-word contradiction of himself. I'm sure he's not the only talking head to be doing a 180 this week.


I got the impression Jon Stewart was pretty pissed last night. He was in rare form.

SI

Logan 09-04-2008 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sterlingice (Post 1824668)
What he said.

In fact, I looked at my posting history and I have used it 4 times on this board. It was to describe Falcons fans, Canadians, women, and Steve Francis. I guess I missed the "it's supposed to the racist" memo.


I laughed my ass off at his inclusion.

sterlingice 09-04-2008 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Logan (Post 1824677)
I laughed my ass off at his inclusion.


I was just going by my posting history :D

SI

Flasch186 09-04-2008 09:17 PM

Troopergate plods along:

Palin aides peeked into trooper's files, union says - CNN.com

Quote:

Originally Posted by Article
From Matt Smith and Scott Bronstein
CNN
Decrease font Decrease font
Enlarge font Enlarge font

(CNN) -- Aides to Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin improperly obtained her former brother-in-law's state police personnel files and cited information from those records to raise complaints about the officer, the head of Alaska's state police union said Thursday.
Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has put an aide on leave during a probe into the firing of the public safety commissioner.

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has put an aide on leave during a probe into the firing of the public safety commissioner.

"It's apparent to us that the governor or someone on her staff had direct access to his personnel file, as well as his workers' comp file, and those are protected," said John Cyr, executive director of the Alaska Public Safety Employees Association.

Palin, now the Republican candidate for vice president, is battling allegations that she sacked her public safety commissioner in July because he refused to fire Trooper Mike Wooten, her sister's ex-husband.

The governor has denied any wrongdoing.


State police union files ethics complaint against Palin

Young Drachma 09-04-2008 09:18 PM

Protesters speak out at the RNC, crowd chants USA back.

Jas_lov 09-04-2008 09:18 PM

LOL! The puke green background has returned!

Young Drachma 09-04-2008 09:22 PM

Ugh.

Young Drachma 09-04-2008 09:22 PM

This thing is like watching a pep rally for...I dunno.

Flasch186 09-04-2008 09:22 PM

When it comes to Public Speaking, McCain's no Palin ;)

Protestors are getting a lot of attention tonight in the hall. Moreso than I can remember in years past no?

Wow, its as if they strategically placed themselves to wait for one to get caught and then they'd start a new protestor or something.

"She's worked with her hands and nose..." huh? Nose?

Young Drachma 09-04-2008 09:23 PM

interrupted again.

Logan 09-04-2008 09:24 PM

That guy threw that thing down WITH AUTHORITY!

MrDNA 09-04-2008 09:26 PM

I can't look at the damn screen! Did they give ANY thought to how the background would look on TV?

Young Drachma 09-04-2008 09:28 PM

"Change is Coming" - McCain.

This shit is hilarious.

Jas_lov 09-04-2008 09:28 PM

At least they changed it to blue. I don't know what the hell they were doing in the opening with the puke green turning into a swirling forest green.

sterlingice 09-04-2008 09:30 PM

This reminds me of the old John McCain a little. Tho he seems older and more tired now.

SI

Flasch186 09-04-2008 09:31 PM

did he just rail on union bosses? Isn't Mr. Palin a member of the Oil Workers Union? Im just saying the union workers and community organizers are gonna be pissed :)

Alan T 09-04-2008 09:32 PM

Mccain isn't quite as charismatic as Palin was, that is for sure.

Young Drachma 09-04-2008 09:32 PM

I love how all of the hand written signs were done by the same person.

Young Drachma 09-04-2008 09:35 PM

ooh...tough talk. lol


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.